Total: 2130 Guests
| Name: Nancy Larson Website: Referred by: Net Search From: Concord, CA Time: 1999-07-09 20:13:20 Comments: Your great interview ran in our local paper, the Contra Costa Times, and I wanted to add my appreciation and support to your campaign. "Phantom of the Opera" is my favorite show and the thought of anyone other than Michael Crawford playing the lead is just appalling and unthinkable. I have seen the play twice in San Francisco and each time wished that Michael Crawford was in the lead. I saw his concert in our area last summer and thought he was fantastic. Please keep up your great work and I hope you succeed. |
| Name: Bob Duren Website: Referred by: NewsGroups From: Metairie, LATime: 1999-07-09 13:03:45 Comments: What an outstanding cause for such a remarkable entertainer!With all due respect to Mr. Antonio Banderas, how could anyone who's witnessed Mr. Crawford's performances consider any other for this role? It's so refreshing to see the stand you guys have made and your support for Mr. Michael Crawford. He's so fortunate to have fans such as you. Thank you for allowing me to offer my support. |
| Name: Linda Montana Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Pittsburgh PA Time: 1999-07-09 12:46:19 Comments: Why anyone would listen to the "paying" public has yet to be discovered by studio executives - but there is always hope. I heard Bandaros sing the Phantom and he was so awful - even worse than I had anticipated. Someone other than Michael Crawford playing the Phantom is as unthinkable as anyone other than Yul Brynner playing the King of Siam. If anyone is listening, please, please cast Michael Crawford in the film of the Phatom so all future generations can enjoy him as much as we have. |
| Name: Theresa
Gassler Website: Referred by: NewsGroups From: Time: 1999-07-09 23:20:56 Comments: Hello!!! My mom and I fully believe that the only Phantom should be Michael Crawford. It would be a crime not to cast him in the movie version. He is the Phantom. I cannot see anyone else in the role but him. This is my opinion for whatever it is worth to the studio heads and Andrew Lloyd Webber. It will not deter me from going to see the stage production however. Thank you for listening. |
| Name: Susan Website: Referred by: Lycos From: Louisiana Time: 1999-07-09 21:05:51 Comments: Michael Crawford IS the Phantom! The ONLY Phantom! |
| Name: John
Nicolson Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Time: 1999-07-09 20:27:34 Comments: Count me as one of the Michael Crawford fans who wish him to play the Phantom in the movie version. John Nicolson. |
| Name: Marianthe
Pepis Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Time: 1999-07-09 20:21:50 Comments: Michael Crawford was, is and always will be the Phantom. It will be a travesty if Antonio Banderas is cast in the role. This is not meant to discredit his talent as an actor, but not for this role. I watched his "audition' for the role. NO WAY! If they want this movie to be a box office smash, Michael is ONLY LOGICAL CHOICE. |
| Name: Karen Degenhardt Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Virginia Beach, VA Time: 1999-07-09 16:27:57 Comments: "How did you find us?" does not allow for news articles as a source. I discovered your mission in an article in the local newspaper. Wholeheartedly agree that the one person capable of doing the title role justice is the one and only Michael Crawford. |
| Name: Erma Gamble Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: New Orleans, La. Time: 1999-07-09 15:50:47 Comments: Michael Crawford is the only person who could possibly do justice to a movie version of the Phantom. He is the best. |
| Name: Iris M.
Hageney Website: Referred by: NewsGroups From: New Orleans, LA Time: 1999-07-09 14:32:55 Comments: I agree, Michael Crawford is the only choice to play the title role in the movie version of the Phantom! |
| Name: Erica Young Website: Referred by: Net Search From: Nazareth, PA Time: 1999-07-09 14:12:15 Comments: I have been a "Phantom of the Opera fan" since I was in sixth grade. I am now going into ninth grade(my first year of high School). I have been playing the piano since I was seven and a half years old.There is an ensemble in our Middle School ,which I have played the piano for during my 6th, 7th, and 8th grades. On my eight grade year, in the Wind Gap Middle School, one of the songe we had to learn for our competition, which was in Hershey Park, was the Phantom of the opera medley and it was beautiful. We won superior which was the highest rating anyone could get and I won outstanding accompanist for the second year in a row. I plan on going to see the play on Broadway, in New York, when I get older. Thank you for being my inspiration!!!! |
| Name: Cristina Website: Referred by: NewsGroups From: Utah Time: 1999-07-09 12:44:00 Comments: How can you even think of putting Banderas or Travolta in as Phantom? They're great singers, yes, but as Phantom?!? I don't think so! Michael Crawford IS the Phantom. I've seen it twice and loved it, but unfortunately not with Michael. So what if he's 57? I think that if he wants to do it, and feels up to it, great! Can you imagine if you were the original lead in a play, WB decided to make a movie of it, but decided to cast someone else? Wouldn't that make you mad? Part of the reason Michael was chosen in the first place was because he had (and still has) a very hypnotising voice, amazing agility, that enables him to be lowered in the proscenium (the angel piece), etc. If you want a great box office opening, and continuation for that matter, choose Michael Crawford. Michael Crawford is the best, and the wisest choice. Don't miss out on this opportunity!! |
| Name: Margaret Ann
Hebert Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Montegut,Louisiana 70377 Time: 1999-07-09 11:06:39 Comments: I cannot see any one else as the Phantom.I have seen the show twice at the Sanger Theater in New Orleans. If a movie were to be made there is no one else to play the phantom except Michael Crawford. The phantom is supposed to be an older man, not a young punk. Please add my name to the list of people who support him. mah56 |
| Name: Donna
Leiter Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Rock Hill,SC Time: 1999-07-09 07:22:57 Comments: I certainly in support of Michael Crawford in reprising his role as the Phantom in a movie version of the broadway musical. Hopefully, ALW and all of the Warners exec will come to their senses before the entire cast is on Medicare! |
| Name: Gail
Edwards Website: Referred by: NewsGroups From: Burlington, Ontario, Canada Time: 1999-07-09 06:28:01 Comments: Wonderful to hear about this Website and the good work being done to get Michael Crawford to play in the Movie. I agree he should be the star and not Antonio Banderas. I heard Antonio singing on Andrew Lloyd Webber's 50th Birthday Bash and he doesn't even come close to Michael Crawford's singing. We definitely NEED Michael to make the movie a great picture. Keep up the good work. |
| Name: Marla Schwartz Website: none-yet Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Northridge, CA Time: 1999-07-08 23:14:44 Comments: First of all, I am absolutely outraged at the fact that they would consider anyone other than Micheal Crawford for the role of the Phantom. His name is synonomous with the Phantom. I have asked many people if they knew him, and they always say, "isn't he the phantom?"I have seen the Phantom of the Opera at least ten times, unfortunatley, none have been with Micheal. I did have the pleasure of seeing him live at the Hollywood Bowl, and was lucky enough to hear hime sing some songs from Phantom. I was moved to tears. I ahve all of his CD's (mainly Micheal Crawford sings AlW songs). His voice is truly moving, no matter what he is singing. Don't get me wrong, I love Antonio Banderas and hav seen many of his films, including Evita. His performance was very good, but his singing is no Phantom. There are thousands and thousands of people like me who have never seen Phantom with Michael, and for us, it would be like a dream come true. There are a great many of us who own the soundtrack, and I fell immediately in love with him. I can gurantee that if the movie is released with Micheal as the Phantom, it will bring more in more money than Antontio. Sure, he is a big box-office name, but when coming to the role of the Phantom, Michael, will bring in a considerable amount more!!!. If MLW wants to see how people would react, he should create a voters web-site and survery. Then he would see how many people would love to see Micheal as the Phantom. Thank you so much for your website. |
