An Open Letter to Antonio Banderas
Total: 280 guests
| Name: Katy Jessup Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Indiana Time: 2000-05-10 10:36:53 Comments: Mr. Banderas, I was possessed to write this because I cannot stand the way so many of the other people who wrote to you speak. I am a huge fan of yours. "Evita" is my favorite movie. You made the role of "Che", and no one (including Michael Crawford) could ever live up to it. On the other hand, Mr. Crawford made the role of "Phantom", and no one (not even you) could ever live up to it. Thank you for your time and understanding. |
| Name: jana ploss Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: lompoc,ca Time: 2000-05-09 11:36:55 Comments: Mr Banderas--cannot you take a hint? Phans do not wish you to raze the role of the Phantom. Not only do the women not want you, the men do not want you in the role. I saw the Phantom with Mr Crawford. I heard the women's sighs over his performance. I heard the men's envious conversations in the mezzanine. I listened to how they would bring their female counterparts in tow by emulating Mr Crawford, at least by purchasing more tickets to more productions where he partook. You can either make or break this movie. Make it by gracefully bowing out. Break it by murdering the aspirations of many Crawford phans who never saw him perform the role, but wanted to see him; and phans who want to see him perform the role forever in picture and on video. You are no Phantom. Please stick to your swash-bucklers and leave the Phantom alone! |
| Name: Melissa
Bashardoust Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Los Angeles Time: 2000-05-08 20:55:18 Comments: PLEASE do NOT take the role of the Phantom! Michael Crawford DESERVES the role. He IS the Phantom, and should always be. No offense, but you do not have the strength, power, or lightness, to sing the part of Erik. Phans around the world will feel SOOO grateful if you turn this role down. I reeeeally want to see Michael Crawford in the role of the Phantom. TURN DOWN THIS ROLE!! PLEASE?? |
| Name: JOYCE
CEBULAR Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: clearfield, pa. Time: 2000-05-08 11:18:49 Comments: an open letter to Antonio, dear sir, i'm pleased to hear that you have been chosen to play in the movie, but please reconsider, and ask Andrew, please recast you as the viscount, and give the phantom lead to MICHAEL Crawford, he has done the role to perfection on the stage many times, and has the musical training to do the music to perfection. you are far better suited for the demanding role of the viscount, and your musical talents would be displayed, as well.I truly feel that this movie is meant for both of you fine young men and actors. it would be oscar material, and that would do the classic, which this book is, great justice. |
| Name: Melissa Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Los Angeles, CA Time: 2000-04-29 18:53:11 Comments: Mr. Banderas, now, I have not heard you sing, and I have not seen you act, but I HAVE heard Michael Crawford as Erik--the Phantom--, and I know he is the one and only Phantom. I am absolutely DYING to see him play in this role. Pretty pretty please refuse to play the part of the Phantom. Did you know that Cary Grant turned down the role of Henry Higgins in My Fair Lady for Rex Harrison? And look what a big success that was. Cary Grant is my favorite actor, but I cannot picture him as Professor Higgins. Honestly, I cannot picture you singing 'You alone can make my song take flight, help me make the music of the night.' Michael Crawford is the true Phantom. One final question: Have you even read the book? |
| Name: John Bednarz Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Southgate Michigan Time: 2000-04-27 19:21:52 Comments: Dear Tony... I Will Not Lie Or Feed You A line Of Crap, You Can't Sing Or Act All That Well Either.. So I Don't Know Who's Putting This Idea In Your Mind To Be Erik Or Even Raoul. Please Do Everyone A Favor And Turn Down Any Part In The Phantom Of The Opera Movie. Let A Real Actor/Singer Like Mr. Crawford Do The Role He Was Destined To Do. You Have Had Enough Bombs In Your Career Already Are You Sure You Would Like To Take A Masterpiece Like The Phantom And Make A Musical Comedy Out Of It. Every Man Should Know His Limitations. Time For You To Wake Up,Pal |
| Name: Thomas
Knapp Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Germantown, New York Time: 2000-04-26 07:41:14 Comments: Dear Mr. Banderas, As a fan of yours I beg you to step down from this role. Please allow Mr. Crawford the opportunity to immortalize his stage role for the ages. Sometimes its risky business to challenge the will of the people and try to replace a legend. Mr. Crawford is "The Phantom of the Opera" to millions of fans around the world. Do not under-estimate his popularity. The backlash could end ones career. VRTK |
