Total: 830 Guests
| Name: Devyn
Schultz Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Texas Time: 1998-09-02 11:37:31 Comments: Hi can't believe there is even a question about this subject. Have Warner's, RUG and Sir Andrew lost their everlovin' minds??!!!! It doesn't take rocket scientist to figure out that people don't want second best (read "Antonio Banderas") when they could have first class all the way. I speak of course of Michael Crawford. HE IS the Phantom as far as millions of people are concerned (say like the 12 million who own the OCR). I'm sick to death of Antonio Banderas and his publicity machine trying to convince us that he's the man for this role. My answer is an unequivacal and resounding "NO YOU'RE NOT!!!!! LEAVE THIS ROLE TO THE MAN WHO CAN TRULY DO IT JUSTICE!!!" |
| Name: Cindy O'Connor Website: Referred by: Net Search From: Newfane, New York Time: 1998-09-02 04:45:28 Comments: There are only two people that I would ever consider going to see as the Phantom: Colm Wilkinson and MICHAEL CRAWFORD. There is no point in seeing it if anyone else were to play the Phantom. The movie should not even be made if this is the case and it will be a flop. |
| Name: Deanna Bell Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: Dupo, IL Time: 1998-09-01 21:17:34 Comments: No one can play the Phantom like Michael Crawford! |
| Name: Shari H. Website: Referred by: Net Search From: New Jersey Time: 1998-09-01 18:14:24 Comments: There is NO other Phantom but Michael Crawford!!! The movie role SHOULD be his...without question!!! Just try to imagine the movie "The Music Man" without Robert Preston...can't huh? Well it came very close to happening as the studios back then originally wanted someone other than Preston, who created the role on Broadway. In my opinion, Hollywood will surely make another "classic" just like "The Music Man"...but ONLY if Michael Crawford is the Phantom...other wise, it will just be "another film". |
| Name: Ernie Nocito Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: PA Time: 1998-09-01 16:25:16 Comments: Upcoming Phantom,the motion picture. Crawford ,YES; Banderas, NO. |
| Name: Mike Kapler Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: Pa Time: 1998-09-01 12:33:57 Comments: I would rather see Warner Bros. just tape a live performance of the Phantom with Michael Crawford in the lead role (back in New York), than to seem them damage an already mastered version. |
| Name: Dan Deal Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Jax FL Time: 1998-09-01 08:26:49 Comments: My previous diatribe was apparently too long! Continuing from #91 - ...features a man beneath a mask it does not necessarily require the supposed matinee-idol looks of Mr. Banderas. More to the point, I'm sure Antonio could bring the house down with a rousing rendition of "Row, Row, Row Your Boat," but then this is a musical, not a comedy! Perhaps Antonio would do well as Raoul, but PLEASE do us all - especially Michael Crawford - the justice we deserve. That justice can only be served by casting the incomparable Michael Crawford in the role he and his amazing voice were born to play - the magnificent Phantom of the Opera!!! |
| Name: Debbie Poole Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Spring Valley, IL Time: 1998-08-31 08:58:08 Comments: I have been waiting for years for the Phantom movie starring MICHAEL CRAWFORD. I will not watch any other actor try to impersonate Michael Crawford. NOBODY can sing as great as Michael Crawford. Andrew LLoyd Webber and Warner Brothers will be making a terrible mistake casting anybody else as the Phantom. If they want antonio banderas in the movie cast him as Raoul but let the only person really born for the role of the Phantom portray him...MICHAEL CRAWFORD! |
| Name: Gene M.
Zentko Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Poland.Ohio Time: 1998-08-29 20:46:21 Comments: My girlfriend and I have seen The Phantom many times in Toronto and it is beautiful. However, we recently had seen a PBS performance of Michael Crawford and he was amazing. If it is not possible for me to see him play the role at a live stage I would love to see him on the big screen!! |
| Name: Dan Deal Website: Against Phantom Injustice! Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Jax FL Time: 1998-08-29 19:10:56 Comments: My girlfriend helped initiate me into the melodic world of "The Phantom of the Opera" and I have become a huge fan. I particularly have come to deeply admire, appreciate, and enjoy the sublime yet spectacular performance of Michael Crawford as the Phantom. I am aware that Andrew Lloyd Webber promised Crawford that, should a movie version of his masterpiece come to fruition, he would indeed reprise his unparalleled role. This promise, of course, was made several years ago. Now, for some bizarre reason, it appears that Lloyd Webber has lost his wits to the point that he is going to allow the film's producers to cast Antonio Banderas as the Phantom. SAY WHAT?!??? This may or may not be at the behest of Lloyd Webber's wife. It most certainly constitutes a severe breach of personal loyalty, for without Michael Crawford's virtuoso efforts as the Phantom, Lloyd Webber's musical would surely not have achieved such stupendous heights. If the movie is to be a musical as well, it demands a superstar voice, and as it |
| Name: Debra Webster Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Holiday, Fl. Time: 1998-08-29 16:31:26 Comments: I saw Michael Crawford in L.A. as Phantom and there can not be another actor who can portray The Phantom! I wouldn't really enjoy the movie. Infact, I probaby wouldn't go. Please consider Michael for the role! Thank You very much. |
| Name: 21st Century
Elephant, Ltd [Talent Agency] Website: Classic British Actors Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: California / England Time: 1998-08-29 12:29:09 Comments: An excellent site, folks, and a great campaign - We're behind you 150%! Michael didn't just play the Phantom, he WAS the Phantom, and Warners should be ashamed of themselves for daring to ignore the opinions of the very people they expect to go and see their movie! |
