Total : 230 Guests
| Name: Casey Lea
Jones Website: Referred by: Net Search From: Broken Arrow, OK Time: 1998-06-14 18:36:40 Comments: Crawford knows the part and how it should be played. He would be excellent for the critics and for show.If you want to make money, and get an excellent performance for the movie, use Michael Crawford!!!!! |
| Name: Brian
Dupuis Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Chicago, IL Time: 1998-06-14 17:09:58 Comments: Michael Crawford should play phantom in the upcoming movie--- With him in it it would have the potential to blow "Titanic" right out of the water in awards and more importantly to the big wigs---- Money. Go with quality on this movie--Not with hollywood flash---they have the potential to make the greatest movie of all time here. Listen to the fans of the show--- Michael Crawford.... |
| Name: Brian O'Flynn Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Kentucky Time: 1998-06-14 07:34:12 Comments: I think Michael Crawford should be in the movie as the Phantom!!!!!!!!!!!1 |
| Name: Mary A
Armellino Website: Mary On The Move Referred by: Net Search From: Barstow, Ca. Time: 1998-06-14 06:18:35 Comments: Michael Crawford is the Phantom and no other will do. I have seen two other good actors play the role, but only Crawford has the power to embody the audience into the story of the Phantom. I was one of the fortunate ones to see his performance in Los Angeles! |
| Name: Susan
Rutherford Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Ft. Lauderdale, Fla. Time: 1998-06-14 05:47:29 Comments: Michael Crawford should be cast as the Phantom in the movie. To think of any one else would be unthinkable. He is the "Phantom". |
| Name: Marcia
Rovins Website: n/a Referred by: NewsGroups From: Southern California Time: 1998-06-13 12:12:18 Comments: I believe that Michael Crawford IS the "Phantom." I truly believe it would make more sense to cast your stars in the roles of Raoul and Christine. At least then they would be seen by the audience that they would allegedly bring to the film. What good would it be to cast someone more famous than Michael, just to disguise he looks, and possibly dub his voice! |
| Name: Carly Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Australia Time: 1998-06-13 04:16:22 Comments: Either Crawford or Rob Guest who played Australia's Phantom, he was incredible and I think if you heard him sing you'd agree he equals the talents of Michael Crawford .. both are amazing.. The real thing is always the sure thing and who could want anyone but the "Angel of Music" ;) thanks! Bye! |
| Name: Michael Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Los Angeles, California Time: 1998-06-12 20:01:21 Comments: The need for a "Hollywood name" should not overshadow the fact that, of all the Phantoms there have ever been, only one actor has personified the role more than anyone...Michael Crawford. Even today, years after finishing his masterful run, he is still recognized the world over as the original and best Phantom. The casting of anyone else in a role that seems destined to be played by someone so blatantly obvious as Mr. Crawford would truly be a shame, and would only further the perception of Hollywood as a town more concerned with names than making memorable movies. To the producers...do what is right...cast Michael Crawford as the Phantom, and let his voice carry the Music of the Night to a new generation of fans. |
| Name: colleen callea Website: NONE Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: WINDSOR ONTARIO CANADA Time: 1998-06-12 16:34:36 Comments: I WOULD LOVE TO SEE MICHAEL CRAWFORD ON THE BIG SCREEN AS THE PHANTOM. I LOVE THE MUSIC .I NEVER SEEN AN OPERA BEFORE, BUT WHEN I WENT TO TORONTO I WAS JUST BLOWN AWAY. I NEVER HAD THE PLEASURE TO SEE MR. CRAWFORD PLAY BUT I HEARD HIM SING THE MUSIC OF THE NIGHT. IM WAITING WITH EXCITIMENT TO HEAR IF AND WHEN IT WILL HAPPEND. FOREVER PHANTOM FAN |
| Name: Brian
Chiang Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: San Jose, CA Time: 1998-06-12 14:55:59 Comments: Anyone other than Crawford in a POTO movie would be a complete waste, and would be boycotted by all true POTO fans, based on principle alone! |
| Name: Magdalena
Johansson Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Sweden Time: 1998-06-12 11:33:54 Comments: Michael Crawford should play the Phantom!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
| Name: Elizabeth
Julius Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Ohio Time: 1998-06-12 11:15:49 Comments: Like so many people on this campaign,I too am angry and sickened to learn that Michael Crawford is not being considered (by both WB and RUG) to reprise his signature role in the Phantom movie. WB and RUG need to learn that not all movies will be hugely successful and make a ton of money with big box-office stars. (I can name a lot of WB movies that REALLY prove this). I know that what you phans are doing will convince the money-greedy execs. to get their heads out of their butts and cast the man that will make the movie one of the most successful ever: Michael Crawford, THE Phantom of the Opera. |
| Name: Joanne Daley Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Illinois Time: 1998-06-11 20:14:02 Comments: Michael Crawford would make the Phantom movie a classic to be enjoyed for many generations. How can anyone else compare with him. Please use your Hollywood stars for the roles of Christine and Raoul. |
| Name: r.m. thackery Website: Referred by: Word of Mouth From: westville, ohio Time: 1998-06-11 18:27:29 Comments: Like many others, I thought this casting decision was a no-brainer. I live in the "boonies" so when I recently joined the internet, I didn't know efforts were being made to do something. It's heartening to see so many others as angry about this movie casting as I am. I have sent letters to Warners, Really Useful Company (NY), and Really Useful Films (CA). I would like to send you a copy. I am new to the Internet, so I don't know how to do this just yet. If you could e-mail an address, or tell me how to send it any other way, I'll mail a copy. The letter is 2 pages (typed) long. The letter sent to you by RUG sounds like a PR form letter. Please let me know if there is anything else we can do. Thanks for all your efforts. More letters to major magazines, like the recent letter (June 9th) in "People" would help tell more people about this mess. |
| Name: Eugene O'Flynn, Sr. Website: Referred by: Word of Mouth From: Kentucky Time: 1998-06-11 17:14:31 Comments: My whole family has signed this guest book and I just wanted to make sure my name was added to this worthy cause. POTO would not be the same without Michael Crawford. |
| Name: Sarah O'Flynn Website: Referred by: Word of Mouth From: Kentucky Time: 1998-06-11 17:06:37 Comments: I just wanted to cast my vote by saying that Michael Crawford deserves to have the role that he made famous. |
| Name: Mirit Website: The Opera House Referred by: Word of Mouth From: Florida Time: 1998-06-11 15:29:54 Comments: Everyone says ALW is only intrested in money. I do not believe this. Why, might you ask. JUst because the movie has a "big" name, does not mean it is going to sell. I have told friends, not necessarily Michael Crawford fans, but Phantom phans, about this whole situation. These people have stopped me and said that they will boycott the movie if Michael Crawford does not play Erik. One girl even told me she would have all of her friends boycott the movie, too. millions of people own the soundtrack, and listen to, not a man "acting" as the phantom, but a man that would make one double check to make sure that the real Erik was actually dead. Why, when this situation make a perfect equation, did Warner Brothers and others decide to put in an unneeded variable in to unbalance many people's lives? Only a true fool would decide to pay to see an unartistic interpretation of a story that was origianlly presented as a work of art. |
