An Open Letter to Andrew Lloyd Webber
| Name: Christopher
J. Krieger Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Baltimore, Maryland Time: 2000-03-01 01:01:49 Comments: Dear Sir: I am a fan of Phantom of the Opera. Although I have never seen the stage show, I have the CD. I listen to it daily and sing the songs with my 4 year old daughter. She plays the part of Christine and I play the role of the phantom. She knows the words, because we play it all the time. I am desperately hoping that Michael Crawford plays the Phantom again so that I may have an opportunity to see and enjoy this incredible show. Many Thanks |
| Name: logan
darkstone Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: detroit michigan Time: 2000-02-29 09:12:24 Comments: Dear Sir In the simpelist terms no other should even be considered for the role of the "phantom" , but the Phantom himself. Michael Crawford is your man and is the only one i think of when i think of the phantom every one else lives in his shadow. |
| Name: Loretta
Williams Website: Referred by: AOL From: Amherst, N.H. Time: 2000-02-24 00:09:01 Comments: Dear Mr. Lloyd Webber, I've seen Phantom 5 times, never with Michael Crawford unfortunately, but I do have the soundtrack with the original cast and play it constantly. My 5 children and their children are all Phantom fanatics and love Michael Crawford. If the movie is ever made, please let Michael Crawford re-create the role only he can do. Antonio Banderas was fine as Che in Evita, but he could never duplicate the singing talents of Mr. Crawford. I would think that with your being the composer, you would have some clout in who portrays your characters. Please let the phantom be Michael Crawford. Thank you. |
| Name: Alice Clark Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Pomona Time: 2000-02-21 03:35:48 Comments: Im not sure of my E mail address |
| Name: Alex Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Florida, USA Time: 2000-02-20 15:18:01 Comments: Dear Sir, I had the most unfornuate occasion as I watched the news last night. In highlights, they announced the closing of CATS on Broadway. My eyes filled with tears knowing that the most legendary show will no longer exist. I hope this isn't so you can save money to afford to hire Antonio for the Phantom movie. I can't believe it after all these years, CATS is going to be gone forever... well, THE MEMORY IS NOW GONE!!! The memory didn't last forever... i am just so upset right now.... I never would have thought that it would shutdown.... I can't help but feel angry and upset, but I am sure you know what you are doing... if not, well I hope God is there to save you from the wrath of the world. |
| Name: Barry McKay Website: Referred by: NewsGroups From: indianapolis, indiana Time: 2000-02-19 03:12:45 Comments: Mr. Weber My name is Barry McKay, and I have been a fan for over 15 yrs., and I have been a devoted fan of P.T.O.. Thank you for writing such a beautiful opera and having it play in my life. Your song "Music of the night" has been a major factor in my life and it plays in my mind at all times. I am praying that Michael Crawford plays Phantom in the movie and sings the song of all times to be pronounced as the greatest. Thank you for your great gift. |
| Name: Bridget Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Time: 2000-02-19 00:17:45 Comments: I find it amazing that you don't realize that to cast anyone but Michael Crawford as the Phantom, would be an extremely egrigious error. Antonio Banderas was not in the least impressive as Che and his singing left a lot to be desired. I am sure you noticed this. I saw the Pantages Theatre, Toronto production of the Phantom, and bought the sound track featuring Mr. Crawford. While the production in Toronto was fantastic, the music of Mr. Crawford still gives me chills. I wore out one tape and had to buy another. Also bought Michael Crawford sings the music of ALW. I WILL CONTRIBUTE TO THE ORGANIZATION OF AN ALW PRODUCTIONS BOYCOTT IF MICHAEL CRAWFORD IS NOT THE PHANTOM IN THE MOVIE. |
| Name: Katy Jessup Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Waterloo, IN Time: 2000-02-17 23:25:50 Comments: My Dear Sir: I'm fourteen years old, so I wasn't around when your musicals first started to come out. I only heard of you within the past year, but since then your music has had a profound influence on me. I love Antonio Banderas, but I want to see Michael Crawford as the "Phantom". How else can you bring it to life on the screen? I think that since this movie was originally set to come out many people have forgotten the magic that Michael Crawford brought to the production. It is my belief that the "Phantom Of The Opera" could never be done justice without him. Thank you for your time. Respectfully yours, Katy Jessup |
| Name: florence
ritter Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: Time: 2000-02-15 18:20:41 Comments: Sir Andrew Lloyd Webber, My 'friend',as you are because you brought the 'Phantom' in my life. I have been to Toronto to see the 'Phantom' and did go back five times more. Colm Wilkinson was the greatest 'Phantom' on stage for me,but,not to cast Mr. Crawford in the movie role,would be the greatest mistake I can think of. Mr. Bandaros is a fine 'actor',but he will never be the 'Phantom'. The role has been defined by Mr. Crawford. His ability to sing and act in this role,have made the 'opera' what it is,today. I do hope,you will find it in your heart and "Think of Me",(and others),when you do the film. Thank you. |
| Name: Priscilla Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Texas Time: 2000-02-12 16:59:45 Comments: You will be doing the world a favor when you make Phantom of the Opera (movie OR video) with Michael Crawford. Think of your place in music history! With Michael Crawford, you will be getting the best possible portrayal of the role in this your finest work. I have been a fan of Phantom of the Opera ever since I first saw it, years ago, and it will always be my favorite. Since then, I have seen it several times, and never fail to be enchanted, even though silightly disappointed that I had not seen Crawford. He has the voice and all the "moves!" Do it! |
| Name: Chuck F. Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Florida Time: 2000-02-12 03:31:33 Comments: Dear. LORD Lloyd-Webber, The reason I capitalize your title, is that without us your title would be incoherent. I must be honest with you, I really don't understand (amongst THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS perhaps MILLIONS now) exactly the reasons behind the dispute amongst the casting. I must admit, when I heard that Sarah Brightman and Michael Crawford were the SET title characters in this amazing show to be filmed, i was ECSTATIC! Unfortunately, Miss Brightman as rumored will not be cast in the film. However, I don't understand the reason for having a 17/18 yr old Christine! I have read Gaston Leroux's version of Phantom, and absolutely love it. For the MAGNITUDE of the amazing singer that brought the house to it's feet and their eyes in tears, the singer must be EXPERIENCED and TRAINED for this accomplishment. I don't see how a singer so young could pull off the singing voice of the Angel, and have the EMOTIONS EMOTIONS EMOTIONS to even pull of the "Wishing You Were Somehow Here Again" scene? At that climactic song, my emotions are just swept away by Miss Brightman's voice (who is TRAINED and TALENTED ENOUGH for this song alone). the EMOTIONS involved in this very special scene, i don't see a CHILD portraying this famed character role. however, amongst my problems with that rumor, i must admit again, that i am devistated by the MASS CONFUSION you're bringing up your devotees. As i understand it, Faye Dunaway of supposed role Norma Desmond of "Sunset Boulevard" was yanked out do to the prohibition of the embarrassment she would cause your show, and her contract money was reimbursed by suit. I would hope you would do the same with Antonio Banderas. I was impressed by his SPANISH role of Che with his SPANISH LOOKS and SPANISH VOICE, but....to have the articulate and amazing and just ENCHANTING voice of the PHANTOM requires SOOOO much more than ANY thing of looks. I simply listen to my Double disc cast recording of the London Cast and I am swept away by Michael Crawford's AMAZING ANGEL OF MUSIC VOICE. In my mind, i see the production (film version of my interrpretation) pass through my dreams and mind as often as I say hello to passer-bys. WIth Michael Crawford's voice, i became hooked onto musicals, and most INSPIRING by his performance, i am now currently writing a musical of which i hope to be staged. Your WONDERFUL musical was the inspiration and i thank you for that. Should i remind you to read Susan Kay's "Phantom"??? I assure you, if you read that book...only then can you understand the MAGNITUDE and WONDERS the PHANTOM has.This isn't just a character, this is a spirit that empowers us all, a voice so enchanting, we stop our everyday routine to listen to the VOICE, the VOICE of the ANgel of music. I see Michael Crawford as the personified vision Gaston Leroux and Susan Kay has. His sheer body movements, mysterious hand gestures, the look of the Red Death envoking Christine to sing the ending of the theme song, Phantom of the Opera. We the listeners have a power, and a say. "the voice of the PEOPLE, NEVER BE DENIED!" I quote that from Evita. The people rose with Freedom with the voice of Eva, let the people RISE with the amazing man and VOICE of michael crawford. You will see, that if you cast Michael Crawford, you will not retire short-changed mentally, you will retire with the SATISFACTION, the assurance that you did something right. the feelings you had when putting Evita and Phantom together, you KNEW it was....."just right". I hold you with the upmost respect. You chose Donny Osmond for the movie version of Joseph for the fact that you said so you yourself, "he's the best Joseph in the world". Elain Paige is "Grizabella",Patti LuPone IS "Eva Peron", Glenn Close is "Norma Desmond". in my mind Michael Crawford IS and ALWAYS WILL BE "The Phantom"....please allow me to see this dream of mine come true, and cast Michael Crawford..."aka....Erik". thank you for you time, sir. |
| Name: Jacquie Website: Referred by: Net Search From: Time: 2000-02-12 03:07:19 Comments: Dear Mr. Webber. I will keep it short... Please Reconsider and consider again and then consider..and after you consider....definitely use Michael Crawford as the Phantom in the movie version of THE PHANTOM OF THE OPERA Thank You! |
| Name: Brian
Montgomery Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Northern California Time: 2000-02-09 18:47:14 Comments: Dear Andrew Lloyd-Webber; I can't begin to tell you of the hours of enjoyment that my 18 year old daughter receives from listening to the Phantom of the Opera CD featuring Michael Crawford. Since then she has sought out other Michael Crawford music, which needless to say has effected our whole family!!! Now the word has come to us that there is to be a movie made of the Phantom, but that there has not as of yet been someone casted in the role of the Phantom. It is the sincere desire of all of our family (especially my daughter) that the role of the Phantom should be played by Michael Crawford. We feel that anyone else portraying the Phantom would be a let down, and may result in our family not attending the film adaptation. I realize that one family may not make a difference, but we are trying to show our support of Michael Crawford as the Phantom in perhaps the only way we can. Thank you so much...We appreciate the many musicals that you have brought to the stage. Sincerely ...The Montgomery Family |
