Total: 9800 Guests

 

The Michael Crawford Phantom Movie Campaign Guestbook

Total: 100 guests      

 

Name:
Donald R. Kimball
January 11, 2005 08:25 AM
E-Mail: Phantom102750@aol.com
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?: North Carolina
Referred By: From a Friend
Comments: Welllllll I cant believe my ears!! I just reviewed the sound track from the movie Tiny Tim might have done a better Job than Gerard did it was tired to say the least I will not see the movie if you cant sing the part then you sure as hell cant act the part this is a shame to the name Phantom I have been collecting Phantom articles now for years music boxes all of michaels cds and anything that refers to the Phantom of the Opera and just so Gerard and the rest of the world know he cant sing a note my dog sings better than him ha thats why its #9 at the box office here in north carolina right now and will slide out of the top ten this weekend well maybe someday they will understand what andrew has done to the name and the man and his music of the night long live the real music of the night!!!!!!

 


Name:
Ray
January 9, 2005 12:21 PM
E-Mail: Houston, Tx
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?:  
Referred By: Just Surfed On In
Comments: People keep making age an issue regarding MC playing the role of the Phantom in the movie. If you read the book, you realize that the Phantom is the same age or a bit younger than Mme. Giry. This would make the Phantom quite a bit older than Christine since she is about the same age as Meg. There's no reason MC couldn't play the Phantom now. The real issue would be if SB would be cast as Christine in the movie - she's the one who's too old for the part (But, as beautiful as she is and sings, it wouldn't bother me!)

 


Name:
Cory
January 9, 2005 10:39 AM
E-Mail: CrStickel@aol.com
Homepage Title: Cory's Fantasy Kingdom
Homepage URL: geocities.com/corydragon99/index.html
Where are you from?: Michigan
Referred By: Just Surfed On In
Comments: As a former campaigner, I just HAD to stop by the site again after hearing the news that the movie bombed on opening weekend (only pulled $4.8 Mil.) and is already being called one of the biggest cinematic flops in history. My response to the news (besides a great big "WE TOLD YOU SO!!!" to ALW): one last song parody for The Michael Crawford Phantom Movie Campaign.

Bless all of you. It has been a pleasure fighting by your side. We may not have gotten a faithful movie version in the end, but by our lack of acceptance for the final product, we've proven to The Powers That Be that we were right. And that is all the victory that we need.

~~~*~~~*~~~*~~~*~~~*~~~*~~~*~~~*~~~*~~~

WHERE DID WE GO WRONG? (to the tune of Where Did We Go Right? from The Producers)

ALW: Look at these reviews! "A masterpiece lost!"

JOEL: Why?...

ALW: "A surprise flop!"

JOEL: Why?...

ALW: "It was glitzy, young, sexy...and I hated every minute of it!"

JOEL: Why?...

ALW: How could this happen? The film was stunning and long; The music was strong... Where did we go wrong?

JOEL: "Hollywood brought new movies for Christmas, but guess who left coal in our stocking: Schumacher and Webber!"

ALW: It had class, Christine half-nude... Why would the audience have booed? Where did we go wrong?

JOEL: "Some thoughts on last night's opening: the Phantom movie is bleep bleep bleep bleep bleep bleep bleep-bleep bleep-bleep. And that's being kind!..."

BOTH: We searched high schools on and off For a Christine we could show off. Who needs try-outs and auditions? They're a bore!

And we tripped the light fantastic For an Erik who could hack it. If the phans voiced their dismay, We dismayed them out the door!

ALW: They should all have cried hooray For Christine's thigh out on display. Where did we go wrong?

JOEL: Our leading man was so gay He nearly flew away. Where did we go wrong?

ALW: A show so difficult to dispise...

JOEL: Now it's up for the "Worst Film" prize!

BOTH: Oh where, oh where, Tell us: where did we go wrong?

ALW: "The biggest cinematic flop in history. Andrew Lloyd Webber is a complete idiot!" ...They HATE me?!?! Oh, we knew we couldn't lose

BOTH: 'Coz M.C. we did not choose...

JOEL: It's the end of our careers!

ALW: Should be the hit film of the year!