| Name: Nancy
Pettengill Website: Referred by: Word of Mouth From: New Hampshire Time: 1998-06-11 12:21:19 Comments: The Phantom of the Opera, the way Andrew Lloyd Webber saw it, is a wonderful story with an extremely complex character at its center. Full of passion, beauty and the pain of love and loss, it needs an actor of incredible sensitivity in the title role. Michael Crawford has proven himself in that role in three of the world's major theater markets, consistently packing the house and bringing people to tears. He is the one who should be chosen to give the Phantom an eternal life on film, as he did on the stage. This movie made with someone else could be very good. Putting Michael Crawford in the title role would make it magnificent. |
| Name: Eric Eckenroad Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Concord, Ca Time: 1998-06-11 11:06:58 Comments: I would like to send be on the guest book but I like Tommy the Rock Opera better since I just saw it last week and I'm seeing it again today. I still love Phantom so that is why I'm signing on Eric |
| Name: Melanie Young Website: Referred by: Word of Mouth From: Mississippi Time: 1998-06-11 09:43:12 Comments: If anyone other than Michael Crawford is cast as the Phantom, then I will be utterly convinced that Sir Lloyd Webber is only interested in money and not the artistical integrity of his work. To produce any work of art - be it a painting, play, or musical - for material gain alone cheapens its worth, and no TRUE artist would ever stoop to such lows (unless, perhaps, they were financially hard-up, and somehow I don't think that Lord Lloyd Webber is). |
| Name: Henry the
CRAB Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Hong Kong Time: 1998-06-11 08:16:02 Comments: I want no one be Erik BUT Michael!!! If Warner Bros. doesn't choose Michael, not only Sir ALW's work will be in vain, but ALSO Gaston's fantastic novel/story!!!! PS: Sorry for the poor English..... :~( |
| Name: Chris Website: Referred by: Word of Mouth From: Columbus, OH Time: 1998-06-11 08:04:29 Comments: I just read a piece from Variety on line that Antonio Banderas will "Tune up for Phantom of the Opera in March." Does this mean it's official? Has anyone heard this bad news as being a done deal? |
| Name: Stanzy Wong Website: Phanstanzy On Net Referred by: Word of Mouth From: Hong Kong Time: 1998-06-11 07:49:57 Comments: MICHAEL CRAWFORD IS THE ONLY PHANTOM! IF he really can't be the Phantom, then the movie should not be made. |
| Name: Kelly
Crawford Website: Referred by: Word of Mouth From: Carrollton, Texas Time: 1998-06-11 07:08:15 Comments: This is a wonderful site! I have gone to other "Save the Phantom" web pages, but am thrilled to find one just for Michael! I'm a member of the MC mailing list and have signed every petition to keep Antonio Banderas out of this movie that I can find and have written to WB and RUG. Hopefully if enough of us are heard the one and only true Phantom will get the part he deserves! |
| Name: Amy and Jenny Website: Referred by: Net Search From: Idaho Time: 1998-06-10 21:28:15 Comments: HI! Michael is so cool!! He is the perfect Phantom!! Andrew (Lloyd WEbber) has a lot of nerve telling him he is to old. He is so cute!!! Michael and Sarah (Brightman) should be the Phantom and Christine!! |
| Name: mary woods Website: Referred by: Net Search From: baltimore Time: 1998-06-10 18:52:56 Comments: I agree that the only one to play the Phantom is Michael Crawford. Good luck. |
| Name: Shirley
Donaghue Website: Under Construction Referred by: Word of Mouth From: Clearwater, Minn. Time: 1998-06-10 18:17:39 Comments: Michael Crawford is the clear and only choice once again to play the Phantom of the Opera!!! Please do not deny us the priviledge to see him perform this role again, and do not deny him the chance to star in his destined role. Thank you. |
| Name: Eugene O'Flynn Website: Referred by: Word of Mouth From: Kentucky Time: 1998-06-10 15:52:14 Comments: I have see the Phantom many times. He is the best so far. It would not be the same without him. |
| Name: Sandy O'Flynn Website: Referred by: Word of Mouth From: Kentucky Time: 1998-06-10 15:01:01 Comments: I wasn't fortunate enough to see Michael Crawford on Broadway, and I thought I had my chance to see him perform the role he created. But now I hear that they want to give the part to younger, more popular stars. No one can give the emotions to the Phantom that he can. |
| Name: Aaron Almeida Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: RHODE ISLAND Time: 1998-06-10 14:25:15 Comments: the movie will obviuosly be another"titanic" and go beyond the succes of titanic if Michael Crawford is cast in the Phnatom's Role! |
| Name: Cynthia
Nunn Website: Referred by: Word of Mouth From: Santa Maria, California USA Time: 1998-06-10 12:46:59 Comments: I commend you for starting this movement to bring Michael Crawford's Phantom to the attention of Warner Bros. and RUG. This Tony award winning actor would bring to the screen a Phantom audiences will rave over. I am prepared to attend this movie every single night it plays in my town should Mr. Crawford obtain the role he so richly deserves. I believe Warner Bros. will be pleasantly surprised at the size of its box office grosses should they wisely cast this outstanding man in the title role. Sincerely, Cynthia Nunn. |
| Name: Tanya Pell Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Pennsylvania Time: 1998-06-10 11:59:02 Comments: Brava to the dedicated fans of Michael Crawford who feel he, and only he, should star in the Phantom movie. He was the original Phantom of the Opera in the Andrew Lloyd Webber musical and he should carry on the role in the movie. Nobody has a voice that can compare to the sensual one of Michael Crawford. He is perfect for the role. There will never be another Phantom like Michael. |
| Name: Ron Siporen Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: San Jose, CA Time: 1998-06-10 10:59:39 Comments: I have seen the phantom three times in the theatre with three different leads. I can't imagine that they could ever consider anyone else for this role. |
| Name: Mike
Farmer Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: St. Louis, Missouri Time: 1998-06-10 10:07:03 Comments: I don't think anyone else could do the part of the Phantom justice but Michael Crawford. In my opinion, he has the most phenominal voice of any singer I've ever heard. He puts everything he has into his singing and acting. Just hearing him sing stirs emotion in you, whatever the song may be. It would be a crime to have anyone else sing the part of the Phantom. |
| Name: Erik Hackmann Website: Referred by: Word of Mouth From: San Luis Obispo, CA USA Time: 1998-06-09 23:09:29 Comments: Add my name to the list. It would be a HUGE mistake to not cast Michael Crawford as the Phantom in the movie. |
| Name: Todd
Clampffer Website: Referred by: Net Search From: Katy, Texas Time: 1998-06-09 20:47:08 Comments: Howdy! I think your cause is outstanding. Althought Antonio Banderas and John Travolta are talented singers and "bankable stars," neither of them can hold a candle to the talents and abilities of Michael Crawford. As a firm and passionate lover of the musical, I believe he is in fact the only person who is qualified to represent the Andrew Lloyd Webber version of Erik to the world. Please keep up the good work! Todd Clampffer |