| Name: David Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: MN Time: 2000-02-09 18:42:09 Comments: Dear Sir Andrew Lloyd Webber, I heard that your film adaptation of "Phantom" was in the planning stages right now. On http://www.musicals.net, we have discussed the idea of a "Phantom" movie many a times. We applaud that "Phantom" can be retold in a lavish film version, which many more people will be able to see at a much lower price. I was very grateful to see the touring company just two years ago. I was shocked when I heard some startling news about film version, though. I have heard that Antonio Banderas has signed on as the Phantom! Now, I won't go crazy like the many other fans that have probably "killed" you in their letters. I just want to give you my point of view. I think Antonio was very good in the movie version of "Evita". He fit the part of Che, and did a well job of it, especially for someone who has not had any singing experiences. I do not think that Mr. Banderas fits the role of the Phantom. The Phantom is an older character, one who needs a much larger singing range that Mr. Banderas has. Mr. Banderas's voice does not fit personality and singing range of the Phantom. How can Mr. Banderas show off his beautiful face and sexy body if he is hidden behind a mask and big, black cape? Wouldn't he strongly fit the role of Raoul much more? Or how about the role of Alex in the film version of "Aspects of Love" which I hear you are planning? Many people I know think that Michael Crawford should be offered the role of the Phantom again. He has won many awards and recognition for his role. Remember, there are no "stars" to begin with. The public makes them. When we discussed the "Phantom" movie on the forum on http://www.musicals.net a while ago, we definitely agreed not to support the movie if Mr. Banderas had the starring role of the Phantom. My friends and peers at school definitely do not want to see a "Phantom" movie with Mr. Banderas as the title role. However, we definitely would be interested in the movie if Mr. Crawford were the Phantom. Well, enough of my babbling. On the forum of http://musicals.net, this is the casting that we suggested for a film version of "Phantom". You do not have to even listen to this, but is recommended, because we think that you will be reasonable and good at casting the film version of "Phantom". These are just suggestions… The Phantom: Michael Crawford Christine: Andrea Corr, Rebecca Luker, Charlotte Church Raoul: Antonio Banderas Madame Giry: Glenn Close, Dame Diana Rigg, Meryl Streep Carlotta: Bernadette Peters, Judy Kaye Piangi: Paul Sorvino, Luciano Pavarotti Andre: Jason Alexander, Mandy Patinkin, Jonathan Pryce Firmin: John Cullum, Mandy Patinkin, Jonathan Pryce Meg Giry: Kate Winslet, Jennifer Dawn Stillings Buquet: Sir John Mills I'm sorry if my letter came across too forceful or snotty. It just would be a great disappointment to many others and me if Mr. Banderas played the role of the Phantom. Thank you for taking your time to read this! Sincerely, David |
| Name: Jacob
Clark Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Magna, UT Time: 2000-02-09 15:07:30 Comments: Lord Webber, I for one saw the touring cast of "The Phantom of the Opera" and thought is was great! Your music was great, with excitment in every scene. Your musicals are all wonderful, and thank you for all of the great musical theatre you have provided for us fans. You're the best! Jacob Clark titanicfreak73@hotmail.com |
| Name: Carlos
Mainero Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Mexico City Time: 2000-01-27 00:56:53 Comments: Dear Andrew: Hello, I´m Mexican and I´m 17. I´ve seen "The Phantom of The Opera" four times, twice in Broadway and twice here in Mexico City. I just wanted to tell you that I really love your work (from Joseph to Whistle Down the Wind)and I really hope that Michael Crawford plays the role of the Phantom in the upcoming movie. Congratulations again, and I hope more of your musicals arrive here in Mexico. |
| Name: James
Henley Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: San Diego, CA Time: 2000-01-24 15:54:56 Comments: Dear Sir, I have had the opportunity to see Cats, Jesus Christ Super Star (w/Ted Nealy), Sunset BLVD (2 x's W/Glen Close), Star Light Express and Evita on stage. I have also seen Phantom of The Opera 9 times 3 times w/Davis Gaines, Robert G., Brad Little and 4 times w/Michael Crawford. I also own the above cast recordings along with many others. My daughter (8 years) has also seen Phantom w/Davis Gaines and has listened to the cast recording countless times and could probably sign the entire libretto form beginning to end. Although she enjoyed Mr. Gaines portrayal’s she still insists "there is only one Phantom, and that's Michael Crawford". I have always admired and supported your work. But you current efforts to bring PTO to the silver screen shocks me. Sir, how can even consider casting anyone else but Michael Crawford in role of Phantom? I own the DVD version of Cats. What an awesome choice of players you chose for that video. Seeing and hearing Elaine Paige sing "Memories" still brings chill down my spine just like Michael does when I here him sing "Music of the Night". Why not make the only choice for the role of Phantom. Choose Michael Crawford and capture your original vision on film for all to see. Any other choice will be a looser. Respectfully JMH |
| Name: Melanie
Young Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Martin, TN USA Time: 2000-01-20 06:30:13 Comments: I admit that if I am angry at anyone over this whole thing, it would be you. I tried to come up with something that was at least tempered with thoughtfulness, but I can't. I will just tell you that as far as I am concerned, if Michael Crawford -- the man who MADE PHANTOM OF THE OPERA the success it is today -- is not in the role of Erik, not only will I not see the movie...I will never watch another ALW related production again. I am severely questioning your artistic judgement. It seems to me it is traveling down the "how much money can I make" road. Cast Mr. Banderas as Raoul...he would do a credible job...but he does not have the talent to handle the role of Erik. Besides, Michael never played a role...he WAS and IS the Phantom. You best look at what the fans are saying because we are the ones who can make or break your efforts. |
| Name: JANET THOMPSON Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: DREXEL HILL PA 19026 Time: 2000-01-15 04:59:28 Comments: DEAR MR WEBBER, I DO SO MUCH ADMIRE YOU AS A MAN WHO HAS ALWAYS BEEN IN TOUCH WITH HIS AUDIENCE, AND THEREFORE I KNOW THAT YOU WILL MAKE THE RIGHT CHOICE AND GIVE MICHAEL CRAWFORD THE OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE HISTORY ONCE MORE IN THE PART THAT IS HIS AND HIS ALONE. |
| Name: Marilynn Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Atlanta, Georgia Time: 2000-01-09 17:12:51 Comments: Dear Sir: Congratulations on the recent announcement concerning the achievement of "Phantom". In light of that announcement, please keep the momentum going and preserve your greatest work by making the movie or video. Phantom was a success because its story touched people with all the different emotions that were inherent in the characters' lives. It was also a success because people could relate to the plight of the Phantom due to the struggles faced in daily lives. It was a success because the music was powerful and the words meaningful. Music is a universal language and the songs in POTO spoke vividly of pain, sorrow, love, and desire. It was a success becase the original cast breathed life into each character. They drew from their own experiences, not from previous cast members', and therefore were able to make each character real and credible to the audience. They gave the characters a heart and soul to which the audience could relate. This was especially true in the case of the Phantom, as played by Michael Crawford. Since the Phantom's face is masked, gestures and voice are all important in order for there to be communication between the Phantom, other characters, and the audience. Michael Crawford was able to achieve this communication. Please don't let this achievement go unnoticed or unrewarded. It was the public that ultimately decided on the success of POTO through their patronage. We await anxiously the uncut, unaltered stage production on film. Thank you, |
| Name: John
Miller Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Lebanon, Pennsylvania Time: 1999-12-30 19:51:04 Comments: Dear Mr. Lloyd Webber, I'm 16 years old and a huge fan of your work. I've been in love with Phantom since I was 10 years old. When I first heard the origional London cast, I was overwhelmed by the power of the score and lyrics. Mr. Crawford is, without a doubt, the best of all of the Phantoms. He inspired me to sing. Casting ANYONE but Mr. Crawford would be a huge mistake. You would be letting down all of your Phantom fans by casting anyone other than he. Please, do not fail us. Please reconsider your casting decision for the sake of the fans and for the sake of the Phantom. |
| Name: Adriana
Martos Naccache Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Brazil Time: 1999-12-23 19:19:10 Comments: I first saw this magical play about 3 years ago and I fell in love with it. So I decided that someday I will be making the role of Christine at the Majestic Theater (where I first saw the "Phantom").By this time I had already graduated in English and was already learning classical and modern ballet. When we came back from NY to San Paul(Brazil- my home town)I immediately started to take singing classes with the best teacher of my country, who studied and performed together with Maria Callas for many years. Now I'm 18 and I'm a professional ballet dancer and opera singer that also knows by heart more than 10 broadway's musicals.In addiction to all this I happened to have a really white skin and long brown curlyed hair -luck or coincidence? As you can see, I would gladly work in any of Andrew Lloyd Webber's productions but, as a fan, I'd really be disapointed if Mr.Michael "Phantom" Crawford were replaced in such an important event as the shooting of a Phantom's movie.I truely respect Bandera's work, but I know that this movie wont be as sucessfull as expected if the Phantom himself is not in it. Everybody knows that entretainment industries such as The Really Usefull Group have most of their public based on the tourism. As a Brazilian, rich tourist I ask you to think carefully about everything I said. Sincerily and with love. Adriana Naccache e-mail: deanacc@yahoo.com |
| Name: Doug
