Total: 2830 Guests
| Name: Elisabeth
Johnsen Website: Referred by: Net Search From: Norway Time: 1999-11-05 10:40:36 Comments: When you say Phantom of the Opera, most people automatically think Michael Crawford. It's also unwise to cast a latino actor with a spanish accent in the role as phantom, when we learn in Leroux's book that the phantom is of European descend. Further more, Michael Crawford is a trained singer with a beautiful woice(which is more than you can say about Antonio Banderas). After all, we're talking musical here, not action thriller. |
| Name: Cheryl Clark Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: California Time: 1999-11-05 09:11:32 Comments: I think that Michael Crawford is the only person that should even be considered for the roll of Phantom in the movie. He made the roll on the stage and no one can sing the songs better than he does. Michael Crawford IS the Phantom. In my opinion, if anyone other than Michael is cast in the part, the movie will not be a success. I know I won't want to see it. I also think that the movie should be kept as close to the stage perforance as possible. It would really be wonderful if the entire original cast would be put in the movie. |
| Name: Christina
Schilder Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Pewaukee, Wisconsin Time: 1999-11-05 06:13:48 Comments: I'm sorry but there is no one that fits the bill better for the Phantom than Michael Crawford. He was awesome in the roll! I like Antonio, he's a fine actor, but he just isn't appropriate for the part. Personally, Antonio as the Phantom would be something I wouldn't pay to see. |
| Name: Maggie Birge Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Owensboro, KY Time: 1999-11-05 05:22:21 Comments: There are two ways to look at making Phantom of the Opera into a movie...one is artistic and the other financial. Artistically, Michael Crawford can sing circles around Antonio Banderas any day of the week. No contest there. Let's look at the financial facts instead. Warner Bros. seems about to fall for the old "bankable" star myth. Put a big name in a movie and presto...the audience will come. Right? Wrong! Banderas has been building a movie name for himself for several years. Most moviegoers know who he is, but does that guarantee they will buy tickets for whatever movie he makes? No! I personally have never bought a ticket on the strength of his name, and a lot of other people feel the same way. Banderas has been the star of only one major hit, Zorro. It was the perfect blend of character and actor, also well written, and had the added insurance of Anthony Hopkins being in it. But look at what's happened to Banderas since. The 13th Warrior opened and closed almost overnight, and Crazy in Alabama, which he directed and which starred his wife, Melanie Griffith (a certified BIG star) was critically panned and resoundingly rejected by ticket buyers. Any movie is a gamble, but if you have a good story to tell and carefully cast the movie with the actors best suited to their roles, you have a head start on success. In the case of Phantom, you have a bona fide hit, a star perfectly mated to his character who has also proved he is a major box office draw, and you have the advantage of the public telling you exactly what it wants and will support. How can you go wrong? Easy, if you ignore all of these things. The moviegoing public will support a Phantom film faithful to the original stage show, starring Michael Crawford and no one else. It will NOT support a film with major changes in how the story is presented, with much of its treasured music removed, and with a another actor playing the Phantom...particularly one with limited singing ability. The three main elements in Phantom's astounding stage success have been Gaston Leroux's tragic story, Andrew Lloyd Webber's beautiful music, and Michael Crawford's mesmerizing performance. Don't tamper with any one of these. Give the public the show and the star it has been devoted to for 13 years. That's your "bankable" formula for a major movie hit. |
| Name: Kimberly
Ruohio Website: Kim's Happy Fun Page O' Downloads Referred by: From a Friend From: Charleston, South Carolina (reside in Helsinki, Finland) Time: 1999-11-05 04:51:09 Comments: I have nothing personal against Antonio. I actually think he's a good actor..however..singer?? No way in hell will he ever be a tenor (and this is the Phantom just has to be, right?).. And Michael _is_ a much much better actor, more deserving, owns the role, and did I mention his awesome voice? :) |
| Name: Maria Morse Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Rochester, NY Time: 1999-11-05 04:29:35 Comments: Michael Crawford is the Phantom of the Opera. He is the voice heard by millions around the world. He breathed life and soul into the character of Eric and created a masterpiece on the stage that should be brought to life on film for all the world to see and generations to come. Anything else would be a travesty. |
| Name: Debra
Baird Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: L.A California Time: 1999-11-04 20:47:27 Comments: I have a few problems with the Phantom movie that is currently being made. I love the theater and love quality work. Phantom Of The Opera was a wonderful musical. It was well written and had beautiful songs full of passion in it. Michael Crawford did a classic performance of Erik. He made the character loved. He was a tormented soul who was brilliant and misunderstood through eyes filled with prejudice We felt his emotion and tragic loss. We also felt that such an angry man could feel and need great love.The audience cried for him. Michael became so identified with the role because he made us identify with Erik. People went to see it again and again because they wanted that great love too and could feel his pain. They also heard an extraordinary voice that filled the theater as well as their hearts. I hear the movie will ignore this amazing talent. The story is re-written and an actor who can't sing will attempt these lovely emotional songs.. I am dejected. I don't understand? Why would one have perfection and throw it away? The Tony Awards reccognized it .Michael created the role. He feels the escense of the man and it shows. I have seen others do the role and as hard as they try it isn't the same. Mr. Banderas is an adequate actor, but he really cannot sing. In Evita the critics felt his singing ability lacked what was needed. Evita did poorly at the boxoffice because theater people won't see something that isn't a quality performance. We know better. The masses might go see" Phantom" at Halloween if you make it scary, but an opera? I don't think so. All you are left with is us. I won't go see a beautiful musical turned into a mockery.Even the masses won't be able to see the pretty face because it will behind a mask. Antonio's looks won't get him through this one. His movies haven't been that successful for his name to carry this one either.Michael is the only thing that can save your brave film attempt Andrew. Otherwise it will be the biggest flop of the year. i hope you enjoy losing money because you will. Word of mouth spreads fast.Another thing I don't understand is why you would want to make a movie that people are already against? Not good business to me.Good business would be to cast Michael and let his fans celebrate and tell the world what they have to look forward to. Michael is already doing concerts across the country singing Phantom songs. We will know the difference when we hear Antonio sing and so will everyone else. Michael always gets standing ovations, does Antonio? Michael could promote the movie clear across the country before it opens, can Antonio? I would think carefully about this and not do something foolish out of stubborn pride. Sincerely, Debra Baird |
| Name: Gloria
Meyers Website: ** Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: W. Sacramento, CA....USA Time: 1999-11-04 19:40:50 Comments: MICHAEL CRAWFORD WAS THE PHANTOM..IS THE PHANTOM....AND ALWAYS WILL BE THE PHANTOM...He has proven himself as the POTO by portraying the Phantom on stage in London, New Work and Los Angeles. Michael has won many awards as the Phantom....such as the Olivier Award, Outer Circle Award, the Drama-Logue Award, the L.A. Drama Critics Award and the celebrated Broadway Tony for the best actor in a musical (POTO)..Michael with his hypnotic voice created the role for which he would become internationally and permanently famous. Theater history was made with Michael as the POTO.. Noone else can breathe life into Erik...like Michael ..leaving audiences completely mesmerized...Haunted by Michael's voice..each body movement..hand gesture Michael made was beautiful..audiences felt every emotion Michael displayed as the POTO...To think such artistic beauty such as Michael had for the role as Phantom on the stage..may never be brought to the screen ..is simply unthinkable.The Phantom's Mask belongs on Michael...Zorro's Mask belongs on Antonio Banderas..AMEN!!! |
| Name: David
Underwood Website: Referred by: AOL From: Australia /Queensland Time: 1999-11-04 19:02:23 Comments: I have seen the Phantom or the Opera 10 times never got the chance to see Michael but have the original soundtrack. I like Antonio but I won't see the movie if he gets the lead I would like to see Michael and Sarah take back there roles because they know there parts they did it for long enough and even to think of putting anyone else in the role of the Phantom you must not want to make any money. |
| Name: Janet Website: Remembering the Road to Avonlea Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Virginia Time: 1999-11-04 18:53:07 Comments: Michael Crawford IS the phantom, and I am glad to know that there are SO many other people out there who realize this too! Please Warner Brothers, we are the ones you are supposed to be making this movie for! We want our Phantom! We want Michael Crawford! |