| Name: Judy Young Website: Referred by: AOL From: San Diego Time: 2000-04-24 16:13:46 Comments: Dear Mr. Bandaras, I do admire your talent greatly however,I cannot understand why you want to hide your handsome face behind a mask and makeup. The Phantom is an older man who has been hiding in the catacombs for years. You would be perfect as Raoul! Crawford and Bandaras what an incredible draw!!! |
| Name: Terrasa
Merchant Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: florida Time: 2000-04-20 18:25:54 Comments: please do not take this role :( |
| Name: George
Kelsey Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Salt Lake City Time: 2000-04-11 10:35:30 Comments: Mr. Banderas, please do not take up the role of the Phantom! It is my opinion, and the opinion of so many others that the only Phantom who can really do the part is Michael Crawford. He really has the vocal range, the sheer acting prowess, and skill to play the part. Do everybody (including yourself) a favor, PLEASE DO NOT SING THE ROLE OF THE PHANTOM!!! Thank you, George Kelsey |
| Name: marina
redford Website: Le Fantome De L'Opera Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: United Kingdom Time: 2000-04-09 12:05:27 Comments: Antonio Banderas, out of the hundreds of entries here, I don't see how or why you should read mine, but in case you do, I can only add my voice to the hundreds of others chanting "Michael Crawford is the Phantom". I have only seen The Phantom Of The Opera once (with Mike Sterling as the Phantom). I couldn't see why everyone wanted Michael Crawford to be in the movie. I wondered how he could be different from Mike Sterling, yourself, and the other actors who have, or possibly will portray the Phantom character. I had seen yourself in Evita, and fell in love with the character Che, merely because of your voice and style. I thought that you would be wonderful as the Phantom. "What changed?" I hear you ask. Well, I had the wonderful experience of watching Michael Crawford perform last night at the Edinburgh Playhouse, and immediately I stopped wondering why everyone was obsessed with him. I have no idea whether you've seen him perform, or not, but I feel compelled to regale some of Michael's qualities: 1) The Phantom character is always seemingly present on stage. He knows everything that goes on in the Paris Opera house. Michael has the stage presence that conveys this. He has the ability to focus the audiences attention on himself. 2) The Phantom has led a solitary, sad life, and is experiencing love for the first time with Miss Christine Daae. The emotions that come with such an act are new, and powerful to him. Michael has a voice which can also convey this. His voice can be "hard as lightning, soft as candlelight" at the same time. 3) Michael does not move across the stage, he simply glides, with the grace of the Phantom. All of my preconcieved notions of what Michael would be like on stage, flew out of the window as soon as his voice possesed me and melted my soul. In that moment, I knew that he was the only one who could bring the Phantom's terrifying, yet beautiful qualities to life. From what I see and hear, you have not yet been offered the role of the Phantom, and I do not know whether you have any wish to accept the role, should you be offered it. I (and the millions of Phantom Phans) can only hope that if you are offered, and accept the role of the Phantom, that you also will be able to portray the Phantom's magical qualities, for if you are not able to... well, I'm quite sure that you are aware of the possible consequences. All that is left for me to say is: Consider yourself in the role of the Phantom. Imagine yourself singing "Close your eyes, let your spirit start to soar..." powerfully and entrancingly yet with a softness likened to "candlelight, angel light, firelight and star glow" and then imagine yourself singing "You will curse the day you did not do, all that the Phantom asked of you" with the heart rendering force that is needed. Do you now still see yourself in the role of the Phantom? I think that everyone involved in the casting of the Phantom, including yourself, Mr. Banderas, should remember those all important four lines, as sung by Michael, in the role of the Phantom: "I gave you my music, made your song take wing... and now how you've repaid me... denied me and betrayed me..." Fate chose Michael for a reason, the same reason Lord Webber wrote the role of Christine for Sarah. Sarah and Michael created the roles of Christine and the Phantom, and for Sarah to be chosen for the movie, and not Michael, is a slap in the face to all of the fans. Without Michael Crawford, the Phantom would simply not exist. I am sorry to have taken up so much of your time, Mr. Banderas, but I hope that you now understand why a lot of Phantom Phans (including myself) think that Michael is the only actor for the afore-mentioned role. In sixty or seventy years, I hope that I'll be able to tell my grandchildren about one of the greatest actors of all time, who stepped down to allow the fans the pleasure of seeing the only Phantom in the movie of The Phantom Of The Opera. In stepping down, Mr Banderas, you not only earn my respect, but the respect of millions across the world. Thank-you, with love, Marina. |