| Name: Melanie Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: California Time: 1999-07-08 14:43:00 Comments: Although I don't believe that Travolta or Banderas "can't sing a note" or lack the ability to persu this role, I do believe that Michael Crawford should get the role. This has nothing to do with that " verble contract" that Lloyd Webber supposably made with Crawford. It's simply that Crawford has more experience in the role and his vocal talents are UNBELIEVABLE! CRAWFORD IS THE BEST MAN FOR THE ROLE, NO QUESTIONS ASKED! MICHAEL CRAWFORD is the big name with ALL Phantom "phans". HE'S the one that most people want to see. |
| Name: Jenny Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: Salt Lake City, Utah Time: 1999-07-08 14:16:15 Comments: I was lucky enough to be in Michael's backup choir on his tour last year. He is an amazing performer and it was thrilling to hear him sing his "Phantom" numbers live. As much as I admire Banderas' singing and acting abilities in "Evita", he will not be able to satisfy the true fans of Michael's Phantom. I fully support the awesome cause to have Michael star on the big screen. |
| Name: Ashley
Tallyn Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: idaho Time: 1999-07-08 10:36:35 Comments: If the movie is to be a successful musical, than Micheal Crawford will have to play phantom, i can't believe they would even consider someone else!!! |
| Name: Maggie Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Owensboro, KY Time: 1999-07-08 10:18:26 Comments: To Andrew Lloyd Webber, Michael Kuhn and Warner Bros.: Let me comment one more time on the Michael Crawford vs. Antonio Banderas issue. This concerns my feelings about substitutes. The only time I was able to see "Phantom of the Opera" was in a road show performance. I'd never heard of the actor who was advertised as the lead but assumed he would be highly talented. I entered the theater with the music from the original cast recording in my head, and although I didn't expect Michael Crawford quality, I was sure I would hear an adequate substitute. Was I ever wrong! The advertised lead didn't do Sunday matinees, so I heard a second-rate sub who might have been adequate for a high school production but certainly not for something I had paid almost $60 to see. The guy was a wooden actor, and he couldn't hit the high notes. His range was so limited the music had been adapted to accommodate his inadequacies. What a joke! I was so angry I was tempted to demand my money back. TAKE WARNING MOVIE MAKERS! The voice of Michael Crawford has been in the minds of millions of "Phantom" fans for 13 years. This is the only voice that comes to mind for most of us when we think of "Phantom." When the movie is made, we want to hear those incredibly pure high notes that hang in the air like crystal clear raindrops, the powerful resonance of the low notes, the voice that whispers seductively and hisses with menace. We also want to hear the perfectly crisp diction that makes every word of the lyrics understandable, not to mention the amazing acting ability that suffuses every word and every note with intense emotion. In short, we want Michael Crawford, not a substitute. I was cheated once. I will not be taken in a second time. You'll never see a penny of my money unless I get the real thing...the real Phantom...MICHAEL CRAWFORD!! |
| Name: Debbie
Theodore Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Pleasanton California Time: 1999-07-08 01:37:40 Comments: This would be the perfect opportunity to take the depths of talent, in acting, voice and projection to the big screen with the true talent that Michael Crawford exudes. I just hope that Hollywood takes the chance to expose the talents, rather than exploit the role, by having a box office draw, step in to the shoes of a true master of stage, and theater.........to bring this to many who cannot afford the $85.00 tickets, will open more doors, and open more eyes to what a well written, musical is really about. I hope the person who hires for this movie, auditions, and chooses the real Phantom of the Opera..... Michael Crawford. |
| Name: steve
asay Website: Referred by: NewsGroups From: Salt Lake City, Utah Time: 1999-07-07 21:20:10 Comments: We were never able to see Michael perform as the Phantom in the theatre. The closest we came was to attend one of his concerts in the area. That is not the same. He still has the voice and the talent to portray the Phantom. Yes, having someone else play the role would still be good box office, but it would not be the Phantom that millions of us would pay to see again and again and again and again. Please, you can have my money once to see Phantom, or you can have it many times to see Michael as the Phantom. |
| Name: Gale Gousha Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Upland, California Time: 1999-07-07 20:51:21 Comments: Michael Crawford IS The Phantom! |
| Name: Paul Murray Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: LaQuinta, CA 92253 Time: 1999-07-07 15:52:49 Comments: Michael Crawford IS the Phantom. I would not be interested in seeing the movie if he is not cast in that role. Or as others have said, if he is not the Phantom, Box 5 will not be the only seat that is vacant. Paul Murray |
| Name: John Birkland Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: IA Time: 1999-07-07 15:26:39 Comments: This is a really great page. |
| Name: Isis Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: utah Time: 1999-07-07 14:37:33 Comments: I'm in total agreement with everyone in having michael crawford as being phantom in the movie. it only makes perfect sense. some people feel that making a phantom movie is wrong. But i'm only 15 and i just saw the play for the first time this summer and I wished I could go back, unfortunatly it didn't have crawford as the phantom. If lloyd webber wants to have the movie ruined by having antonio banderas as the phantom, by all means I say he can do it. |
| Name: Judy Kelly Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: S. CA Time: 1999-07-07 13:15:44 Comments: Having seen Michael Crawford as the Phantom seven times in L.A., and Davis Gaines once, I cannot imagine anyone BUT Michael playing the Phantom in the movie! He was sensual beyond belief, as well as having a magnificent voice! As good looking and talented as Antonio Banderos is, he SHOULD NOT be in the movie! We want Michael!! |
| Name: Nancy Rogers Website: Referred by: Clicked on our Banner Advertisement From: Santa Monica, California Time: 1999-07-07 12:59:49 Comments: I can't imagine anyone else playing the Phantom. I have seen it three times with Michael and once with someone else. There was absolutely no comparison. I would not go to see the Phantom of the Opera if Michael were not in it. |
| Name: Mona
Davidson-Murray Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: LaQuinta, CA (near Palm Springs) Time: 1999-07-07 12:59:16 Comments: I think it would be a travesty to have anyone other than Michael Crawford star as the Phantom. Please, please, do not consider anyone else, especially Antonio Banderas. I heard him on the 50th Birthday Party Special for Sir Lloyd-Webber on PBS and whereas, he was quite good in Evita, I was decidedly underwhelmed with his performance. I have seen the musical, and would dearly love to see it as a movie, but I do not believe I would bother if anyone other than Michael Crawford were the Phantom. Mona Davidson-Murray |
| Name: Isobel Barnard Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Perth Time: 1999-07-07 06:51:32 Comments: I love the power of music in Michael Crawford's voice. I have heaps of his CDs, including Phantom of the Opera, and I saw him in his concert. If Michael can play the Phantom on Broadway, then he can play it in the movie. I will only see the Phantom movie if Michael Crawford is the Phantom. |
| Name: Julie Kearns Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: West Covina, California Time: 1999-07-06 21:14:11 Comments: A Plea to Andrew Lloyd Webber and the Powers That Be for the Phantom of the Opera Movie: PLEASE, PLEASE LET THE PHANTOM BE MICHAEL CRAWFORD. GET YOUR BOX OFFICE DRAWS WITH CHRISTINE AND RAOUL, BUT MICHAEL CRAWFORD ABSOLUTELY HAS TO BE THE PHANTOM. HE IS THE PHANT0M. WHY WOULDN'T YOU WANT THE BEST??? ANTONIO BANDERAS MAY BE A GOOD SINGER AND MAY BE SOMEWHAT OF A BOX OFFICE DRAW, BUT HE CANNOT POSSIBLY BE THE PHANTOM. HIS CASTING AS THE PHANTOM WOULD ACTUALLY TURN ME AWAY FROM SEEING THE MOVIE!!! THANKS FOR THE CONSIDERATION. |