| Name: William Craig Website: Referred by: Word of Mouth From: Kentucky Time: 1998-06-09 19:05:03 Comments: Whenever I think of Phantom of the Opera, two words immediately come to mind. MICHAEL CRAWFORD!!!!!!!!!!!! Without his voice, the Phantom would be a lifeless character from a storybook. Michael brings him to life in a way Antonio "Two Much" Banderas or John "Grease Lightning" Travolta never could. |
| Name: Cheryl Powell Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Time: 1998-06-09 17:36:08 Comments: If they are determined to make a film version of "Phantom," they must cast Michael Crawford in the title role. I have nothing against Antonio Banderas, but this role belongs to Michael Crawford. I believe that if he is given the chance to play this role that he was born to play, he will win an academy award and that Warner Bros. and RUG will have a very special film on their hands. It will not be a throw away as the film versions of so many musicals have been. I always cry when Yul Brynner dies at the end of "The King and I." (A film by the way, made several years before I was born). Please, please, Warner Bros., let me and my children and grandchildren have the chance to thrill at and weep for Crawford's phantom. |
| Name: FoxPhan Website: Referred by: NewsGroups From: San Fran' California Time: 1998-06-09 16:35:15 Comments: Ok- well-- it wasn't from a NewsGroup that I found it. Rather- a very kind poster of a Phantom Site left this link to come here. And- now I am here. Amoung other fellow Phantom Phans... who all believe that Michael is the ONLY canidate who should even be considered to play the Phantom. My thoughts on the movie is debateable-- but now that it seems that there is no stopping it.. I might as well take a side. I will not see Antonio... or any other Hollywood name. I only saw Phantom once- jus' once at San Francisco. And I am planning to see it again, I have only heard Michael on my CD. He has a brillant voice... which cries out to me every time I play it. I do not have to see M.C. to realize he is the only Phantom out there who should portray Erik in the flim. Doesn't Warner Brothers have any clue to what the public wants to see? Those who haven't seen M.C. or Phantom'-- but has heard the CD would most likey want to see the fello who sings those notes! Antonio? Puh~ he is no Phantom as many of The Phantom of the Opera fans out there would say-- " I want Michael! " FoxPhan |
| Name: Rayne
Knights Website: Rayne'sHomepage Referred by: Word of Mouth From: Long Beach, California Time: 1998-06-09 16:28:40 Comments: now, i know that theater goers will hate me for saying this, but, when you make a movie out of a play, it tends to be the "official" version. this is due to the fact that movies are cheaper, and more accessible, and also have larger distribution and advertisement. its because of this that michael crawford must be the Phantom of the Opera in the movie!!! i mean, michael is just the one and only, the first, the original. his power to move people with his acting as well as his voice is unparalleled by any of the other actors who have portrayed the phantom. just listening to the original cast recording, you dont even need to see him, you can just visualize the scenes because of his vocal expression and ability to really emphesis feeling in his singing. this is why michael must be the phantom in the movie, cause in many hearts, he *is* the official phantom. and also, this movie is going to be seen by millions of people around the world who probably will never get the chance to attend a theater production of "Phantom" and therefore, whatever this movie turns out to be, that will be they're ultimite impression on "Phantom of the Opera." So i say, lets do it right!! Leave to a professional whos devoted most of his career to making "Phantom of the Opera" the great show it is today (i am refurring to michael crawford, just in case you were wondering) sincerely, Rayne Knights:) |
| Name: Kyle
Richardson Website: Referred by: Word of Mouth From: Ontario, Canada Time: 1998-06-09 15:16:53 Comments: I think that Michael is the one and only Phantom, I would be more inclined to see the movie over and over if it was done by Michael. He created the Phantom, and as far as I am concerned is a better singer than Antonio Banderas - not to insult Antonio or anything. |
| Name: Doris
Thompson Website: None Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Time: 1998-06-09 11:15:23 Comments: Michael Crawford is my first and only choice to play the Phantom. It is an acknowledged fact that most people (i.e. the people who will actually go to see the movie) feel VERY strongly about this, The notion that he is "too old" for the part is total rubbish- some things improve with time, Miachael is a great example of that (behind the mask, who can tell anyway?). Please, please consider the fans - happy fans are more than willing to hand over their money at the box office. Thank You. |
| Name: Jeanne Andersen Website: Referred by: Net Search From: Nykøbing F., Denmark Time: 1998-06-09 07:05:13 Comments: I have seen Phantom twice in London, with 2 different actors as the phantom, but none to equal Michael Crawford at the CD. The part is his, and his alone. |
| Name: Lana Kessinger Website: Referred by: From LinkExchange From: Lexington, KY Time: 1998-06-09 06:29:52 Comments: The world always remembers a play as it was portrayed on film. Most of us remember Audrey Hepburn's "My Fair Lady", rather than Julie Andrews. Michael Crawford brought Eric to life (and probably ALW's "Phantom"). I can't imagine that ALW or Warner Brothers would want this movie to be done in any way other than the best it could be - and that would have to be with Michael in the starring role. |
| Name: Brenda
Poulton Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Lancashire, England Time: 1998-06-09 06:07:45 Comments: I don't believe this debate is still going on. There is no other phantom except for Michael and what on earth does age have to do with it anyway???? |
| Name: Betty
McIntosh Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Lompoc, CA Time: 1998-06-09 03:23:19 Comments: Of course, by lokking at more popular names the powers that be are trying to come up with a way t attract the younger audiences. They need to consider who the real fans of the Phantom are, and they are not the teenagers (although I grant that some teenagers may be fans)! We, the true fans of "THE" Phantom, would be less inclined to see the movie multiple times, buy the video, and rave about anyone less than Michael Crawford, and anyone else would be less, period. Who says the Phantom needs to be any younger that fiftyish? Who says the audience would have less sympathy for an older man in love with Christina? GIVE US THE REAL TRUE PHANTOM, GIVE US MICHAEL CRAWFORD!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
| Name: Barbara Website: Barbara's Phantom Lair Referred by: Word of Mouth From: Canada Time: 1998-06-09 00:12:55 Comments: I have been trying to avoid this issue for months now, but it's time to make my voice heard. Though I don't think that necessarily Michael Crawford should play the Pahntom in the movie, any actor who has protrayed the Pahntom on stage could do a great job. I realize that Hollywood is all about money, but why not cast a big name as the handsome aristocrat Raoul. A name like DiCaprio or such would be sure to bring people to the movie, and at the same time the many, many Phantom fans and anyone who has an appreciation for live theatre would be satisfied seeing a musical actor in the movie as well. Why not go with such an idea to please everyone? I myself am involved with theatre and casting someone who does not have a significan theatrical background always proves unsuccessful. There IS a huge difference between acting on stage and acting in a movie. Please reconsider this decision. Disappointed in Warner Brothers, |