| Name: John
Miller Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Pennsylvania, USA Time: 2000-04-07 21:39:11 Comments: All I have to say to you is, "NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!", ahem, "NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!" Have a nice day! |
| Name: Debbie
Chapman Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Chapin, South Carolina Time: 2000-04-07 14:35:37 Comments: Dear Mr. Banderas, No offense to you, but Michael Crawford is the only wise choice for this role. I hope you will recognize this and allow the real phantom to "appear". respectfully, Debbie |
| Name: Aaron Michael
Clement Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Utah Time: 2000-03-31 09:24:43 Comments: Dear A.B All I have to say is the role is not for you and you should stay away from the role of the Phantom let The real Phantom play his role. Michael Crawford is the phantom and no one and I mean no one can take his place. Just to let you know I did like you in evita and to also let you know I have not seen any of your movies but Evita.. Here is why When I found out that you were asked to play the phantom in the movie and I saw you on Andrews 50th Birthday celibration I thought that I could not support you in any movie but Evtia I would have to say that you are a limited actor/ Performer. So I think you know what I mean so leave Phantom to the Pros.. :) |
| Name: Maren Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Minnesota Time: 2000-03-29 14:34:17 Comments: Dear Mr. Banderas, As a fan, I greatly appreciate the work you have done as an actor. I am an actress in an amateur youth theatre in my hometown, so I can understand what it is like for you to be offered such a role as the PHANTOM. However, I (and many others) would appreciate it if you would step down from that role. Michael Crawford is the original PHANTOM, and I believe that it would be best for everyone if Mr. Crawford was permitted to once again become the PHANTOM we all love and adore. Sincerely yours, Maren |
| Name: Alyssa
Parker Website: none Referred by: From a Friend From: Virginia Time: 2000-03-29 10:40:05 Comments: Dear Mr. Banderas I am a (rather young, 15) fan of "Phantom" and I'd greatly appreciate it if you would step down and let Michael Crawford be the Phantom in this movie. I know you will get other offers for other movies and I want my children to, one day, be able to see "Phantom" as it was originally. Please, please step down, if not for me, for other future Phantom fans! Sincerely, Alys |
| Name: Julie Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Montana Time: 2000-03-26 11:44:10 Comments: Mr. Banderas, I think you are a wonderful actor, and Evita is one of my favorite movies! You had a pretty good sucess with Evita, and I enjoyed it very much. However, for the Phantom of the Opera movie, I would be so greatful if the original Phantom, Mr. Crawford could play the PHANTOM. I know it must be a great honor for you to be asked, but so many people would appreciate it if you would step down. We have nothing against you, in fact you are one of my favorite actors! I just want to see Mr. Crawford perform his star role himself, he is the PHANTOM, and I would appreciate it so much if he could always be the PHANTOM. I have nothing against you at all, if you could just understand, I just want Mr. Crawford to be casted in his rightful role. I'm sure you will have many other opportunities, but this may be Mr. Crawford's one chance to touch everyone's heart again in his enthralling role of the Phantom. Please, please, please, I would be so grateful if Mr. Crawford could play his rightful role. I am still one of your great friends, I just don't think this role is for you, I'd be so grateful if Mr. Crawford could play it! Try to understand. Thanks, Julie |
| Name: donna Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Phoenix, AZ Time: 2000-03-23 21:27:37 Comments: Dear Mr. Banderas, I am going to talk about a great actor, a legend if you will. I am sure you have heard of him, his name is Cary Grant. You see he was offered a very wonderful role and he turned it down. He turned it down because he knew that Rex Harrison, the actor who WAS the role was the best one to perform it on film. Not only did he turn it down he also informed Warner Bros. (hmm, you think they would learn their lesson) that if they did not have Rex Harrison portray the role he would never do another Warner Bros. picture. I believe James Cagney was offered the same role and responded the same way. What true actors, what true masters of the arts and what gentlemen. Thank goodness for all of us that those two gentlemen thought more of the integrity of the theater, the fans who would be watching and the over all beauty of the role and the outcome of the show. They thought more of that than they did of their wallets and their egos. They were true stars and gentlemen. Please Mr. Banderas follow their example. Show us all that you are more concerned with upholding the integrity and beauty of Phantom