BOTH: Tell us: where did we go wrong?!

(The PHANS know where you went wrong. Ya ready to listen to us now?...)

 

 


Name:
Ray
January 9, 2005 12:21 PM
E-Mail: Houston, Tx
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?:  
Referred By: Just Surfed On In
Comments: People keep making age an issue regarding MC playing the role of the Phantom in the movie. If you read the book, you realize that the Phantom is the same age or a bit younger than Mme. Giry. This would make the Phantom quite a bit older than Christine since she is about the same age as Meg. There's no reason MC couldn't play the Phantom now. The real issue would be if SB would be cast as Christine in the movie - she's the one who's too old for the part (But, as beautiful as she is and sings, it wouldn't bother me!)

 


Name:
Michael (Crawford-Fan)
January 9, 2005 09:30 AM
E-Mail:  
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?: Leeds
Referred By: Just Surfed On In
Comments: I tried so hard to stay away from the cinema over the Christmas break... I promised myself that I would not support the movie because of the casting. I ended up seeing the film twice, I thought I had dreamed it really was bad the first time and I had to go back to confirm my eyes were telling the truth.

Apart from the obvious missing Michael Crawford, what the hell was wrong with Masquerade? The song is about colours and the whole cast were dressed in black and white. This number was the second biggest disappointment of this dreadful film, the stage version of Masquerade is lavish, thick with a wealth of vibrant colours and life.

I'm not going to mention Music of the Night or pass comment on Mr Butler's performance as I don't hold him responsible, although he could have done us all a favour and turned the part down.

I would also like to blame the make up department for adding their 2 peneth of damage to this fine show... this is the 21st century isn't it? I though Warner Bros had advanced CGI techniques in the bag (care of the Matrix), yet they couldn't turn a mildly handsome gent in to a disfigured monster. When the mask was removed I though "Oh! he's got something in his eye".

Please, please, please. If Lord Lloyd Webber or any of his minions surf these pages, would you pass on an idea.

I think that a Video/DVD version of the live stage show (like the ones available of Cats, Oklahoma and Barnum etc) featuring Michael Crawford as the Phantom should be made available. I don't know if it was filmed at the time Michael first appeared in the show, or whether Michael could be tempted back to record a special version of it? I think it would be a good way to thank and reward all the loyal "Phan's" and Michael Crawford himself that have brought the Billions of $ in on this wonderful stage show...

Many thanks

 


Name:
Katherine Asbury
January 9, 2005 01:22 AM
E-Mail: klasbury@frontiernet.net
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?: Lk.Havasu City,Arizona
Referred By: Just Surfed On In
Comments:  

Name:
Charlie
January 8, 2005 10:05 PM
E-Mail:  
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?: Atlanta
Referred By: Just Surfed On In
Comments: Have you ever had to go to the bathroom right in the middle of a movie and it aggravated you because you thought you might miss something? I had to go during Phantom and it didn't bother me!

 


Name:
Thomas
January 8, 2005 08:19 PM
E-Mail: jeepshadow@hotmail.com
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?:  
Referred By: Just Surfed On In
Comments: I completely agree with this website. Noone could, or ever will be able to capture the Phantom role like Crawford. He truly completes what is the mystery, the voice, the passion and yearnings of the Phantom.

 


Name:
Beth
January 8, 2005 03:35 PM
E-Mail:  
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?: Tampa, Florida
Referred By: Just Surfed On In
Comments: At the end of what would be the first act of the stage version, the Phantom is crouched in the darkness watching Raoul and Christine pledge their love for one another (..say you'll share with me...). When the Phantom begins singing at that point (...he was bound to love you...), I'm expecting to see real emotion on his face - where the heck were the tears, the anguished looks, the fury at the end of the song, etc?!?!?!? His wooden acting was just as bad as his singing.

 


Name:
David
January 8, 2005 03:31 PM
E-Mail:  
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?: San Francisco
Referred By: From a Friend
Comments: Butler should be arrested for impersonating a Phantom! Raoul was mediocre at best; I liked Christine. The sets and cinematography were stunning.