| Name: Suzan Hallam Website: Referred by: AOL From: Lawrenceville, Georgia Time: 1999-11-04 18:39:15 Comments: There is only one phantom and that is Michael Crawford. |
| Name: Jacqueline
KEECH Website: Referred by: NewsGroups From: Perth, Western Australia Time: 1999-11-04 17:07:23 Comments: There really is nothing I can add here that hasn't already been said. Please lets get on with this film. The world has waited sooo long. POTO is undoubtedly the greatest musical ever written and MUST be given to the public. There has only ever really been one Phanotm, Michael Crawford who breathed life and soul into the role as none other has been able to do, as much as there have been some brilliant performances by other great singer/actors. Surely the cheapest, easiest and most memorable way to film 'Phantom' would be in a 'theatre mode' as seen in its original and HUGELY successful format. Please dont delay much longer, the world it waiting. Thank you so much. |
| Name: Lisa Kelley Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Dover DE Time: 1999-11-04 16:57:21 Comments: Michael Crawford is the best and only choice for the Phantom in the Phantom of the Opera movie. Millions of fans can't be and are not wrong. He is amazing and seems to have been born to play the role. It is clear that Michael is the only real choice for the role of the Phantom. |
| Name: Cathy
Hatcher Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: WV, USA Time: 1999-11-04 16:28:43 Comments: I can only hope that my letter along with the thousands who have written in support of Michael Crawford for Phantom will not only be read, but understood. Can you not see that we are outraged for good reason at the thought of anyone but Michael Crawford in the title role? We are not a bunch of "groupies", but a diverse, world wide league, with intelligence and good taste. Our opinions do count. It is time that the "powers that be" realize wherein the POWER lies...with the consumer. The movie is bound to fail for many reasons. Fans of Phantom will not buy a ticket because of the casting. Also, a much loved musical is being changed to "fit" the mediocre voice of Antonio Banderas. How could Antonio Banderas even be considered for such a demanding role? He does not have the singing ability anywhere close to Michael Crawford's. Nor does he have the depth of character needed to portray the Phantom. I am sure Mr. Banderas will give it his best shot, but sadly, that won't be good enough. Far from it. Please do the RIGHT thing...the SMART thing and go with Crawford! He will make the film a real winner. Something to be proud of. Not a piece of junk for the video counter in six months! Michael Crawford IS the Phantom, and shall ever remain so! |
| Name: Jean
Cismowski Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Chula Vista, CA Time: 1999-11-04 16:19:23 Comments: Having seen Michael many times in POTO and in concert and AB in Evita and at the ALW Birthday Celebration (which made me ill) I can't believe Sir Andrew would cast AB as Phantom and not Michael. The movie would be one huge FLOP! Can't we stop all the AB self hornblowing? I can't listen or watch anymore. Please Andrew, Michael Crawford, Michael Crawford! He sold the stage version for you and no one who saw him there will settle for less! |
| Name: Janice Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: utah Time: 1999-11-04 15:56:19 Comments: michael crawford is the ONLY phantom!! he is the best and if they don't cast him to do the movie, they are making a huge mistake! that's all i have to say He deserves to be the phantom, he's the one who started it and he should be the one to end it!! |
| Name: Eileen
Kent Website: Referred by: From a Web Ring From: Utica NY Time: 1999-11-04 15:16:54 Comments: Michael Crawford for Phantom -Antonio for Raul! |
| Name: Kelly Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: New York Time: 1999-11-04 15:07:48 Comments: Just wanted to drop a note saying that, in my opinion, Michael Crawford is the only man who can portray Erik, the Phantom, as he should be portrayed. The past attempts at a film version of The Phantom of the Opera, although admirable, did not do the story justice, with the exception of the 1925 version starring Lon Chaney. No one wants to see another attempt fail. The only solution is to cast Mr. Crawford and to keep the story intact. Many, many people will be sorely disappointed otherwise. |
| Name: Laura Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: UK Time: 1999-11-04 13:50:05 Comments: I really do hope that the people with the'power'take the time to read these messages...they wouldn't have to read them all, I think one or two would pretty much sum up the feelings of a nation. You may think that that is a slight exageration...but look at the number of entries in this guest book...look at the amount of people rooting for Michael Crawford...and over and above all...look how many people would be paying good money to see your film (with Michael playing the Phantom) I find it quite sad that 'big-wigs' in the film industry feel that a movie, these days, need BIG names or pretty faces to sell. Perhaps some movies do...movies that don't have a strong story line, movies that are all special effects...but not Phantom, not 'OUR' Phantom. We are the people who have loved and cherished this story for such a long time...so many years that some of us may rather forget :) Please, cast Michael as the Phantom...and PLEASE don't change/add/remove any of the score. I grew up on one of the most amazing musicals of our time, The Phantom of the Opera, and I also grew up listening to the wonderful voice of Michael Crawford...no two things have ever matched so beautifully, so perfectly as Michael and Erik do....don't take this away from us...not something that means so much to so many!! Please, Laura. |
| Name: Christine
Grey Website: Referred by: NewsGroups From: Chattanooga, Tennessee Time: 1999-11-04 12:34:27 Comments: I would love to see a Phantom movie if it were starring anyone (almost) other than Antonio Bandaras. I really like Antonio and all and I think he's pretty cute, but I would not come to see the Phantom movie if he were in it. He just dosen't have the voice or the attitude for the part. Michael Crawford is your best bet for the part. |
| Name: Jessie Lewis Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Utah, United States of America Time: 1999-11-04 12:28:38 Comments: I sincerely hope someone at Warner Bros. reads this message. I support Michael Crawford to be cast as the Phantom in a movie of "The Phantom of the Opera." His overwhelming charisma and perfect singing voice would make this a movie to be remembered. Listen to what your customers are saying - we want Crawford. I refer you to an article called "Big Red" in the Nov.6-12 TV Guide by Michael Logan. He says what everyone but you is thinking - that really great musicals (like Phantom) don't need so-called 'names'(like Antonio Banderas). Let Phantom of the Opera be the resurgence of blockbuster musicals by casting the ONE AND ONLY PHANTOM - Michael Crawford. And please do not tamper with the original score. Michael Crawford's voice and that score go together. Think about repercussions if you put Antonio Banderas in this movie with music reduced to his size - you will be quite a laughing stock and, of course, those dollars won't materialize. |
| Name: Paula Blake Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: UK Time: 1999-11-04 11:47:56 Comments: I find it sad that we now seem to live in a world where the general public have little say in what is thrown at them under the guise of entertainment! It is obvious that those who make the decisions in the entertainment industry seem to be striving for mediocrity, or worse, rather than magnificence. Years ago, I often used to go to see movies at my local cinema, but now I cannot remember the last time I did so. There is nothing ever on that I would go to the trouble of making a short journey to see. I, also, used to hire or buy videos of movies quite often, but now, I do so very rarely. When I do, it's usually something for my children, like The Lion King. As the standard of TV also leaves a lot to be desired, I have, consequently, turned my attentions to the theatre. Musical theatre in particular. I must have been one of the first people to see The Phantom of the Opera at Her Majesty's Theatre in London.I will never forget that night and Michael Crawford's performance. To say it was both the most magical and moving show I have ever seen, is an understatement. However, I discovered when I saw the show again, at a much later date, with another actor in the title role, I realised that it had been Michael Crawford that had made the show what it was. I have never, before or since, seen and heard any actor, give a performance to equal his, in all the years I have been going to the theatre. I forgot I was watching Michael Crawford and totally believed in Erik. To this day, I have to remind myself that this man wasn't real, but a character played by Michael Crawford. If Warner Bros. wants to make a movie of ALW's Phanton of the Opera with some other actor in the role. Fine, go do it then, but, I for one, will not bother to even hire the video, even for the purposes of making a comparison with the stage show. Why? Because with someone else in the role, I am quite certain that it will not be worth seeing. |
| Name: Mary
Burbidge Website: Referred by: NewsGroups From: England Time: 1999-11-04 11:33:52 Comments: Please cast Michael Crawford as the Phantom in your film as it won't be worth watching with anyone else. |
| Name: Roseann