| Name: Bob Hunter Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Va. Beach, VA Time: 1999-07-06 19:49:39 Comments: I did not find this site by "Just Surfed On In". Instead there was a lengthy article in our locsl paper, The Virginian -Pilot which carried a story about the motion picture deal. I saw the "Phantom of the Opera here in Norfolk, Va. a couple of years ago. The lead singer was no Michael Crawford but the show was great. A movie without Mr. crawford playing the Phantom would not be a smash, that's for sure. Lets hope Hollywood rises to the occasion and heeds our wishes to select Mr. Crawford to play the lead role. By the way, the Virginian - Pilot gave the web site as |
| Name: Kathy
Allen Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Virginia Beach, VA Time: 1999-07-06 18:41:27 Comments: Our local newspaper just ran a HUGE article on "Supporters of original Phantom keep him in the spotlight" We have heard the rumors about Antonio Banderas playing the part of the Phantom. I was really disapointed in it! I would never go see the Phantom movie without Michael Crawford playing the lead. Michael Crawford IS the Phantom! He is so wonderful and his voice is amazing. If Warner Bros. doesn't cast Michael Crawford as the Phantom, then they might as well not even make the movie. Anyone who knows the Musical, The Phantom of the Opera, also knows that there is no one better than Michael Crawford to play the Phantom. Thank you for making this web site. I hope that the big wigs at Warner Bros. listen to what the fans want. |
| Name: Corinne Website: Goewyn Referred by: AOL From: California Time: 1999-07-06 18:20:39 Comments: All there is to say really is that Michael Crawford is the obvious choice for the role of the Phantom. His skill level as a performer is such that he is able to draw the audience into experiencing every slight change of emotion. If there is to be a Phantom movie, let the performer who originated the title role and put part of himself into it be cast. I cannot think of a better choice for the Phantom, and I sincerely hope that you will choose to cast the man who has already brought so much to this musical. |
| Name: Ana Daniels Website: n/a Referred by: From a Friend From: Virginia Time: 1999-07-06 16:47:02 Comments: I believe that it is not only his right as being the original as well as the BEST Phantom, to be casted for the part in the upcoming movie. Antonio Banderas is a well acted person, but the part does not suit him or his abilities. The Phantom, in the Phantom of the Opera, is a strong part that requires someone who knows the part inside and out, and Michael Crawford does. |
| Name: D. Higgins Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Virginia Beach, Virginia Time: 1999-07-06 12:56:59 Comments: Robert W. Weylkos' article was printed in our local paper today (7/6/99 Virginian Pilot) and your web address was published. I would like to go on record that I WILL DEFINITELY BOYCOTT THE MOVIE VERSION OF THE PHANTOM OF THE OPERA IF MICHAEL CRAWFORD IS NOT CAST IN THE TITLE ROLE. Has anyone contacted Rosie O'Donnell ??? This sounds like something she can support.....Michael Crawford is the Phantom, All the others are just pretty faces. GOOD LUCK AND I HOPE YOU WIN, otherwise I smell an expensive BOMB. Yeh, pass THAT on to the Hollywood Boys. Let me know what I can do to help your cause!!!!!!!!!!! |
| Name: SummrNites Website: n/a Referred by: NewsGroups From: East coast Time: 1999-07-06 12:36:59 Comments: I've heard news about the Phantom of the Opera movie for a while now...and i just recently read a newpaper article about John Travolta turning down the role as Phantom |
| Name: Jo Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Utah Time: 1999-07-06 10:33:21 Comments: I think and know that Michael Crawford has been and is the best phantom, just look at him and his character. The way that he presents himself as the phantom, how he expresses himself through the music, just a quote of what he says while he is the phantom "Let the dream begin, let your darker side give in to the power of the music that I write..." Michael Crawford is the only true phatom. |
| Name: Charles &
Norma Deyo Website: Referred by: NewsGroups From: Hollywood, Florida Time: 1999-07-06 09:38:02 Comments: We did not see Phantom of the Opera but our local Public Television Station had an hour of his singing songs from the Phantom....Michael Crawford's singing was out of this world and we would never ever consider seeing Antonio Bandares in the part...no way..who the heck is Antonio compared to the best and only one, Michael Crawford should play the part and there should be no ifs, ands or buts....Norma & Charles Deyo |
| Name: Sandra L.
Cahill Website: Referred by: NewsGroups From: Pompano Beach, FL Time: 1999-07-06 09:18:03 Comments: It is unthinkable to me that anyone could be the Phantom but Michael Crawford..I did not see him in the production, another actor did a great job, but Michael IS the phantom. Antonio? Ugh! I recently saw the 50th birthday party for Andrew, and what a slight, not to have Michael on the show! Is there an address that I can directly reply to ALW? There was an article in today's Miami Herald, and I got this address...I will NOT see the film unless Michael stars! I saw Michael in concert at the Coral Sky theatre (outdoors) sweated golf balls, but I can only compare the experience to my seeing Richard Burton in Camelot...electrifying! |
| Name: Phyllis and
Edward Resnick Website: Referred by: NewsGroups From: Miami Beach, Florida Time: 1999-07-06 08:03:45 Comments: Antonio Banderas?????!!!! Puh---lease---!!!! We saw him doing the two numbers from "Phantom" on TV during the birthday salute to Andrew Lloyd-Weber. HE WAS AWFUL!!!! Michael Crawford and only Michael Crawford should do the movie. He IS the Phantom!!! As you say on your web page, so many other stars of the stage successfully transferred their roles to the movie versions of same. Warner Bros., GET REAL!!!! |
| Name: Jennifer Barnard Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Western Australia Time: 1999-07-06 05:01:55 Comments: Michael Crawford is the only one who can play the Phantom in the movie. If he doesn't, then the movie is going to be terrible, and not worth watching. |
| Name: Edith Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Oakland, California Time: 1999-07-06 01:58:13 Comments: I personally would not waste my time watching the movie of "Phantom of the Opera" if the phantom is not played by M.Crawford. I understand that a movie is different than an opera but its basically about acting and Crawford is not only acting but even more than that. He is the essence of the Phantom himself. A mere actor like Antonio Banderas will bring no justice to the "Phantom". Besides his accent will kind of ruin it all, based on the opera itself (ofcourse) that I have seen twice. Their is no doubt that Crawford brings depth to the music of the phantom. |
| Name: Ginalyn Website: Referred by: Net Search From: Pittsburg, CA Time: 1999-07-06 00:06:45 Comments: "MICHAEL CRAWFORD" as "PHANTOM" nobody else is best suited for this rule. Antonio Banderas? Oh, please! Just listen to his terrible accent. MICHAEL CRAWFORD was the original Phantom on stage, his voice so wonderfully overwhelming should also be the original Phantom on the movie. My son loves listening to Michael Crawford's Phantom of the Opera CD and would very much love to see him on stage. We hope he goes back on stage and we would love to see him in the movie also as the Phantom. |
| Name: judith hettler Website: Referred by: AOL From: Benicia, Calif.(San Francisco area) Time: 1999-07-05 23:01:59 Comments: There is only 1 phantom as there was only one King of Siam and one eliza , 1 scarlett, need I go on. Why dont you try another dismal remake of gone with the winf and try another rhett!!!!!! Crawford is the phantom - whats his name is a cute young spaniard whose married to melanie griffin. Thats all I care to know about mr. banderas. For god's sake, age and box office draw can be compatible!!! please dont do this terrible travesty. Give Michael what he can do so superbly or hand this country completely over to the greed mongers and teeny boppers! |
| Name: Jim Riddle Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: El Sobrante, Ca. Time: 1999-07-05 22:55:26 Comments: Great to see the support for Michael Crawford. Include me among his supporters for the film role. |