of the Opera. Show us all that you too are a gentleman. Please, if offered the role of the Phantom, turn it down. Tell them that if they don't give it to Michael Crawford you will never do another movie with Warner Bros. Wouldn't you rather go down in movie history that way, instead of as the actor who tried to portray the Phantom in a movie that was a box office failure. Mr. Banderas look at all the attention this is getting. Look at all the phans who want Michael Crawford to play the Phantom in the movie. How can you even consider taking the role, when you know how passionate the phans are about this. Ultimately the movie is for the fans, please give us what we want. We want Michael Crawford as the Phantom. I have enjoyed your work in many different movies. But to be brutally honest, if you play the part of the Phantom in the movie, I along with about a million other fans will not enjoy you in that role, nor will I ever watch you in another film, special, tv show, concert, etc. Michael Crawford is and always will be the Phantom of the Opera. Be a gentleman Mr. Banderas, be a gentleman. Thank-you Donna |
| Name: Steven M. Lurie Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Bergen County, New Jersey Time: 2000-03-21 23:46:51 Comments: Please allow Michael Crawford to have filmed his wonderful performance as The Phantom in The Phantom of the Opera. Thank you. Steve Lurie |
| Name: Janet
Jamilkowski Website: Referred by: Geocities From: Clinton, CT, USA Time: 2000-03-21 21:02:48 Comments: Dear Mr. Banderas. You have a fine singing voice, are an excellent actor, and if you do become the Phantom, then I shall go see it--but reluctantly. It is your FACE that I want to see, sir, and how can THAT be possible in this movie? Please reconsider... peace. Jan J |
| Name: Erin Website: None Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Lancaster, PA Time: 2000-03-19 12:53:04 Comments: Antonio, you really do have a great voice, I just don't think it's the best voice for Phantom. I'm sorry, but something with the Spanish accent just doesn't sound right. Now, I love hearing you in songs from Evita, and so on, but please, don't take a role that might just not be right for you! |
| Name: Alex Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: New York City Time: 2000-03-17 04:53:09 Comments: OK, you're a great actor, but It takes more than just a great actor to play the role of the phantom. You have a really nice voice, but it just doesn't suit the part. Sure, Michael Crawford used to be a little stick running around in "Hello Dolly," but he has since then matured into an outstanding actor and his voice is the best thing that ever happened to the theater business. He can act, and he sure can sing. Please, he has said he'd like to play the role in the movie (granted, he might turn it down), but PLEASE give him a chance to take the role or decline it. I'm sure that any day now you will be offered a role that is more suitable for you. Please do the right thing and match the right person with the right role. Michael Crawford IS the most suitable for the role, and even the largest of actors should be able to admit that to themselves. If not, they shouldn't be in the business. After all, I'd hate to see anyone EXCEPT Michael Crawford sing "Music Of The Night" in front of millions in movie theaters. Please consider my plea. Respectfully Yours, Alexandra Horn |
| Name: Christine
or Christy Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Portland, Maine Time: 2000-03-15 14:36:39 Comments: Hi Mr. Banderas. I am just saying, weren't you already in Evita? |
| Name: Maggie Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Owensboro, KY Time: 2000-03-14 20:08:44 Comments: In recent weeks I have twice listened to the complete London cast recording of Phantom of the Opera as well as looked again at your appearance on Andrew Lloyd Webber's 50th birthday show. I wanted to be certain I had made an objective comparison between Michael Crawford's voice and yours. It reaffirmed my initial judgment. There is no way to compare your voices because they exist on entirely different levels. He is a professional; you are an amateur. I can see why you want to play Erik, the Phantom. There is a mystique about him that must be attractive to many actors. What you don't seem to understand is where that mystique comes from. It is largely Michael Crawford's creation. The Phantom of the Opera has always been a story about a man obsessed with music, but it had never before had its own musical score. Andrew Lloyd Webber created the perfect music to match the story's drama and passion. He also made a brilliant choice of a singer/actor to interpret that music. Michael Crawford and Erik were the serendipitous blending of the perfect actor and the perfect role. As an actor you surely know that not every actor can play every part. You claim that you saw Michael Crawford perform in Phantom of the Opera. If that is true, then how can you honestly believe you can play that part? Forget for a moment the sensuous gestures and graceful movements that