Solnica Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Yonkers, NY Time: 1999-11-04 09:52:34 Comments: With the new blood at Warner Brothers, Mr. Barry Meyer and Mr. Alan Horn, in charge I had been hoping that good sense would prevail and that we would hear some positive committment from them to producing the film of the ALW musical that adheres to the already supersuccessful stage production and stars the original and best Phantom, Mr. Michael Crawford. However, all one continues to hear is the propaganda that Mr. Banderas and his publicity department continue to spew forth. Warner Brothers is silent and thus complicit in that propaganda. Wake up, Mr. Meyer and Mr. Horn. How many times do the fans and the general public have to tell you that Michael Crawford is the one and only Phantom they want to see on the big screen? He is the quintessential interpreter of the role since he created it and won multiple awards for that achievement. In the years since he has only improved his skills, as can be seen from his concert and TV appearances where he has sung Music of the Night, and other Phantom songs. He would be only BETTER now than he was 10 years ago. He does have an international following which is proven by the attendance at his concerts in the US, Uk and Australia (where, by the way, his tickets sell out in hours of their release). And lots of people who don't know him for anything else always recognize him as the Phantom. What more could you want? Your public is waiting for you to make the perfect movie from one of the best musicals ever on Broadway or the West End. I implore you not to miss this chance to make movie history, but it will only happen if you committ to excellence, committ to Michael Crawford, the Phantom of the Millenium. |
| Name: Shirley
Falandysz Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Michigan Time: 1999-11-04 09:45:34 Comments: IF Michael was a good enough phantom to star in POTO for four years, he certainly is good enough to star in the movie. Why change a certain good thing? With him, you are sure of a large audience with large box office receipts. |
| Name: Beth Morrow Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Time: 1999-11-03 20:27:52 Comments: My name is Beth Morrow, I am 48 and have been a fan of Michael Crawford since I was in high school when my sister and I saw him in the movie "A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum" and thought he was fabulous. My sister and I somehow dragged our parents to New York to see him in "Black Comedy" with Geraldine Fitzgerald. More than 25 years later, my sister surprised my husband and myself with tickets to the production of "Phantom" soon after it opened in New York. She had seen the play in London and was so overwhelmed by Michael Crawford's performance that she stood in line for hours the day tickets first became available (she's a neonatologist who was over 35 at the time) and bought tickets to the New York production for everyone in our family, parents and siblings. Even today, almost 12 years later, when I just took my own daughter to see the Phantom to celebrate her 10th birthday, it is the original CD that gave her her love for this production--and she hadn't even been conceived when we saw Michael Crawford as the Phantom. But his voice is so haunting, and his portrayal so real that I can still remember it, and was yearning to see him enter onto the stage at the last minute and surprise me--since no one else could ever be the Phantom for me. Having anyone else be the Phantom, would be somewhat like trying to remake "Gone With the Wind" without Clark Gable as Rhett Butler. He became the Phantom in the way that Gable became Rhett. To cast anyone else would be to doom them forever to a poor comparison--like Audrey Hepburn suffered as My Fair Lady--and to leave the producers scorned as idiots the way the producers of My Fair Lady were for not casting Julie Andrews. Great performances are not created by publicity and hype, and even stars known only on Broadway can bring huge audiences to films, as Julie Andrews was subsequently to prove. |
| Name: Nancy Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: BC Canada Time: 1999-11-02 23:06:56 Comments: "Phantom" is one of my all time favorite opera/musicals. I would be tramatized to see an amature do a professionals work (No offese to Antonio Bandaras who is great at what he goes, but doesn't have the operatic tone needed to support that role). Far too many actors are cast because of their popularity, and talented actors and vocalists are left in the dust. I am strongly in support of getting Michael Crawford the lead in the movie. thank you. |
| Name: Maggie Birge Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Owensboro, KY Time: 1999-11-02 22:41:52 Comments: Just listened to Michael Crawford's new Christmas album for the first time and words almost fail me. Where does that voice come from? How does he do the things he does with it? Just when I think I know what he will do next, he surprises me. This is an incredible display of an amazing talent. How can anyone say this man will not bring audiences into a movie theater? How can they deny us--the people who will make up that audience--the joy of experiencing Michael Crawford in the role he was born to play! Michael Crawford or no movie at all!! |
| Name: Bruce Smith Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Torrance Time: 1999-11-02 22:08:52 Comments: There is no other Phantom other than Michael Crawford!!!! I will never see a movie cast with another Phantom. Why bother. |
| Name: Katherine
M. Hufnagel Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: Clinton township, MI. 48036 Time: 1999-11-02 19:57:25 Comments: I recently went to see Paul Stanley play the Phantom, in Toronto, Canada. Although, I did enjoy the show, I would have preferred to see Michael Crawford, because I love his performance that I've heard on compact disc. Michael Crawford & Sarah Brightman are fantastic. It should be performed by someone who is experienced & passionate about & with the story. |
| Name: Melissa Schramm Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: Mission Viejo, CA Time: 1999-11-02 11:37:48 Comments: Michael Crawford "is" Phantom it would be a mistake to not cast him as such! |
| Name: Irene
Emelyanova Website: Referred by: Net Search From: Moscow, Russia Time: 1999-11-02 03:42:19 Comments: I've already signed this and will be more until this madness stops. We in Russia love good music and good voices. We Russian fans of ALW know his 'Phantom' and love it. We don't want it to be spoiled by a talentless play of the lead role. The one who created the role and made the Phantom famous and loved throughout the world must remain the Phantom forever on the movie version of the ALW musical. We vote for Michael Crawford! - Irene and her friends |
| Name: Sara
Caldwell Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: Kansas City Time: 1999-11-01 23:54:20 Comments: I met Michael at a time in my life when I thought that theatre was dead. There was nothing portraied anymore that was real and believeable. I saw the Phantom of the Opera with Michael and it changed my mind able the theatre. I could understand the character as if he were a real person that I would meet. Knowing Michael and the character has changed my life completely. |
| Name: Sara
Caldwell Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: Kansas City Time: 1999-11-01 23:48:32 Comments: Michael is the ONLY Phantom there is in my opinion. |
| Name: Kirsty Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Sydney, Australia Time: 1999-11-01 21:46:20 Comments: I saw Phantom in London in 1987 with the entire original cast. My mum used to sing with one of the principal actors. We waited backstage and got an autographed program each. It was one of the most fabulous experiences of my life and I will never forget it. Michael Crawford is truly a great talent and no male actor/singer has surpassed him and I don't think ever will. |
| Name: Tim Glynn Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Reno, Nevada Time: 1999-11-01 15:48:55 Comments: I have seen Phantom on stage a number of times. The fact remains...there is only one - Michael Crawford. |
| Name: Joyce Miller Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Ashland, OR Time: 1999-11-01 13:42:11 Comments: I was involved in leading tours to England when Michael was touring with his A.L.Webber tour. People were fighting to secure a space to visit London and Paris and catch Michael in concert at many locations. He has a following not to be believed. What is Warner Bros. thinking? Let me know what I can do!!!!!!! The phantom does not sing and speak with a spanish accent. When I saw Antonia perform the songs....he looked the part OK.......til he opened his mouth!!!!! |
| Name: Nicky Website: Referred by: Lycos From: England Time: 1999-11-01 12:08:49 Comments: I think that you're page is great because i've thought 4 ages that Crawford should be the star, not Antonio or Travolta. Warner Bros. WAKE UP AND SMELL THE PORRIDGE! |
| Name: Melinda Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Time: 1999-10-31 17:02:08 Comments: Di, Please send your post to the powers that be. It points out how important it is to preserve this performance. It also points out that the men at Warners don't understand the "why" women are so moved by MC's portrayl or the "how" women can fall for a guy fully dressed (including a cape) who wears a mask over a deformed face and expresses his emotions through his singing and body and hand movements. Need I say more? melinda p.s. check out entry #58 on the guestbook ********************************************* Hi Melinda, The posts have been entered here where they can be publicly read by our visitors. We will send Di's post along with our next mailing to Warner Bros. and The Really Useful Group. Hopefully they will read it and it will have an impact. Thank you Melinda for your post. TMCPMC |