| Name: Kellie O'Flynn Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Kentucky Time: 1998-06-08 18:13:24 Comments: There is no one in the world who can bring the Phantom to life on the screen like Michael Crawford did on Broadway. Casting anyone else in that role would be an embarrassment to Warner Bros. and to Andrew Lloyd Webber. |
| Name: Joann L. Quinn Website: Referred by: Word of Mouth From: Bristol, PA Time: 1998-06-08 16:34:37 Comments: I'd like to begin by saying that I do not usually write letters. I just keep my thought to myself, but this time it is different. Something has to be said. I am writing this as a potential customer (a movie goer). It pertains to the rumors concerning the upcoming movie "The Phantom of the Opera." I had the opportunity to see "The Phantom of the Opera" on Broadway. Unfortunately, we had just missed Sarah Brightman, but Michael Crawford was the Phantom. It is a role he has created and brought to life, something amazing to see. Hidden under layers of makeup, behind a mask and cape, his movements created a feeling I just can't describe. I've seen "The Phantom of the Opera" since, and nothing against the wonderful actors in that role, it just isn't the same. Michael Crawford is the Phantom. Every now and then I would read along the lines of a Phantom movie. I so looked forward to it, hoping that I could just one more time see Michael Crawford in this remarkable role and hear him sing those wonderful songs ("The Phantom of the Opera" and "The Music of the Night"). Now I keep seeing that the role of the Phantom may be going to John Travolta or Antonio Bandares. Nothing against either of these men, but why would anyone want to replace an actor that has won awards (Tony, Los Angeles Drama Critics Award, among others) for a role. A role that he has played more that 1,300 times. Let me repeat myself, Michael Crawford is the Phantom. As I said, I have seen "The Phantom of the Opera" numerous times and nothing compares to when I saw it with Michael Crawford in the role of the Phantom. I look forward to seeing it again later this summer and fall in local productions. I'm sorry but if anyone other that Mr. Crawford is awarded the role of the Phantom, you can count me among those that will not be in attendance. Also, is Hollywood ready for yet another remake with pretty faces. I'll wait for it to be televised. The latest thing I've read is that Mr. Crawford is too old or his name is not well know enough. Since when is 57 old? Please don't tell my 78-year-old mother. As for Mr. Crawford not being well know enough, you could have fooled me. I couldn't tell with the success of his current CD/album "On Eagle's Wings," his recent PBS special (hailed by many stations as "the most successful pledge drive") and a current concert tour. We (my mother and I) are traveling to New York to see Mr. Crawford during the concert tour, and when I tell anyone that we are seeing "Broadway's original Phantom, Michael Crawford" everyone knows exactly who I mean. NOTE: I am not a young kid, I am forty years old and this is my first concert in many, many years. I believe this will be my mother's first concert! Let me end by saying that if the role of the Phantom is awarded to Michael Crawford, you will have a hit on your hands. I would bet money on it. Remember millions paid enormous amounts of money to see him in London, on the Broadway stage both in New York and Los Angeles. Sincerely, Joann L. Quinn (sorry about the length) |
| Name: Chris Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Columbus, OH Time: 1998-06-08 11:50:21 Comments: Michael is #1! He's the only one who can bring the Phantom to glorious life. He did win a Tony...or does Hollywood not pay attention to that? Unfortunately, I did not see MC in Phantom on stage, but of course I have the soundtrack CD and have seen him in concert and in "EFX." He has such a presence. Don't mess up the Phantom Phlick by letting anyone other than Michael Crawford portray Erik |
| Name: Bethany Reeb Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Albuquerque, NM Time: 1998-06-08 11:32:44 Comments: I believe Michael Crawford is the only Phantom worthy to play the part in the movie. |
| Name: E. O'Brien Website: Referred by: Word of Mouth From: Time: 1998-06-08 11:04:05 Comments: I encourage ALW and members of RUG and Warner Bros. to go see Michael Crawford in concert. When he sings the songs from Phantom of the Opera, he *becomes* the Phantom. You can actually feel another presence in the room, and that presence is Erik. I have loved the story of Phantom since I first read Gaston Leroux's haunting book. Never did I dream it would be brought to life so passionately, so vividly as when Michael Crawford first breathed life into Erik on stage. That is the performance that should be immortalized through this movie. Warner Bros. has a chance ro make a run of the mill, ho- hum movie with fly-by-night actors....or they have an opportunity to create a classic film, about a classic story, sold brilliantly by the creative energy and talent of Michael Crawford. He *IS* the Phantom................. Betty O'Brien |
| Name: Lilian
Barbuti Website: Referred by: Word of Mouth From: New York Time: 1998-06-08 09:39:09 Comments: Just wanted to add my vote for Michael Crawford. I can think of no other actor better suited to fill the Phantom's shoes. |
| Name: Angela
Cappiello Website: Referred by: From LinkExchange From: New York City, NY Time: 1998-06-08 07:33:02 Comments: Michael is truly the one and only Phantom! |
| Name: Matt
deMille Website: None Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Tacoma Time: 1998-06-08 00:45:18 Comments: Recently, I sent a personal letter to Andrew, stating all the right reasons for the casting of Crawford in the film, which seem to be shared and are stated very well in the introduction to this very website. Moreover, I believe there are even MORE reasons NOT to have anyone ELSE in the role. Having taken this musical to heart, and to a certain extent even performed some myself, I will say to anyone who will listen that, without Michael Crawford, it just won't BE the Phantom of the Opera. The role was originally written with him in mind, after all. Matt "Red Death" deMille |
| Name: Cathy
Groelinger Website: Referred by: Word of Mouth From: Frederick Maryland Time: 1998-06-07 19:32:04 Comments: I am one hundred percent behind what you doing here. There can't be anyone else but Michael playing the Phantom. The powers that would be crazy to cast anyone else. |
| Name: Thiago
Marcellus Website: Referred by: Net Search From: Rio de Janeiro Time: 1998-06-07 16:57:30 Comments: Definitively he is the best. In my humble opinion, Michael was born destined to this role. It would be a cruel mistake not to place he in the film, for several reasons: 1- Michael Crawford possesses the experience as the phantom that the other ones do not. When I say other ones, I refer to all the other ones, since Michael is the original. All those that later came to represent the phantom, with certainty they had him as example and inspiration. 2- It is a great opportunity for Michael to win the Oscar, that we know he deserves. 3- His performance with Sarah Brightman is perfect. Together they get to transmit what the public wants to feel. 4- Those who see and hear Michael Crawford, mainly as the phantom, understands the true meaning of " Angel of Music " 5- He is the best, independent of your point of view. |