caused a sensation with audiences. Just consider the singing. Michael Crawford's voice has been classically trained for nearly 25 years. He practices daily and pampers his voice like a priceless instrument. As a result, it has incredible substance. It has authority and resonance. Listen carefully to him singing the Phantom music. His voice can soar to falsetto one moment and plunge to a baritone the next. It can whisper caressingly and hiss with menace. It is both angelic and demonic. It can command, threaten and seduce. The role demands an unusually high degree of versatility and professionalism, and Michael Crawford met those demands brilliantly. He set a standard so high that few other actors have come close to matching it. You are inviting the most intense scrutiny you have ever experienced if you play this role. There isn't a single critic or entertainment journalist who is unaware of our campaign to keep you from playing the Phantom. Every step in the making of this movie will be closely watched, and when the movie is released your performance will be analyzed microscopically and mercilessly. These people know Michael Crawford's triumphant history with Phantom, and every gesture you make and every nuance of every note you sing will be compared to his performance. Few actors have ever had to live up to a legend like this one. I believe with all my heart that you are making the worst mistake of your professional life with this decision. You are admittedly an amateur singer. In spite of what you and Andrew Lloyd Webber think, you are unprepared and unfit to perform such a demanding role and I guarantee you will regret the day you made the choice to do it. Please change your mind before you cause irreparable harm to your career and alienate the vast number of people who want Michael Crawford--not you--to star in the Phantom movie. |
| Name: Walt
Pleimann Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Colorado Springs, CO Time: 2000-03-14 07:55:02 Comments: Antonio: Raoul is definitely the part for you..please preserve that wonderful Phantom role for the original...Michael Crawford..Yul Brynner WAS THE "KING" as Michael IS THE PHANTOM!...please do your career a great service and pick the parts wisely. Challenge your acting in other areas and let this one for Michael! Thanks.. |
| Name: Calvin Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Los Angeles Time: 2000-03-13 21:48:26 Comments: Mr. Antonio Banderas: I've seen your performance with Sara Brightman and in Evita. Your particular and distinctive voice does not match the voice quality and characteristic of the Phantom, which I believe only Michael Crawfort can deliver. After seeing various other broadway performances, I don't believe anyone else can deliver the same caliper of voice charisma and character as Michael Crawford. Truly, Calvin |
| Name: Ken Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: San Diego, CA Time: 2000-03-12 02:36:09 Comments: Dear Mr. Banderas, I'm sure that you are just following your instincts in trying to obtain the role of the Phantom in the film version of "Phantom of the Opera". You're an actor and it's an exciting role in a hugely successful stage musical. Perhaps you see it as a challenge, one that will stretch your talents to a new level. And I'm sure that it would. However, the role was created by someone who breathed passion into the character, primarily by his incredible voice. Erik is called "The Angel of Music". Music is the most important thing in his world and his voice must convey that to the audience. It must mesmerize, enchant, seduce, excite, and frighten. And it must have the range to sing the song that makes Christine fall under his spell, "The Music of the Night". It is the Phantom's song and giving it to Christine to sing makes no sense. I'm sure by now you have seen the PBS concert that Michael Crawford did two years ago. Can you watch and hear him sing the music from POTO and imagine that you could do as well? If not, then don't let them change the score, the dialogue, the lyrics, and the story just to suit you. You can do any number of action pictures and your fans will love you, but this one musical could be disastrous to your career. Your Phantom will forever be compared to Michael Crawford's. And guess which ones the POTO fans will choose? They've already chosen. They've been telling you loud and clear, ever since your name came up in connection with this film. Roaul is a better part for you. Your handsome face will be in view. You get to sing a very romantic duet and you get the girl. Your fans will love you for it. And the Phans will sing your praises. Just let us have Michael Crawford for the Phantom and we'll all be happy. That goes for ALW and Warners. They'll make more money and that's what the movie business is all about. Right? |
| Name: JOYCE