| Name: Diane Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: California Time: 1999-10-31 16:56:17 Comments: Hi Angela, Happy Halloween back to you. The script from 1990. Before I help tear apart what I don't like I want to say that we will be VERY LUCKY if we end up with anything this close to the original play after Kapur and Webber chop up the new one to pieces. That script was acceptable for me, but there were several things I did not like. One you already mentioned was the bench scene. Every woman on this planet who saw Michael Crawford perform the bench scene wants it left in. In fact I will go further, every woman who saw him perform it as he did in Los Angeles wants it left in. The video I have seen of him when the play first opened did not have the explicit parts (oh lord) that I saw in LA. He was the bravest person I ever saw in my entire life and I still cannot believe he was so willing to give so freely to an audience. It was so personal that it was painful for me to watch, I felt I was intruding on someones most intimate moment, and of course that was part of his intent. He definitely made clear his pent up frustration for Christine! Out of the other five Phantoms I saw, only Norman Large his understudy took the bench scene to the lengths that Michael Crawford did. If Webber had left it in the film in 1990, the film would NOT have received a PG rating, I can fully assure you. I was very disappointed in the removal of that scene. I also was very disappointed in "Music of the Night." Dragging around a boat by a rope does not sound as romantic to me as the beautiful staging of the play during this song. Give me Michael Crawford stalking Christine like a panther any day, he was poetry in motion and one of the most graceful and elegant things I have seen in my entire life. I don't think a person in the audience breathed during that entire song. Years later I can still remember it just as clearly as the day I first saw him perform it. I was really put out at that rewrite although I thought the ending of MOTN was *gulp* intriguing...... What was Webber thinking? Looks like a sequel to me, even way back then. Watching the Phantom pull down those bed curtains..... Yikes! I was also unhappy at the fighting between Raoul and the Phantom in the Cemetery scene. For heavens sake, why the physical fight? What does it add to the story? I just could not understand it. But one of the biggest things that hurt me in the whole script was Webber adding MOTN to the rooftop scene for Sarah Brightman to sing. It reads on the script that she takes the song farther than the Phantom did. All that Andrew Lloyd Webber gave Michael Crawford from the start was 28 minutes. That's it, and Michael Crawford created a legend and the blueprint that every great Phantom who came after him has followed. He developed that character and breathed the life, heart and soul into him. He loved his creation, the role meant the world to him and with only 28 minutes he managed to break people's hearts, win their sympathy, make them cry and in most cases for the women in the audience to fall completely in love with him. For Andrew Lloyd Webber to cut out some of the most beautiful scenes that Michael Crawford created and performed and then give his signature song to someone else to sing shows me that Webber never fully got or understood what the phenomena behind the play really is. It is many things of course, a beautiful story, a lush and wonderful score, great special effects and beautiful costumes and scenery...... but the true magic of the piece comes from the Phantom himself. And the experience on the part of the audience will vary in the same degree to the talent of the actor to move them with the portrayal of the Phantom. With a bad actor, the play can be enjoyed and a good time had, with a good actor the play will become a memorable experience and remembered with fondness. But with a truly great and talented artist such as Michael Crawford and a few others who have followed, the play becomes a once in a lifetime experience; memories loved and cherished even years later. That is what this campaign really is about. There will be one blueprint left behind for everyone to see and cherish in the generations to come. One chance only to capture the magic and beauty, a movie classic that should have been a once in a lifetime legendary creation by a man who gave the original role everything he had inside of him. The biggest hurt for me will always be Andrew Lloyd Webber not fighting to make sure that this performance, the performance that people slept on the streets to see, camped out for days on end, scalped tickets, saw dozens of times, worshiped and stood a block deep after every performance for just a glimpse of the man who just couldn't be a true breathing human being. That is the performance Andrew Lloyd Webber is not fighting for, and I personally will never forgive him. I suppose I can see him doing this to Michael Crawford, although his lack of loyalty makes him look really low, maybe even see him not caring about his fans..... but to destroy this piece of art because some suits at Warner Bros. have decided that a movie musical made with integrity towards the original play starring a man whom they now think won't make them their money (Fools that they are, someone should tell them the fight that goes on for just a darn poor quality bootleg of the original Phantom) is impossible to forgive or understand. I think they should cast Michael as the Phantom. Banderas as Raoul, and with a mature Raoul like him they could use Sarah Brightman and pull in the European audience that adores her. She could pull it off, she has the voice and she could be made up to look young once again. I also think they should film it as a theatre experience. They were on the right track with the first script, stay as close to the original as possible. For the record, I would rather have a high quality video of the play with the original cast. Looks like that won't happen until they film this travesty. Of course I am a nobody out here and my opinion is unimportant. We will probably see Banderas cast as the Phantom. It will be one movie that I will never see. I think I will just hold onto the Bob Hope MOTN video clip and my memories. Oh yeah, only one scene to keep? Forget it. I want the whole package in the 28 minutes allowed. Di |
| Name: Angela Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Time: 1999-10-31 16:52:57 Comments: Fondness Greetings To You All, Hi everyone! I hope y'all are having a wonderful Halloween weekend! I just read the script to the POTO movie that unfortunately did not come to pass...yet anyway. I can't believe that they would leave out the bench scene! That's awful!! And what was up with the "great fight that ensues" in the graveyard? Weird changes they are making. They need to KEEP that bench scene though!!!! Hey just a question for everyone... Just for curiostiy's sake, if you had to, could any of you actually CHOOSE a favorite part of Michael Crawford's performance as the Phantom? I know I couldn't! Just curious as to what y'all think. Take care ^_^, Angela |
| Name: Christine Website: The Opera Box Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Time: 1999-10-31 15:19:47 Comments: Hello! I love music from The Phantom of the Opera (I never got a chance to watch the play or the movie, but I'm in the middle of the book right now). I love your site. It is very nice. I wish you success in keeping Michael Crawford in Phantom. ~* Christine *~ (Can it be, can it be Christine?!) |
| Name: Russell Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: USA Time: 1999-10-31 13:41:56 Comments: Just been reading the posts, recent news on this site and movie reviews in the local papers. Has anyone else noticed? Is Banderas's star slipping? Has an unorganized backlash begun? Personally, I have gone from a passive and objective position on Banderas as an actor and human being to actively not supporting any project in which Banderas or his name is associated and recommending the same to anyone who will listen. By reading the posts on this and other websites I know I'm not alone. The "13th Warrior" was a flop - not only with the critics, but also with the public at large. I just read a scathing review of "Crazy in Alabama" - which has been universally panned. Now Andrew Lloyd Webber and Warners are basically saying that AB doesn't have the talent to sing the "Phantom of the Opera" so they will rewrite the music for him. They couldn't have done a better job of setting him up for failure and slaughter by the critics if they had tried. I'm in public relations for a major corporation and this is not a position you would want to sell to anyone and have any credibility left. Is Banderas so stupid and egotistical that he doesn't see this? Hasn't he noticed? Other major stars have backpeddled away from this role because they don't want to be compared to a multi-award winning performance and face the wrath of anyone who has ever heard the music and the "voice". I just viewed the clips on the website of the Bob Hope Show appearance and the Tony award performance. Even as bad as the quality of the clip was I would rather have a the video of the Crawford's performance than a film of Banderas as the Phantom! |
| Name: josephine
Marsch Website: Referred by: Clicked on our Banner Advertisement From: New Jersey Time: 1999-10-30 14:20:51 Comments: I am a fan of Michael Crawford and saw his performance of the phantom on Broadway in New York City 4 times. Also saw him at MGM in Las Vegas. No one can play the phantom role like him. |
| Name: STACEY R.