 


Name:
Mrs. S
January 7, 2005 09:42 PM
E-Mail:  
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?: ,Arizona
Referred By: Search Engine
Comments: I saw the play in San Francisco twice and was taken by it so much that I went out and bought the CD and listened to it all the time. The music is so beautiful. It puts you in a magical dream world. I just saw the movie and I must say it was good, but did not even come close to the stage play. Mini Driver did a very good job. I think she stole the show. The special effects were great, then the Phantom, Mr. Butler, opened his mouth. I couldn't believe it. Why, oh why did ALWebber choose him over Michael Crawford or at least someone who could sing like him?? This I will never understand. What a dissappointment. I've been waiting for this film to come out for such a long time and then.....no comment. Sorry, too bad they can't redo it. I'm too old to wait for the next version. Guess I'll just have to go back and see the Broadway version.

 


Name:
mdaae aka venice
January 7, 2005 08:55 PM
E-Mail:  
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?:  
Referred By: Just Surfed On In
Comments: I suppose there are many reasons for loving the ALW stage play of POTO. I would like to give a few of mine. Later I will make some observations about the movie version.

Mythological - POTO exists in one of the lesser-explored mythologies - though "Beauty and the Beast" seems to border on this theme as well. The basic idea of a beautiful soul within a tortured soul is really cool. Everyone has a beautiful core, IMO - some people never get a chance to explore their angelic side. For others (like "the Beast") it takes an enchantment for them to find their beautiful/gentle side. The Phantom was always seeking balance between his curse and genius. Balance is really tough some times and stories that explore this balance resonate with me at a very deep level.

Mystical - the ALW play handled the mystical elements of the original story very well (and maybe embellished them a bit - but that is OK in my book). The Phantom of the AWL play and book was something more than just a man. The magic was always with him.

Musical - this is the first production that was completely music centered. Wonderful singers have historically played the role of Phantom. I recently got the Dutch Cast Highlights recording. Henk Poort is amazing (!)

Comedic - A little comedy is welcomed, even in a tragedy such as the POTO. Piangi is a delight in the play - perhaps this is set up to lighten the potential clash between the Phantom (a baritone for the most part) and Piangi's tenor. I thought the Don Juan rehearsal scene was a hoot.

Horror - Let's face it, this is a movie about a guy so ugly at birth that his own mother could not even look at him. Hey - that's pretty darn ugly, OK? While nothing short of people fainting from the sight is really gonna make me happy (see also the Lon Channey version), the ALW play did a credible job of creating a stage makeup which addressed both the requirement that (1) the actor be able to sing and (2) the audience was at least repulsed. Did I mention he was supposed to be REALLY UGLY?

Where are these elements in the movie?

Mythological / Mystical - the film story goes out of its way to reveal and even trivialize the magic that was everywhere in the play. Example: Does the Phantom disappear into thin air at the end of the movie? Nope - he exits behind a curtain. Sort of like a reverse of the Wizard of Oz, only worse.

Musical - M. Butler can't sing. People who protest this assessment are either tone-deaf or female He is awfully good looking ...

Comedic - I loved Minnie Driver as Carlotta but Piangi was nearly written out of the movie. What's up with that?

Horror - M.Butler's Phantom seems to have an asymmetrically receding hairline and a mild case of post-pubescent acne. And then they filmed his unmasked face through some sort of softening lens. No horror - except from the more discerning members of the audience who must have felt completely betrayed. Fact: The phantom was a murderer. He was not nice. He was not pretty in any sense of the word. He will not be on the cover of GQ - ever. Yes, we are supposed to pity him, but the movie phantom was a wimp; he couldn't even beat Raoul in a sword fight. And don't even let me get started on Raoul

In short, the movie fails to deliver in every aspect of the play that I loved so dearly.

Could we get a do-over please?