| Name: DAVID
DÍAZ MATEU Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: SPAIN Time: 1998-08-28 17:31:16 Comments: I COMPLETELY AGREE WITH THIS CAUSE. EVEN WHEN I AM SPANISH AND I LIKE HIM A LOT, I DO NOT WANT ANTONIO BANDERAS IN THE ROLE OF THE PHANTOM. I MISSED MICHAEL CRAWFORD IN THE THEATRE AND I DO NOT WANT TO MISS HIM ON THE SCREEN!!! |
| Name: Patricia
Rasteiro Lorenço Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: I'm from Brasil Time: 1998-08-28 15:54:10 Comments: I'd like to let people know that my sister just loved the cd of the play that's performed by Michael. She cries everytime she hears to it so,it's because it's quite good.And for this reason I think that Michael should be the Phantom on the movies as well. |
| Name: Rayn Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Kent, Ohio, USA Time: 1998-08-28 09:44:30 Comments: I may have already signed this guestbook, but hopefully not! I would just like to say that I think Michael is the only man for the role. He has done it better than anyone else anyway, in my humble opinion.. If he is not cast, millions of people will be disappointed and also feel betrayed by Warner Bros, The Really Useful Company (although I'm beginning to doubt how useful it is.), and everyone else involved. Even people who are not big fans of Michael Crawford recognize him as the Phantom and realize his talent. If they would only cast him, EVERYBODY would be happy. Bye. |
| Name: Cristiane
R. Lorenço Website: Referred by: Net Search From: I'm from Brazil Time: 1998-08-26 21:06:44 Comments: As an exchange student last july, I've been able to see The Phantom of the Opera in San Francisco.And I was so delighted with the play that I decided to buy the sound track. And Michael's performance on the songs makes me feel as if I was part of the play;because he is the heart and the power of it. So, if anyone has the right to be the Phantom on the movies, this right belongs to Michael. I hope that Holliwood can listen to its audience,and give Michael the role of the most loved Phantom around the world. Cristiane |
| Name: Abby Fiscus Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Denver Time: 1998-08-26 14:45:32 Comments: Actually, I saw the article in the Rocky Mountain News about your web site. You are right. Phantom of the Opera is one of the best musicals of all time. I have only seen it once but I hope to see it again soon. I also like "The Fantastiks". I have extremely limited Internet access but when I get an E-mail address (or internet access in my own home, for that matter) I will post it. |
| Name: Christine
K. Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Bloomington, MN Time: 1998-08-26 10:08:00 Comments: Michael knows how to be Phantom. He would be the obvious choice for the movie, if he wants to do it... |
| Name: Betsy H. Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Florida Time: 1998-08-25 16:45:31 Comments: Michael Crawford is the the Phantom. There is no other Phantom! Thank you for giving us a chance to voice our opinion. |
| Name: Joan Crenshaw Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Monterey Peninsula, California Time: 1998-08-25 11:40:18 Comments: Any film version of Phantom that did NOT star Michael Crawford wouldn't be worth the time and effort it took to film it. |
| Name: Dolly Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Texas Time: 1998-08-24 21:53:58 Comments: Send in the Clowns! There are plenty of them sitting in places of authority who should know better. Dear Michael, with his wonderful philosophy, "what will be, will be." Guess he's been around the barn a few times, probably with good ole Warner Brothers. The only good part about all this is that he will always be THE phantom, with international recognition as the man who set the standard for this role. No one can take that from him, nor the awards he has received. He has been validated over and over. Why they can't see this from their lofty perches is a mystery that we may never solve. It would seem that THEY could tell us SOMETHING, and lay to rest all the rumors. |
| Name: Gloria Cazian Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Mission Viejo, Ca Time: 1998-08-24 21:50:36 Comments: I would love to see Michael Crawford in the movie version of Phantom. I saw Antontio Banderas in "Evita" but I don't remember him singing. Maybe, because it wasn't memorable. Why do we need "Pretty Boy" in Phantom? He wears a mask and heavy make-up throughout the entire performanc. When Michael sings...it is memorable. It would be a shame to see any one else in the film version. |
| Name: Chris Vrchota Website: Hootie's Homepage Referred by: Yahoo! From: Bloomington, MN Time: 1998-08-24 18:09:07 Comments: Having anyone but Michael Crawford play the role of the phantom would be an absolute sin. I've heard both John Travolta and Antonio Banderes mentioned, and it sickens me. Great job on the page, I hope it pays off!!! |
| Name: Jose
Francisco Salinas Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Fremont, California Time: 1998-08-24 14:31:04 Comments: I saw the Show in San Francisco love it, bought the CD and want is Pictures of the Original, because wanted to see the Cast Behind the magnificent voices. |
| Name: christina
sutphin Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: radford, virginia Time: 1998-08-24 06:41:52 Comments: I totally support this campaign to get Michael Crawford to play the Phantom. Unfortunately, I have never seen the Broadway musical (something I hope to correct in the future), but I own the original cast recording of The Phantom Of the Opera, and Crawford's voice is phenomenal. Crawford would be the only person who could accurately portray Erik in a film version, any Hollywood actor would only serve to give movie- goers the wrong impression of Erik, and could not portray the passion that the role requires. |
| Name: William A.