HUNT Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: MICHIGAN Time: 1999-10-30 08:39:09 Comments: No-one can do the phantom like Micheal Crawford, NO ONE My sister taped a special on the restoration of the Pantages Theatre in Toronto, and it was done just for this production. Sarah Brightman was also featured. Only they have the power to portray these charactors. |
| Name: R. John Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Time: 1999-10-29 20:07:44 Comments: Please do everything in your power to make sure the casting is perfect.. CRAWFORD AND BRIGHTMAN THERE IS NO ONE ELSE!!!!!!!!! |
| Name: Steve
Hurley Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Baltimore, MD Time: 1999-10-29 13:44:46 Comments: I commend your efforts. I can't believe that Warner Bros. and ALW are so blind. Antonio Banderas just does not have the voice required for POTO. Why are they tinkering with the play? They should keep the original scores, add no additional dialog, no additional scenes, and for Gods sake, cast Michael Crawford and Sarah Brightman as the leads. Anything less will be a failure. |
| Name: Briana
Norris Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Kentucky Time: 1999-10-29 08:03:29 Comments: I am excited about a Phantom of the Opera movie! I will definitely go see it! |
| Name: Dennis
Farmer Website: Referred by: Net Search From: Riverside, California Time: 1999-10-29 04:55:22 Comments: I have long since loved the music and mystery behind the Phantom of the Opera. As most people I believe unless exceptionally done and with the correct casting a Phantom movie would not only "flop" but be a disgrace to the talented stage performer's who have made him come to life. Above all a high quality video version of the stage play would suffice most fans adaquatly and would make a considerable profit. But if a movie is in fact a neccesity or beyond the fans control, of course Michael Crawford should be given first run at the role. Michael Crawford IS the Phantom and though others such as Brad Little or David Gaines have done remarkable jobs in portraying the infomous role, the stage presence, and ambionce that M.C. diplays is increadable and can not be surpassed. |
| Name: Johnny Website: Welcome ... Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Germany/Europe Time: 1999-10-28 13:10:31 Comments: Banderas or others? NO - NO - NO!!! Crawford? YES - YES - YES!!! Why? The original one is best!!! |
| Name: Amy
Schnarrenberger Website: The Stage Door Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Pittsburgh, PA Time: 1999-10-28 09:17:44 Comments: I am in favor of Michael Crawford as Phantom in the new movie!!! |
| Name: Melinda Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: USA Time: 1999-10-28 08:01:13 Comments: Just got done reading the AB interview on the site. Yuk! I rarely get personal with my postings but this guy seems to push all the right buttons. Banderas has now become the Hollywood triple threat: Can't act, can't sing, and now can't direct. I'm not sure what's left, dancing?. His english isn't improving either. I don't usually waste my time watching him in interviews, but I wanted to see if his accent had thinned. He was on Charlie Rose promoting "Crazy in Alabama". Subtitles would have helped. Rose just looked at him and smiled with a blank expression. By his mannerisms, you'd have thought they were interviewing Hitchcock. What an EGO! Why don't they just make a horror picture with AB, take out all the noteworthy music (Oh I'm sorry, that's what they're proposing now) and call it the Phantom in London (I mean Paris) and leave the real Phantom of the Opera alone? Do we really want Hollywood to film this musical? First, I thought they were just being obstinent and overly cautious. But now I realize, they just don't have a clue (which may be even worse). I'm with those who would rather have it videotaped in theater form with MC. Sorry about the tone of this post but,I haven't been around for some time, so pardon the sarcasim and pent-up frustration. |
| Name: Susann
Wedin Website: Referred by: Clicked on a 'Guestbooks by GuestWorld' Button From: Sweden Time: 1999-10-28 03:20:48 Comments: I LOVE the phantom on THE opera!!!! |
| Name: Rhonda Website: Peachieone's Home Page Referred by: From a Friend From: Virginia Time: 1999-10-27 21:37:18 Comments: Thanks for inviting me here. I got your email. I just love Phantom Of The Opera. You have a wonderful page. Keep up the good work. |
| Name: Forest and Debbie Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Nevada Time: 1999-10-27 20:21:17 Comments: We have seen Phantom 4 times. The first, and the best, was with Michael Crawford. After that, it just got worse each time. Given Antonio's mediocre performance in a musical special last month, we just have to say that if he plays the Phantom, we wouldn't even bother to see it, even for free. Michael Crawford is the Phantom. Enough said. |
| Name: Vickie Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: La Mesa, CA Time: 1999-10-27 20:01:16 Comments: I so want to see Mr. Crawford in the movie version as he truly is the only Phantom. Years ago when Mr. Crawford was interviewed by Larry King (I still have it on tape), there was talk then that he would most likely do the movie. I sure hope Hollywood sees the light!!!!!! |
| Name: Sharon and Alice Wylie Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: San Diego, CA Time: 1999-10-27 19:33:53 Comments: Michael Crawford is to "Phantom of the Opera" as Yul Brynner was to "The King and I." Sure, other actors have played the King of Siam, but can anyone name one? (OK, we can too, but you get the drift.) No offense to Antonio Banderas, who was excellent in "Evita," but having any other actor play the Phantom will be a grotesque embarassment to all involved. We've seen some wonderful performances of the Phantom with other actors in that role, but nothing, and we mean NOTHING, compares to Michael Crawford. End of story. |
| Name: Nan Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Montclair, Ca Time: 1999-10-27 18:34:59 Comments: I love Michael! He has to be the Phantom! I cannot believe that they would consider anyone else. Michael, you are very talented and are the only and original Phantom. You are truely wonderful. |
| Name: Alejandra Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Argentina Time: 1999-10-27 15:32:22 Comments: Michael Crawford should definetely play the Phantom. In the Phantom's Original London Cast Recording, he is escellent. His voice is wonderful. |
| Name: Sheila Hall Website: Referred by: Clicked on our Banner Advertisement From: Birmingham, UK Time: 1999-10-27 05:53:34 Comments: Michael Crawford IS the phantom, I can't imagine the role without him |
| Name: Audry Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Time: 1999-10-26 19:34:03 Comments: I believe that Nobody but Michael Crawford can do the part as the Phantom. He IS the Phantom and he always will. I'm behind him being the Phantom 110%! |
| Name: T. Harris Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Montana Time: 1999-10-26 18:45:02 Comments: How could anyone else be the Phantom? Unless, he is physically unable to play the role? I'd also like to see Sarah Brightman there. Are they both interested in being in the movie? |
| Name: Pam Sullivan Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Encinitas, Ca Time: 1999-10-26 16:42:45 Comments: I can't possibly think of any other person playing this role. Michael Crawford is for once and ever the real Phantom. To have anyone else be put on film to be viewed as the phantom for generations to come would be unthinkable. |
| Name: Jen Website: Monkey Pants Luv Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: San Diego CA Time: 1999-10-26 16:18:19 Comments: I LOVE MICHAEL CRAWFORD!! If they cast Antonio Banderas over Michael they have made a very VERY BIG MISTAKE! Antonia Banderas Can't sing in my opinion. I'm a singer and Michael Crawford is my inspiration to succeed in Show Buisness. I love your web site! |
| Name: Sally Crowe Website: Referred by: NewsGroups From: San Diego, CA Time: 1999-10-26 15:14:25 Comments: I've seen "Phantom" twice while it was in LA. I definately vote for Michael Crawford to do the movie! No one else can do it so well, even tho others were good, just not Michael Crawford!!! Keep me posted on the progress. |
