Frequently Asked Questions

 

MC_and_Julie.jpg (68173 bytes)

 

Webboard Q & A  

 

How did your group get started?

How many are in your group?

Do you think you can succeed?

Why do you care?

Do other fans agree with you?

Does Michael Crawford approve
of what you are doing?


Isn't Michael Crawford too old
or not well known enough?


Would you accept anyone else
in the role as the Phantom?


How do you know that Michael Crawford
would like to do the movie?


Why wouldn't any competent actor do for this role?

How can people help?

What is next for the Campaign?

Film Stars VS Stage Stars in a Musical

 

 

 

How did your group get started?

In April of 1998, a concerned fan started a small web page in support for the casting of Michael Crawford in the Phantom movie.  Over the next few months she was contacted by other concerned fans, we organized in June of 1998 and "The Michael Crawford Phantom Movie Campaign" was born.

 

How many are in your group?

Thousands of people have signed our guestbooks from countries all over the world, and our web site receives many thousands of visitors a week. In addition, thousands of flyers have been distributed and petitions circulated all over the UK, US, Australia, and New Zealand. We know that many of those people have written letters without being in contact with the campaign organizers.

 

Do you think you can succeed?

Yes!!! We truly believe that a group of sincerely dedicated individuals working toward a common goal can move mountains. Fan campaigns have saved television shows and other movies such as Star Trek, and we intend to save this film.

 

Why do you care?

We care because we have seen too many of our favorite musicals ruined by Hollywood, usually because of ridiculous casting. We care because we are devoted and sincere fans of Phantom of the Opera, and we don't want to see *it* also ruined by Hollywood; we want it to be the most successful movie of a musical ever made, so that we, and the rest of the world, can enjoy it again and again. We care because we love movies and musicals, and a great film adaptation will bring audiences back to musicals, and musicals back to movies. We care because Crawford is the Phantom personified and no matter what script changes, directorial liberties, and special effects do, the essence of the show will be there if Crawford is there. And we care because we believe Crawford deserves the chance to bring his legendary performance to film like Brynner and Harrison did, especially because he was originally cast when the film was first planned in 1990-91. We wouldn't support him if he were an unknown and would hurt box office potential. Michael Crawford's stature, international popularity, and association with Phantom are enough for Warner Bros. to make a huge profit with him in the title role.

 

Do other fans agree with you?

Speculation over a possible film of Phantom has been a hot topic among fans for years, both in fanzines and Internet sites. All along Crawford was by far the leading name, but when first Travolta and later Banderas became possibilities most fans united behind Michael Crawford. This has been true in poll after poll after poll.

 

Does Michael Crawford approve of what you are doing?

We are a totally independent group of fans who want to see a spectacular POTO movie filmed. Mr. Crawford is not involved in this campaign in any way, but we do know that he appreciated our efforts that resulted in the November 1998 Variety ad. On December 16, 1998 he spoke about the advertisement on The Howie Mandel Show, saying, "It's mind-blowing for those people to have gone to all that trouble, I must say, because I don't know who they are."  Howie Mandel replied, "They're fans!" Michael Crawford continued, "It's really, really, really nice and I so appreciate it." On September 9, 1999 he phoned into the UK morning show, The Big Breakfast, and told the shows hosts that he was "flattered" by the campaign and thanked everyone for their support.

 

Isn't Michael Crawford too old or not well known enough?

Michael Crawford is not too old, he is the perfect age for the character. The Phantom is a man that is old enough to be Christine's father. Casting a younger actor makes this fact unbelievable. As for not being well enough known, Michael Crawford is an International star. To millions of people Crawford is the Phantom and always will be. He originated the role in London, New York and Los Angeles to great critical acclaim, and gave the character his heart and soul. His voice features on the highest selling cast recording of all time, amassing sales in excess of 20 million worldwide to date. He earned an Emmy nomination for his first TV special for PBS, Michael Crawford In Concert. Showing no signs of slowing down, Michael Crawford has been confirmed to play Count von Krolock in Dance of the Vampires, a Vienna hit that will open in Broadway's Minskoff Theatre on April 11, 2001.  Composer Jim Steinman called Crawford "a towering talent... He would be worth every cent we can pay him." Additionally, a new Disney CD was released in Australia in April of this year containing comtempory soundtrack selections from a "whittled down list" of Michael Crawford's favorite Disney songs.   By May the CD went Gold and topped the best-selling Albums Chart at number one!  The Disney Album is now Platinum in Australia and due to be released in the US on September 18th. His name is synonymous with the Phantom. Imagine the audience response with the advertisement - "The Phantom of the Opera" - featuring the award winning original Phantom Michael Crawford!

 

Would you accept anyone else in the role as the Phantom?

NO, we have seen the best and will settle for nothing less. When you know how great a movie this could be, seeing something less than that is unacceptable. Hollywood gets away with making just "okay" movies when they could make great movies, and in many cases it is only because people don't realize what they could be. But when you have a show like POTO millions of people do know how great it could be and will be very disappointed. POTO rises or falls on the voice of the Phantom. If the voice of the Phantom can not reach down and grab your emotions the show will fail. The role of the Phantom is not an easy thing to perform successfully. We will not go to see any mediocre Phantoms.

 

How do you know that Michael Crawford would like to do the movie?

Mr. Crawford has talked repeatedly of his connection to the character of the Phantom and that he never tires of performing the music. On the December 16th airing of The Howie Mandel Show he was asked by the shows host, "They are doing a movie of The Phantom of the Opera and YOU should play the Phantom of the Opera, right?" Crawford's response, "I would love to do it, yes." Throughout the past few years he has continued to confirm to the media that he would be very interested in doing the film if asked.

 

Why wouldn't any competent actor do for this role?