McCallum Website: Referred by: NewsGroups From: British Columbia, Canada Time: 1999-12-20 06:50:34 Comments: To Lord Andrew Lloyd Webber Dear Sir: Though I have long been an admirer of your work, I find your recent behaviour appalling. You claim to love musical theatre and to be concerned with its future, and yet when it comes to adapting your dramas for film, you approve the casting of movie stars who have had no prior connection with the original shows or with musical theatre as such. As a result, the film version of "Evita" was a travesty of the original, with a female lead who could not perform the songs properly as written and a Che whose delivery of the lyrics was large unintelligible. What a far cry from the moving performances of such artists as Elaine Paige and David Essex--fortunately those of us who most appreciate your compositions can at least enjoy excerpts of the originals on CD and video highlights. That is what I and my friends do, for we would not pay good money for the dreadful film "adaptation," which had no highlights and left only a bitter memory and which "lives again" only in the form of regrets for what might have been. You should have more regrets than anyone, since it is your creation that is going to live on only as a dim shadow of its former self. Is this how you want your works to be remembered? As travesties? Yet now you are about to compromise your integrity again and participate, again, in the violation of another great piece of musical theatre, one which many consider a masterpiece and which you claim to be proud of, even as you speak of turning it into another grotesque travesty. What a contradiction! You have said in a recent interview that you feel that this was one musical which you and your collaborators got right from the outset. Clearly millions of fans who have flocked to that production in London, in New York, and dozens of touring versions since have agreed. And yet you contradict yourself by talking about acquiescing to a "revised" script by a hack director who had nothing to with the work you "absolutely got right" a decade ago. Your own words come back to haunt you and will continue to do so as you betray your own work, your future reputation, the collaborators who first helped make it a success, and the millions of theatregoers who have wonderful memories of the impact it made on stage. Do you really think that any of us will be fobbed off with another substandard version, with music omitted or rewritten, merely in order to indulge the limitations of a movie star (and not even one of the first rank)? You should ask yourself why you repeat a mistake you ought to have learned from before, and why you wish to go on participating in your own degradation. Nor is it enough for you to betray yourself. Now you want to also betray the actor who contributed the most to presenting your vision in the best possible light, to giving the title character an indelible life in the minds of audiences everywhere. Hal Prince has said on more than one occasion that in the various restagings of the original production the main task for the lead actor has been to imitate as successfully as possible Michael Crawford's unforgettable embodiment of the role. Even those of us who were not able to see Mr. Crawford on stage have been able to verify this through the original cast recording and from various performances of excerpts on videotape. These are enough to make plain how subsequent performers have simply sought to copy, with varying degrees of success, Mr. Crawford's incandescent conception and incarnation of the role: his characterization, his walk, his gestures, his vocal inflections and colourings. You may be able to deceive yourself about these matters, but you won't be able to fool millions of fans who know Michael Crawford's contributions directly or indirectly. Your callous and shortsighted refusal to even consider him for the film is a dreadful repayment for the talent and devotion with which he served your creation. After having publicly promised him the film role, you have equally publicly broken your word! Why should anyone credit you or your future work with any integrity? You profess surprise at the controversy that has followed your recent conduct and attribute it to a bad image. But how do you think you acquired that image? Don't blame the public for it, especially not the legions of devotees, who have been loyal fans of yourself and your music in the past. Blame yourself, because you and your disgraceful, deceitful conduct have created that image and sparked the controversy. Consider it a left-handed compliment that our protest derives from our appreciation of, and loyalty to, your compositions, though we must dissociate them from the dishonest and disloyal person that you are increasingly becoming. You still have a chance to show some decency. Halt the misguided, self-corrupting course of action on which you are embarked and make amends to all those you have betrayed: to Michael Crawford, to your loyal audiences, and by doing so, to your self and your reputation, as well as to the future of your great work. Wake up and don't destroy another music drama's rightful place in history. Sincerely yours, Doug McCallum, Ph.D. P.S. In another of the disingenuous and misleading statements you have been making lately, you attributed the longevity of "The Phantom of the Opera" merely to 15 and 16 year old girls going to see it repeatedly. If you believe that nonsense, it just exemplifies how self-deceived, self-reinforcing and ultimately self-destructive your current mental state is becoming. It seems a paradoxical way to promote either the stage or film versions of the show. Implying that it is most suitable for fixated teenage girls does not seem calculated to attract new audiences from other demographics, including age groups who actually have more income to devote to repeated expenditures of $80 or more on theatre tickets. Of course by spreading such nonsense you do create the illusion of justifying your intention to cast a teen heart throb in a role for which he is unsuited and to turn Christine herself into a teenager. You're taking a very shortsighted and blinkered view of your own self interest. But once again you're only fooling yourself. The rest of us are not going to want to see a dumbed down, Ken and Barbie version of a once powerful drama. In fact I doubt if most teenagers will either. You seem so out of touch with contemporary realities that I should point out to you that teenagers have long since left Ken and Barbie behind. Those 15 or 16 year old girls who may have seen your show more than once were obviously content to see it with mature performers and without a "pretty boy" phantom, which, you ought to admit, is a ludicrous idea. I am sure Mr. Banderas, would rather watch in a movie where his face isn't covered up. |
| Name: Chris Burns Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: St. Pete, FL. Time: 1999-12-17 11:18:32 Comments: To begin, I am a very strong admirer in your productions, and I have seen Phantom of the Opera on more than one occasion. It has been my family's and my own favorite musical since it's introduction to broadway. I am very displeased with the choice NOT to include Michael Crawford in the upcoming movie. Antonio is a wonderful performer, however, his vocal quality is too ethnic, and lacks the integrity the the phantom voice held under Michael. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE reconsider. There appear to be a number of fans ho would enjoy this film, who were not lucky enough to see a Michael Crawford performance...including myself. Thank You. Chris |
| Name: Jason
Evens Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Leeds, UK Time: 1999-12-16 21:58:32 Comments: There can be no question over Michael Crawford's necessity to play the Phantom of the Opera. He is a hughly emotional person who holds his audience enthralled both in character and in person. If some might say he is less of a singer than might possibly be found to perform the role, this misses the point. Michael's voice has an emotional rawness to it that gives the music and the character their greatness. Many others, Antonioa Banderas included, lack this and the result is half a phantom and emotionally removed. Better no phantom, Andrew, than half a phantom. If they won't have him then forget it. If Warner Brothers' do not feel they can count on the bankability of Crawford's name on the big screen, they need only be reminded of how he took the public by suprise on stage with his performance. For this to be repeated on stage is surely not so far fetched, and is far more interesting than the prospect of a familiar box office favourite producing big opening takings but a disappointing result. Let people come to see a phantom film because they have heard how breathtaking it is, not because Mr Box Office is in it. J Evens |
| Name: Geri A.
Mellgren-Kerwin Website: Webscribe - a writer's homepage Referred by: Clicked on a 'Guestbooks by GuestWorld' Button From: Burbank, Ca. Time: 1999-12-09 23:34:58 Comments: Dear Lord Lloyd-Webber: Phantom of the Opera is a work of genius and the best stage musical of the century. Another act of pure genius was the casting of Michael Crawford as the Phantom. Since the story has 2 male leads, why doesn't Antonio Bandaras take the role of Raoul and let Michael play Erik. Raoul could be a latino and a handsome contrast to the disfigured Phantom. Pure casting genius! Best of all worlds! |
| Name: Maggie Birge Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Owensboro, KY USA Time: 1999-12-09 04:47:03 Comments: I have to comment on something I recently heard. I have been listening to some sound bites of various interviews with Antonio Banderas. In them he states that in the proposed Phantom film you are going to take out a lot of the show's music, add some new music, plus add some dialogue. My question is, why add dialogue? If Antonio plays the phantom, it will be a waste of good words. If you think you can validate your choosing Antonio for the part by giving him dialogue to say instead of difficult music he can't sing, save your time and energy. He can't even pronounce YOUR name intelligibly, let alone give the phantom a voice that an audience can understand. We already know Antonio is a weak singer. He's no better at speaking English dialogue. What a travesty this is going to be! Your beautiful show is going to become such a joke and you are going to be the laughingstock of the film industry!! You have a chance to recreate the perfection of the theatrical production, and you are throwing it away. What are you thinking? |
| Name: Victor
Faughnan Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: San Diego, CA.. area Time: 1999-12-07 14:42:25 Comments: Dear Lord Lloyd Webber, During this past year I have sent you 6 or 7 letters concerning the "Phantom of the Opera" movie. I think, as one of your fans of your music and Plays I deserve a reply. A response from you would be the decent thing to do. Thank you Sir, I await your considerate response.. Your Fan, Victor Faughnan, 10800 Woodside Ave., Space #218, Santee, CA., 92071-5607, USA...... vicsantee@aol.com |
| Name: Sara
Macdonald Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Surrey, British Columbia, Canada Time: 1999-12-05 05:30:17 Comments: Mr.Andrew Lloyd Weber...PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE don't give the part (in your upcoming movie) of the phantom to anyone other than Michael Crawford. I havwe nothing against Antonio Banderas (or anyone else) but you know Michael can sing circles around them all. He IS the Phantom. No one will ever come close to replacing him. Please don't make the mistake of not casting him. |
| Name: Kim Casella Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Time: 1999-11-29 23:09:35 Comments: Mr. Andrew Lloyd Webber: I have gone to see The Phantom of the Opera two times already on broadway, it is a wonderful production. I have only one regret though, and that was that I never got to see Michael Crawford perform as the Phantom. It would be a great error in your part to have someone other than Mr. Crawford play the part of the Phantom in the movie that you are to be making. Do not get me wrong Mr. Banderas is a good movie star, But he is no Phantom. I have had the chance to see Mr. Crawford in concert, and let me tell you he can belt out a song. If you are worried that he could not perform up to standards, you are sadly mistaken, his voice has never been better. Mr. Banderas does not have the vocal range that Mr. Crawford has for the Phantom. Please reconsider your decision. A fan of Michael Crawford's |
| Name: Jane
A. Whitmoyer Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Time: 1999-11-28 19:33:47 Comments: Dear Lord Lloyd Webber, I have been an admirer of you and your work for years. To me you are the most prolific composer of our time. You were absolutely brilliant when you chose Michael Crawford as the "Phantom". He was an instant success. As I understand it, at one time, you wanted Mr. Crawford to do the film. For the life of me, I can't understand why you changed your mind. He definitely is not too old, and as for Mr. Crawford not being a big-name star, that is not true. He is very well known here in the States. Please reconsider and choose Mr. Crawford for the film version of the "Phantom of the Opera." I believe, as do many others, that the film will not succeed without Mr. Crawford in the role. |
| Name: K.