Hamilton Jr Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: West Valley, Utah Time: 1998-08-23 16:57:30 Comments: Mr Crawford has performed the Phantom over 1,300 times. For all practical purposes, Michael Crawford is the Pantom. Why would anyone in their right mind look for someone who has no clue, who the Phantom was. Besides, he is getting closer to the age of the Phantom. That's a joke my friend. |
| Name: Mikhaila
Pye Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Sheffield England Time: 1998-08-23 11:16:55 Comments: I think Micheal Crawford should be in the film because it is one of the most demanding male roles in musical theatre. Also it was a role that he created and so no one else can do it like he can. There is no big name in Hollywood at the moment who has sufficient talent to do this. Certainly not the currant favourite, Antonio Banderas who sung (badly)at Lord Lloyd Webbers 50th Birthday Concert. Although Banderas was suited to the part of Che in Evita there is no way he can sing the Phantom. It is about time Hollywood stopped pandering to the minority of mostly American moviegoers who will not go to a film unless it has a big "star" in it. There is a great problem in that some actors never get a chance to follow their productions to Broadway because they are not "known" in America, ie Elaine Paige in Evita. A film of this kind does not need a big hollywood star as it will sell itself and the people who are bothered about stars probably won't want to see the film any way. Therefore it is very important for the success of the film that Micheal Crawford or at the very least, if they must cast an American, some one who has played this role on Broadway. There are so many marvellous actors out there who could play this part and so few films of this nature made that it seems very sad to me that WB and surprisingly Andrew Lloyd Webber are putting what profits above senseand seem set to make what could be a very good film into a travesty. Also having created a show myself, I know how much that means to you. So I say Micheal Crawford as first choice for the Phantom and should he not be able to do it then one of the actors who have played it before not some hollywood star. Keep up the good work. |
| Name: Tara Smith Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: Calgary, Alberta, CANADA Time: 1998-08-22 18:49:32 Comments: Although I believe that the integrity of the original cast should be maintained, my primary concern is that Antonio Banderas does not have the vocal agility and richness required to convey the emotional depths of this role. |
| Name: Alex
Castro Website: Antares' HomePage Referred by: Net Search From: Mexico Time: 1998-08-21 16:16:35 Comments: I entirely support Michael Crawford for the role...His voice is truly magnificent |
| Name: Joel McNair Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Virginia Time: 1998-08-21 13:03:07 Comments: Great Cause!!!! I definately agree! |
| Name: Aileen Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Texas Time: 1998-08-21 12:58:48 Comments: I am extremely disappointed to think that Michael Crawford may not be cast as the Phantom - I have been waiting so long to see him recreate the role. He is by far the most qualified actor for the role and does, indeed, want to do it. He has said as much recently and Warner Bros. and ALW should jump at the chance to use him. Michael was born to bring Erik to life! |
| Name: Heather Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: Irving, TX Time: 1998-08-21 10:27:04 Comments: I read today on the Playbill News Website (8/18) that Antonio Banderas has signed the contract to play the Phantom in the upcoming film version of the musical. I am a long-time Phantom fan and I have mixed feelings about this. Michael Crawford is, along with a lot of other fans, my favorite Phantom. To me, he IS the Phantom. I've been closely following the campaign to have Michael Crawford play the Phantom. My question is this: Does Mr. Crawford want to play the Phantom again? A lot of people are campiagning for this, but has anyone asked him about it? Many fans are saying that if Antonio Banderas plays the Phantom, then they will boycott the movie. I can say in my heart that I will not. I love "Phantom of the Opera" mostly for the story (being a deeply romantic person) not necessarily for who sings the role. I don't know if Antonio Banderas will make a good Phantom. He may surprise us all. Vocally speaking he needs some more work but I'm sure his acting quality will suffice. Give the man a chance. I still deeply wish Micahel Crawford would play Erik, but if God (and the executives at Warner Bros.) will not make it possible, so be it. We will all know that Mr. Crawford was and still is the orginal Phantom and no one can ever change that. |
| Name: Kim Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Pennsylvania Time: 1998-08-21 07:03:39 Comments: Michael Crawford is the only Phantom. How dare ALW think of casting someone else for the part after he promised the role to Michael ! Antonio Banderas doesn't have the voice for this part. And his accent is definitely not going to fit in the role of Phantom. Michael Crawford IS the Phantom! |
| Name: peimon badiee Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: Time: 1998-08-21 03:31:23 Comments: I really like The Phantom Of The Opera very much and I hope that W.B. does push through with it's plan to make the movie. |
| Name: j.marie Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Raymore,Mo Time: 1998-08-20 13:45:03 Comments: Warner Brothers hasen't had their share of box office bombs? How can they even think to take MC part away from him,the one he created and is rightfully his? This sickens me, and I agree 100% with the previous signatures.WB seems to have ignored their fans,the fans that are the KEY to this movies success.I WILL NOT SEE this movie or anyother WB production and for that matter any RUG productions . This movie will undoubtably fail without MC............ Here is my final word..... "You will curse the day you did not do all that the Phantom and his fans asked of you............"Taken from ALW Phantom of the Opera,modified by myself. |
| Name: Rosemary