 

 


Name:
Kelly Inman
January 7, 2005 04:36 PM
E-Mail: punkinhead00@msn.com
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?: Indianapolis, IN
Referred By: Just Surfed On In
Comments: I originally signed the guest book a few months ago, before the movie's release, but had to sign it again, now that I've seen the film. I must say I agree with Sandy Rawls from Virgina. I enjoyed the film very much and loved Emmy Rossum and Patrick Wilson, but the Phantom was clearly the weakest link. I would have preferred him to be portrayed as he was on stage - an older man with more extensive disfigurement and a half-mask, no open-shirted costumes, not so gruff and angry, and with the ability to draw Christine to him through his voice alone. (Unfortunately, this was not how Joel Schumacher envisioned the character.) I believe Gerard Butler did the best he could, but clearly he was cast mostly on his looks, and certainly not on his vocal ability. His acting was very good in spots, but uneven overall. It's a shame the Phantom was the biggest weakness in a film that was good, but could have been so much better. Obviously, I wish they could have used Michael Crawford - the original and best - in the role, but if they had to go with someone else, it should at least have been an age-appropriate actor who's a trained singer.

 


Name:
Sandy Rawls
January 7, 2005 01:34 PM
E-Mail: ,sandy.rawls@vdot.virginia.gov
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?: ,Richmond, Virginia
Referred By: Just Surfed On In
Comments: Well, to add to my first posting, I gritted my teeth and saw the movie. Visually it was Stunning,atmosphere great. Sets, costumes etc. breath taking. I could have been a perfect 10, except Gerald Butler had to open his mouth, Look, I give him a bit of credit, he tried, my patience. He was a bit too menacing,too psychotic. The 3 productions I have seen of POTO, 2 in Norfolk Va, and once on Broadway(with Gaines Davies) The rare video footage of Michael, The Phantom was seductive,driven, and misunderstood,with just an undercurrent of menace. They could have gotten Michael to sing it, and dubbed over Butler's assaination of the songs, Heck, if an actress of the caliber of Minnie Driver was honest enough and smart to let someone sing for her,well Butler ain't that great an actor to begin with, Maybe he's an ok Vampire, but he is no Phantom. Oh, and word to Mr.Butler, You sir could never begin to compete with Michael, and FYI, Michael turns 63 this month January 19, 1942, read his Autobiography, at least be accurate. On a whole the movie was excellent,could've been perfect,if Gerald Butler had not done his own singing

 


Name:
Hector
January 7, 2005 11:52 AM
E-Mail:  
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?: Miami
Referred By: Just Surfed On In
Comments: When I saw the opening special effects of the wind blowing the dust off the chairs in the theater (rather than just seeing the drapes fall in the stage version), I thought, "Wow, this is going to be something good!" Unfortunately, it went downhill after that - the Phantom's "singing" sounded like the REAL Phantom had cursed him with the same affliction as Carlotta! the poor fool really had me laughing!!! Or cringing if the truth be told!

 


Name:
Bella
January 7, 2005 09:30 AM
E-Mail: emailbella@shaw.ca
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?: Calgary Canada
Referred By: Just Surfed On In
Comments: sure.

 


Name:
Cheery
January 7, 2005 08:42 AM
E-Mail: cheery01@hotmail.com
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?:  
Referred By: Search Engine
Comments: Your voice has made my mind take wings. Your music will never be over.NEVER!

 


Name:
Stephanie
January 6, 2005 08:55 PM
E-Mail:  
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?: NYC
Referred By: Just Surfed On In
Comments: Because of my husband's position in the music industry, I've been able to attend many social functions with various stars from Broadway. Two or three years back we were introduced to Mr. Crawford at a benefit. During the course of the conversation the idea of a movie version of Phantom came up. It was my impression that he was not that interested in playing the role. whether or not he would have considered it, I would have liked it had ALW at least had the courtesy to ask! His "replacement" is abysmal.

 


Name:
Klaus
January 6, 2005 10:30 AM
E-Mail:  
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?: Germany
Referred By: Just Surfed On In
Comments: I am visiting in the US and saw the movie. I was repulsed by the acting and singing; Crawford and Brightman were much, much better. I did appreciate the special effects and everything else that was made possible by making the movie. I can only think that having Crawford and Brightman in the film version would have made for a movie that I would watch a thousand times.

 


Name:
Elise Iannuzzi
January 6, 2005 01:18 PM
E-Mail: sugarnspice0003@yahoo.com
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?: Bowling Green, KY
Referred By: Just Surfed On In
Comments: Hey,all! I am a die-hard fan of The Phantom of the Opera. I saw Michael Crawford as the Phantom and have fallen in love with the show ever since. Go see the show!!!! ( on Broadway)

Sincerely, Elise

 


Name:
Mary Styles
January 6, 2005 08:16 AM
E-Mail: preemarose@iinet.net.au
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?: Western Australia
Referred By: Search Engine
Comments: Am looking for the DVD version of Michael Crawford in Phantom of the Opera. Am hoping to by it for a surprise gift for a friend.