| Name: Cynthia Bleich Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Davenport, Ia. Time: 1999-10-26 13:25:26 Comments: Michael Crawford is the only phantom. For those who didn't get to see his amazing performance in the theater, it should be immortalized on film. |
| Name: misha Website: misha's place Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: living in ny Time: 1999-10-26 11:33:44 Comments: great page...keep up the good work...i home michael gets the role...grrr...come visit anytime... |
| Name: LARRY
JENSEN Website: Referred by: AngelFire From: DENMARK, WISCONSIN Time: 1999-10-26 11:28:36 Comments: I AGREE THAT MICHAEL CRAWFORD IS THE ONLY ONE THAT SHOULD PLAY THE PART OF THE PHANTOM. THERE SIMPLY IS NO OTHER CHOICE! |
| Name: Shaun McGuffin Website: Referred by: Net Search From: California Time: 1999-10-26 02:17:30 Comments: I have loved Phantom since High school.. Enough to learn the entire libretto before I ever saw the show. I hope it continues to run and that the quality of it never diminishes. Michael Crawford is the only logical choice for phantom in a movie. Thank you for a great musical Shaun |
| Name: Sara
Springston Website: Honshu Weyr Referred by: From a Friend From: Ft. Worth, Tx. U.S.A. Time: 1999-10-25 20:28:46 Comments: The original was a hit, stick with a know factor! |
| Name: Liesl Taylor Website: Referred by: NewsGroups From: Toowoomba, Australia Time: 1999-10-25 20:04:36 Comments: it would be blasphemous to even consider putting someone other than Michael Crawford in the role as the Phantom. It's not as if he has never done films before, he has the experience, and when it all boils down, Michael Crawford is THE PHANTOM |
| Name: Beverly E.
Martin, Ph.D. Website: Referred by: From a Web Ring From: Brooklyn, New York Time: 1999-10-25 17:00:45 Comments: I totally agree with the premise that Michael Crawford should be in the movie version of 'Phantom of the Opera'. His interpretation of the song 'Music of the Night'is magnificent, and no one can duplicate it. May the powers that be in Hollywood see the light! |
| Name: Lynn
Alexander Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: Wisconsin Time: 1999-10-25 14:26:11 Comments: I just saw the Phantom at the Weidner Center in Green Bay. It was incredible, but yet something seemed to be missing- MICHAEL!!! I hope you are successful in your campaign to get Michael in the movie version. We thank you for your efforts. Bravo! |
| Name: Ellen K Bilotti Website: Referred by: AOL From: Bronx NY Time: 1999-10-25 08:19:19 Comments: I think Michael Crawford has a voice of a angel!!!!Antonio Banderas sounds like a frog.Michael Crawford is the phantom!!!!! |
| Name: Bethanie Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: California Time: 1999-10-24 21:00:51 Comments: While watching the video clip from the 1988 Tony Awards, I was transported back in time to the evening I was priviledged enough to see Michael Crawford perform this role. I once again got chills down my spine, and was spellbound by his artistry. How anyone can even consider making the film version of Phantom of the Opera without Michael Crawford is inconceivable to this music lover. Don't ruin this jewel of a show...let people all over the world know what it's like to be amazed and enraptured by the single most bewitching theater performance of the last part of this century. No one else compares to Michael Crawford. |
| Name: Katrina
Hess Website: Referred by: From a Web Ring From: Abingdon, MD Time: 1999-10-24 19:45:08 Comments: I believe that Micheal Crawford should play the Phantom in the movie becuase he IS the Phantom. He is a wonderful performer and really brings to life this tortured soul. I would refuse to see this film if it were made without him. |
| Name: Rita
Dahlke Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Minneapolis, MN Time: 1999-10-24 18:54:32 Comments: To Warners Bros. & Andrew Lloyd Webber: The recent stories regarding this movie are very sad to read. It breaks my heart to hear talk about taking a lot of the old music out and adding new music and speaking parts. But what really tears my heart out is that after waiting all these years for a chance to see Michael Crawford in the role which made him famous (or did he make the role famous?), you are instead, opting for a movie "actor". What a sell-out! This is not about artistic integrity. If it was, you would still be sticking with Crawford, who is the true artist. This is just another so-called pretty face gracing the cover of a magazine. Unfortunately for this movie, the face will be covered with a mask. And all the re-written music in the world will not save it at the box office. |
| Name: Nicole Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Ohio Time: 1999-10-24 17:42:51 Comments: I read the Recent News Section before I signed the guest book and I think I actually felt my heartbreak with the realization that seeing your video clip of the 1988 Tony's will probably be as close as I will ever come to seeing Michael Crawford in The Phantom of the Opera. Sir Andrew Lloyd Webber- You have disappointed your fans greatly with all these rumors that you have neither confirmed nor denied. What you fails to realize is that we are not eager to forgive and forget when we are discussing this masterpiece. You have lost great amounts of respect in my eyes by thinking that we would be so quick to cater to Antonio Banderas simply because of his Hollywood stardom and "good looks". Frankly, Sir Andrew Lloyd Webber, you have dug yourself a hole that you may never recover from. Casting Michael Crawford is the obvious choice, but you are not realizing that. Do you fail to realize that we, the movie and theatre going audience, would settle for second rate simply because this is such a highly anticipated movie? We anticipated this movie because it was quoted BY YOU that Michael Crawford would immortalize the role. And also because the unforgettable music would accompany Michael Crawford's sensuous voice. If recent reports hold true, then that is also untrue. Your masterpiece is quickly getting torn to shreds. Only you have the power to save it, but you are obviously getting false promises that Antonio Banderas will make you the big money. Well, they are not taking into account that the money will come from us. We are the audience you want in those seats. And those seats will be empty unless Michael Crawford is cast as The Phantom! |
| Name: Allen
W. Brickhaus Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Time: 1999-10-24 17:19:46 Comments: Oh, please allow this to happen. |
| Name: Meghan Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: U.S.A. Time: 1999-10-24 13:03:43 Comments: First off when I heard that A.L.W was making a Phantom movie I was thrilled at the thought of having a masterpice that I could own on video. Then I read that Bandaras was going to be Phantom. At FIRST I thought that it wouldn't be that terrible, it was like any Phantom movie is better than none. I was watching PBS presents Happy 50 Birthday A.L.W! I heard Bandaras sing. It acuttuly hurt my ears.(This isn't a joke) The boys at my high school choir could sing better than he did. He doesn't have the air, age or acting ability to prefome Phantom better than what a high schooler could. Crawford is Erik, there reallyisn't any other. What did he do that got him brushed away from a wonderful role that was already his? |
| Name: Deanie Website: Referred by: From a Web Ring From: New York, New York Time: 1999-10-24 10:06:33 Comments: If your Recent News is true, according to the Miami Herald article, then perhaps Jenna Elfman is available to play Christine? I know she's a Lucy Ball wannabe and would be a perfect casting choice for Antonio "Ricky Ricardo" Banderas' Erik. Sorry, I'm so upset and this is not funny at all. I get this way at funerals too. Good luck on your campaign, and count me in to boycott the movie. Deanie |
| Name: Suzanne Website: Bopeep Referred by: From a Friend From: Yorkshire UK Time: 1999-10-24 01:54:12 Comments: Sorry I was to late to vote but have been off line for two months. This is my first visit to this page but I will now be returning often. Sue |
| Name: Niles