Kord Website: Referred by: AOL From: TX Time: 1998-08-20 12:31:34 Comments: I'm sure all of you have the same sick feeling in your stomach as I do after reading the latest news proclaiming that Antonio Bandaras has signed the contract as of 8/14. Although this is being confirmed by his agent only, I wonder why Warner Brothers has not made this "contract" public? Could it be they are rethinking this decision due to the public's demands that Michael Crawford play the part? Is Warner Brothers bowing down to Andrew Lloyd Webber's insistance since his current wife approves of AB? Whatever the answer, we have supported the only logical choice for the role; that of Michael Crawford. In fact, if Warner Brothers changes their minds re AB, would Michael Crawford even consider playing the part after being passed over as first choice? Again, my only suggestion would be to make the video tape of the stage performance available to those of us who only want the "REAL THING". That's all I have to say about this except Warner Brothers must be sitting on their brains and I think they will return to "reality" when they see the "bottom line". Money talks and the lack of revenues from this movie will be the only satisfaction we will have. Disgustedly yours, Rosemary Kord |
| Name: Prillie B. Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Texas Time: 1998-08-19 21:27:45 Comments: It sickens me to hear that Banderas *may* have been signed to do the movie. At this point I still refuse to believe that ALW and Warner Bros. would be so foolish. They need a very successful film - do they think this monumental piece of miscasting is the answer? I want Michael Crawford as the Phantom or no movie at all! Prillie B. |
| Name: Stef Website: Stef's Musicals Page Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: PA, USA Time: 1998-08-19 21:05:44 Comments: WB and AB are really getting on my nerves. How can WB have the audacity to cast someone other than Michael Crawford and expect the movie to be good? How can AB think he can do the movie justice if Phantom fans time again say that they don't want him in the role? Wake up, WB. Your big-star casting decisions didn't help you in the past, and they won't help now. Michael Crawford or no one! |
| Name: Diane Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Palmdale, Ca Time: 1998-08-19 20:00:01 Comments: I just wanted to let everyone who visits this guestbook know that we called Warner Bros. yesterday after the Playbill Article came out that reported Antonio Banderas's agent as saying he had signed to do the movie. Well, our phone call was sent back to feature productions. The lady we spoke with voiced some surprise. She said that the project had been put into turnaround quite some time ago, and that this information was not coming from them. We then called The Really Useful Film Group and spoke with an assistant who didn't know anything about it either. She also mentioned to us that they (RUF) were getting a lot of mail every day. Then she stated that the mail would not make a difference. This campaign has probably generated some of the strongest support ever shown for an artist to be cast for a movie in history. We have distributed thousands of flyers at Michael Crawford's concerts all summer long, advertised the addresses on this web site, and who can know the amounts of mail that have arrived on the doorstep of Warner Bros. and RUG as a result? Warner Bros. has had the audacity to completely ignore the fans who are also moviegoers, consumers and part of the paying audience. They have not had the courtesy to return even one single reply or even acknowledge our existence. Then the media, ever politically correct, has furthered their box office draw intentions by holding back this story from network news despite the hard working efforts of two separate campaigns on the net who are fed up with rumors of Hollywood glitz replacing the art and beauty that is so much a part of this beloved play. Now RUF admits that yes, it is getting a LOT of mail, but it will make absolutely no difference. Guess nobody wants to listen to the fans anymore or cares about what or who the fans would like to see in movies. It doesn't feel very good to be ignored, cheated and lied to. We were promised this film eight years ago with Michael Crawford, he had a contract for years and I am BOILING MAD!!!!! Antonio Banderas is going to be FRIED by the critics. I am sorry, it is just the truth. The movie recording is going to be an absolute joke and will be held up to Michael Crawford's original cast recording that has been cherished for over a decade. That is unless they get Michael Crawford to dub Antonio Banderas's voice. Don't do it Michael! We want the whole package! You are the Phantom, you have the moves and we want to SEE you too! We all love and support you! Warner Bros. have completely lost their minds in my book and Andrew Lloyd Webber sold his soul and sold out his fans. It may be difficult to boycott a huge corporation like Warner Bros., but trust me, I will not have a difficult time staying away from RUG or THIS MOVIE!!!! If you can't give us decent casting then, KILL THE MOVIE!!!!!!!!!!! Diane Flogerzi |
| Name: Maggie Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Owensboro, KY Time: 1998-08-19 19:05:02 Comments: It seems a "spokesman" in Antonio's agent's office is saying that Antonio has now signed a contract for the "Phantom" movie, but no one at Warner Bros. claims to know anything about it. Either Warner Bros. is stonewalling on making the announcement because they know a lot of people aren't going to like this news, OR Antonio -- with the brazeness of his giant ego and his obssession with getting this part -- is trying to put pressure on the studio to close the deal. For weeks now, the only person who's been saying that Antonio has the part has been Antonio himself. Something smells here. If Warner's has signed Antonio, then Hollywood's legendary shortsightedness and avarice have triumphed once again, and the studio should have the guts to stand by their choice and make it public. I hope Warner's enjoys playing films to sparse audiences, because that's what is going to happen with this one. As someone on one of the many message boards about this said , "Box 5 won't be the only empty seat!" How true! Without Michael Crawford's incredible angelic voice, "Phantom" will be just a hollow shell of what it could have been. Let's see if Antonio's talent is as great as his ego. It would have to be in order to qualify him for playing this role and keep him from going over the top into melodrama. (To the powers that be at Warner Bros., see if you can come up with an appropriate tune for the following words: Don't cry for yourselves, Warner Bros., and ask why the fans have left you. Because you're stupid, you let them down. They wanted MICHAEL!). Adios, WB & ALW. My money and I are staying home!! |