 


Name:
Mary
January 5, 2005 07:28 PM
E-Mail:  
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?: Michigan
Referred By: Just Surfed On In
Comments: Saw the Phantom movie the other day. He seems more suited to a soap opera than to the Paris opera. And Christine? Lovely girl, great voice, but did someone glue her arms to her side? And her face had only one expression thru the whole movie!

 


Name:
Miles
January 5, 2005 06:22 PM
E-Mail:  
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?: England
Referred By: From a Friend
Comments: MC would have been a million times better than this guy - he cannot carry a tune in a bucket. It's funny, however, as I was sitting there I thought, "ALW doesn't care what we think - he's making money just by us being there! I think the movie was a true adaptation of the stage show - it was the horrible acting that made it seem so bad. Interestingly enough, the movie was more accurate when it comes to the translation of the original book (e.g., Mme. Giry's role in rescuing the young Phantom and the closing scene where Raoul found the rose/engagement ring on Christine's grave). That doesn't matter though.

 


Name:
Lee
January 5, 2005 01:07 PM
E-Mail:  
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?: Va
Referred By: Just Surfed On In
Comments: The reviews I read all said this was a true adaptation of the stage show. Baloney. The stage show was a moving story of a deformed tortured man and his obsession for a young opera singer. The movie is about a teenager discovering sex. They should have renamed it Christine of the Opera. The guy playing the phantom was so unmemorable that the Washington Post apparently didn't even notice he was in the movie. None of the actors I've seen on stage ever let their Christines steal the show out from under them.

 


Name:
Cesar Gutierrez
January 5, 2005 10:00 AM
E-Mail: cesar.gutierrez@ericsson.com
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?: Spain
Referred By: Search Engine
Comments:  

Name:
Aaron
January 5, 2005 04:52 AM
E-Mail: iarechachi@yahoo.com
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?: Fontana, California
Referred By: Just Surfed On In
Comments: I've wanted to see the play again with many of the originals. I feel that the movie could be way better with someone like Crawford as the Phantom and many of the original cast. It could be more memorable with the originals if they were casted in a movie, which people could watch many times.

 


Name:
Josette
January 4, 2005 10:12 PM
E-Mail:  
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?: Hanover PA
Referred By: Search Engine
Comments: So glad I found this site. You have put so much into it and it shows. Please keep it going the clips are great! They need to be preserved for posterity. I ran straight home from that abomination of a movie to hear MC sing music of the night! Ahhhhh.....I must have been dreaming, oh yes of course, a nightmare where they cast some jerk who can't sing!??!!! this guy clearly should have known he was in way over his head. It boggles the mind truly.

 


Name:
Michael Day
January 4, 2005 05:24 PM
E-Mail: michaelday_22@hotmail.com
Homepage Title: www.hotmail.com
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?: Canada
Referred By: Just Surfed On In
Comments: It is canda sad to see the Michael Crawford not to be cast in the movie If I were in the movie I would do a good job better then Butler.

 


Name: Chris
Posted on: January 3, 2005 02:02 PM
E-Mail:  
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?: Ohio
Referred By: Search Engine
Comments: Saw the movie this weekend. Gerard Butler was terrible. His phantom can't sing at all and has the charisma of a soggy leaf. Even after so long of hoping for MC to be cast, I still tried to have an open mind at this point. But I was just so disappointed in Butler's performance. On a positive note, the movie has a beautiful atmosphere and look to it that I find to be true to the stage production. Emmy Rossum was OK as Christine, though I feel she is a bit too young. At least she can sing. Can't help but hope the movie tanks and ALW will realize his casting mistake.