| Name: Leanne & Mike Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Pittsburgh, PA Time: 1999-07-05 22:02:30 Comments: TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Please reconsider Banderas for the film version of The Phantom! He is Latino! Although, he is a good in some parts, how can he play a frenchman in the 1800's?! Michael Crawford is the ONLY one who can play the phantom for the film version! Thank you for your time! |
| Name: Dil Daruvala Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Bombay, India Time: 1999-07-05 21:36:51 Comments: I have never had the opportunity to actually see the opera, but I heard the soundtrack and fell in love with the music. I'm a great fan of Andrew Lloyd Webber, and was thrilled to read that The Phantom was being made into a movie. But to think of anyone other than Michael Crawford as the Phantom, is just not possible. I watched the Lloyd Webber Birthday show on TV in great anticipation, expecting to see the original stars in the tribute. What a let down it was. I'm sorry to say Antonio Banderas was a very poor replacement, singing off-key at times. The movie will definitely flop if he is given the lead. Success depends only on casting Michael Crawford as the Phantom. Anyone else is unthinkable. |
| Name: Louise Huxley Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Monterey Park, Ca. Time: 1999-07-05 20:23:24 Comments: Just viewed the comparison of Michael Crawford/Dale recording and the Antonio Banderas/Brightman rendition of Phamtom of the Opera. There is no question but Michael is a much more professional singer for the role. What a great way to compare the two singers than on the TMCPM webpage. Great!!! Louise |
| Name: Joan
Cornfield Website: Referred by: NewsGroups From: Bethel Island, Calif. Time: 1999-07-05 20:02:31 Comments: We want Michael !!! |
| Name: Oscar Erickson Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: El Sobrante, CA Time: 1999-07-05 18:52:41 Comments: Mr. Bandersa was fun in Zorro but it would be a crime if Michael Crawford did not get the roll. I was fortunate to see him do the part and though I have seen four other leads, his was the defining roll. Saw the address in a newpaper article. |
| Name: Joan Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Time: 1999-07-05 18:35:35 Comments: My husband and I (65'ers) both can't imagine anyone else but Michael Crawford for the part of Phantom in the movie. Antonio Banderas? Goodlooking? Yes. But the Phantom? Unthinkable. |
| Name: Jorge
& Lisa Hernandez Website: Referred by: NewsGroups From: Miami, FL Time: 1999-07-05 16:56:50 Comments: We have seen "Phantom" numerous times. We even planned a trip to NY around a purchase of fourth row orchestra center tickets. We like Mr. Banderas in his Spanish comedies, but with all due respect he is not TPO. Age is not a factor in chosing the lead in the movie. Mr. Crawford will be wearing "tons". His acting and his voice will make this a classic!!! |
| Name: Newton Smith Website: Referred by: NewsGroups From: Miami FL. Time: 1999-07-05 16:00:12 Comments: Don't let this be another Julie Andrews/My Fair Ladydebacle.Michael is a STAR.He will bring more patronsto 'PHANTOM'than any movie idol.The world rcognizesMichael as "THE Phantom" |
| Name: Sarah
French Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Minnesota Time: 1999-07-05 12:31:51 Comments: Personally, I cannot imagine why any sane person would even think of making a movie of The Phantom of the Opera without Michael Crawford in the starring role--unless, of course, Crawford didn't want the part, which seems highly unlikely to me. To many people, Crawford IS the Phantom. He created the role, and all other Phantoms are merely following in his footsteps. His voice is at once menacing and seductive, powerful and tender. With his commanding stage presence, wonderful talent for bodily expression, and flair, he is the only actor who should be considered for the role of the Phantom. To the casting crew at Warner Bros.: You're trying our patience, make your choice!! |
| Name: Larry
Zavaglia Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Benicia, California Time: 1999-07-05 10:14:43 Comments: Its not that I am anti- Bandaeras/anyone else, but I am just so damn much a Crawford supporter and great admirer! There is no replacing the shear magic of his portrayal...none whatsoever. I would NOT even care to see the movie with anyone else! Can we also remind people of how Hollywood passed over Richard Kiley in another one and only performance to dub Peter O'Toole...and lets not even mention Sophia Loren who brought only bosom to the role. When will they ever learn to stop trying to improve on a perfectly matched artist and role creation? Andrew, please listen to we who love you and your wonderful creations for our enjoyment and the history of theatre. |
| Name: liz Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Time: 1999-07-05 09:54:39 Comments: hello fresh from seeing poto the 3rd time and my first on broadway! i couldnt wait to get on the message board and was unable to it said it was the wrong adress or something like that thought you'd like to know. also, soooo many people where i stayed at the marquis in nyc were milling around all ages, men and woman when they saw my playbill of course a lively discussion of phantom began many people who i talked with actually saw michael on broadway over 11 years ago and all agreed he is the one and only choice to immortalize the role in the movie what struck me is these people saw many phantoms yet michael was the one who they say is the one they mentally see when they think about the show or listen to the music and this is 11 years ago. what does that say to everyone, HELLO WARNER BROS listen to the people, the paying audience. keep up your great work. liz |
| Name: Suzanne
Jones Website: Referred by: NewsGroups From: Utah Time: 1999-07-05 08:47:39 Comments: There is only one Phantom, and that is Michael Crawford. It is an injustice to even consider anyone else. It is his voice that I hear in my head when I think of the music. It is Michael Crawford that deserves the role. Please listen to the fans as well as listening to Michael's voice. |
| Name: Neil Barnard Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Western Australia Time: 1999-07-05 02:44:37 Comments: Yes, Michael Crawford is the only person who can play the Phantom in the movie. I listened to the CD, and then watched his concert. Michael Crawford is the one and only Phantom of the Opera. |
| Name: liss
betts Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: bountiful, utah, usa Time: 1999-07-04 21:49:36 Comments: i would just like to add my two cents to the brouhaha over the phantom movie. michael crawford may be in his late 50's but voices and acting ability do not age. he is still and handsome man and his performance is very electrifying. i have never seen him in the role of the phantom, although i have owned a recording of "phantom of the opera" in some form or another since 1990. i do not see how you could condescend to put a big name star like antonio banderas in the role of the phantom for a movie version. he is good looking and a box office draw but he will never be able to perform in the role of phantom as well as michale crawford has. i just saw "phantom of the opera" for the third time last night. it was a gift to myself for my 23rd birthday. the last time i saw this production was in san francisco five years ago and a year before that in the ahmanson theatre in los angeles. all three phantoms (one of which was davis gaines) were very good. but none have the soul-wrenching abilities that michael crawford has as i have heard from a mere recording. i would suggest to the movie producers and anyone else developing this project (especially andrew lloyd webber) that they sit up and take notice of real talent. since michael crawford created this role and his interpretation is the one that people are listening to on every recording that they buy (and obviously that interpretation does not bother them because recordings are still selling steadily after all these years) that must mean that michael crawford really has done a great job of playing the phantom. please, seriously consider the fans (including one die hard fan that has never seen crawford perform, let alone as the phantom) and cast the right person in the movie version. you will see that the correct person is michael crawford. sincerely, liss betts |
| Name: Afton