| Name: Pat
Hatch Website: Referred by: Word of Mouth From: Massachusetts Time: 1998-06-07 10:24:31 Comments: I fully support the efforts of this wonderful web page. Michael Crawford should be the one and only consideration for the Phantom OF The Opera movie. No one else can portray the feeling and soul that Michael has given to Erik. |
| Name: Michael
Martin Website: Referred by: Word of Mouth From: Michigan Time: 1998-06-07 09:04:24 Comments: Great job on staring a mad riot for Michael! I'm in and forever let Michael and Erik be one! |
| Name: Jason Tomczak Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Atlanta Ga Time: 1998-06-07 04:43:51 Comments: Michael C.Rocks. When I heard that John Travolta or Antiono Bandaras was going to play the lead I was so dissappointed. If the POTO is going to be a musical movie then we deffinently need M.C. to play the lead. Thanks that it. |
| Name: Aileen Website: Referred by: Word of Mouth From: Texas Time: 1998-06-06 19:51:06 Comments: Congratulations on the new version of the webpage. It looks great and presents facts which need to be known by all. Here's hoping that Warner Bros. and ALW see the light and choose the man who brought the Phantom to thrilling life on the stage and can do it again in the film--Michael Crawford. He alone can make the song take flight! --A dedicated POTO fan |
| Name: Leatha
Ann Betts Website: Referred by: Word of Mouth From: Utah Time: 1998-06-06 19:49:36 Comments: This webpage is superior in its focus, and its gentle influence is felt through out the world. Like the haunting songs generated by the mastercraftsman, Michael Crawford, this page will go down in the annels of the internet, as a true voice for the little people out in "the dark" who pay for tickets and are discriminating in their choice of entertainment. We all will not accept second-best, a youth-obsessed society's decision to conform to the mediocre in movie media. We want Mr. Crawford, he can handle the hard work, has made movies before, is no novice, and holds no candle to anyone else. This webpage is a solitary candle burning, the light of which will succeed in reaching its goal. Either Mr. Crawford, or NO MOVIE! That's all, no if, ands or buts. |
| Name: David Website: SickDawgs Philosophy & Poetry Page Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Illinois Time: 1998-06-06 19:26:28 Comments: Good page. |
| Name: Donna
Jahn Website: Referred by: Word of Mouth From: Northern California Time: 1998-06-06 19:17:41 Comments: Michael Crawford and Erik's soul are inextricably linked. No one understands Erik nearly as well. Michael is an experienced film actor as well as a stage actor; he has the skills, the talent, the voice, and the soul. His performance is comparable to Yul Brynner's as the King and Rex Harrison's as Henry Higgins. It would be a travesty to cast anyone else as the Phantom. I sincerely hope that those in the decision-making process will allow his legendary performance to live forever on film. |
| Name: Nancy
Shealy Website: Referred by: Word of Mouth From: Easley SC Time: 1998-06-06 19:11:09 Comments: Hey Diane!! Great Page! Truly worthy of our boy Michael!! I love all the changes and this page is so right: Michael Crawford is the embodiment of Erik. It takes a performance like Michael Crawfords to bring a fictional character like Erik to life. Warner brothers, when you read this take into consideration that MC was the only thing that Frank Rich liked about POTO!! I would hate to read what Frank Rich would say about Antonio!! MIchael Crawford is the Angel of music and the only person alive who could ever play the Phantom to the point that he did. He is truly the Phantom and always will be! Nancy PS--Need anything, Di? Let me know!! |
| Name: Diane
Flogerzi Website: Referred by: Word of Mouth From: Palmdale, CA Time: 1998-06-06 15:44:33 Comments: To all who read this guestbook from this point on you will see references made to a "Diane". I started this campaign in the beginning of April. Today the campaign no longer belongs to me, there is now a large group of people, and this page hereafter belongs to The Michael Crawford Phantom Movie Campaign. |
| Name: Connee
Sheckler Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Marriottsville, Maryland Time: 1998-06-05 05:22:17 Comments: I hope that you all have gotten rid of the ridiculous notion to cast John Travolta as the lead for the movie, "Phantom of the Opera". Please strongly consider other leads, such as Michael Crawford or Christopher Walken who have the caliber of talent and experience needed for a role of this magnitude. |
| Name: Jessica
Heredia Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Germany Time: 1998-06-05 01:09:08 Comments: I really like your page and I love the Phantom of the Opera. I can't wait to see the new movie. |
| Name: Judy Kobel Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: KC MO Time: 1998-06-04 18:54:32 Comments: No one will do the role of Phantom like Michael. Anyone else would be heresy! No one else sings as well or has the feeling for Eric that MC does. I too will boycott the movie if anyone else is in the starring role. I have written to RUG and Warners in the past, and received a reply from Warners that no decisions had been made at that time. Studio propaganda? When you look at EVITA and the controversy surrounding Madonna, that I feel had an impact on ticket sales. Do you suppose the powers that be would make another dumb mistake in casting the title role? Let's hope not. Keep up the good work Diane. Beautiful artwork on your title GIF. Judy |
| Name: Phyllis
Akers Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Ironton, ohio 45638 Time: 1998-06-04 16:41:43 Comments: Michael Crawford was born to play the Phantom. No other will do to play this part. Phantom lovers cannot support another choice. If this movie is to be a classic for all times it must star Michael Crawford!!!!! |
| Name: Paul
Edmondson Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Nelson ,Lancashire Time: 1998-06-04 13:45:46 Comments: Going to see Phantom in London on 12th June, my first visit. I wished I had seen it when M.Crawford was first staring in the version, anyway hope I enjoy it. I agree John Travolta should stick to Saturday Night Fever!!! |
| Name: Annette Cowles Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: UK Time: 1998-06-04 13:05:45 Comments: If anyone has it in their power to change the casting to Michael Crawford then please hear our plea an give the world the ultimate cinematic experience! |
| Name: dan jendrzejewski Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: marathon wi, usa Time: 1998-06-04 13:01:55 Comments: I LOVE PHANTOM! I ONLY SAW IT ONCE. BUT I'VE BEEN HOOKED EVER SINCE |
| Name: Joella Knapp Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Woodville, TX Time: 1998-06-04 12:36:11 Comments: Michael Crawford is the only man on the planet to portray the role of Erik in a film version of Phantom of the Opera. His interpretation of the role, combined with his incomparable voice would insure the success of Phantom, the movie. |
| Name: Crystal Website: Wormgerm's home page Referred by: Word of Mouth From: Cali Time: 1998-06-04 11:23:44 Comments: I want MC to be in the new movie |
| Name: Denise Website: Referred by: Word of Mouth From: Texas Time: 1998-06-04 10:26:44 Comments: Great page and cause! It is hard to believe that anyone would even consider anyone but Michael Crawford as the role of Phantom. No one else could bring such magic to the role as the talanted man who created him! |
| Name: Richard