| Name: Jean H. Cvetko Website: Referred by: Net Search From: Alexandria, Virginia Time: 1998-08-19 17:00:55 Comments: I do not believe anyone could do justice to the Phantom then Michael Crawford. I know the powers that be want a big Hollywood name, but Michael Crawford is a BIG Hollywood name and a very big calling card. The movie would be one of the greatest musical to come along with Mr. Crawford and Ms. Brightman. It would be a very big mistake to cast anyone else in these roles. |
| Name: Roger Mapel Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: St. Joseph, MO Time: 1998-08-19 14:01:13 Comments: Obviously the "Committee of Hollywood Morons" (those people considering casting someone other than Mr. Crawford) is composed of private agents or people who "owe" other people because if they were at all interested in doing what was in the best interest of the play, "Phantom of the Opera," there wouldn't be anything to consider. Michael Crawford is the only choice that makes sense. |
| Name: Kristin
Koenig Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Los Angeles, CA Time: 1998-08-19 13:56:17 Comments: I had the immense honor to perform with Michael Crawford on his west coast tour as a member of his back up choir in Las Vegas, Phoenix, Concord, Shoreline, Irvine, and the Hollywood Bowl. I was also a member of his back-up choir on the PBS special for which Michael recieved an award nomination. I must say that I have seen Phantom several times, once with the leading roles played by Michael and Dale Kristien, and that was the best show by far. Michael brings a sense of passion and realism to the character that other actors are lacking and I could not see any other actor being as suitable for the role. The Phantom is, has been, and always will be associated with Michael. Michael loves the role of the phantom. It's HIS role. Give it back to its rightful owner. |
| Name: Roger Mapel Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: St. Joseph, MO Time: 1998-08-19 13:47:31 Comments: Quite honestly, how could the "Hollywood Experts" be so STUPID? I DO like Antonio Banderas, but casting ANYONE other than Michael Crawford as the Phantom would make as much sense as casting Antonio Banderas as Christine Daae (no offense intended Antonio). |
| Name: Kenny Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Hong Kong Time: 1998-08-18 23:34:17 Comments: Who can be the Phantom in the movie? There's only 1 - Michael Crawford of coz! |
| Name: Judith
Dally Website: Referred by: Net Search From: Australia Time: 1998-08-18 19:07:27 Comments: Absolutely agree that Michael Crawford IS the Phantom |
| Name: Heather Moke Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: Ohio Time: 1998-08-18 16:42:05 Comments: It would be traumatic if anyone else was cast as The Phantom. I would absolutely boycott the movie and the Warner Bros. studio. |
| Name: MRM Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: PA, USA Time: 1998-08-18 13:53:03 Comments: Let me merely say I agree with all the prevous people's messages. Michael Crawford the one true Phantom! |
| Name: Katarina
Hunter Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Jacksonville, Florida Time: 1998-08-18 12:26:30 Comments: By the way, I forgot to mention in my last message that ANTONIO BANDERAS CANNOT SING...and who is a phantom that cannot sing? Not a REAL phantom I presume...Please make Michael the Phantom...so we can enjoy his voice and music once again. Give him the chance that you promised him. |
| Name: Katarina
Hunter Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Jacksonville, Florida Time: 1998-08-18 12:15:15 Comments: I am a great lover of Michael Crawford and The Phantom of the Opera. If you want this film to be a success, you must star him in it, not Antonio Banderas. He is the part, not just a wonderful musician, actor, and singer. Please hear us on this, I will not go see it if it doesn't star him, and none of my many friends and collegues will either! |
| Name: Cheryl
Clark Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Vista, California Time: 1998-08-18 11:22:22 Comments: The movie "Phantom of the Opera" will not be the success it could be without Michael Crawford. There is no other person that can be the Phantom but him. I can't imagine a singer even wanting to try to play the part. If the people who make these decisions do not choose Michael Crawford, they have lost their foresight for making great and memorable movies. |
| Name: Christy Masterson Website: Referred by: Net Search From: Los Angelos, CA Time: 1998-08-18 11:09:37 Comments: If Michael, the Phantom, is not cast in this movie, I, as well as the DRAMA DEPARTMENTS of most California high schools, have agreed to boycott this movie. Michael is BEYOND qualified to play the Phantom, and he most certainly is NOT too old to return to his role. Even though we might only be teenagers, we make up much of this state's population. It isn't a really good start for a movie to have so many people against it when it hasn't even been started. It will be an enormous mistake to miscast this movie. If the movie stars Antonio Banderas, whose name doesn't even BELONG in "The Phantom of the Opera", it'll be a waste of money, because NO ONE WILL SEE IT! |
| Name: Andrea Henderson Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Chicago, Il. Time: 1998-08-18 10:50:54 Comments: If any other person, especially Antonio Banderas, tries to take Michael Crawford's place as the Phantom, the chances of the Oscar for Best Actor will totally be ruined. I can't believe that after ALL Michael has done for this musical, Andrew Lloyd Webber is choosing somebody who won't ever be half as breathtaking as Mr. Crawford was as the role he originated. |
| Name: Nancy
Enright Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: New York state Time: 1998-08-18 10:28:40 Comments: My husband and I were fortunate enough to see Michael Crawford at Radio City Music Hall. Wow! As far as we are concerned, it's Michael in the movie or there is no movie! |
| Name: Carol Atkins Website: NA Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Massachusetts Time: 1998-08-17 21:33:16 Comments: I believe casting anyone other than Michael Crawford in the movie version of POTO is ludicrous. He is THE Phantom!!!! |
| Name: Serena
Agusto Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: Massachusetts Time: 1998-08-17 19:40:04 Comments: I hope that Mr. Crawford and Hollywood can come to an agreement about doing the motion picture version of the musical. It would be fantastic. Keep up the good work! |
| Name: Margaret
Hutchison Website: Referred by: Signing another Guestbook From: Pennsylvania Time: 1998-08-17 16:45:04 Comments: For sheer magic in empathy and interpretation of Andrew Lloyd Webber's music, Michael Crawford in the role of Phantom is incomparable. |