 


Name: Karen Dick
Posted on: January 2, 2005 11:52 AM
E-Mail: castleb@pulsenet.com
Homepage Title: Castle Blood
Homepage URL: www.castleblood.com
Where are you from?: Pennsylvania
Referred By: Just Surfed On In
Comments: Well, I finally saw the movie, and...what a disappointment. It has *none* of the sparkle and magic of the play. All three lead actors were two-dimensional, and I couldn't relate to any of them. (Minnie Driver as Carlotta was the high point of the show, which is pretty sad when the comic relief is stealing scene after scene because the regular actors are so leaden.) Gerard Butler's Phantom is brutish and completely unlikeable--lost forever to moviegoers is Michael Crawford's mixture of sarcasm, poignance, and elegance. *sigh* My biggest gripe with the movie is that in the stage production, the Phantom was always magical, throwing fireballs at Raoul, appearing and disappearing seemingly out of nowhere, and striking from a distance with the Punjab Lasso. The movie Phantom has none of that mystery surrounding him--he's an angry, disfigured sociopath with a noose. At the end of the movie, I can't wait for Christine to get away from him, as I am fearful she's going to get raped. How very different a feeling than the one evoked by the end of the play, where much of the audience wishes, at least wistfully, that Christie could have stayed with the Phantom. Obviously, the producer and director of this movie missed the point...and it is a HUGE point.

 


Name: Molly
Posted on: January 2, 2005 09:18 AM
E-Mail:  
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?:  
Referred By: Just Surfed On In
Comments: "Gerard Butler cannot be blamed for being cast and he cannot be blamed for not doing his very, very best!" I'm sorry but I don't understand this comment. I don't think anyone held Gerald at gun point. He should not have accepted the role if he did not intend to do his very best for all of us. I have nothing against him. He is a fine figure of a man. To quote Michael on his CD, "In Concert", "You have to feel the part deep down inside" If the situation had been reversed and Michael (as a new comer or unknown) took such an important part, he would have done his very best. That is what acting is about. Not compition, ACTING! Wanting to ENTERTAIN your Public!

 


Name: tabby
Posted on: January 2, 2005 03:48 AM
E-Mail: labelledechat@hotmail.com
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?:  
Referred By: Just Surfed On In
Comments: I am so sorry I didn't find this sight till now...I just saw the movie and was very dissapointed with alot of the voices in the film and of course Crawford would have been 20,000,000,000 times better.

 


Name: Howard Anderson
Posted on: January 1, 2005 10:21 PM
E-Mail: guardian917@cox.net
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?: Greenville, NC
Referred By: From a Friend
Comments: Thank you MCPMC for you're efforts in trying to prevent a catastrophe in the arts. I had the privelage of watching Mr. Crawford perform "Phantom" in April of 1990. No words can describe the peformance i so enjoyed that Spring evening in NYC. "The Phantom of the Opera" was and still is my favorite musical and definitely my favorite of all Broadway plays i have taken in.

 


Name: Courtney Thompson
Posted on: January 1, 2005 06:45 PM
E-Mail: sammyncourtney@americaonline
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?: Peoria,Illinois
Referred By: From a Friend
Comments: The Phantom of the Opera is great to have Michael Crawford in. So the perfect Cristine became Sarah Brightman. It became the most perfect Phantom of the Opera ever! GO PHANTOM OF THE OPERA!

 


Name: Samantha Thompson
Posted on: January 1, 2005 06:34 PM
E-Mail: sammyncourtney@americanonline.
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?: peoria,il
Referred By: From a Friend
Comments: I think Michael was a good idea to choose as the phantom. He did great in his singing. GO MICHAEL!

 


Name: Eric French
Posted on: December 31, 2004 05:39 PM
E-Mail:  
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?: Athens, Ohio
Referred By: Just Surfed On In
Comments: My mother told me that a guy on the TODAY show said all they'd have to do is figure out which cave Ossama Bin Laden is hiding in, pipe the POTO movie soundtrack into it and he'd come out running.

 


Name: Cindy
Posted on: December 31, 2004 04:34 PM
E-Mail:  
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?: NJ
Referred By: Just Surfed On In
Comments: Saw the movie. What a dissappointment. Why couldn't they cast someone who could sing like the Angel of Music. They should have waited for Hugh Jackman if they couldn't use Crawford.