Gillies Website: Referred by: Net Search From: Brisbane, Australia Time: 1998-06-04 07:43:20 Comments: Well, Michael Crawford would probably be my first choice - but Antonio Banderas appears to be quite talented and has not disappointed me as yet (although I've never heard him sing)...But I'm sure Sir Andrew and co. would not dream of compromising such a beautiful and moving musical by casting just any two-bit actor in the lead role - they're above that. By the way, great site!! |
| Name: Ceeeceee Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Time: 1998-06-04 06:51:09 Comments: Diane--We're on the way! You're doing beautiful work. Word is getting out to other sites. Hope everyone reading this will join to give Michael support. Ceeeceee |
| Name: Cathy Conway Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: California Time: 1998-06-03 23:32:00 Comments: Hello Diane, All the work you're doing is incredible, and I can only hope and pray that it will come to fruition in the only way that will be pleasing to the public who WILL be the people who place (or don't place) rear-ends in seats: The casting of Michael Crawford in the movie role! I was one of the fortunate ones who was able to see him in the role of Phantom while he was in Los Angeles. I'll never forget it. Many of my family members, who'd never before even seen a stage musical (aside from my H.S. and Jr. College ones) saw the musical from 1-3 times! (And I have a very frugal family!) People were willing to spend OBSCENE amounts of money to see Michael portray this man, most, not knowing anything about his past career or even what he looked like presently. They went because they'd heard the OCR, or someone else said it was so wonderful they MUST. It was THAT good. If people could spend $75 on theatre tickets for such a length of time as they did to see this virtually unknown actor (in the U.S.) why on earth would the "powers that be" think that the SAME public wouldn't see him for the price of $7 theater tickets! It's absurd! MORE people would go! They'd be lining around the block! I personally think it would rival Titanic's success. (I saw Titanic 3 times... I'd see POTO with Michael in the role many more!) I can't understand the mentality out there where people are saying that Michael's "not well-known enough." NO ONE here in Los Angeles really knew who he was! But his acting, his sublime creation of this tortured soul Erik, brought them in droves to the theatre to see POTO time and time again! I remember the first time he did an interview "unmasked" for Good Morning America and then A.M. Los Angeles, and everyone was talking about "now we get to SEE what he really looks like!" Michael DID IT ALL without people even knowing! That's how sublime he is as an actor. That's how wonderful he was in that role! I've never before (or since) seen theatre tickets for a closing performance auctioned off for $25,000.00! But Michael DID it! If anyone besides Michael gets this role, it will be a truly sad day for me. As the mother of two young children who already ADORE musical theatre and good voices (Michael's included) I want them to be able to witness Michael on the screen as Phantom. They were too young to see him at the time he did it on stage. The thought that they might not at all now is sad to me. Michael created the Phantom. They each borrowed something from eachother.... Michael has a part of Erik's soul. As Polly Warfield so aptly put it in her review from "Dramalogue" : "Phantom was waiting for the actor." And the Actor IS Michael Crawford! Cathy C. |
| Name: Leatha A.
Betts Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Utah Time: 1998-06-03 21:06:27 Comments: Michael Crawford brought the Phantom to life, with grace, poise, and singing ability only he can do the work justice. It is a shame hollywood cannot make the correct choice. They did it twice when Yul Brenner and Rex Harrison were given the parts they made famous. It is a pity that they cannot learn from these triumphs and allow Mr. Crawford to recreate his masterpiece for the screen. He has the gentle touch, by a miastro's hand.....a musician's heart, and all the pain which the character requires. If only hollywood were grownup enough to choose correctly, not for the money, but for art! |
| Name: Katherine Block Website: Referred by: Word of Mouth From: MO Time: 1998-06-03 18:37:21 Comments: I sincerely hope that all our efforts will indeed have an impact upon the casting of this film. The role belongs to Michael Crawford and in my heart, he will always be the one and only Phantom. --Katherine |
| Name: Becki Clark Website: Referred by: Word of Mouth From: California Time: 1998-06-03 15:37:51 Comments: Diane, I was told to come here and express my feelings about this POTO movie that WB is going to make. Well here I go. I don't want to be rude or cruel I just want to make my opinion, as a POTO fan, known. I want to see Michael Crawford in the role of Phantom and I am willing to do whatever it takes to see that he does. Everyone knows that he IS Phantom. There is no replacing him. He is the one that inspired my love for it. Yes, I am a Michael Crawford fan but even people who are not still know that he is the only one who can play that role and make it come to life. I say if they want big stars to help sell the movie let them put the BIG names in the parts of Raul and Christine. Well, I hope that all of this protesting and letter writing works. Because I would sure hate to have to boycott the movie but if I have to I will. Thanks for reading this. A Very Serious Phan, Becki |
| Name: Peggy Othen Website: Referred by: Word of Mouth From: Cutchogue, New York Time: 1998-06-03 12:15:34 Comments: I have been a huge fan of Michael's since 1988 when I first saw him in "Phantom". Michael created Erik and the passion in the role. The pity, love and understandng that we all felt for Erik was due to his way of playing him.( Not to mention that wonderful voice that charmed us all!!) It would be a very big mistake on ALW and Warner Bros. not to have Michael do the movie. In our minds he will always be Erik. They can search from now until the end of the world and never find anyone more suited to play the lead!!! I would never see the movie with anyone else in the part. Without Michael Crawford the movie will be nothing!!! He is the heart of it!!! Without that it has no life!! |
| Name: Sandy Rabinowitz Website: Referred by: Word of Mouth From: Florida Time: 1998-06-03 10:26:28 Comments: In the minds of many, the movie role of Phantom has been cast since POTO opened over 10 years ago. It is the man whose voice is, has, and always will be the Phantom's. I refer, of course, to Michael Crawford. To bring in new, younger fans, concentrate your efforts on finding "stars" to play Christine and Raoul, people who have youth, beauty, popularity and whose voices could be dubbed with no aesthetic loss. This will please everyone and be sure to be a commercial success as well. |
| Name: Jennifer Watson Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Idaho Falls Time: 1998-06-03 09:45:55 Comments: I defantly want the best for the hit play the Phantom of the opera. And if you want the best you want Michael Crawford! He is awsome I was lucky enough to see him in Utah. WHAT A VOICE! |
| Name: Linda Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Pittsburgh, PA Time: 1998-06-03 07:09:41 Comments: Just want to let you know that there a lot of Michael Crawford fans in Pittsburgh and we are with you all the way. There is only one Phantom and his name is Michael Crawford. He originated the role and won The Tony and numerous other awards for his efforts. If anyone has any doubts, they need to see Michael Crawford in one of his concerts. I saw him in Las Vegas. He literally turned into the Phantom with no makeup or props. I don't think anyone would think differently after seeing this concert. |