| Name: Aaron Sashihara Website: N/A Referred by: Yahoo! From: New Jersey Time: 1998-08-17 16:34:56 Comments: I think that this home page is great and I thank you for puting it up. I hope that you suceed in your quest to have Michael Crawford star as the Phantom in the coming movie. I am a Phantom fan, and I would never consider seeing a movie of the "Phantom of the Opera" that did not star THE phantom, Michael Crawford. Thank you, and good luck! |
| Name: Wendy Schroeder Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: New Jersey, USA Time: 1998-08-17 16:09:57 Comments: To me, Michael Crawford is The Phantom. It is a crime not to cast him in the film version. |
| Name: GENEVIEVE
RAFTER-KEDDY Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Time: 1998-08-17 14:19:08 Comments: KEEP UP THE GREAT WORK!!! |
| Name: Renee Rothera Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: origiallyEngland, now in Tennessee Time: 1998-08-17 13:57:35 Comments: I think you are all doing a great job, if there is something small I can do please get in touch. I want Michael to play the Phantom in the movie. As far as I am concered he is the Phantom and no other can take his place. |
| Name: Sandie Smith Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Clayton, New Jersey USA Time: 1998-08-17 09:31:16 Comments: Michael is the ONLY logical choice! Sandie Smith |
| Name: Linda Allen Website: Referred by: NewsGroups From: North Carolina Time: 1998-08-17 09:26:22 Comments: Nobody, and I mean NOBODY else should play the Phantom but Michael Crawford. Remember the backlash when Julie Andrews did not play Eliza in My Fair Lady? I am positive that casting anyone but Michael Crawford will doom the film to failure. I have spoken to numerous friends and relatives and we all agree that we would not go to see the film if anyone other than Michael Crawford were cast as the Phantom. |
| Name: Cmczyz Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: USA Time: 1998-08-17 08:43:49 Comments: i had the pleasure of seeing michael crawford on stage in new york when he was the phantom and can't imagine anyone else in this role. not only did he have the ability to handle a physically demanding role, but his vocal range and ability was captivating. despite the fact that michael is older now, he still maintains a strong stage presence and certainly maintains the vocal ability of past years. to take antonio banderas and place him in this role is to appease fans who appreciate lesser talent. it seems that mr. banderas has had few roles recently which have been critically acclaimed or have been box office successes. where is the logic in placing him in the role of phantom ... |
| Name: Gretchen Corso Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Ohio Time: 1998-08-17 08:36:53 Comments: this is in regards to having michael crawford star in the movie version phantom of the opera. he is the only one who could star in this movie and capture the audience you would need. i just saw him in concert tour and he has a way of captivating the crowd to total silence. i say he has a big enough draw to do this movie and i for one will be disappointed if he is not the star. he will make it a hit. please consider him and listen to the people who agree. thank you gretchen from ohio |
| Name: mad4bama Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: N.C. Time: 1998-08-17 08:29:07 Comments: I believe that Michael Crawford should play the Phantom in the movie version of The Phantom of the Opera. I have seen the Phantom of the Opera in Washington, DC and in Raleigh, NC and although both Phantoms were excellent, his voice is the one I hear in my mind. I have played the soundtrack so much that I have worn it out. Those who say that he is too old or not known well enough to play the movie version are crazy. My husband, daughter, and I are really looking forward to his concern at Hardee's of Walnut Creek near Raleigh on July 15th. Of course, hearing him perform some of the songs from the Phantom will make us want to see him in the movie version even more than we do now. Our vote is very much for Michael Crawford!!!!! |
| Name: Ann Henry Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Ohio Time: 1998-08-17 08:22:38 Comments: Hi, I want you to know that we support the idea of Michael Crawford playing the Phantom in the movie version.There is no other choice,he is superb at his craft! I just saw him in Cleveland with Dale Kristen and they were wonderful. He makes you feel every breath he takes and every move that he makes as he glides across the stage.He is nchanting!!!! Michael Crawford excels in his art! Thanks from Ohio |
| Name: marte
galtung Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: Norway Time: 1998-08-17 06:58:44 Comments: I fully support your campaign against Antonio Banderas or anyone else but Michael Crawford to play the part of Phantom |
| Name: Toni Ryon Website: Referred by: Net Search From: Time: 1998-08-16 23:18:43 Comments: I recently had the enormous thrill of touring the original (Garnier) Paris Opera House. I came away convinced, more than ever, that the role of Erik was written for Michael Crawford, and that he is the only person in the world who could do it justice on the screen. Lloyd Weber - I have loved your shows and spent thousands of dollars traveling to see them all over the world, on tickets, memorabilia, and recordings. But it will come to a screeching halt if anyone other than Michael Crawford is cast in the movie!! |
| Name: BONG KOOK
KANG Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: SOUTH KOREA Time: 1998-08-16 19:46:40 Comments: Daer Phantom movie for MC! I herd "phantom.."cd,I was very very excited MC voice. Absoulutely Pantom rolled are Michael Crawford. Michael voice adapted phantom's voice very well. I love love Michael!!!!!!!! God Blee you.. Sincerely yours Kang from S.Korea. |
| Name: Jennifer
Couch Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: Orlando, FL Time: 1998-08-16 19:42:43 Comments: Only Michael Crawford can pull this off! No one else can do this part justice! |
| Name: Aleshia Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Oklahoma Time: 1998-08-16 13:00:49 Comments: I just wanted to say that ever since I saw the 91' version of the phantom of the opera I have been a fan. I would love to see Michael Crawford continue on as the phantom. I will join the boycott if they don't give him the part. I really enjoyed the 91 version and wondered if you would know if it is available on tape. Sincerely Aleshia |
| Name: cat Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: Deltona,FL. Time: 1998-08-16 08:12:09 Comments: I have wanted people to make a phantom movie with crawford in it |