Michiel Cavuoti Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: Abilene,TX Time: 1999-11-27 02:58:03 Comments: The Honorable Lord Lloyd-Webber, I must admit that it is a crushing disappointment to find that a man whose talent and music I have idolized does indeed have clay feet. I never thought you would sell us out, unhappily I was wrong. |
| Name: Jaime
Dawn Crawford Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: oz Time: 1999-11-26 12:41:43 Comments: 26-11-1999. Dear Lord Lloyd-Webber, I would just like to say that IF the video production of THE PHANTOM OF THE OPERA goes ahead with Mr. Antonio Banderas, and not Mr. MICHAEL CRAWFORD, then I will NOT be purchasing a copy;---if the role of THE PHANTOM is NOT played by Mr. MICHAEL CRAWFORD, I won't be the only one NOT purchasing the video. I would sincerely LOVE to own your production on video---I absolutely ADORE your version of THE PHANTOM OF THE OPERA; the music, the costumes, the touch of comedy---EVERYTHING. Regretably, I have NEVER seen Mr. MICHAEL CRAWFORD as ERIK. I've only seen snippets of him on television, which has REALLY WHET MY APPETITE. I do not mean any disrespect to Mr. Banderas or anybody else, but, believe me, if you want the video production to be a success as popular and as well-loved as the stage-production, you will take the public's thoughts and views into consideration. I know that I speak for---LITERALLY---thousands of people. PLEASE, LORD LLOYD-WEBBER, THE ROLE OF THE PHANTOM MUST, MUST, MUST go to Mr. MICHAEL CRAWFORD. Thank You For Taking The Time To Read My Letter. Miss Jaime Dawn Crawford. jaime@picknowl.com.au |
Name: Scott Milham |
| Name: Lora
Fitzgerald Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Buffalo,New York Time: 1999-11-14 16:44:12 Comments: Hello. My name is Lora,and I am a HUGE fan of Sir Andrew Lloyd Webber.I think he is simply brilliant,and can be easily compared to Mozart and Beethoven because he is so varied.There is no one like him and there never will be.I always look for something new on him,and have everything up to date.Please never stop creating Sir Andrew Lloyd Webber!!! Thank you for this chance to speak my feelings. Your's very Truely, Lora |
| Name: Courteny
Daniells Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: New York Time: 1999-11-08 06:47:01 Comments: I have heard that you and others have decided that you would not cast Micheal Crawford in your movie of the Phantom that is coming out this year....I just wanted to let you know that I am very discusted about this and many people that I know also feel the same...If you had any common sense, what so ever, you would NOT be casting Antonio Banderes as the phantom...please in what life time was the phantom a 30 year old spanish man......Not to say he isn't a good actor..he is..but come on you should cast original people if you have the chance to and they can still play the part!!! And everyone in there right mind knows that he can still play the part...or have you not heard his newest album....but if you haven't heard it, I guess it is understandable since you seem to be an unenlightend type of person who is just in it for the money. |
| Name: Jessie Lewis Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Utah, United States of America Time: 1999-11-04 20:48:23 Comments: Dear Lord Lloyd-Webber, It is with sadness that I have heard you are planning to change the music in "The Phantom of the Opera" and star someone other than Michael Crawford. What has changed since your brilliant selection of him to play this role. It has brought you fabulous acclaim and money, and it made Michael Crawford an international star. His voice is - and will always be - the Phantom. A movie made with another person and a 'watered-down' score will only bring negative attention to you as the composer. If you listen to the customers - they want MICHAEL CRAWFORD, and will buy tickets to see the film if he is the Phantom. Otherwise, plan on a major flop (as they say in Hollywood.) If Michael Crawford isn't to be in the film, at least please have the courtesy to tell your supporters why. |
| Name: Marilynn Gardo Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Atlanta,GA Time: 1999-10-31 17:31:08 Comments: Dear Sir: Back in 1925 when the POTO was being conceived as a movie, and the casting of the Phantom was being discussed, the conclusion was arrived at that in order for the movie to be a success "it had to be Lon Chaney or nothing." The movie was a success. Today, as the casting of the Phantom is being discussed in order for the musical stage version of the movie to be a success, it has to be Michael Crawford or nothing. The movie will then be a success. In your heart surely you know that your original decision to cast Michael Crawford as the Phantom was a brillant decision and that casting him as the Phantom in the movie version will guarantee it's success and preserve your original masterpiece. Thank you. |
| Name: tmc Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Time: 1999-10-28 19:38:30 Comments: Only Michael Crawford should play the Phantom. |
| Name: Sarah
Campbell Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Hawaii Time: 1999-10-28 04:51:31 Comments: Dear Mr. Webber, I'm not sure if this will be read by you, but even if it isn't, maybe it will convince the millions of Phantom 'Phans' out there to fight for this cause. Although Mr. Bandaras was spectacular in Evita, he's just not the Erik for Phantom. Please understand that Michael is the ONLY ONE for Erik. When I was nine, my aunt sent me a recording of Michael and Sarah, and I fell IN LOVE. Even at such a young age, I knew how special and wonderful Phantom is. It's truly a masterpiece, Mr. Webber. Please don't let it go to waste. Antonio is wonderful, and I loved the whole 'casting different cultures' thing in Les Miz. with Lea Salong, but Antonio is VERY Hispanic and just not ERIK. I don't have anything against Antonio or Hispanic people- on the contrary, I think they're both awesome, but they're not ERIK. Please reconsider. Ever since I got the CD, any other person singing Erik and Christine is second-rate. Even Franc D' Ambrosio wasn't up to Michael's standards. And the man can SING! The Phantom of the Opera is REALLY, REALLY important to me. It's like my life- It's everything to me and I know it is to other people too, and I would be crushed if you cast Mr. Bandaras instead of the REAL Erik- Michael Crawford. There is no other for this role, Mr. Webber. Please, please please please please please please. We're begging you- please choose Michael. And if there is even a QUESTION who would be the best Christine, Sarah is without a doubt THE ONE. You can't deny that she's ASTOUNDING- it's like the role was written for her- same with Michael. Please, Mr. Webber. I feel so close to Erik when I'm listening to him on my CD. And I know that no one else, least of all Mr. Bandaras, could do justice to the role- could do HALF as good a job as Michael Crawford. Please listen to the millions who worship Michael- Phantom- You. Thank you for listening, sir. I love everything you've done and desperately wish that you will keep up the legend and choose Michael. I hope it's not too late. With the utmost sincerity, Sarah Christine Campbell, Wishing he was somehow here again. Hawaii |
| Name: Shaun McGuffin Website: Referred by: Net Search From: California Time: 1999-10-26 10:15:42 Comments: I have loved Phantom since High school.. Enough to learn the entire libretto before I ever saw the show. I hope it continues to run and that the quality of it never diminishes. Michael Crawford is the only logical choice for phantom in a movie. Thank you for a great musical Shaun |
| Name: Rommel Anacan Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Hawaii Time: 1999-10-23 13:22:50 Comments: Dear Lord Lloyd Webber... The Phantom of the Opera was the first musical that I had watched. It was in Los Angeles at the Ahmanson during Phantom's 4 year run. I have not had the privilege of seeing Michael Crawford performing as the Phantom but I did see him in concert of your music. Over the course of the yeras I have seen Phantom with Robert Guillaume and Davis Gaines. I must say that I would love to see Michael Crawford in the film production...I believe that as the originator of the role he would be the best to perform it. While I have the utmost respect for Antonio Banderas and enjoyed his performance in Evita I must say that I would rather see Mr. Gaines or Mr. Guillaume in the film before I see Mr. Banderas. I saw and heard Mr. Banderas in the birthday concert and I was not impressed at all with his performance of the "Phantom of the Opera"...I felt his voice was not right for the vocal demands of the score. Please reconsider... Respectfully Rommel Anacan Hawaii |
| Name: Jana Lynn Ploss Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Time: 1999-10-21 23:07:18 Comments: I write again for I have just 'disgusted' the Miami Herald interview with Antonio Bandit with my friends. Your subtle, poetic, Beauty and the Beast story will be the Jekyll and Hyde horror story after you downgrade to Antonio Bandit's range and allow him to incorporate his swash-buckler's acrobatics. Mr Crawford's body language spoke volumes that Mr Bandit cannot imitate. I recall the scene where Erik enters with Christine, hurls his hat across the stage, curls his finger through his hair, and does a Michael Jackson 'G' rated version of his hands sliding down his chest to the nether portions. Every bloody time could I hear the women swoon and the men snicker with anticpation of what was in store for them that evening. Not even Davis Gaines could perform it as well. Robert Guillaume did not even try to emulate Mr Crawford, but presented his own version. Michael Jackson could only marvel at the grace of Mr Crawford's hands. When Michael Jackson can see no other person in the role of Erik, does that tell you something? Hordes of people are reminding you to remember your words years ago, that professionalism over commercialism is your only concern. From my experience I have learnt crow is not the most delicious dish. I do not think you will enjoy it. You need some success backing your name again. Whistling and Jeeves did not do you justice, Michael Crawford will. Would you not prefer a gentleman who does not need to boast his ego (his fans are doing rather well in that category)? Or do you prefer the feathered cock who must crow to any interviewer that will listen that he is the only Erik? Listen with your heart Lord Lloyd Webber and not your pocketbook. |
| Name: Lisa L.