| Name: Audrey
Aucott Website: Referred by: Net Search From: NJ Comments: Hello, I understand you are forwarding your guest book to some pretty powerful people, So I thought they might be interested in the effect this man has on a normal, intelligent, demographically correct married mother of two. Here is my personal review of the first two concerts of this genius who is turning me into a musical camp follower! .........."PREPARE TO FALL IN LOVE ALL OVER AGAIN".......... It's been a long wait for all of us, longest of all for Michael Crawford, but finally our "Angel of Music" is back on tour, raising us all up on angels wings, and with his voice, which is more glorious than ever. His range and power are awesome. Every note is a perfect polished gem. He holds nothing back, giving one expert rendition of song after another, telling it's story, living it's emotions, sharing, creating it's experience for all of us. Texas was full of smoke. Houston was like a steam bath. Dallas was less humid but buggy. Add stage lights. Try to imagine what the temperature on that stage must have been. Michael took no notice, pausing only occasionally for a sip or two of water. ( Take your time, Michael. The longer we are in your presence, the happier we are! We are glad you're being careful. ) He thanked the audience for coming, with a warm and funny moment, down on his knees. As if we would miss being there for anything less than the second coming! Some of us were in face masks, most of us were drenched with perspiration, but, you betcha!, we were there. Once he appeared and began his "Michael Magic", all discomfort was forgotten. There was only ourselves and this amazing, Amazing man! This concert is so personal. Some moments I felt almost alone with him, other moments it seemed I was within just a small circle of friends. Then a song would end and the waves of applause from the thousands of people in back of us would be a wake up call, ...until the next song began. Michael is the ultimate professional. He knows no matter how things seem to go in rehearsal, one never knows how the audience will react to a story or a bit of business. Therefore those of us who are fortunate enough to see the concert more than once ( and aren't we gleefully greedy where this man is concerned) will be able to watch him take a performance, which in Houston was already a blue white diamond, and polish it to unparalled perfection as the tour progresses. The process is wonderful to behold. Just one night later, Dallas was even funnier. And more beautiful. In Houston I laughed, sighed, and, yes, cried. At Dallas, from the third row, center!, I tried to make a mental recording of a concert I never want to forget. You will want to too. When it ends, you won't want to go home. You will stand and applaud and call out until your hands and throat are sore, just as we did in both Houston and Dallas, with thousands of people, established fans and new, everyone wanting more from our marvelous Michael Crawford. We are told that Michael leaves quickly, as soon as he is off stage. I hope he is aware of the noisy demonstrations of love and appreciation he generates, of his triumph each time he definately "Leaves em screaming for more!" With Love, Audrey Aucott |
| Name: E. Rauser Website: Referred by: Word of Mouth From: Maryland Time: 1998-06-02 14:10:57 Comments: I'll keep this short and sweet. Please! John Travolta as The Phantom. I sure hope that this is a total rumor. Mr. Travolta may have been good in other movies, but come on the Phantom of the Opera deserves a more traditional / accomplished actor. My vote would be Anthony Hopkins. |
| Name: melinda Website: Referred by: Net Search From: Idaho Falls, Idaho Time: 1998-06-02 11:36:58 Comments: I have been a great Phantom fan for quite a while and too, was waiting with anticipation for when it might possibly be made it into a movie. When I found out that it was going to be made, my joy was quickly absolved in my horror at the thought of John Travolta playing the role of the Phantom!! I am a HUGE fan of Travolta, but certain roles can and should only be played by just the right actor. It would be like Al Pacino playing John Travolta's role in Grease. Yes, he is a wonderful actor, but couldn't possibly capture the character that everyone has fallen in love with. The only person that I believe would do justice to the role, would be the one and the only, Michael Crawford. I fear that if Michael Crawford wasn't used, there would be quite a rebellion by Phantom fans across the world. The role is one that requires such a great ability to act beyond just your face, and the music demands that it be sung by someone with such expression in his voice that is so rarely found. Please consider the choice you are making, and listen to the public, they are usually right. Michael Crawford has proven himself and continues to do so in everything he does. It can only be right to have him play the role he so deserves, but more so it is only fair to the role and all those who worked so hard on Phantom to have it played by the BEST possible person. Thank you for your time and I hope to see your wise use of judgment in this matter. Sincerely, Melinda |
| Name: Tim Rauser Website: Braus-eround Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Goddard, Maryland Time: 1998-06-02 10:16:10 Comments: This page is really awesome. I am 14 years old and have been interested in the Phantom of the Opera since I was 6. I would really not want to see the Phantom be played by John Travolta or anyone like that. I think that we should stick with the original (and the best) Phantom, Michael Crawford. He's really the only one out there that fits the part. I think that the movie would be ruined with someone else playing the part. I also think that if someone other that Michael Crawford does play the part, the film would be protested by a majority of the Phantom fans who would most likely be the leading profit for the movie anyway. |
| Name: Caroline Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Bixby, Oklahoma Time: 1998-06-02 08:45:33 Comments: Oh good grief! The age issue is utter nonsense and as was mentioned below is a mere and petty excuse to cover up Warner's money-lusting! I highly doubt ALW said this at all! How could a man who recently finished a huge and highly physically demanding Las Vegas stage show be too old for this scaled-down stunt-doubled movie role? I can testify to his amazing abilities as I just returned from seeing him perform his concert live in Salt Lake City and Las Vegas. And you wanna talk about appeal? OH wow! He was incredible and that voice and body is stronger than ever!!! He has more strength, stamina, and energy that most 30 year-olds have!! And yes, folks, the man has incredible sex appeal from all ages! Put him on the big screen and you wanna talk about major heartthrob!! He already is without it! Think about it folks, Crawford is part of the original equation that produced the original successful formula. Take Crawford out of the equation and you have no formula! This may sound shallow but Michael is better looking at 56 then most Hollywood "Hunks" are at their prime! He has the appeal and he has already set the standard for the Phantom. If you've heard of Phantom, you've heard of Michael! I for one wouldn't want to be Banderas about now! Talk about pressure and shoes to fill! If he does have to do it, I wish the poor man luck! My best wishes to all of you and most of all, to Michael-- the one and only Phantom of the Opera!! Love, Caroline |
| Name: L.