 


Name: Filomena Napolitano
Posted on: December 31, 2004 01:45 PM
E-Mail: menanap@yahoo.com
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?: New York,
Referred By: Just Surfed On In
Comments: I saw the play with my sister, brother-in-law and boyfriend. I had chills going down my spine. It was captivating, scary, but sexy i want to buy the cd to the music and when the movie comes out on dvd, I will be the first to buy it. The phanotm Of The Opera is the best play I have ever seen. I could watch it forever.

 


Name: Molly
Posted on: December 31, 2004 09:27 AM
E-Mail: mollyann1946@hotmail.com
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?: NC by way of Chicago!
Referred By: Just Surfed On In
Comments: I finally found where the movie is playing and I do want to see it ASAP, even with all the bad reviews. Posted below, is how they discribed the movie. The words, "new star" and "young soprano" should have given someone a clue that their ages should have not been the same! Also, I saw Gerard Butler and Emmy Rossum sing on Good Morning America and was totally shocked by the lack of emotion on Gerard's part. He almost seemed not want to compete with Michael. There was no feeling in his voice, with his arms limp at his sides. I hoped it was just too early in the morning for him and the movie would be better. I think Emmy was great, but as I said before, I did not see the play. I'm still hoping that someone will read all of this and please release the original play on CD. Andrew Lloyd Webber’s The Phantom of the Opera tells the story of a disfigured musical genius (Gerard Butler) who haunts the catacombs beneath the Paris Opera, waging a reign of terror over its occupants. When he falls fatally in love with the lovely Christine (Emmy Rossum), the Phantom devotes himself to creating a new star for the Opera, exerting a strange sense of control over the young soprano as he nurtures her extraordinary talents.

 


Name: Deborah
Posted on: December 31, 2004 12:58 AM
E-Mail: deborahnicolle@hotmail.com
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?:  
Referred By: Just Surfed On In
Comments: I saw the play with Michael Crawford and was mesmerized. I saw the movie and was annoyed. Bad acting...terrible singing and lipsynching. The worst part was that there was no emotion in the film. I really wanted to love this film...but was greatly disappointed. Too bad...it could have been great..especially if Michael Crawford had been the Phantom.

 


Name: Jenn
Posted on: December 30, 2004 08:13 PM
E-Mail:  
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?:  
Referred By: Just Surfed On In
Comments: The movie is just like cotton candy. All fluff, no substance. What a shame. It could have been great.

 


Name: Al
Posted on: December 30, 2004 01:54 PM
E-Mail:  
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?:  
Referred By: Just Surfed On In
Comments: I agree with everything Jason said.

 


Name: Jeff
Posted on: December 30, 2004 12:19 PM
E-Mail:  
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?:  
Referred By: Just Surfed On In
Comments: Andrew and Joel probably figured if Crawford were in the movie the same thing would have happened that happened with the show. All the talk would have been about Crawford. By casting someone as incompetent as Butler they guaranteed any good talk about the movie would be about them. What they didn't realize is that the raves about Crawford were crucial to the success of the show and overcame its weaknesses. A good phantom makes people overlook the faults. Butler simply emphasized them.

 


Name: Jason
Posted on: December 29, 2004 10:28 PM
E-Mail:  
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?: New York, New York
Referred By: Newsgroup
Comments: Alright, let me start off first by saying, I hate Emmy Rossum! How can she play Christine?! I watched her in an interview, and she said, "before this movie, I never even listened to any of the Phantom of the Opera music. I haven't seen the show." She also said that she doesn't like Opera's. How can you be in an OPERA and not like Operas?! Also, how can you be in an OPERA and never heard it's music?! She is not a true Phan, let me tell you that. Besides which, Butler can NOT sing. Hands down, this movie sucked. They need MUCH better actors, and singers. Also, the actors sucked, and were not true to their characters. I'm sorry...but please, do not go and pay to see this movie, it is not like the show on Broadway! Do not support these horrific actors.

 

 

 

 

 


Name: Eric French
Posted on: December 29, 2004 02:08 PM
E-Mail:  
Homepage Title:  
Homepage URL:  
Where are you from?: Athens, Ohio
Referred By: Just Surfed On In
Comments: Butler also said he was " competing " with " the master ". Having only seen a few pictures & listened to the excruciat