McClannough Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Edinburgh, Scotland, UK Time: 1999-10-23 21:50:20 Comments: I sign this after hearing an appeal from a dear friend of mine telling me about how Hollywood plans to ruin The Phantom of the Opera. I was a bit unsure at first, but took her advice and checked this site out. Sure enough, she did not exaggerate it at all. I am appalled that Sir Andrew Lloyd Webber would sell his soul to the Devils of Hollywood by casting anyone other than Michael Crawford as The Phantom. Truly his word is not worth anything anymore. He has lost my respect and I was once a fan and went to see all his works in London or New York when I found myself there. He expects a *big name* in Hollywood to get him the *big money* that he is so hungry for. He has forgotten that the constant sell outs to see The Phantom of the Opera demand that Michael Crawford be THE PHANTOM! Truly, Sir Andrew Lloyd Webber, you think us to be naive little pawns, if you expect us to see this movie just because your name along with Mr. Banderas appears in the headlines. I once held you in high esteem, but I no longer do. As if allowing Antonio Banderas to sing the part of the Phantom is not raping your piece of enough dignity, you are now allowing music to be taken out! HAVE YOU NO RESPECT FOR THE FANS OF THIS PRODUCTION? Do not try and save your soul now! You have thought wrong if you think that casting Sarah will save it! We, as the movie going audience, are not to be toyed with! We pay to see the production and you have crossed the line. This will never be a success without Michael Crawford as The Phantom. Save yourself the humiliation. If not Michael, then NO MOVIE! |
| Name: Jeanna
Hicks Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: TN Time: 1999-10-23 21:25:50 Comments: I just read the recent news and am shocked! In the intereview with Antonio Banderas, he said that ALW and the director were "changing some of the music'? The music is a vital part of the Phantom! Look at other Broadway musicals adapted for the big screen...the music remained intact. Also, no one can be the Phantom besides Michael Crawford! Banderas can't even sing, I cring at the thoughts of him singing "Music of the Night" ! Please, whoever is in charge of these decisions, reconsider and leave TPOTO intact! |
| Name: {Miss}
Jaime Dawn Crawford. Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Australia. Time: 1999-10-23 19:44:03 Comments: Sunday, October 24, 1999. SO,.....IT IS TO BE WAR BETWEEN US! IF MR. MICHAEL CRAWFORD IS NOT CAST AS THE PHANTOM, A DISASTER BEYOND YOUR IMAGINATION WILL OCCUR. YOUR OBEDIENT SERVANT, O.G. There can be NO OTHER man to play THE PHANTOM but "THE PHANTOM" himself, MR. MICHAEL PATRICK CRAWFORD. It goes without saying---IT'S MICHAEL CRAWFORD, or it's nobody. If you go ahead with any other man to portray The Phantom, you will have a video/silver screen production that will NOT be purchased OR viewed by the public majority, because THE {video} PRODUCTION WITHOUT MICHAEL CRAWFORD WILL NOT BE WORTH HAVING. PLEASE, take it from me, ONE OF A MULTITUDE OF MANY, MANY, MANY THOUSANDS;- MICHAEL CRAWFORD, MICHAEL CRAWFORD, MICHAEL CRAWFORD, MICHAEL CRAWFORD, MICHAEL CRAWFORD, MICHAEL CRAWFORD, MICHAEL CRAWFORD, MICHAEL CRAWFORD. Thank you, Jaime Crawford. jaime@picknowl.com.au |
| Name: Barbara Website: Referred by: Signing another Guestbook From: Chicago Time: 1999-10-23 14:54:15 Comments: I don't know where to begin in explaining how much joy "The Phantom of the Opera" has brought to me over the past few years. As much as I have longed for a movie to be made I would rather they didn't make it if Michael Crawford is not going to be in it. I guess I don't understand the big wigs in Hollywood and why they would want to change something that is perfect. I for one will not go to see a movie unless Michael Crawford is the Phantom. |
| Name: George
Kelsey Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Time: 1999-10-23 11:20:04 Comments: Michael can NEVER be outclassed in the role of the phantom, especially by somebody like Antonio Banderas. Antonio just doesn't have a good singing voice, pardon me but Antonio sucks! Michael is the one and only person who can handle the role of the Phantom well! Sincerely, George Kelsey |
| Name: Giulie
St-Laurent Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Montreal, Canada Time: 1999-10-23 09:13:21 Comments: Michael was the first and will always be the best Phantom. Others were ok (I've seen at least two others) but Michael is IT! If they want the best for their movie, they should not look any further. Hello to all MCIFA members, hang in there, we make a difference. |
| Name: Marilynn Gardo Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Atlanta, GA USA Time: 1999-10-23 04:20:19 Comments: Dear Sir: Put the mask on the man and the communication of the Phantom then depends on gestures, movements of the body, and the voice. Therefore, the actor assuming the role of the Phantom, has to be intimately acquainted with the character in order to know how and why a particular movement or voice inflection is carried out and is necessary for the audience to feel the Phantom's emotion and believe in his existance. Only one man is intimately acquainted with the Phantom and knows why Erik moves and speaks in a particular manner. Only one man has the voice which can communicate the deep anguish, power, and gentleness which Erik exhibits and feels. Only one man can sing the demanding vocal arrangements which make POTO so artistically beautiful. Only one man is able to be so transformed into the Phantom, that as he sings the musical numbers they become an emotional dialog between the other characters and the audience. Only one man turns a performance into an experience which transports the audience to another time and place and leaves no individual unmoved or unaffected. Only one man will draw audiences to see the movie because of his amazing talent and because his name is synonymous with the role in which millions of people fell in love. Those who will go to see the movie, are those who saw the original stage production with the one man who will make the movie as much of a success as the stage production. That one man is MICHAEL CRAWFORD. No substitutes will be accepted. Thank you, Marilynn Gardo |
| Name: Madelyn
Sheets Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: San Diego, CA Time: 1999-10-22 18:05:02 Comments: Sir Andrew, The show MUST go on! The only real phantom is none other than Michael Crawford. He IS the phantom, elegant, complex, emotional. What next...Garth Brooks? Come to your senses, man and just get on with it. He and Sarah are truly that match made in heaven. Their voices, chemistry and sensitivities to the roles are unsurpassed. |
| Name: Richard Hart Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Cleveland, Ohio Time: 1999-10-22 16:49:27 Comments: Lord Lloyd-Webber should NOT cast anyone other than Michael Crawford in the cinematic role of the Phantom. No other voice or performer would ever do the role the justice it would deserve. The Phantom of the Opera is without a doubt the Crown Jewel in Lord Lloyd-Webbers career. To cast a name to possibly improve box office success would be the epitome of a career sell-out. It was difficult enough to survive Madonnas feeble attempt to play Evita, please do not subject the populace to such another embarrassment. Michael Crawford is indeed a name and well known, contrary to what certain critics may say. |
| Name: Mindy Website: Referred by: Clicked on a 'Guestbooks by GuestWorld' Button From: born in chicago but grew up in tx Time: 1999-10-22 16:03:30 Comments: antonio bandaras was good in evita but his accent clearly gets in the way of his performance of phantom. He is from argentina and everyone knows that Erik is from england and later moved to France while running away. it is very much so out of character. Michael Crawford has a voice that is lulling and soothing and soft. It is the hypnotizing voice that definately goes with the phantom. the audience watching could see how Christine would be following him behind the mirror becase they themselves will be in a small trance from his magestic voice. antonios voice is harder and sounds forced so if anyone who is actually making the movie is reading this, put micheal crawford in the role or else all of those phantom obsessed people out their ( which i am) will be very upset and will gaze in hatred at the movie screen because the man they dislike is playing the role they love. Also sarah brightman has to be Christine. Dale christian sounds like a chipmunk and she doesn't move her lips. |
| Name: Rachel