A. Benefiel Website: Referred by: Word of Mouth From: Texas Time: 1998-06-01 21:12:51 Comments: Diane, best of luck in this effort to persuade the makers of the proposed film of "Phantom of the Opera" to cast Michael Crawford in the lead role. I have written previously on my feelings on the subject; now I would like to address separately one other aspect of the issue: it has been suggested that Michael Crawford is "too old" to play the role. This is ludicrous--the original character in the book was close to Crawford's age. Frankly, if there is worry about sex appeal, those who are casting the film should take a look at the females of all ages who are flocking to Michael Crawford's concerts. It's a pity that they don't know the ages of the fans who take part in the numerous internet boards and mailing lists devoted to MC--they range from teens to senior citizens, all of whom are charmed by the actor's wit, boyish good looks and lively personality as well as by his singing ability. Those girls and women will be thronging the theaters to see the Phantom film starring Crawford--and hurrying back again and again! |
| Name: L.
A. Benefiel Website: Referred by: Word of Mouth From: Texas Time: 1998-06-01 20:41:24 Comments: A "Hollywood name" in the lead role of the "Phantom of the Opera" film will not insure a great movie. Like a multitude of other theater and movie fans, I am appalled that Travolta or Antonio Banderas or any other current movie heartthrob might be chosen to play Erik. There is only one person who should star in the film and that is Michael Crawford, the actor/singer who brought this character to brilliant life on the London, Broadway and Los Angeles stages. Can anyone who saw him as the Phantom on stage or has seen Crawford's interpretation of the Phantom in his recent PBS special or his current U.S. concert tour picture a performance half as good by some mere movie "hunk"? Do we want to hear that beautiful music sung by the glorious voice of Michael Crawford or rewritten for a mediocre singer? Many of us will boycott the film if it is butchered by Hollywood instead of being made into the great classic which it could be--one which would bring us back to the movie theaters time after time. I hope that Warner Bros. and Lord Lloyd Webber will come to their senses and hasten to cast Michael Crawford in the role he was born to play. |
| Name: Carole Nikovski Website: Referred by: Word of Mouth From: New Jersey Time: 1998-06-01 20:07:59 Comments: I am appalled to read that Warner Bros and/or Andrew Lloyd Webber could be considering someone other than Michael Crawford for the screen role of The Phantom. With the recent track records of both (Warners has had a string of dud movies, many of them with Hollywood stars in the lead; Mr. Lloyd Webber's Sunset Boulevard was considered a financial failure and he didn't even bring Whistle Down the Wind to Broadway) you would think that they would not want to tinker with perfection. Michael Crawford made this role his own, and he is the actor most people think of when they think of The Phantom of the Opera. Why would anyone want to put a virtual non-singer (a phrase which describes both John Travolta and Antonio Banderas) in a demanding singing role? The only reason why Banderas was ok in Evita was because he was Everyman. He didn't have to sound good; he had to sound like a bartender, a peasant, a man on the street. There is no way Banderas can sing like an angel, which is necessary if Hollywood is not going to completely change the story. If Warners makes this movie with some Hollywood pretty boy instead of Crawford, they will have a very expensive dud on their hands and Andrew Lloyd Webber will have the knowledge that he really screwed up his best chance at conquering another medium. I fully intend to boycott this movie and future projects from Andrew Lloyd Webber unless we are given a Phantom movie starring Michael Crawford. And I will tell everyone I know, who thinks of me as a Phantom expert, that it will not be a movie worth seeing. |
| Name: June Laange Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Petaluma, CA Time: 1998-06-01 19:53:58 Comments: Have been a MC fan for ten years. Have seen him twice, and really enjoy the man, the voice, etc. |
| Name: Cindy Walker Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Texas Time: 1998-06-01 17:57:10 Comments: If Michael Crawford is passed up, Please let him do a cameo appearance. Michael is and will always be THE PHANTOM. |
| Name: Rachel N. Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: New Jersey Time: 1998-06-01 11:39:02 Comments: I support you all the way, Diane! I think it's phantastic that you have this webpage!! I love Michael Crawford just as much as you do, and I feel that it would be an absolute crime not to cast Michael as Erik in the POTO movie! I would love to see him as the Phantom in a movie, especially since I wasn't privileged enough to see him perform the role on Broadway. As far as I'm concerned, Michael IS Erik, and I don't understand how ALW, RUG, and Warner Bros. could even think about casting an actor for the role who is totally unqualified for it(not to mention unworthy)! It makes me soooo angry!! John Travolta is not the Phantom, and neither is Antonio Banderas! Just the thought of either one of them wearing Erik's mask makes me sick to my stomach! What is ALW thinking?! Does he need to have a chandelier fall on his head to knock some sense into him?! I know one thing for sure- I will not pay a penny to see any Phantom movie starring an unqualified actor as the Phantom. The bottom line is: I want to see Michael Crawford as the Phantom, and if not Michael, than one of the other stage Phantoms, who are also deserving of the role!!! The following article appeared in the May 25th issue of People magazine(of this year) on p.47: "How badly does Antonio Banderas want to play the Phantom in the film version of ALW's POTO? Well, last month he flew to London and sang 2 ALW songs(including Phantom's Music of the Night) at the Royal Albert Hall for the composer's 50th-birthday celebration. Lunching w/ALW's publicist Peter Brown the day of the event, Banderas confided that he'd never sung live onstage before........Banderas is ALW's choice to play the Phantom, though nothing will be final until a director is selected." This article infuriated me when I read it! That's all. Keep up the good work, Diane! |
| Name: Cheryl Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Mississippi Time: 1998-06-01 08:15:44 Comments: I have just returned from Las Vegas where I saw Michael Crawford perform for the first time in person. How anyone could even imagine that Antionio Banderas (or anyone for that matter) could sing this music better than Michael Crawford is beyond me. I am still numb with awe. The Phantom, after all, was only a voice when Christine first became enchanted. And Michael Crawford IS the VOICE! |
| Name: Sabra Brown
Steinsiek Website: Referred by: Word of Mouth From: Albuquerque, NM Time: 1998-06-01 06:41:30 Comments: There can only be one logical choice to play the Phantom in the movie... Michael Crawford, the man who originated the role, the man who *is* the Phantom. There have been comments about Michael's age. This is just an excuse for the shortsightedness of those in control. The Phantom is ageless. Recent comments attributed to Michael have indicated his willingness to provide the singing voice for whoever does the role. What a travesty! To put that voice in the mouth of a lesser talent would be a service to no one. To the powers that be... please, come to your senses before it's too late. Make this a movie to be proud of by casting the man who deserves the role. |
| Name: Diane
Flogerzi Website: Referred by: Word of Mouth From: Palmdale, CA Time: 1998-05-31 17:43:40 Comments: Hello Everyone! Welcome to guestbook number two! We will be periodically transfering guestbook entries to our web site for quicker access and viewing. Thank you to everyone who has shown their support for the casting of Michael Crawford in the upcoming movie Phantom by signing in the guestbook! Let's hope that together we can make a difference! Diane |