| Name: Rosey Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Tx Time: 1998-08-15 20:35:16 Comments: I have signed the guestbook on a previous occasion. We are all of the same opinion. Here's a twist that may satisfy everyone: IF Warner Bros. (who produced Michael Crawford in Concert) does not cast him in the title role of Phantom of the Opera (the movie), can we at least have access to the videotape of the stage version for all of us who love Him to cherish and enjoy? I would be willing to settle for a compromise as long as I had SOMETHING of Michael Crawford's work as the Phantom. In fact, why not do a concert comparable to Les Mis which was a smashing hit!! I understand that Cameron MacIntosh was influential in the stage production of Phantom Of the Opera. I would be first in line if this video ever becomes available on the open market. I would be interested in any of your comments regarding this statement. Sincerely, Rosey |
| Name: Louise
Poole Website: Referred by: Net Search From: Georgia Time: 1998-08-15 12:42:47 Comments: YES! By all means, we have to have Michael Crawford in the "Phantom" movie! I just bought the CD "On Eagles's Wings" and I am waiting anxiously to see the repeat of his concert on PBS during this membership drive. I have not yet heard when this movie goes into production. Can anyone tell me? Thank you, L.P. |
| Name: Christina
simms Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Canada Time: 1998-08-15 08:38:05 Comments: I feel that Michael crawford should play the phantom in the movie version because he is the only one who would truely fit the role. I don't think that anyone especially those who have not played the phantom on broadway should not play the phatom. Frankly I feel that choosing michael to play phantom again would be enjoyable to see and that hollywood should think twice before getting someone with lack of experience playing phantom would make the movie a total flop. |
| Name: Linda Ames Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: Palmdale, CA Time: 1998-08-14 19:13:02 Comments: Only Michael can do this role!!! |
| Name: GLORIA BELVAN Website: Referred by: AOL From: GEORGIA Time: 1998-08-14 18:52:51 Comments: I can't imagine anyone else in this role, not even John Travolta. Let him play the other guy! Mr. Travolta's voice could not begin to touch Michael's. What a voice! He puts his all into every song he sings. Truly gifted! The Phantom of the Opera movie will be nothing without Michael. He's also not new at the movie business! Remember Hello Dolly? He was adorable! The movie will be a box office flop like Evita because instead of Barbara Streisand they put Madonna. Ha! Oh well, what goes around comes around and hopefully they learned from Evita. |
| Name: LAndes Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: USA Time: 1998-08-14 09:07:55 Comments: There are quite a lot of people I know, including myself, who have never seen Michael Crawford perform The Phantom of the Opera, but based soely upon the London soundtrack Michael Crawford embodies the soul of what we consider to be the Phantom of the Opera. To think of any other person giving form to this character is abominable to myself and many friends. If the film is made with any one else besides Crawford in the title role you can be sure I will not spend one penny of my money towards the film or an y related merchandise. Michael Crawford is the Phantom of the Opera. Don't make a costly mistake $$$$$. |
| Name: Linda Levitt Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Time: 1998-08-14 09:02:05 Comments: This is my second attempt to plea that it would be ridiculous to consider someone different than Michael Crawford as the Phantom in the film version. Why do we always feel compelled to "fix what is NOT broken?!" It would truly be a major disappointment as we the public often imagine an actor synonymous with a role. How confusing to make a change!!! Linda Levitt |
| Name: Connie Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: USA Time: 1998-08-14 08:59:00 Comments: I think you'll get a lot of movie lovers interested in The Phantom of the Opera if you use Michael Crawford as the lead. If you don't, a disaster beyond your imagination will occure!!! I remain, gentlemen, your obedient servant, OG |
| Name: Maria Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Halifax, N.S. Time: 1998-08-14 08:56:04 Comments: MICHAEL CRAWFORD is the only person who should star as the PHANTOM! He is the original star. This is his role. Anyone else would just ruin a good movie. Maria, Halifax, N.S. |
| Name: AMD Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: MI Time: 1998-08-14 07:25:12 Comments: Diane, your LOS ANGELES TIMES 8/5/98 article doesn't seem to be available anymore!! I just came from the WB suggestion boards, and I'm SICK!!! My Michael is being jilted, and I want to throw some punjabs at Warner's!! I have placards all over my wall, stating my obvious opinion, and I will tell anybody who asks what they are for. HOW CAN THEY DOES THIS TO US!?!?!?!?!?! "Listen...to the Angel of Music! MICHAEL CRAWFORD FOR PHANTOM!!!" |
| Name: Angelina Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Michigan Time: 1998-08-14 04:53:12 Comments: Folks, I'm scared. Really, REALLY scared. Zorro is not coming out until March (?) 1999, and I'm TERRIFIED that I will see a preview for Phantom on it.The minute I heard the news about Banderas possible getting the part, I screamed, and my soul has been wailing ever since. One word: NOO! NO NO NO NO NO NO NO!!!!!!!!!! IS ALW OUT OF HIS MIND!?!?!?! We MUST have Michael!!!! I know it's been said a million times, but I will say it again: he is the Phantom. Period. I just re-watched my taped version of his March PBS special, and I shivered all the way through the title song. HOW CAN THEY THINK OF PUTTING ANYONE ELSE IN THE MOVIE!?!?!?! It's sacrilege! It's heresy! Blasphemy! (etc,etc,etc...) Michael is the PHANTOM. There are many FOXES, but ONE PHANTOM. Diane, people, please get this petition out to the media FAST!! Stop them! stop them! before they break this poor Phan's heart!!! I could say a lot more, but it would be repeating. LONG LIVE MICHAEL CRAWFORD!!!!! |
| Name: Nadine M. Kanz Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Winona, Minnesota Time: 1998-08-13 19:29:50 Comments: Michael Crawford IS the Phantom. I missed him on the stage but did see the PBS video. It was great. I also bought his new album "On Angels Wings". This may not be the title but it was great. I would not go to see the Phantom with anyone else playing the lead. Keep up the good work. |
| Name: Joy K.