Nesser Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: New Jersey Time: 1999-10-22 13:21:42 Comments: To Andrew Lloyd Webber and Warner Bros., My Biology prof. in college gave this story to us in class. It's a true story, and while it may seem funny and may appear to have nothing to do with the Phantom movie, I'm using it as an analogy/symbolic situation of what would happen to the Phantom movie if you cast Antonio Banderas as the Phantom: "The Farside comes to life in Oregon. I am absolutely not making this incident up; in fact, I have it all on videotape. The tape is from a local TV news show in Oregon, which sent a reporter out to cover the removal of a 45-foot, 8-ton dead whale that washed up on the beach. The responsibility for getting rid of the carcass was placed on the Oregon State Highway Division, apparently on the theory that highways and whales are very similar in the sense of being large objects. So the highway engineers hit upon a plan- remember, I am not making this up- of blowing up the whale with dynamite. The thinking is that the whale would be blown into small pieces, which would be eaten by seagulls, and that would be that. A textbook whale removal. So they moved the spectators back up the beach, put a half ton of dynamite next to the whale and set it off. I am probably not guilty of understatement when I say that what follows, on the videotape, is the most wonderful event in the history of the universe. First you see the whale carcass disappear in a huge blast of smoke and flame. Then you hear the happy spectators shouting 'Yay!' and 'Whee!' Then, suddenly, the crowd's tone changes. You hear a new sound like 'splud.' You hear a woman's voice shouting 'Here come pieces of....MY GOD!' Something smears the camera lens. Later, the reporter explains: 'The humor of the entire situation suddenly gave way to a run for survival as huge chunks of whale blubber fell everywhere.' One piece caved in the roof of a car parked more than a quarter of a mile away. Remaining on the beach were several rotting whale sectors the size of condominium units. There was no sign of the seagulls who had no doubt permanently relocated to Brazil." Now, here's my version of this story as it relates to the Phantom movie: "The Farside comes to life in Hollywood. I am absolutely not making this incident up; in fact it's on film. It's the film version of Andrew Lloyd Webber's largely successful, hugely popular musical, The Phantom of the Opera. The responsibility for making this movie musical was placed on Warner Bros. studios and Lloyd Webber, apparently on the theory that Webber and a Hollywood studio would be the right team to make this musical into a successful movie. So Webber and Warner Bros. hit upon a plan- remember, I am not making this up- of casting Antonio Banderas as the Phantom. The thinking is that Banderas, as a Hollywood name, would be a big box office draw in the film, which would be accepted by the general public (especially Michael Crawford/Phantom fans), and that would be that. A textbook casting decision. So they altered the musical to suit a Hollywood actor in a Hollywood movie, put Banderas in the role of the Phantom, and released the movie into theaters. I am probably not guilty of understatement when I say that the film is the most horrible, disgraceful movie musical in the history of the universe. First, you see Banderas's lame attempt to portray the Phantom on screen. Then you hear the happy Webber, Banderas, Warner Bros., and Hollywood shouting 'Yay!' and 'Whee!' Then, suddenly, their tone changes. You hear a new sound like 'splud.' You hear the audiences' shouting 'Here come pieces of....MY GOD!' Later, a movie critic explains: 'The humor of the entire situation suddenly gave way to a mad dash out of the theaters as the movie bombed and huge chunks of it fell everywhere.' Remaining in Hollywood were several huge rotting pieces of the movie. There was no sign of the audiences who had no doubt permanently boycotted Webber's musicals, Banderas's films, and Warner Bros. films." Are you getting the symbolism here? Are you making the connection? The blown-up whale incident was, as my prof. said, "A perfectly organized piece of stupidity." Well, if you don't cast Michael Crawford as the Phantom in this movie, and insist on ruining it by casting Banderas as the Phantom, the film will end up being a perfectly organized piece of stupidity, not to mention a huge bomb, and the rotting chunks of the movie will fall down on top of you! You're ignoring us Phantom and Michael Crawford fans just like the highway engineers ignored the force of gravity when they blew up the whale. You think we'll accept an altered Phantom movie with Banderas as the Phantom just like the engineers thought the seagulls would accept and eat the chunks of whale. If this analogy isn't clear enough for you, then you're as brainless as those highway engineers! Please, have the brains to cast Michael Crawford as the Phantom in this film! Think about it! |
| Name: Brian Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Time: 1999-10-22 10:24:43 Comments: To Warner Bros. Studios: I would remind you of the folly your studio committed when dealing with the filming of another hugely popular musical, My Fair Lady. Jack Warner decided against casting Julie Andrews simply because he felt she wasn't a "name" and wouldn't bring people in to see the movie. This poor way of thinking was certainly proved wrong when Miss Andrews came to Hollywood anyway to make Mary Poppins and The Sound of Music, both of which were much more popular at the box office than the My Fair Lady film turned out to be. Don't make the same mistake again! Trust the way in which audiences the world over have taken Michael Crawford's performance to their hearts! Whether a film has a "movie star" in it or not, if it is not a good film it fails; a good film with no "movie star" finds its audience and succeeds! Please remember this and make the choice that will lead to a good and successful film. And while you're at it- I would love to see Ruthie Henshall play Christine. I think she would be lovely and wonderful. At any rate, please don't cast someone whose voice is dubbed; so much of Christine's character is contained in her singing that having a dubbed performance would be almost pointless. |
| Name: carol a.
letendre Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Westport, MA Time: 1999-10-22 10:21:34 Comments: I would love to see Michael Crawford do Phantom in the movies. There is and never will be anyone else who can play the role of Phantom like Michael Crawford. He has one of the most incredible voices and was just meant for that role. I was not fortunate enough to see him portray the Phantom on stage, but listen to the CD all the time! I never get tired of hearing his voice. Good luck with the campaign. If I can help, let me know. |
| Name: George Kelsey Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Salt Lake City Time: 1999-10-22 10:03:25 Comments: Michael Crawford is the one and only Phantom of the Opera! |
| Name: SOL SCOTT Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: FLORIDA Time: 1999-10-22 08:30:43 Comments: ONLY MICHAEL CRAWFORD CAN PORTRAY THE TRUE PHANTOM! |
| Name: Pam Ralph Website: The Official Tom Hewitt Page Referred by: NewsGroups From: Butte, MT Time: 1999-10-22 04:52:26 Comments: As far as I am concerned this is NO OTHER PHANTOM than Michael Crawford. I wouldn't bother even seeing the movie without him. As far as Antonio is concerned he can't sing, and he doesn't have the spark that Michael does. Pam |
| Name: Chloe Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Ohio Time: 1999-10-21 17:03:48 Comments: Don't change the music. Don't change the scenes. Give me Michael Crawford as the Phantom. I don't think I'm asking for too much. The show is a hit everywhere! So, why change it to something else when making it into a movie? People want the movie to be the same as the musical/opera. I don't know why that's hard for Mr. Lloyd Webber or anyone else involved in bringing this about to understand. I WILL NOT see this movie if they make the changes I have read about, and I hope I can say that neither will most Phantom fans. |
| Name: TMCPMC Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: The Michael Crawford Phantom Movie Page Time: 1999-10-21 17:00:57 Comments: Welcome to our 28th Guestbook. Our thanks to all who sign this book in support of Michael Crawford to star as the Phantom in the upcoming film version of "The Phantom of the Opera." TMCPMC |