Bentrup Website: Referred by: Net Search From: St. Louis , MO stationed (US Navy) Groton, CT Time: 1999-10-21 21:51:33 Comments: Dear Mr. Webber, I would really like to know what has happened to your common sense. Most everyone I knoe thinks you have really lost "it". How could a brilliant artist not see the "Rembrant" before his very eyes? I love "Grease" and John Travolta in it, but not as the Phantom, I saw Antonio sing the Phantom on the PBS special of your birthday ( one question: Why was he singing and acting so angry???? To me the Phantom is not angry at anyone, didn't anyone inform Mr. Antonio of this well known fact. I know this is your show and you can do, basically what you want with it, before you make a final decision: "The moment I saw him (Crawford) with Sara at dinner for the first time, I knew there was no point in discussing the casting any further. The way he hypnotized her with his view of what he thought the phantom could be...I just tiptoed off and left them. I phoned Hal and said, ' It's cast." Time 1/18/88 Has this view changed? If so please explain to ever Phantom and Crawford fan why, I think we deserve that much. Thank you for your time, LISA |
| Name: Claudia Hemsi Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: São Paulo, SP, Brazil Time: 1999-10-21 00:49:43 Comments: Lord Andrew Lloyd Webber, when you first started working on The Phantom of The Opera you said you wanted it to be your "South Pacific". That is to say, your masterpiece. You achieved that, sir. It is a masterpiece. It is -your- masterpiece... you composed beautiful music, you were faithful to many aspects of Leroux's fantastic story... but most of all, you chose the right people. You chose Michael Crawford to be your Erik. It was, like George Perry said, "a brilliant casting coup". After all, you chose a man whose performance became one of the most acclaimed, celebrated and awarded performances of theatre history... you were strong enough to stick to your choices and request that the original cast went to Broadway... to more awards... to more recognition... then Michael Crawford went to LA... and the rest is history... a star, an era, a character was born. I live in Brazil, sir. In a country with no tradition in musical theatre at all. But people here know about the existence of The Phantom of The Opera, your masterpiece. Some only by reputation, some because they were lucky enough to be able to travel, like me, but, more than anything, because most of those people own a soundtrack... a CD that sold 12 million copies... the Original London Cast of your musical. Michael Crawford and Sarah Brightman. So most of people here in Brazil relate your masterpiece to Michael Crawford, and sir, let me tell you, it's the first impression that stays... how many times friends of mine did not come to me to tell me how much they loved his performance, and that by comparison the other Phantoms were weak... I saw your masterpiece 4 times, sir, and NONE of them compared to the powerful and unforgettable performance of Michael Crawford. And now, sir, you want to transform The Phantom of The Opera in a movie. Brazil is a great movie audience... I was thrilled with the idea, so were my friends... the play I loved so much, that touched my life so deeply, accessible to so many people who weren't lucky enough to see it on stage... the chance to finally -see- what they all -heard- for so long! And then... the disappointment, the frustration, the anger... you want to cast Antonio Banderas. A man who can't sing, a man who's not acquainted with the role... because his name means money, because his name sells, maybe because he's "more famous"... I don't know... but sir, this is not right... you have in your hands the chance to make art and history again! Michael Crawford is there, right before your eyes... a choice that all relate to the role, that doesn't need dubbing or music changes, that has touched so many lives with his performance and that now has the chance to become a movie legend. We have a saying here in Brazil... "you don't change players in a team that's winning". Michael Crawfordis a choice that guarantees success... Antonio Banderas is a risky and sad choice... sad because it could be a failure. A failure because I know many people won't see it because they -know- Antonio Banderas does not belong in this history... and that, sir, would be sad... to watch your masterpiece perish in hands that can't handle its power, the responsibility. Lord Andrew Lloyd Webber, your casting Michael Crawford to be your original Phantom was a surprise. But it worked. You were right. You were wise. You were perfect. How can you risk to be remembered for ruining your own work? Casting Antonio Banderas is wrong, sir, and I hope is not too late to open your eyes. It's the audience that saw your play, that bought your 12 million CDs, that gave you all the money and recognition, that asks for that. You can't go wrong with Michael Crawford. You knew it then... you should know it now. Humbly, Claudia Hemsi São Paulo, SP, Brazil. |
| Name: Jana Lynn Ploss Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Time: 1999-10-21 00:11:02 Comments: I am thoroughly disgusted with Antonio Banderas' interview with the Miami Herald. I read it through the phantommovie recent news. The man is arrogant and IS NOT respective of Michael Crawford fans. Deleting old music and adding new music is not the way to keep Phantom phans. Now I am thoroughly disgusted with you, Lord Lloyd Webber. I respected you more than any composer I can remember. Now I have lost it. |
| Name: Kathleen Sedlock Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Chicago Time: 1999-10-20 16:41:47 Comments: Dear Sir, Remember the good old days when a person who was in the play or musical on Broadway or West End would get to do the movie. So many of our TRUE stars like Jimmy Stewart and Julie Andrews would never have been known if it wasn't for the stage. All the composers like Irving Berlin crossed over and did both. It is just in the past couple decades where there is a definate line between the stage and screen. And I have always believed that they who are stage actors are the better actors. I have just heard comments that you were suppose to have said that Antonio is doing the movie version of Phantom of the Opera. I am very upset. I have been a fan of your music for along time and this makes me furious. I still have the announcement from five years ago from Variety stating that both Michael Crawford and Sarah Brightman would be doing the movie.Michael created and MADE that role what it was and no one since has compared in comparison. Remember Michael has had a longer film career than Antonio. And now this, remember, Antonio didn't do that fantastic of a job in Evita, and it wasn't a run away hit. It didn't make tons of money, it was just a modest success. In casting a younger and Spanish actor would be wrong, on top of which he has NO voice. It is the Phantom of the OPERA. Haven't you learned anything of late? Remember you cast a Hollywood actress for Sunset Boulevard to generate publicity and what happened? Glenn Close got the Tony and as soon as she left to go make her millions in Hollywood, the show closed. And where was Patti LuPone? Then instead of giving your songs to a good singer like Sarah Brightman, you gave to the songs to Barbara Streisand to sing. And so much for the video's and other promotional things you thought she'd do. Plus, her voice isn't what it once was and it made your songs painful to listen too. So there are two examples, where you stepped over friends to grab the brass ring. The trouble with that is it will eventually tarnish and what goes around comes around. Maybe Cameron Mackintosh should throw his hat into this ring, because since he produced the show and it is your biggest hit. Maybe you are a good composer but maybe your not a good producer as you think. And clearly Sir Mackintosh is supreme at producing. If you do hire Antonio, be aware that you will not only alienate your fans, fans of the show, but most importantly fans of Michael's and Sarah's. I do hope this gets to you and you fullfill the promises made and Michael Crawford is and will always be THE Phantom. That is his signature role and Sarah Brightman will always be Christine. So it is decison time, how will you decide by creative artistry or by money? If past indications are true you would stick to money, I hope I am wrong. |
| Name: Cris Website: none Referred by: Net Search From: London, Ohio Time: 1999-10-19 22:10:12 Comments: Alright.... now. I'm 13 years old and I'm not gonna go around sucking up to you like the rest of these people. I'm gonna give it to you straight. I LOVE the Phantom of the Opera. I tell people about it all the time if they would listen to me. I keep telling then how good it is and stuff like that. If you come out with this Zorro dude playin the Phantom, it's just gonna ruin the whole image I have been trying to give to these people! I don't want them to see that guy behind any other mask than Zorro's. Michael Crawford IS the phantom. i have the OLC CD and he isn't even to be compared to Antonio, it's probably humiliating to Michael!..... well, thats my opinion, sorry if I was a little blunt on it. |
| Name: Allianna
Nadjik Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Time: 1999-10-19 21:47:11 Comments: Please, dear god, do not cast Antonio Banderas in the part of the phantom. |
| Name: Matt Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Michigan Time: 1999-10-19 02:09:56 Comments: Dear ALW, Please do not choose Mr. Banderas over Mr. Crawford. I suggest that if you want your most successfull musical of all time to be a movie than please make Michael Crawford the Phantom! Remember, if it wasn't for Michael Crawford putting Phantom "on the map", Phantom would not have been a success in the first place. Please choose Mr. Crawford for the Phantom! PLEASE! If you want to consider Mr. Banderas so badly, let him do the sequel movie! Michael Crawford is the Phantom! It would mean so much to his fans and him. That would be the ultimate tribute to the best performer of this time! Please here us Phantom phans out! |
| Name: Michelle
Osborne Website: Crysania's Worlds Referred by: From a Friend From: Syracuse, NY Time: 1999-10-18 07:48:54 Comments: Dear Lord Lloyd Webber...I apologize ahead of time if I appear to be bitter. But I cannot even begin to understand your reasons behind casting someone other than Michael Crawford in the role of the Phantom. Your musical, sir, changed my life completely. I first heard it at the age of 14 and your music, combined with the ethereal voice of Michael Crawford hooked me on it completely. The story of Erik and Christine is very special to many people, as you probably already know. We don't want to see it bastardized in such a way! And now we find out that you plan to remove music already written and replace it not only with new music, but spoken dialogue as well?! All this, to accomodate someone who can barely sing. Have you forgotten that Erik had the voice of an angel? Would Christine have ever believed Antonio Banderas's voice to be that of her Angel of Music? Never! Michael Crawford has the perfect voice for this role, just as you discovered so long ago. Please...Drag those memories out into the light and reeaxamine them! Go back and listen to his performance...Go to one of his concerts and watch the women swoon and hear the wild applause. Michael Crawford is *loved* throughout the world! If you don't cast him as the Phantom, you are guaranteed to lose more audience than those you would gain by casting Antonio Banderas. Everyone I have ever talked to, whether they are into musical theatre or not, know Michael Crawford was, is, and always will be the Phantom. Just do what is right, artistically and otherwise, and cast Michael Crawford in the role! Don't settle for anything less than the best!! |
| Name: Sheri Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Chicago Time: 1999-10-18 04:40:37 Comments: Dear Lord Lloyd-Webber: I have been an admirer of your work for so many years. I've loved the Phantom most of all. I am heartbroken at the thought of any performer other than Michael Crawford bringing our beloved Erik to film. Antonio Banderas is a fine actor, but he cannot sing the songs we have all loved and been seduced by for more than a decade. Mr. Banderas does not have the vocal training necessary and he never will. Should the rumours that the score and story are being rewritten to fit Mr. Banderas's talents prove true, you will be destroying the body of work that inspired 12 million of us to buy the original soundtrack and inspired countless millions around the world to go to the theatre numerous times. There is no one but Michael for this role. Any true Phantom fan will not go see the film; I know that I certainly won't. In fact, I'll weep the day that it's released. Mr. Banderas's fans may go see the film...once...maybe. But the film, without Michael, will suffer a quick and agonizing death at the box office. And the fans will say "We told you so", but it won't do any good because we...indeed, the whole world...will have been robbed of a great treasure. Please, Lord Lloyd-Webber, reconsider. Your fans don't want to lose faith in you...we want to trust you with the character who has meant passion and romance to us for 12 years. We want, and need, to trust you with our Erik. Thank you for your time and attention. Sincerely, Sheri Boyd |
| Name: Rebecca