Ferris Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Utah Time: 1999-07-04 17:18:18 Comments: I was thrilled when I heard several years ago that a movie was going to be made of "The Phantom of the Opera." I was equally disappointed when I learned this past year that Warner Bros was considering casting someone other than Michael Crawford as the Phantom. There is no other Phantom! I have seen the broadway production four times - none with Michael Crawford in, but I have the CD's with him singing the Phantom and have listened to it more times than I can count. I have seen Michael Crawford in concert and several of his PBS performances. I can't imagine what Warner Bros is thinking to even consider anyone else for the role. I will be the first in line to see the movie if Michael Crawford is in it, but I don't know if I will even go if he is not. Also, when the video comes out, I will buy it as soon as possible. I don't think the movie will become a classic, like other broadway productions have, if someone other than Michael Crawford is cast. Please, please don't do this to the "real" fans of "The Phantom of the Opera" starring Michael Crawford. |
| Name: Marilyn Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: So. California Time: 1999-07-04 11:00:53 Comments: This role was promised to Michael over 10 years ago by Andrew. It was well known, to everyone. MICHEAL IS THE PHANTOM! THE ONLY PHANTOM! Why the change now! You folks at Warner, and Mr. Webber. The price you will pay, making this movie without Michael. Sure! Antonio is a big name. But not to this role. Please! Have seen the performance of Mr. Banderas with Sarah on PBS. Don't get me wrong. I like Antonio Banderas. But not this role! He nowhere near has the range of Mr. Crawford. Am so Happy that my son and I had the privilege to see Michael as the Phantom. So many others who wanted to see "The Phantom Of The Opera", but could not afford the price of a ticket. These people will denied the "TRUE" phantom, and the beautiful voice that only Michael has. How sad. I will not attend this showing without Michael. As will many. Oh, the money Warner could make with Michael. They Obviously can't see. Mr. Michael Crawford is never, could never be to old for this role. HE IS THE PHANTOM! |
| Name: R. Levine Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Long Beach, CA Time: 1999-07-04 07:40:22 Comments: My humble comments to the people at Warner Brothers: I don't get it. For five years I've been telling my wife how great Michael Crawford was in Phantom and how great he would be for the film. Let's be honest here; Michael Crawford IS the Phantom!!!! He has put an indelible mark on the role, as Rex Harrison (as Henry Higgins) and Yul Brynner (as the King of Siam)did before him. Once again, Michael Crawford IS the Phantom. Antonio Banderas might be a "draw" to the women, but he will never have the singing ability or the dramatic range needed to become the Phantom. If you won't cast Crawford in this role, save yourself some embarassment and a great deal of money; dont make the movie at all! |
| Name: Sue Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Los Angeles Time: 1999-07-03 19:56:58 Comments: Found you because of the LA Times article. Just wanted to point out, that according to the article, WB is in serious negotiations with Shekhar Kapur to direct. If the way he butchered the story of Queen Elizabeth I is indicative of how he treats ALL his films, even if you GET Michael Crawford (which you SHOULD), you probably won't get the Phantom you know and love. (He bragged about throwing out the history and costume books, etc.) Just a word to the wise.... (As if you didn't have ENOUGH to worry about!)**************** Hi Sue, yes, *sigh*. No one here at the campaign is thrilled with the rumors of Kapur directing and the possible artistic license he may wish to take with the original play. In fact, we are all wondering what happened to the Andrew Lloyd Webber who once stated... "There will be no fiddling with this one." What *may* have happened should probably be best left unsaid here. The heart of this issue though is that there is a performance that has yet to be recorded in its entirety and captured for future generations. Webber is still talking movie so we are still talking movie. It *is* difficult to accept that these rumors may be true and he would so disappoint his fan base and the very people he expects to support him and his future productions. If he does film this project with this disregard for the fans or loyalty to the original play..... history, the media, critics and the fans will end up crucifying him. There will be NO satisfaction in that for any of us, because once filmed it will be too late to change anything. In the meantime we will continue to fight for the only vehicle that is being offered at the moment to record Michael Crawford's already legendary performance. We will continue to remain optimistic that if Crawford is there, so will be any semblance of integrity to this much-loved musical. Thank you so much Sue for visiting and signing your support for this effort. |
| Name: Hans
Mols Mortensen Website: Referred by: From a Web Ring From: The Fareo Islands Time: 1999-07-03 18:07:54 Comments: I don't have a problem with Antonio Banderas, I actually liked him in "Evita"; but for me there is only one Phantom. And that's Michael Crawford. It would be so wrong for someone else other than MC to play the role, as so many see Michael Crawford as a synonym to The Phantom himself. It would be a betrayal to all those millions of Phantom fans out there. |
| Name: ananomous Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: Time: 1999-07-03 16:47:43 Comments: The first time i heard something of the phantom of the opera was in my 7th grade orchestra class and saw a short clip. i imideately fell in love with it and bought the highlights with the original cast recording. I saught that particular one because i knew nothing but that would do. I would give anything to see the actual opera but only with the one and only one phantom (crawford!!!!) his voice is mezmerising. The other phantoms can't stand a chance, i myself actually feel sad and cheated everytime i even hear of other ppl singing the part. when i heard that there was a chance that the real voice might belong to the phantom once again i was thrilled!! I beg and plead that you will try to have the opera once more with the cast that made it the fantastic success and the only opera that anyone would love to see, even those who hate even the mension of the word opera. thanks, anonomous 16yr old |
| Name: Irene
Emelyanova Website: Referred by: Net Search From: Moscow, Russia Time: 1999-07-03 15:24:41 Comments: So. It's all plain. I don't think I'll ever have the opportunity to see the 'Phantom' show (there aren't any in Russia, and, may be, thank God!) so I'd like the movie to exist, I think. BUT I AGREE WITH NO LESS THAN MICHAEL CRAWFORD AS THE PHANTOM. There are two main reasons: 1) The role is vocal, the voice is the most important part of the character. The movie is an interpretation for many years and people. It must be the best. The part of the Phantom is TERRIBLY DIFFICULT TO SING even for a professional singer. Michael Crawford does it divinely. What else does the movie need? 2) Michael Crawford's performance is legendary. He is the creator of the role and is world-renowned and loved for it. For many people who have seen him MICHAEL CRAWFORD IS THE PHANTOM. It's his performance that must be immortalized in the movie! God bless Michael Crawford for his impossible work, and, if he wants to play the role, THE MOVIE CREATORS MUST NOT ONLY ACCEPT HIM - THEY MUST THANK HIM FOR HIS AGREEMENT AND BE HAPPY FOREVER WITH IT! How dare anyone reject him? IF MICHAEL CRAWFORD WANTS TO PLAY THE PART IN THE MOVIE, THERE'S NO RIGHT FOR ANYONE ELSE TO DO IT! |
| Name: Steven Flores Website: Referred by: AOL From: albany new york Time: 1999-07-02 16:57:02 Comments: i would like to offer any aid in getting mr crawford as the phantom of the upcoming production...truly he is the only person alive that can perform that role flawlessly |
| Name: Stephen Nixon Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: So California Time: 1999-07-02 04:33:21 Comments: It was told to me that the roll of phantom in the movie must be Michael Crawford not Benderas and that I agree hope you agree thanks Steve Nixon |
| Name: Gloria
Meyers Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: W.Sacramento, CA Time: 1999-07-01 21:55:35 Comments: MICHAEL CRAWFORD WAS THE PHANTOM...IS THE PHANTOM...AND ALWAYS WILL BE THE PHANTOM!!!!! Mr Crawford has proven himself as the POTO by portraying the Phantom on stage in London, New York and Los Angeles. He won many awards as the Phantom...such as the Olivier Award, Outer Circle Award, the Drama-Logue Award, the L.A. Drama Critics Award and the celebrated Broadway Tony for the best actor in a musical. Michael with his hypnotic voice created the role for which he would become internationally and permanently famous. Theater history was made with Michael as the POTO.....THEN WHY SHOULD ANYONE ELSE APPEAR AS THE PHANTOM IN THE MOVIE VERSION....WHEN THERE IS MICHAEL CRAWFORD????? |