Whitehead Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Illinois Time: 1998-08-13 10:47:40 Comments: I know I will not be seeing The Phantom of the Opera movie if Michael is not the Phantom. I have been waiting for years for this movie to come out, what a disapontment it would be if the Phantom of the Opera, did not have the "PHANTOM" |
| Name: Winnie
Huang Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: USA Time: 1998-08-12 22:49:59 Comments: I couldn't think of anyone that could play "phantom" better then Michael Crawford. He is such a great actor. Please cast him for the movie role. I would love to see his interpreation of Eric in big screen. |
| Name: nate schultz Website: Referred by: Net Search From: North Carolina Time: 1998-08-12 20:02:13 Comments: I think Michael should do the movie. He is the best Phantom I have ever hear. Bring him on! |
| Name: Mary
Wolkerstorfer Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Minneapolis Minnesota Time: 1998-08-12 13:04:01 Comments: I just experienced seeing the Phantom of the Opera here in Minneapolis and I can honestly say I have never seen anything like it in my life. I am HOOKED. I must say that I agree with this campaign to make sure that Michael Crawford is cast as the Phantom. He IS the Phantom. I purchased the CD and am totally overwhelmed with the beauty of the music. Count me in as a supporter and big fan of Michael Crawford. Thanks! |
| Name: virginia Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Time: 1998-08-12 12:40:12 Comments: Hi Virginia, What we know here at the Michael Crawford Phantom Movie Campaign is that the Antonio Banderas PR people are doing their job very well. Banderas keeps saying he has the job, RUG keeps saying that he is the front runner, and Warner Bros. keeps saying that no one has been signed. We will continue the fight until the end. Thank you for your message. ***************************************************************** Do you realize that Antonio Banderas has been cast as the Phantom, ET mentioned 2 days ago when they talk about Antonio for his birthday. My condolences, Antonio is a good actor, but not a strong singer. I wanted Michael Crawford, too. |
| Name: Diane
Nilsen Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Rochester, New York Time: 1998-08-12 11:59:58 Comments: Michael Crawford is the Phantom. I had the pleasure of seeing him in New York. This show is not the same without him. He brings tears to my eyes everytime I listen to his music or watch a video of him singing the Phantom music. |
| Name: Aurora
deLioncourt Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Time: 1998-08-12 10:28:54 Comments: While you are contemplating the advantages and disadvantages of having Antonio Banderas as opposed to Michael Crawford in the lead role of the Phantom of the Opera, you might also think about what they are going to do about Christine. The role is so challenging that even trained Opera singers have trouble manipulating their voices to reach the hard and almost impossible range required to fill the role. One might compare this to the movie version of another Lloyd Webber musical, Evita (1996) but you must also take into account that the lead role of Eva Peron did not require the range, training, or operetic style voice that is required to sing Christine's part. You must also remember that the part of Eva Peron was lowered to accomodate Madonna's low voice. Now, the role of Christine is unique and memorable because of the extreme high and low notes which she sings repeatedly in the Light Opera. If Andrew Lloyd Webber is planning on casting a Hollywood Prima Donna (e.g. Nicole Kidman, Madonna) then we can only expect that the part will be changed to fit her voice. This will not only ruin the entire mood of the Operetta but it will lose a major element that makes the Phantom of the Opera what it is. The casting can go TWO ways. Either they can cast a hollywood actress with little prior voice training and TRY to give her the instruction she needs to fill the part or they can cast someone who has made it their profession to sing challenging roles such as Christine Daae. It is a lot more likely that they will do the former rather than the latter which will, as said before, diminish the concept on which the Phantom of the Opera is based on. One further complaint about the entire affair is the atmosphere. There is no possible way that the movie could reproduce the feeling one gets when they walk into the theatre and finds themselves in the Paris Opera House. No Matter how hard they try and what effects they have there is no way that they will ever make the Phantom of the Opera what it is on stage. After seeing it three times in the Theatre, I have come to the conclusion that no matter how much I like Antonio Banderas and the idea that I would be able to see the Phantom of the Opera whenver I want the movie itself is a bad idea. Furthermore, by not having Michael Crawford they are further ruining the very important part of my little world :) Tell me what you think. Aurora deLioncourt |
| Name: Roy Funk Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Time: 1998-08-12 09:59:28 Comments: I agree, M. Crawford is the only Phantom. |
| Name: Lee
Kline Website: Referred by: Word of Mouth From: PA Time: 1998-08-12 09:17:25 Comments: LET MICHAEL CRAWFORD DO THE MOVIE ! OR AS THE PHANTOM SAYS "A DISASTER BEYOND YOUR IMAGINATION WILL OCCUR!" |
| Name: Angelica
Danae Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Michigan Time: 1998-08-12 07:00:47 Comments: First things first: I ADORE the Phantom. Second: I would love to see a movie made, but only, ONLY if Michael Crawford played the role of Erik. In my mind, and in many others, Michael is the ONLY Phantom. He is the life, breath, soul, and VOICE of Erik...those who have seen him in the show or in concert will agree that he doesn't even need the Mask to become the Phantom. It would be sacrilege to put anyone else in that role How could they beat Michael's incredible voice? HOW? I just saw Antonio Banderas sing the part, and personally, I think the accent was distracting. Michael was born to be Erik...He IS Erik. Leroux had his voice in mind when he wrote the book, I swear. I know, because whenever he sings, I feel just like Christine. "Softly, deftly, music shall caress you..." Does it ever. ALW needs a hit, but he is commiting theatrical suicide! Does he want to kill his original show? Because believe me, this will. Come to your sense Andrew! Give us Michael! 'Cuz if you don't, believe me, HE will know, and HE will find you. It would be a shame...you know how HE is when he's been betrayed. So please... Your obedient servant, Angelica, E. A. (Erik's Angel) |
| Name: Lori
Chandler Website: Referred by: Net Search From: Somewhere in Texas Time: 1998-08-11 15:56:41 Comments: I love Phantom. If Mikey Crawford isn't in the film, I'll loose all the faith and magicc the story and play have brought to me. |
| Name: Nancy
Blankenship Website: Referred by: Advertisment/Brochure From: Calif. Time: 1998-08-11 15:52:29 Comments: I know that I would have no desire to see the Phantom played by anyone other then Michael Crawford. He is the Phantom. I will not go to see anyone sing his part but him |
| Name: Stacy
Kendrick Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Texas Time: 1998-08-11 15:25:33 Comments: I would only support a movie version of Phantom of The Opera if Michael Crawford was the Phantom. Antonio Banderas may be a good actor but he is NO Phantom. |
| Name: Donna Neil Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Long Beach,Calif. Time: 1998-08-11 13:11:40 Comments: I would like to see Michael Crawford play the Phantom in the movie. I recently saw him in concert and I can't beleive that the studio would even consider another person to sing his role. I will not see the movie if someone else sings as the phantom. |
| Name: Bob
Deitrich Website: Referred by: Word of Mouth From: Laguna Beach, Ca Time: 1998-08-11 12:53:34 Comments: Warner Bros. is going to destroy "Phantom" without M. Crawford. Just remember what happend to "Chorus Line" and "Annie". Both cast with hollywood types and both bombed big time. If Rex harrison and Yul Brenner got to put there most famous roles on film why is Warner Bros. trying to get the latin-lover to do the part? Antonio could never bring what Michael can to the role. I for one sincerely hope that the right thing get's done. Bob |