A. Sanders Website: Referred by: Signing another Guestbook From: Texas Time: 1999-10-18 03:29:15 Comments: Dear Lord Lloyd Webber, After seeing the Phantom performed for the first time, I, of course, realized that you were an artist of great caliber. I am a musician myself, and I was stunned by how moving and beautiful the songs were. Of all the music that I have ever heard, yours alone has been capable of moving me to tears. I am also an artist: a writer of poetry and fiction. As an artist, my first concern is the integrity of my art. If I should live a thousand years and never earn a dime, I would still never let anyone destroy that integrity. I would assume that the same is true for all artists and that the same would be true for you. To be completely honest, I would rather not see a movie made of the Phantom, for fear that it would hurt the musical industry. After all, most people would rather spend three dollars to rent a tape of a film than fifty for a seat in a theater plus travel expenses. However, since it seems that a film of the Phantom is decidedly going to be made, I beg of you to protect your art and give the role of Erik proper justice. At the risk of sounding crude, I feel that I should be totally honest about the current casting situation. Antonio Banderas is a fine actor, but musicals call for much, much more than mere acting, and Mr. Banderas, alas, sings like a bleating Spanish goat. His accent alone should cast him out of consideration. When you first heard Michael Crawford sing, you realized that he had a voice that could stir souls and seduce his audience. Mr. Crawford can captivate an audience like none other. Also, it is clear from viewing tapes of the two that he understands the role much better than Mr. Banderas. If you are determined to go through with making a film of the Phantom, I can only hope that you will choose to protect what most believe to be your finest work. Do not let yourself be bullied into casting a big name by producers. An artist's work is an extension of himself. If you let Hollywood destroy Phantom, you are destroying a part of yourself. I pray that you will make the right decision. Sincerely, Rebecca A. Sanders |
| Name: Jana Ploss Website: Referred by: Geocities From: Lompoc Time: 1999-10-15 23:01:43 Comments: This is in support to Eileen Kent's 15 October 1999 input. I did not watch the 'Making of My Fair Lady' because I do not have cable and only receive two channels: on and off. Remember Lord Lloyd Webber that Audrey Hepburn won the role for Eliza, but Julie Andrews won the Oscar for Mary Poppins during the following year's Award Show. |
| Name: Eileen
Kent Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Utica, NY Time: 1999-10-15 13:54:17 Comments: Sir, This is my second letter to you, this time prompted by hearing your comments on the AMC channel's "Making of My Fair Lady" last night(10/14/99). I find it quite ironic that you felt moved to comment on the choice of Audrey Hepburn to play Eliza in the movie (with her voice being dubbed), while the stage production Eliza, Julie Andrews was passed over. This error in judgment has been made frequently -you know all the examples -and yet you still seem to be considering using an alternate Phantom over Michael Crawford. Please, please listen to your initial instincts and choose Michael again. He proved you right and became the Phantom which made the production so famous and successful. No one will be accepted as a substitute by your ticket buying audience. We would rather have a film/video of the staged production, as you have recently done with Donny Osmond in "Joseph", or did with "Cats", but ONLY if the original PHantom -Michael Craword -plays the lead. Please end our torture and do the right thing for all of us -your conscience and bank account will thank you. PS If the rumor of your hotel in Vegas is true -it's a wonderful idea! |
| Name: Michelle
McCormick Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Virginia Beach, Va USA Time: 1999-10-13 05:36:10 Comments: The Phantom lives inside of Michael Crawford, consumes every part of him. His facial expressions become Erik's when he sings those songs, his body becomes an instrument of seduction and his voice reaches the innermost depths of the soul. His mode of expression has brought many to tears because of its beauty. There are many who could play the part but only Michael becomes it and that is something truly special. To rob those who have never seen Phantom of the opportunity to see it the way it was meant to be done is a heinous crime. I sincerely hope that you realize how many lives this story has touched and how many more could be captured by it if the right person plays the part. Think on it. |
| Name: Maggie Birge Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Owensboro, KY Time: 1999-10-07 22:26:00 Comments: Your Phantom of the Opera is a character whose very essence is music. He can only communicate effectively through music. He uses it to mock the people he hates and to seduce the woman he loves. This is a middle-aged man who has never known a moment's kindness or love in his entire life. His loneliness and despair are as palpable as raw wounds. Michael Crawford is an actor with the depth of talent to express the Phantom's emotions believably without going over the top into melodrama, and his voice is absolutely perfect to convince us he is truly an "angel" of music. Together, you and Michael created a theatrical masterpiece. Please do not even consider anyone else for the movie version of your show. A vast audience for this film has been building for the past 13 years, due partly to the numerous companies staging the show around the world, but also due to Michael's Crawford's extraordinary recordings and concert performances that have kept the Phantom music in the general public's consciousness. Michael is the definitive Phantom to most of the world. Most fans want only him in the film. No one else is acceptable. It's time to get the film made, and made properly. Michael Crawford as Phantom...or no movie at all! |
| Name: Katharina E. Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Austria Time: 1999-10-05 14:17:13 Comments: Dear Andrew! Hello, my name is Katharina. I come from Austria. I love your musicals, especially "Phantom of the Opera". I have seen it in Vienna. I have all CD´s of the production. If you like to make a film, please take an actor and singer like Michael Crawford, Steve Barton or Jerzy Jeske (Phantom in Germany). Christine should be played by Sarah Brightman!!! Or you make a video from the show (such as CATS and now JOSEPH) with the actors I have written. Don´t make the best musical I have ever heard and seen to a bad film. The musical "The Phantom of the Opera" is powerful and tragical and romantical. The music is the mirror for the feeling of the story. I love the story and the music - all. Don´t make a mistake with the film!!! Goodbye, Katharina |
| Name: James Anderson Website: Referred by: Net Search From: Heckmondwike, West Yorkshire Time: 1999-10-04 16:43:51 Comments: I would like to invite you to a production of Pirates of Penzance where I will be playing Frederic. It is in Keighley and opens on 18 October for 1 week. I am 6'4" slim, blue eyes, fair, and have been trained to sing by Jeffrey Lawton of the Scottish Opera. Free travel, tickets and accommodation are available for yourself or someone else who could come and give me their professional opinion on my ability. I was only contacted a few weeks ago to see if I was available to play this part but I am becoming more known and I am more in demand now and have been advised to try and get in the chorus of a West End show. Please reply. P.S. Mr. Crawford should play the Phantom in the film!! |
| Name: Hayley Marie
Christine Witthans Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Minneapolis, Minnesota(U.S.A.) Time: 1999-09-29 03:12:46 Comments: Dear Sir Andrew Lloyd Webber, Allow me to introduce myself. My name is Hayley Marie Christine Witthans. I am 13 years old, and a soprano, a lot like Charlotte Church from Wales, except I haven't done anything great like her. I greatly adore all of the music that you have composed, especially "Phantom of the Opera." I am also a great fan of both Sarah Brightman and Michael Crawford. And I wish that, instead of you having Antonio Bandares or John Travolta be the Phantom in the film version of your musical, that you would have Michael Crawford be it, with Sarah Brightman as Christine Daae'. I saw Sarah and Antonio sing at your 50'th birthday party, broadcasted on TV. Antonio couldn't come andywhere close to the genius Sarah has. They don't work well toghether. However, I've heard Sarah and Michael sing together, and they are perfect! What Angels of Music! I'd give up everything I had to see Michael Crawford in this film. My belongings, my dreams, even my life! Just please let Michael be in this film! Sincerely, Hayley Marie Christine Witthans P.S. I'm working on my own version of the continuation of "Phantom". If you are interested to see it, please contact me at my mom's E-mail address: darlene.witthans@ci.minneapolis.mn.us |
| Name: DONNA
MICHELI Website: Referred by: AOL From: ALBANY, NY Time: 1999-09-23 06:03:14 Comments: WITH ALL DUE RESPECT TO YOUR IMMEASURABLE TALENT I WOULD ADD MY SMALL VOICE TO OTHERS. THERE IS NO OTHER CHOICE FOR THE PHANTOM NOT JOHN TRAVOLTA WHO CANNOT SING OR DONNY OSMOND WHO CANNOT FIT THE CHARACTER LEAVING ONLY MICHAEL CRAWFORD WHO HAS LIVED THE TORMENTED SOUL. WHO BETTER TO UNDERSTAND. I DON'T KNOW WHY YOU CANNOT CONCEIVE BUT PLEASE RECONSIDER. THERE IS NO GREATER CHANCE FOR OPERA TO SURVIVE AS A MOVIE WITHOUT THE A TEAM CRAWFORD AND BRIGHTMAN WOULD DO YOU PROUD. PLEASE CHANGE YOUR MIND. DONNA MICHELI |
| Name: Marilynn Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Georgia Time: 1999-09-19 21:24:47 Comments: Dear Sir: Of all the actors I have seen perform on the stage and screen, none have the commanding presense of Michael Crawford. He alone is able to communicate the character's feelings, emotions, and traits to the audience in such a way that the character comes alive and becomes real. The audience is then able to relate to the character and become involved in that character's life. Michael Crawford alone will present the Phantom in the movie in such a way that audiences will want to see the movie again and again. Please cast Michael Crawford as the Phantom and make a movie that will not only be financially successful but will live in the hearts of minds of audiences forever! Thank you, Marilynn |
| Name: D.J. Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: South Carolina Time: 1999-09-18 19:46:42 Comments: Mr Webber, Let me start off by saying that you are the master of musicals. I own cats, and Evita, and plan to get "Joseph...." when it comes out. I know that you have been getting a lot of complaints about Antonio Banderas playing the phantom. I think the Michael Crawford should play the Phantom as well, but if he doesn't I understand. It is your musical and it is your decision. Whatever you do, I bet it will be a movie to remember. From a devoted Fan!!! |
| Name: John Strom Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Portland, Oregon USA Time: 1999-09-13 00:33:28 Comments: Dear Sir Lloyd Webber, I had the pleasure of seeing your wonderful, "The Phanton of the Opera" six times while I was living in New York (just one performance without Michael Crawford) and was enthralled by the music, the sets, the acting and especially by the incredible talent of one man, Michael Crawford. I believe Michael Crawford helped immeasurably in making "The Phantom of the Opera" the spectacular hit it became. Simply put, Michael Crawford IS the Phantom! I have also had the pleasure of seeing most of your other works including "Cats" (three times), "Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat", "Jesus Christ Superstar" (twice in London), "Evita" and "Aspects of Love". Of all of the musicals you have written only one has been elevated to the very pinnacle due to the efforts of one man. That one musical is "The Phantom of the Opera" and that one man is Michael Crawford. There has been talk for several years now of making "The Phantom of the Opera" into a motion picture which I hope you will do. "The Phantom of the Opera" is a wonderful story, has marvelous music and will surely be a hit. I confess dismay, however, that there is talk of Antonio Banderas (or some other) playing the lead. I urge you to reconsider. Antonio Banderas is a very average actor and his singing talents are pedestrian at best. There is only one man for the lead in "The Phantom" and that is Michael Crawford. There is absolutely no comparison between their singing talents and Michael Crawford is far and again the more romantic. I trust you will make your selection for the movie "The Phantom of the Opera" after assessing the talents of the two. Thank you for your consideration of the hundred of "The Phantom of the Opera" fans, to which I add my name. I remain..... Very truly yours, John E. Strom |
| Name: Arielle
Perez Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: New York City, NY Time: 1999-09-10 04:46:37 Comments: Dear Mr. Webber, I have heard, from many reliable sources, that you are planning to make a film version of your most magnificent musical piece of work "The Phantom of the Opera". I was VERY excited about this news, especially when I heard that you planned to have THE Michael Crawford as the hypnotic and majestic figure of Erik(The Phantom). Suddenly, all my dreams were shattered when I found out that you planned to have Antonio Banderas as the Phantom instead of Mr.Crawford. I must admit that at first I thought this was some kind of a cruel joke, but the many news clippings, websites, and other sources destroyed all my clinging hopes and confirmed my darkest fears that all of the rumors were undeniably real. No offence to Mr. Banderas, he was good in "Evita" and "The Mask of Zorro", but I honestly can't beleive that you are actually thinking of putting in an actor who has never even been in "Phantom" and whose vocal range is very limited. Michael Crawford IS the Phantom and I believe that he should immortalize the role of the Phantom for future generations. You chose him because you knew he posessed a voice that would bring the Phantom to life, a hypnotic voice which was(and still is) capable of touching a person's heart and reduce him/her to tears when he sang to Christine that one last time. That is the voice that I, and many others like myself want to be our beloved Phantom. I don't speak to you as an young thirteen year old girl but as a devoted and loyal fan of "The Phantom of the Opera". Please, listen to what I, and many other Phantom fans are trying to tell you. Michael Crawford is the only man that we will ever accept, and to turn our request down is to turn down everyone who has ever seen "Phantom' and was deeply moved. Please, don't make the mistake of replacing the moving and emotional Michael Crawford with a big Hollywood name. That is not what your musical was about. Please give the world that gift of having "Phantom" as it was made to be. That way everyone, especially young people like myself, can witness and experience the magic that it plays on people. Look into your heart, Mr. Webber. I know that there you will find a way to make the right decision. I thank you for your time. |