| Name: Glenn
& Rani Stoddard Website: Referred by: NewsGroups From: Los Angeles Time: 1999-07-01 15:40:19 Comments: Found this site from Los Angeles Times article of June 27, 1999. "Phantom" is ALW's masterwork, the primary thing that his body of work will be represented by and remembered for. Webber needs to realize that if he allows Hollywood to screw up this movie by casting the leads based primarily on celebrity status (as "Man of La Mancha" undoubtedly was), a redemptive remake within his lifetime is unlikely. "Phantom" itself has more of a "must see" draw than any movie star on the horizon. |
| Name: Jenean
Bugiada Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Toluca Lake, California Time: 1999-07-01 12:31:48 Comments: I found your web address in the L.A. Times. I heard on t.v. somewhere that Michael Crawford was considered too old to play the part!! My question to the producers of the film is "What difference does his age make?" He has to wear so much make-up to become the Phantom that no body would be able to see his real face anyway. As long as his voice is in shape, it shouldn't matter. When I saw his concert on PBS a few months ago, he sounded as great as ever. Hollywood has such a thing about age. They should get over it. Especially for this film where make-up will hide all of his wrinkles. In my opinion, his age would enhance the Phantom look and character. I think Antonio is too young looking for the role. (If that is what they are looking for). He has a good voice, but so do many other actors I know. Living in the L.A. and N.Y. area, I've seen and known many great voices. Also, I think Michael (in this role) would have a greater box office draw than Antonio. In my opinion, he is the Phantom. |
| Name: michael
nelsen Website: Referred by: NewsGroups From: nyc Time: 1999-07-01 05:39:35 Comments: can not believe anyone would want their music sung by anyone but the BEST !! is the GREED FACTOR is strong that one has to settle for the mediocre ? given hollywood's history, i'm afraind we'll see another "mame", leaving us to think...."if only, if only" m.n. |
| Name: Dave
Hutchinson Website: Hutch's Hutch Referred by: AOL From: Laguna Hills, CA Time: 1999-06-30 19:13:08 Comments: ALW & The Studios involved are just plain idiots if Mr. Crawford doesn't snag the lead in the proposed film version...OR, if those involved had ANY brains, they'd at least do a filmed version of the stage production with Mr. Crawford for home video release (as ALW did with his "CATS")- it would satisfy the legion of international fans of the musical itself, as well as provide Michael the opportunity to set his performance for posterity. |
| Name: Jane Fairlee Website: An Open Letter to WB Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: The Campaign Time: 1999-06-30 09:28:13 Comments: Okay I've cooled off (not really). I don't think you have any idea who we are (although Diane's picture should have given you a clue) or what we are about. Who we are (since you don't bother to open our letters to find out)is a group of people who range in age from 12 to 90. We are men and women of various incomes and educational backgrounds and I dare say most of us have never written a fan letter or done anything remotely like this before or ever will again. What we are are people who saw Phantom with Michael Crawford and were so stunned by the performance that we immediately wanted to see it again and again (and at theater prices not movie prices). We went out talking about a performance that we wanted everyone in the world to see because it was so incredible. One reviewer described it as the kind of performance you will be able to boast to your grandchildren about seeing. We went home and called our friends and cornered strangers and said "You have to see this performance". Isn't that what you want from your movie? Isn't that the reaction you're trying to get? Isn't that what makes a hit movie? I've seen other phantoms. We all have. Some have been quite good. But none made me want to go out and tell people they had to see the show. We are people who haven't seen Michael Crawford as Phantom except perhaps in video clips or in concert where you can see him physically turn into the phantom when he does the song. We are people who were mesmerized by the voice of Michael Crawford on the original cast recording and can't get that voice out of our heads. We are people who have been waiting for the movie as our chance to see Michael Crawford. We are people who want to see the phantom created by the actor who brought it to life on stage and whose name will forever be associated with it. We are teenagers and college students who want the chance to see the original phantom. We don't want an imitation. We want the original. I used to take bus trips to NY to see various shows. I could always tell whether it was a "good" or "bad" phantom by the reactions on the bus. With a mediocre phantom people would talk about dinner and shopping and when asked about the show say "It was good. Music was nice. Chandelier was cool" With a good phantom they would recommend it to their friends and maybe see it again. With Michael Crawford they talked about the show the whole way home and asked when the next trip was. Isn't that what you want? It's not an easy role to do. You have a problem. Too many people have seen this show and heard the music. They'll know that they are not getting the very best. They'll know they are getting cheated because they'll know what it could be. (Remember the Avengers, another movie that people had something great to compare it to. Not exactly a big hit was it?) And the reviewers will know too. I've talked to a lot of people on the street who are not part of this campaign. Their reaction is You're right of course but that's Hollywood. What can you do" Well I grew up reading the Little Engine that Could. I went to college in the 60s. Thanks to the internet I can try to do something. Michael Crawford will always be the phantom just as Yul Brynner will always be the king and Carol Channing will always be Dolly Levi. This isn't about Michael Crawford the man or Michael Crawford the actor this is about a performance that should be preserved forever, that touched people's lives in a way very few have. If you don't understand that your movie will fail and you will have no excuse. If this movie fails we will NEVER forgive or allow you to forget it. |
| Name: Laurie
Quadagno Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: New York Time: 1999-06-30 08:02:46 Comments: I learned about this on the radio news this morning and looked up your web site using Search.com Good luck! |
| Name: CLIFFORD J
BROOKS Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: AUSTRALIA Time: 1999-06-30 03:48:19 Comments: MICHAEL CRAWFORD AS THE PHANTOM IN THE MOVIE? WE IN AUSTRALIA WOULD LOVE TO SEE THAT WE WANT MICHAEL YEA YEA YEA.............................. |
| Name: Lynda Malerstein Website: Referred by: NewsGroups From: Los Angeles CA Time: 1999-06-29 23:25:40 Comments: When I heard that Mr. Banderas might be cast to sing the lead in the movie of my favorite musical, I felt sick. While Mr. Banderas is quite handsome and a wonderful actor he does not posess the vocal power or intensity to sing this beautiful and moving score. When I heard him sing at Mr. Lloyd-Weber's birthday party I was struck by how thin his voice sounded compared to those of the other participants who all had Broadway caliber voices. If Mr. Banderas is cast as the Phantom I will not attend the movie. |
| Name: Katie
Ryan Website: Referred by: Viewing another Guestbook From: Abilene, TX Time: 1999-06-29 22:05:26 Comments: I just down loaded both of the Real Player clips and listened to Antonio Banderas/Sarah Brightman and Michael Crawford/Dale Kristien. I don't mean to be disrespectful to Mr. Banderas,but I never imagined the Phantom as an alto. Where his voice complemented Madonna's in Evita, it comes off reedy as the Phantom. When he and Miss Brightman sing simultaneously, their voices are difficult to distinguish one from the other. I have seen POTO nine times (London-5, NYC-1, LA-1, Dallas-1, Denver-1). I have bought five copies of the Original Cast album. The role really calls for not just a tenor but a bari-tenor to get the resonance necessary for the music.While I have seen some very good portrayals- nobody does it better than Mr. Crawford. And in the first few notes that one hears from the Phantom , "Bravi, bravi, bravisimi..." it is possible to tell how good (or bad) the evening will be. Voice doesn't matter? Think again. And when you do, think Michael Crawford- there is no substitute for the best. |