It is not that we DO NOT want any other actor because of lack of talent--it is that Mr. Crawford's Tony Award winning role needs to be immortalized. Other competent actors have successfully performed the Phantom. Mr. Crawford's interpretation is legendary and defined the character. His performance is what made the musical the international sensation it has become. That is the performance we want to see and would like for others to experience and remember.

 

How can people help?

By adding their voices to the thousands who have already written to The Really Useful Group and Warner Bros. The addresses are available on our web site. People can also sign our guestbook, join our monthly newsletter and get involved with the projects the campaign is developing to support Michael Crawford's casting. Most importantly, we ask that those who want to see Mr. Crawford as the Phantom spread the word and get involved. Let Hollywood know that you will not be ignored.

 

What is next for the Campaign?

The campaign will continue our letter writing efforts to Warner Bros. and the Really Useful Group, and letters and advertisements to media all around the world. In short, we will not go away.

 

Film Stars VS Stage Stars in a Musical

    The movie moguls may think that casting John Travolta, an A-list star, or Antonio Banderas will be box office insurance, but they haven't really thought through ALL the odds. Such well known stars would probably generate some publicity from their celebrity alone, which would probably help at the box office *the first week*.  But what about afterwards, when lukewarm reviews and lukewarm word-of-mouth and possible media-covered protests by disappointed phans have taken their toll?  By week 2 or 3 box office receipts will drop off, and soon the film could be playing at the dollar houses.  In other words, by pursuing this shortsighted policy, ALW and WB are cutting off their nose to spite their face.

    This is even more inexcusable because there is so much past history of filmed musicals to learn from.  With a few exceptions, when Hollywood substituted film stars unqualified in musical theatre, it didn't work.  And when Hollywood replaced performers who, like Crawford, had become *legendary* in their roles, it didn't work.

Proof:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FILM   STAR(S) SUCCESS LEVEL
*=original theater star
Mame with Lucille Ball    Disaster
Evita with Madonna and Banderas    Moderate
Annie with Albert Finney     Disaster
A Chorus Line with Michael Douglas    Disaster
A Little Night Music with Elizabeth Taylor    Disaster
Man of La Mancha with Peter O'Toole, Sophia Loren    Disaster
Jesus Christ Superstar (qualfied unknowns)    Moderate
Cabaret with Joel Grey*, qualified star Liza Minnelli    Huge Hit, Oscars
Paint Your Wagon with Clint Eastwood, Lee Marvin    Disaster
Funny Girl with Streisand*    Hit, Oscar for S
Oliver with most West End original stars*    Hit, Oscar
Sound of Music with Andrews (qualified)    Huge Hit, Oscars
Funny Thing...Forum with Zero Mostel*, Jack Gilford*

   Hit

My Fair Lady with R. Harrison*, A. Hepburn, S. Holloway* (Harrison and Holloway won Oscars. Replaced MFL legend Julie Andrews won for Mary Poppins. Poetic justice?)

   Hit, Oscars

West Side Story with Natalie Wood, qualified unknowns  

   Huge Hit, Oscars

The King and I with Yul Brynner*

   Hit, Oscar for B

Fiddler on the Roof with Chaim Topol

   Hit, 3 Oscars

The Music Man with Robert Preston original star

   Huge Hit, Oscars

 

Who Loses? By Jane Woodside

 

Here are a couple of other submissions from Campaign Member Maggie Birge
Thanks Maggie!

Gone with the Wind, A Lesson from History

More Movie History


And here is a submission from Melinda:

Warner Brothers Studio is getting a lot of valuable marketing research and feedback on a project that is still in its infant stages. What more could a company want? Anyone who has ever done this type of research would love to have the sampling base that is being provided (great demographics and free of charge!) The sampling group is also very knowledgeable and frank about the product which helps marketing get past a major roadblock and cost of familiarizing and promoting an unknown entity. Honesty from the potential consumer is also extremely valuable.

The marketing group that handled the Star Trek movies did a good job of identifying and then satisfying the existing consumer base by using the original cast in the first movie.   They increased their number of potential customers by introducing the new cast and using the original cast for the transition in later Star Trek movies. In other words they knew their consumer and courted their trust so that not only was the initial project well received and accepted, the next project with a new cast was also eagerly anticipated and accepted. Similarities between the original Star Trek movie and the proposed Phantom of the Opera movie can be made. The following is a brief list of current marketing knowns for the Phantom of the Opera film project:

1)  The number of potential consumers familiar with this product is very high.

2)  The level of satisfaction by potential consumers with this product in its present form is very high.

3)  The anticipation and support by potential consumers for a successful presentation of this product is very high.

4)  The level of dissatisfaction and support by potential consumers with proposed changes in this product is very high, intense and increasing.

5)  The level of support by potential consumers for proposed changes in this product is very low and decreasing.

6)  The level of animosity by potential consumers towards tentative casting decisions and tentatively cast personnel is increasing.

7)  The number of potential reviewers familiar with this product is very high.

8)  The level of satisfaction by potential reviewers with this product in its present form is mixed - good for Crawford but mixed for the product itself (see reviews of the play on this website.)

9)  The level of anticipation and support by potential reviewers for a successful presentation of this product is mixed.

10)  The level of criticism by potential reviewers with proposed changes in this product is increasing.

11)  The level of criticism by potential reviewers towards tentative casting decisions and other projects of tentative cast members is increasing.

12)  The level of criticism by potential reviewers towards current projects by the composer of this product is increasing.

13)  The proposed cast lead (Phantom) has had little success in attracting consumers to the latest group of projects in which he has been featured and heavily marketed.

14)  The original cast lead (Crawford) is still successfully attracting consumers and performing Phantom material.

15)  A well tested and highly accepted product is being radically changed causing high level of distrust and distress in existing consumer base.

 

Role.gif (33428 bytes)