| Name: Arthur
Wiegand Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Colorado Time: 1999-09-10 03:52:55 Comments: I think you have been the greatest influence for the musical stage. I hope and pray for your continued success. I also hope that Michael Crawford would star in the movie, Phantom of the Opra. |
| Name: Peter
Bradford Website: The Web Page of Peter Bradford, formerly of Kent, now Maryland USA Referred by: Clicked on our Banner Advertisement From: Columbia, Maryland, by way of Kent, UK Time: 1999-09-08 14:26:01 Comments: Dear Sir Andrew, I must be one of the few people in the world who never had the opportunity to see "Phantom". By the time it was in my area, Michael Crawford had left the cast -- I refused to see it with any other lead. You could put that right for me by making sure he is your Phantom in the film version. May I add that in addition to being a huge fan of Michael's -- dating back to "Some Mothers Do 'Ave 'Em" -- I am an avid admirer of your work. My favourite, among many, being the piece you wrote for your brother, Julian; "Variations". I'll always remember sitting down to watch the very first airing of "The South Bank Show", and being blown away by the introductory music and the rest of the show, which was dedicated to the production of the record. Incidentally, through that I became a fan of your brother's, as well as of Barbara Thompson and John Heisman. In conclusion, please be loyal to your many fans, to your fellow countrymen and to the world of the arts -- "Make it Michael". Thanks, Peter Bradford |
| Name: Kelley Website: Referred by: AOL From: Nashville, Tennessee Time: 1999-09-05 20:58:52 Comments: Dear Mr. Webber, I have already sent you a letter by mail, and i hope you recieved it. Like i said in the letter, NO ONE can replace Michael Crawford, NO ONE! Michael Crawford is the Phantom and the Phantom is Michael Crawford! Please don't make a horrible mistake by letting antonio play the Phantom, Let him be Roule! and let Michael be the Phantom!! A loyal fan! Kelley |
| Name: Veronica Cyr Website: Referred by: AOL From: Santa Ana, CA, USA Time: 1999-09-05 19:52:36 Comments: Dear Mr. Weber, The Phantom of the Opera has been my favorite story since I was around fourteen years of age. I have seen every movie release, read the original book, and am thorougly in love with the story. I have seen Mr. Crawford in the theatre production of Phantom of the Opera more than '30' times. In my estimation, he IS the phantom of the opera. He brings the tortured sould to life. Antonio Banderas is a star in his own right, but he is NOT the person to play the phantom in your movie. This movie doesn't need a hearthrob to play the lead role. The phantom is deformed, he is tortured, he expresses himself in his music. While Antonio did alright as Che in Evita, he cannot hold a candle to the voice behind the mask that is Michael Crawford. Most of the people who will attend a movie musical will be the same people who enjoy the theatre experience. You are not going to draw the 'action adventure' crowd to Phantom of the Opera, the movie musical. Please listen to your phantom audience. They are the ones who will go to see your movie again and again, bring their friends, recommend it to others, and buy the video when released. Please reconsider what you're doing. Phantom onstage was a success because of Michael, plain and simple. His voice, his moves, his tortured soul, brought us back again and again. He is the Phantom! Thank you, Veronica Cyr Santa Ana, CA 92704 |
| Name: Katrina
Jenness Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Oregon Time: 1999-09-03 04:42:54 Comments: Dear Mr. Lloyd Webber, I am a dedicated fan of yours, and have loved your music since hearing 'Memory' as a young child. You are a true genuis, and I'm sure you know that by now. I have listened to or seen most of your works, and I have to admit "Phantom..." is my favorite. It is also your best. I believe that you must have a special kinship to this particular work of yours. I know many of your fans do. 'The Phantom of the Opera' is a story that will never go out of style. People will still be flocking to see any and all versions of it until the end of humanity as we know it. I know, because I once performed in a verson of the play. I know you are an artist, and see things with skill. Surely, Antonio Banderas can't be the one that the artist inside you really wants in the role. His style is not classic enough for the role. Michael Crawford, who has shown every success as The Phantom, (or, Erik,) seems to have been put to the side. Why? I have every faith in your descision, Mr. Lloyd Webber, because I know you would not sabbotage such a masterpiece. I am sure that you will do what you think is in the best interest of future artists and all of posterity. In my personal opinion, as a fan, actress, singer, critic and artist myself, Michael Crawford would be the most sensible living human to put into the role, stage or screen. Your admirer, Katrina Jenness |
| Name: Jo West Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: The Hill Country, Texas Time: 1999-09-02 04:57:06 Comments: Dear Mr. Lloyd-Webber, Although many men have done admiral jobs protraying the Phantom on the stage (and I have seen many of them), there is.....in fact......only one true Phantom: Michael Crawford. I urge you to consider noone else for the film version of your beloved classic stage production. All best, Jo West |
| Name: Jessie Lewis Website: Referred by: Clicked on a 'Guestbooks by GuestWorld' Button From: Utah, U.S.A. Time: 1999-09-01 05:53:32 Comments: Dear Lord Lloyd-Webber, Your choice of Michael Crawford as the original Phantom of the Opera proved to be very profitable for you and provided untold hours of enjoyment for the theatre-going public. If the long-delayed movie is really to come to pass, I encourage you to use the same foresight as the first time and choose Michael Crawford to play the Phantom again. He would love to do it, and your fans would love to see him do it. You know in your heart there is no other who could come close to capturing a world-wide audience for you. Also, the recent release of his autobiography, will bring much additional publicity for the movie. Please preserve the music of the night for posterity. Make this a money-making, blockbuster movie with integrity, not a mediocre also-ran with someone else in the title role. |
| Name: Dan
McCleve Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: USA, Ogden, Utah Time: 1999-08-21 05:46:03 Comments: Dear Andrew, First I'd like to say I love all of your musical's you've ever done, I can honestly say your AWESOME!, and your "The Man." Now I have a few idea's for future musicals which I thought you might want to consider: First a musical about Alexander The Great would be very cool, I mean you've done musicals like Starlight Express and Cat's that are centerd around groups of different Trains, or Cats, but you've never really done one around just one soild Character, well Evita and Joesph had lot's of help to get to the top, but to Alexander it came naturally, I thought it was a good idea anyway, the Second idea is to make a musical with lot's of "Seize The Day" songs in them, I know every musical ever made has at least one, but to make a musical composed of them would be pretty cool I think. I mean we all know that we can and do relate to musicals and there songs, but the "Seize The Day" songs give us, let's see how can I put this, well for me personally they give me inner strength and a boost of confidence evertime I listen to them. Please give me you input. Thank you |
| Name: Brandon Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: CA Time: 1999-08-26 11:52:24 Comments: Dear Mr. Webber, I am a devout fan of the phantom and am eagerly awaiting its release on the silver screen. However I am distressed about the casting. Antonio Banderas is a talented actor who did a fine job as Che. Despite this he lacks the singing ability to be the phantom. His shortcomings as a singer are even more evident after listening to other recordings of Evita. Many are calling your 50th birthday celebration a try out for Mr. Banderas. To me the event proved he just does not have the voice. In the video release of Cats you returned to one of the originals, Elaine Paige. The result was memorable (pun intended). Please trust Mr. Crawford to do the same with the Phantom. Thank you for your time. God bless. |
| Name: Yev Bronshteyn Website: - Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Connecticut, USA Time: 1999-08-12 14:45:31 Comments: Dear Mr. Webber, You have probably read many comments about the upcoming Phantom movie, and probably know ahead of time what I will attempt to say, but being a Phantom fan, I feel the need to say it anyway. Antonio Banderas is a good actor. I liked the way he played Che's part in Evita. He is talented as an actor, but I feel lacks ability as a singer. On your 50'th birthday, when he and Ms. Brightman performed The Phantom of the Opera, she literally drowned him out! His face, his posture, along with all other visual components of a good performance were perfect, yet his voice lacked the strength. Accent was yet another significant problem. Although I am impressed by how much he was able to conceal his accent, he did not conceal it well enough. Lastly, Antonio Banderas lacks the experience as a singer. Sure, he had to sing plenty of times, but he didn't have a career in singing like Mr. Crawford did. Banderas does not have Crawford's tenor or vibrato, or those other elements that make Phantom's voice memorable. You have probably already made your decision, and this one letter will probably not change your mind, yet I do beg you to reconsider. Much of your audiences will be fans who have seen the production of Phantom. They will want a Phantom who will be as good as or better than the one they had seen. Who better to be trusted with that role than the original Phantom himself? Please. Make the right decision. Your fan, Yev Bronshteyn |
| Name: Kirsten Website: none yet: it's a new domain Referred by: From a Friend From: Massachusetts Time: 1999-07-28 06:43:50 Comments: Dear Andrew... I have to quote from another letter written to you.. it states most of the thoughts I have: "I never had the chance to see Michael Crawford on stage. But I did see videos clips of 'Music of the night' and realised that he performs in a truly unique style, bringing a life, a soul to the very character of the Phantom, making him seem a more realistic and tragic figure than many of the old films (And trust me, I must have seen every single one). Its not that I dislike Mr Banderas, but I have several complaints about him: Too young, too good-looking (Thats what people want to see, but if he's wearing a mask, what's the point?) and his voice is simply not up to the standard required for the role. In the various books, emphasis is laid in the beauty of the Phantom's voice, in contrast to his disfigured appearance and, having listened to the original cast recording more times than I can count, I believe that Mr Crawford has the ideal voice. No insults to your judgement, but Crawford is the best and I hope it won't take you long to realise that." I think Banderos' voice is small, strangled compared to the voice of Michael Crawford.. MC is not beautiful and perhaps that is how he can convey the pathos that the Phantom must have (in order for the audience to believe in him)... How can you think of another to play the role?? I was so disappointed in the movie "Evita" because Patti Lupone's emotion grabbing voice was not there!! And, Banderos was okay in Che's part, but Mandy really WAS Che!! I will not watch "Evita" again... and I saw the play (whenever I could) at least a dozen times!!! Please consider your decisions longer!!! Please pay some attention to your fans!!! We made you.. didn't we?? |
| Name: Matt
Tilmann Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Michigan Time: 1999-07-27 23:53:50 Comments: Dear Mr.Lloyd Webber, You are a theatrical genius! How do you do it? Phantom is your best hit of all. My family and I are going to see the Canadian Phantom next month. Anyways, just please keep up your magic and put Michael Crawford as the Phantom for the movie. Don't let Hollywood executives persuade you otherwise, keeping in mind Michael Crawford is the one who made Phantom a great success in the first place. So, please make other Phantom "phans" as well as myself's wishes come true. Thank you for your time. A huge fan, Matt Tilmann |
| Name: Chris Kopacz Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Cicero, IL Time: 1999-07-25 16:31:14 Comments: Dear Andrew, The Phantom of the Opera is quite frankly the best musical ever written for the stage. A film version is a wonderful idea that will allow fans to cherish the Phantom experience forever. Michael Crawford and Sarah Brightman CREATED the roles of the Phantom and Christine. By bringing in Antonio Banderas, John Travolta, or some other box-office magnet, you run the risk of ruining the Phantom memories for many people. My suggestion is to do what was done for CATS: bring back many of the original cast members and recreate the Phantom experience that began its success. Thank you for your time. chrisk Chris Kopacz Cicero, IL |
| Name: Marvin G.