| Name: Louise Website: Referred by: AOL From: Burbank, CA Time: 1999-06-29 21:45:40 Comments: The powers that be have wasted enough time! I've seen the Phantom of the Opera so many times (double-digit!), in L.A. and in London. While there were some good Phantoms, none can compare to Michael Crawford!! Don't the studio-types understand the strong emotional ties that Phans have with Crawford? Enough of this...just make the movie with Crawford!!! |
| Name: Noelle
Dolan Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Time: 1999-06-29 19:13:42 Comments: I'm a major "phan" of The Phantom of the Opera and I've recently had the pleasure of seeing it in London. I also have the original soundtrack recording with Michael as the Phantom. If Hollywood can be so stupid as to cast Antonio Banderas in another singing role after the disaster with Evita, then let them loose what's left of their dignity. If there is some sort of petition or anything that I can sign or participate in that will help Michael take his rightful place in the upcoming film, please email me Cordially yours, Noelle Dolan |
| Name: Sydell
Graham Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Time: 1999-06-29 19:02:56 Comments: Help, I couldn't believe Michael was not going to play in the movie version of Phantom. First of all if they are going to put a mask on Banderas's face age is of no concern. I saw Michael on stage and I will never get over it. He was so sensual and of course the voice. I will write to whomever I have to. I thought I was alone on this and I expected such from the film industries attutude toward money,money. Did they ever consider that if he were in the movie folks like us would see the movie more then once. I have met people who have seen the play more than 5 times. Let's win this one. Syd |
| Name: Katherine
Chinn Website: Referred by: NewsGroups From: California Time: 1999-06-29 16:47:34 Comments: My best and most earnest wishes. I'd like to help in any way I can |
| Name: Marc Eastman Website: Referred by: AOL From: Los Angeles Time: 1999-06-29 16:35:48 Comments: Michael IS Phantom - there is none other. |
| Name: Joan
Robinson Website: Referred by: NewsGroups From: Laguna Beach California Time: 1999-06-29 14:58:42 Comments: I was privileged to be at the opening night of Phantom in Los Angeles. Even in the last two seats in the last row, Michael Crawford's Phantom was magical . I will never forget his "Music of the Night". It seemed that the entire audience held their collective breaths the entire length of the song. When he finished those last melodious notes, there was a universal release of a mass sigh. Truly a most memorable eveing! |
| Name: Marilyn
Simpson Website: Referred by: NewsGroups From: Corona, California Time: 1999-06-29 13:49:24 Comments: My husband and I saw the Phantom four times, three with Michael Crawford. No one can compare to Mr. Crawford. He made us feel his pain when he longed for Christine, and he made us care about him. We wanted to see him get the beautiful girl. We felt the rejection, just as he did. I've seen hundreds of plays, but never felt any play as deeply as I did this play. Why? Michael Crawford, that's why. I have heard that Mr. Lloyd Webber does not like to have an actor's name above the title because he feels his play is the star; however, he is wrong when it comes to the Phantom. Michael Crawford is the Phantom. I have been waiting for the movie to come out since the play opened in Los Angeles. I want to be able to see it on the big screen, purchase the video so I may view it often, and feel the joy and sadness when I watch it again and again. Please, Mr. Lloyd Webber, don't make a stupid move to go for what you think will be box office. Michael Crawford will be box office. With Michael you will have a film that will sell for years and that will have a following forever. Trust us. . . |
| Name: Bryan
Eberhardt Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Time: 1999-06-29 02:54:21 Comments: Michael Crawford is the only Phantom. 'nuff said. |
| Name: Howard Amster Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Time: 1999-06-29 02:51:09 Comments: Having seen Phantom 10 years ago and having seen M. Crawford at the Universal Amphitheatre a few years after that as well having listened to him sing the Phantom songs on various CD's, there is only one true Phantom. Nothing against Banderas, best wishes to him, but just not as the phantom. It was only after Yul Brynner died that someone else played the King. Crawford should be afforded the same status. It is true that visually, Crawford's face can be hidden behind the mask of another actor just as Brynner's face was placed behind the mask of another actor on The Kind & I, Ben Kingsley. Most important, however is that Crawford's voice cannot be masked by the voice of another singer. Sincerely, Howard Amster |
| Name: PJF Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Time: 1999-06-29 02:45:24 Comments: I want to add my vote to cast Michael Crawford in the role of the Phantom in the possibly upcoming movie. I can visualize no one else in the role. Antonio Bandaneres is a good actor, but it seems to me that he doesn't have the voice to handle the part effectively. |
| Name: Lisa
Tyler Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Thousand Oaks, CA Time: 1999-06-28 22:00:02 Comments: Read the article in the L.A. Times -- glad to know there's an actual campaign going on. I've never seen Michael Crawford in person (I've seen Phantom four times -- in Toronto, Chicago, San Fran., & L.A.) but from the soundtrack it's obvious there's no one better. The idea of Antonio Banderas is ridiculous -- if they want a "name" put him in the role of Raul! |
| Name: Kim Lentz Website: Referred by: AOL From: CA Time: 1999-06-28 21:36:16 Comments: Micheal Crowford will always be the only phantom for me and my family. We saw him in Los Angeles and we won't go to a movie which casts anyone else as the phantom. |
| Name: Cathy Down Website: Referred by: NewsGroups From: Los Angeles, CA Time: 1999-06-28 20:22:14 Comments: I was lucky enough to see Michael Crawford as the Phantom in New York and Los Angeles. I have also seen other actors play the role, but they were no Michael. Some actors create a role, while others seem to be born to play the part. Michael is the latter...he truly embodied the role of the Phantom, his hand gestures and body movements made the audience swoon. And even though you knew the story's outcome, part of you wanted the Phantom to end up with the girl. While I think Antonio Banderas is a fine actor and is very good looking...he's not and will never be the Phantom. Just as Yul Brynner is and will always be the King [King & I], Michael Crawford is and will always be the Phantom. |
| Name: Audrey Aucott Website: The Michael Crawford Phantom Movie Campaign (member) Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: New Jersey Time: 1999-06-28 18:37:57 Comments: Hi All, I just want to post some interesting facts about the Boomer Generation that I recently discovered on the web. Also I'd like to discuss "crossover films"....................... Hollywood likes to say that the Boomer generation does not go to the movies. We sit home and watch HBO or rent films. Considering the quality of many films, I can agree with this idea up to a point. However every Hollywood Producer loves having a "Crossover film". Boomers go to these.............................. A crossover film is one whose appeal extends to a wide variety of age groups and types of people.................. "Star Trek, First Contact" & "Star Trek, The Voyage Home" were both considered crossover filmsbecause they were well made and because they drew an audience much wider that the basic Trekker/Sci-Fi fan base. Their stories stood on their own, separate and apart from the shows and genre they came from................... The most recent film which was a major crossover was "Titanic". People of all age’s backgrounds came out in droves! There is nothing like a major disaster to bring out the masses! Another great category to bring them out is a well done romance. Most people of the 90's are starving for romance.................. Phantom, IF it is made with Michael Crawford, could be a major crossover film. First(naturally), it would bring in his fans, "Phantom" fans and people who love theater and musicals. A lot of these people are boomers........ Many are students!.............. Both could contribute to the positive "word of mouth" for the film................................................ ......................... Millions of romance books are sold each year. Woman who love romance will come to this movie and IF the film is extremely good, IF it has Michael Crawford melting hearts again. Then word will get around to all the romance lovers and they will line up around the theatre. They will bring friends. Think repeat business too!............................. If the film disappoints -it will die..................... ................................. OK - Young guys - for some unfathomable reason, a major target audience - They might think "Chick Flick" but will bring their girl friends to the film just to please them (and, let's be honest, "to get their motors running"). If Christine is played by a beautiful girl, that will also draw them in.................................... For their part, the young ladies, like Christine, will have the delicious dilemma of having to choose between the Phantom and Raoul. If Michael Crawford plays the Phantom, it will be a tough choice indeed, no matter how handsome and famous the actor who plays Raoul is. No matter how well he sings!............................. ......................................................... Finally, let's talk about reputation and mystery. We all know that Michael Crawford is not yet as well known as Redford or Connery. But this could work in his favor! There is a mystique around the Phantom in the musical which was created by the reputation of MICHAEL CRAWFORD IN THE ROLE. NOT the reputation of the musical itself, but the amazing depth of character and exposure of the soul that only THIS ONE MAN has created! Say Michael Crawford to many a non-musical fan and you get a funny look until you say "the ORIGINAL Musical Phantom" and them they recall the whole "legend" - "Oh, yes!" - and are usually interested enough to ask questions. The reputation / legend of Michael Crawford's Phantom WILL draw them in like no box office idol ever could. "I heard about this guy, he's supposed to be very good." When they discover just how good he really is, they will report "their find" to all their friends. .......................... A lot of people will have no idea what Michael Crawford "really looks like". I think some of his new, "instant fans" will go to great lengths to find out and enjoy every minute of it. Some of you may recall your first sight of Mr. Spock. WOW! Who IS that? Then you read the credits. "Leonard WHO?" and "What does he really look like?" Same deal here. .............................. I predict a new, massive wave of "Michael Mania". Women love him! Men admire him! Boomers, teenagers, eight year olds and grandmothers, it doesn't matter! They just need to "be introduced". .......................... Now the boomer facts - which say we can basically afford to buy what ever we want - when and if we find it. "IT" would most certainly be the "Phantom of the Opera" video and all the trimmings. But only if we fall in love all over again with the only REAL Phantom, Michael Crawford!............................. Here are the facts; ........... - In the US, between the end of World War II and 1964, 78 million baby boomers were born and now are part of the "Boomers" generation. ........... - Boomers are now entering middle age and changing the demographic of the total population. 4 out of 10 households are between ages 35 to 54 and the numbers of householder’s ages 45 to 54 will increase 20 percent from 1995 to year 2000. ............ - As empty nesters, boomers have more money to spend as the median income for boomers bracket is $47,300 annually. ($$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$) ............ - The average household headed by boomers age 35 to 54 spends $12,000 annually for housing. ............. - The number of couples without children between the age of 45 and 60 will increase from 8 million in 1980 to 16 millions in the year 2010. .............. - Every 7.5 seconds, a Boomer turns 50! .................. Thank you! .......... Audrey Aucott :) |
| Name: Alisa Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Southern California Time: 1999-06-28 17:32:05 Comments: I've seen Phantom 4 times 2 with Michael and was lucky enough to see him in his return in April of 1990, at that time I was living in Hawaii and when I heard he was returning to the role I just had to see it again. Price didn't matter as I've always enjoyed his talent so I bought myself two tickets and flew myself and a friend who never had seen Phantom and gave him quite an enjoyable experience. Since then he has also seen Phantom several times Both in LA and NY and as much as he had enjoyed the performances he still preferred Michael as the Phantom. It's a shame that Hollywood just doesn't learn that box-office draw and young doesn't always mean it's going to pay off or it's going to be good. As young and talented as Antonio Banderas may be he just isn't and never will be The Phantom, and anybody with half a brain would know that. |
| Name: Kirsten
Wilhelm Website: Referred by: AOL From: Wisconsin Time: 1999-06-28 17:03:39 Comments: I can't believe they would do that Micheal Crawford!!!!! John Trovolta sucks!!!!He can barely get a note out!!!! How could they even think of replacing Micheal Crawford!!!! This is unbelieveable!! I will do anything to help Micheal Crawford!!!! He is the best and I mean the best singer. He is the King!! |
| Name: Noel
Dolan Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Colorado Time: 1999-06-28 14:44:57 Comments: Your page is fantastic and I applaude your efforts to stop Hollywood from making yet another mistake in the name of money. I listened to both RealAudio clips of Antonio and Michael. My opinion? Hmmm...do I want some tone deaf guy who has no range singing or do I want an extremely talented, well-trained musician and actor to do the role? Obiviously, my answer is Michael Crawford. Bravo on your page! Noel :) |
| Name: Terri
Tracey Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Temecula, CA Time: 1999-06-28 11:54:11 Comments: We have seen the Phantom of the Opera in 3 countries; USA, Canada, and England. We have not had the pleasure of seeing "THE PHANTOM" Michael Crawford in any of the three. We listen to his CD all the time and we wouldn't see the movie with anyone but him in the title role. |
| Name: joanne Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: the valley Time: 1999-06-28 11:33:19 Comments: Having M.C. as the phantom is the only way to go . My question is who should be Christine ? My vote goes to Dale Kristien of LA production. |
| Name: S. Whitman Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Hollywood,CA Time: 1999-06-28 09:57:08 Comments: What if Christy Brinkley were alive in Italy when Leonardo Da Vinci painted Mona Lisa. Would Yani have overshadowed Mozart and not let him be heard? Would Bill Clinton have been the father of our country just because women found him sexier than George? Oprah Winfrey is not Joan of Arc and Antonio Banderras is not Michael Crawford. Why at this time in history are we so willing to settle for second best? I saw Phantom. I saw Crawford. They are one in the same. I should just be happy that Adam Sandler can't sing. |
| Name: Genie
Lee Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: California Time: 1999-06-28 09:41:45 Comments: I have seen Phantom five times, three with Michael Crawford. I am a singer and was amazed by his range, breath control and interpretation of the lyrics. Andrew Lloyd Webber writes extremely difficult music to sing. Not just anyone with an OK voice can sing his scores. Antonio Banderas, though delightful to look at, does not even have close to the range, depth and timbre that the role of the Phantom demands. Michael Crawford grew into the role of Phantom as did his voice. His age is not a factor as the more we mature so does our voice. He now has the depth and timbre that this role demands.Michael Crawford caused a stir wherever he played Phantom. I worked for a non-profit organization and was lucky enough to secure Michael's participation in our Bachelor Auction. A date with Micheal brought in $22,ooo! If that isn't star power, I don't know what is! How sad that studios and directors continue to look for youth instead of pure talent! |