Zehr Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Carthage, NY Time: 1999-07-25 00:16:34 Comments: Sir Andrew (or whatever appeals to you the most); How anyone of us could presume to dictate a composer's wish for such a phenomena as "The Phantom of the Opera" is a bit askew. Most of us stand in awe of the years of work and rivers of perspiration that goes into the creative process. To presume we might be able to effect your decision is quite naughty of us. Being a humble secondary music teacher, I thought one more person with a simple plea might be the seed. Every year I teach a unit on your infamous musical to my charges at Carthage Central School. After preparing them with background on instruments of the orchestra, we carefully examine your libretto and listen to the original cast recording. Without question it is the student's highlight of the year. Even those students labeled with learning disabilities find it fascinating. With a subsequent trip to Toronto or a nearby city to see the production, they are completely moved by the experience. So, if it means anything to you, I too vote for Mr. Crawford. He posesses the subtle vocal nuances so critical in portraying both the "bright" and "dark" sides of the phantom. I respectfully doubt Bandaras can culture those qualities with his voice. A recent PBS performance, seemed to indicate a restrictive edge to his voice which does not lend itself to the lyrical ambiance so necessary to our empathy with the phantom. Michael so artfully calls us to fall in love with him. Again, I feel slightly embarrassed but clearly stirred by this challenge. You are the composer. If Michael is not available - give me a call. You need a lyrical Tenor not a makeover baritone. God Bless. |
| Name: Anne
Croteau Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Canada Time: 1999-07-24 03:00:39 Comments: mr. Loyd Webber, I would like, like many others, ask you to do something to get mr. Crawford to play the phantom. You are a musician yourself, and a heavenly talented one at that, you must know that Antonio Banderas is far from having an adequate voice for the phantom. So, I'll do what so many keep doing, I beg you to cast Michael Crawford as the phantom, I don't believe you would like to see your music turned to ridicule by a bad singer. Yours truly, one of your biggest fans. |
| Name: Clare Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Braveheart country Time: 1999-07-20 20:44:05 Comments: Lord Lloyd-Webber I was just a screaming brat when Phantom came out (Whose to say that I've changed much?) and I never had the chance to see Michael Crawford on stage. But I did see videos clips of 'Music of the night' and realised that he performs in a truly unique style, bringing a life, a soul to the very character of the Phantom, making him seem a more realistic and tragic figure than many of the old films (And trust me, I must have seen every single one). Its not that I dislike Mr Banderas, but I have several complaints about him: Too young, too good-looking (Thats what people want to see, but if he's wearing a mask, what's the point?) and his voice is simply not up to the standard required for the role. In the various books, emphasis is laid in the beauty of the Phantom's voice, in contrast to his disfigured appearance and, having listened to the original cast recording more times than I can count, I believe that Mr Crawford has the ideal voice. No insults to your judgement, but Crawford is the best and I hope it won't take you long to realise that. |
| Name: Elsa Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: England, UK Time: 1999-07-20 19:08:57 Comments: It is absolutely incredible, unthinkable, that anyone but Michael Crawford could be considered for 'The Phantom' !! I listened spellbound when Michael performed Andrew Lloyd Webber Music LIVE in Birmingham ... he was brilliant. The applause was deafening, the encores demanded by a captivated audience .. appreciative of sheer genius !! Please, please, please, Lord Webber ... Michael Crawford IS The Phantom .. let him haunt our lives for ever. |
| Name: Kat H. Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Time: 1999-07-20 06:48:20 Comments: HELLO LLOYD WEBBER! DO YOU NOT SEE THAT WE WILL NOT GO AWAY! MICHAEL IS THE PHANTOM! HE IS NOT TOO OLD! THE PHANTOM WAS OLD ENOUGH TO BE CHRISTINE'S PHATHER! AND, DID YOU NOT HAVE TO MAKE MR.CRAWFORD LOOK OLDER PHOR THE PLAY? WE WILL STOP AT NOTHING. LONG LIVE THE PHANS! LONG LIVE MICHAEL CRAWFORD! .....YOU WILL CURSE THE DAY YOU DID NOT DO....ALL THAT THE PHANTOMS ASKED OF YOU!!!!! ....YOU GAVE US THE MUSIC.... WE MADE THE PLAY TAKE PHLIGHT.... AND NOW.... HOW YOU'VE REPAYED US!.... DENIED US AND BETRAYED US.... WE, THE PHAN'S WON'T VANISH.... WON'T DIE WITHOUT A PHIGHT..... I ADVISE YOU TO COMPLY MY INSTRUCTIONS SHOULD BE CLEAR, THE PHANS WILL JUST KEEP HAUNTING YOU 'TILL CRAWFORD'S VOICE HEAR! -KAT |
| Name: Hollie Website: no homepage Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Utah Time: 1999-07-16 21:05:20 Comments: Dear Mr. Webber, Why are you considering to put Antonio Bandaras as the Phantom? You know the phantom is supposed to be a disfigured human being. No offence to Antonio, but he's a pretty boy. I've seen Phantom once, and it was pretty good, not Michael Crawford, but still good. I want to see Michael do the role, so for me (and everyone else like me) just let Michael do the role if he's willing. |
| Name: elizabeth Website: Teacher's Toy Box Referred by: Yahoo! From: St. Louis, Missouri Time: 1999-07-14 21:41:55 Comments: Lord Lloyd Webber, My introduction to your great musicals was when Phantom of the Opera was released in the US. I fell in love with it so much that when my 16th birthday came around, my parents flew me to LA to see it--with Michael Crawford and Steve Barton (he was filling in!). Since then, I have seen it every chance I get--4 times--but none of the other phantoms have compared with Michael Crawford. I have been a devotee both of the story of Phantom and of your other works. I know that I am not an influentially famous or wealthy person, but I hope you will at least consider my opinion as one of your fans, for it is the fans who give wings to the work you do. I appreciated the casting of Antonio Banderas in the movie Evita. He was not as strong a singer as, say, Mandy Patinkin, but he did surprisingly well with the part and added an interesting flavor to it. However, I am saddened that you have not approached Michael Crawford with the part of the Phantom for the movie. I know that you've read the book and understand that the phantom is an older character. In addition, Michael Crawford is still very attractive and, I am certain, very capable of playing a sympathetic and alluring phantom for your movie. I am also certain that Antonio Banderas will not make an acceptable phantom and certainly will not give the movie strength to call people back to musical theatre on the big screen. Instead, I'm afraid the movie will be a laughing matter. Antonio Banderas does not have the strong voice necessary for the role of the phantom. His breathy, half-singing at your birthday celebration showed that, and I think many people will not find him the sexy phantom you wish when the one who is supposed to hold the keys of music and woo with his voice cannot sing strongly. Please remember this is a musical and give the role to someone who's devoted his study to singing and musical theatre. Antonio Banderas may be a big name, but your largest crowd for the movie will be people who love musical theatre and people who have seen the show--not people who are looking for an action-adventure Zorro movie. The action-adventure phantom movie has already been tried--it didn't even have weak singing in it--and it was a flop. No one remembers it. Please don't do that to a story we all love and a movie we've all been looking forward to. You do have the power of making a wonderfully beautiful movie--one that can restore faith in the musical theatre and create great potentials for the future. Please don't ruin it by taking a show that probably has the greatest chance of enamoring the public and making it less-than-the-best. Thank you. |
| Name: Pat Williams Website: Referred by: Net Search From: Finksburg, Maryland Time: 1999-07-12 06:37:32 Comments: Dear Mr. Lloyd Webber, I have been waiting for years for the movie version of POTO. No matter who stars in the movie, EVERYONE knows: "The role of the Phantom can no longer be cast, because Michael Crawford IS the Phantom." No one can duplicate Michael, no one has his voice, no one can bring out the emotion. Michael and the Phantom are one and the same! I saw POTO in D.C last summer. It was good. I have seen Michael Crawford twice on stage, the last time being last summer (he sang various hit songs from numerous shows). There was no comparison. On stage in a tuxedo, no mask, no props, etc. he still strikes in the depths of one's heart with feelings, tears, love and joy. Please don't give us second best, when all we are asking for is first rate -- the "real" thing! |
| Name: Lucille
A. Jones Website: Referred by: NewsGroups From: Maryland Time: 1999-07-11 20:20:36 Comments: Mr. Lloyd Weber, When you finally did something right by choosing Michael Crawford as the original Phantom, it's best you stay with a winning choice. Some of your 'replacements' on stage did not do the show just |