CEBULAR Website: NO HOME PAGE Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: CLEARFIELD,PA. Time: 2000-03-11 21:57:53 Comments: HI MR. BANDEROS,JUST A NOTE TO LET YOU KNOW THAT I'VE ENJOYED YOUR FILMS,IN THE PAST. BUT I PERSONALLY DO NOT THINK, ARE FITTED FORTHE ROLE AS PHANTOM. THAT ROLE WAS CREATED, BY MICHAEL CRAWFORD, WH PUT A WHOLE RANGE OF EMOTIONS, IN HIS SONGS ANDTHE PART. I REALLY THNK YOU ARE MORE SUITED TO PLAY THEROLE OF---RAOUL, WHAT WITH YOUR SPANISH HERITAGE, ANDYOUR DARK EYES AND GOOD LOOKS. WHAT PERFECT VISCOUNT YOUWOULD BE. MR. LAROUX CERTAINLY DID NOT HAVE YOU IN MINDWHEN HE WROTE THE BOOK 'PHANTOM OF THE OPERA'.I AM MORE INCLINED TO BELIEVE, HE HAD MICHAEL CRAWFORD, INMIND, IF MR. LAROUX WERE ALIVE TODAY TO DO THE FILM.SIR ANDREW LLOYD WEBBER, WOULD DO A GREAT INJUSTICE TO THEBOOK, AND THE PLAY, THAT MADE HIM LOTS OF MONEY, SO, PLEASEBE A GREAT SPANISH GENTLEMAN, AND STEP ASIDE AND LET MICHAELCRAWFORD DO THE ROLE HE CREATED. |
| Name: FreakyMartian Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Time: 2000-03-11 04:01:44 Comments: Dear Mr. Banderas, There is no doubt that you are a talented actor and you have established that you can sing. You have sixteen fansites on Yahoo! However I, along with many other Phantom of the Opera fans, must ask you to please decline the role Andrew Lloyd Webber and Warner Brothers has offered you as the Phantom. Michael Crawford delighted audiences in NY, London and Los Angeles as the original captivating Phantom and he deserves credit onscreen as the original as well. The rest of the world needs to know what we've known for so long about Mr. Crawford, but the rest of the world already knows who you are and has seen proof of your acting talent in your past films. Please, give the Phans what they want! Thank you! FreakyMartian |
| Name: Margaret Bupp Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Clearwater Fl. Time: 2000-03-11 01:17:11 Comments: Dear Mr. Banderas Please don't deprive the world from seeing Michael Crawford as the Phantom. The world knows only him to be the Phantom. You will be known for your great rolls , but he is known as the Phantom. Please let the world know what a great person you are by declining the roll so he will accept. Thank You Margaret Bupp |
| Name: carol buescher Website: Referred by: NewsGroups From: washington,missouri Time: 2000-03-10 16:23:08 Comments: Banderis---give it up. You are not now, and never will be the Phantom. |
| Name: Tim Landry Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: USA Time: 2000-03-10 07:26:48 Comments: Phantom without Crawford is like King and I without Brynner or Music Man without Robert Preston. |
| Name: Lisa Rakebrand Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: New Jersey Time: 2000-03-09 13:39:16 Comments: Mr. Banderas, I am a fan of your work in Evita...you did a fantastic job and I listen to my cd quite regularly. That being said, I have to tell you that Michael Crawford deserves to play the Phantom in the movie adaptation. He IS the Phantom, and is also the perfect age now to play the part in the movie. You would be a great Rauol, but Mr. Crawford will always be the Phantom. I wouldn't be able to bring myself to see a movie that casted the lead to anyone else. I don't think that a movie production of this wonderful musical would do very well without the original, true Angel of Music. |
| Name: Cassie Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Texas Time: 2000-03-08 21:10:37 Comments: Dearest Antonio, I think you are a great talent. I saw the clip of you and Sarah, and I think that your voice would be perfect...FOR RAOUL! I also saw the clip of MICHAEL and Dale, and I know that there is NO ONE for the Phantom but Michael. He started it, so it's only right that he should play the role. Thank you. |
| Name: Luann Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: Sacramento Ca. Time: 2000-03-07 14:09:46 Comments: Mr. Banderas I would like to say that you have a nice voice and can sing fairly well. I enjoy listening to my CD of Evita. I know you would really love to play the Phantom in the movie version of The Phantom of the Opera. I think the gentlemanly thing to do here is let the man that really put the life into the phantom play the role. I think you would make a wonderful Raoul and he ends up with the girl in the end anyway, besides the fact that he is on stage more than the phantom. You are a good-looking man so why would you want to hide your fabulous face behind all that makeup? You know as well as any one else that Michael Crawford should be the one to portray the Phantom. There are so many Michael Crawford fans out here in the general public, people who go to the movies and are banding together. If you make them all mad by not doing the honorable thing by stepping down you just might find a boycott of your movies by them all. You’re a great actor and I enjoy your movies a lot but I think you would do the world an injustice if you push ahead and insist on the Phantom role. Not to mention I don’t think the film will do all that well with all the protest that will be taking place over the injustice to Michael Crawford. Please do the right thing and let Michael Crawford play the part he is best known for. |
| Name: Rasmus
Rimestad Website: Ordets sky Referred by: NewsGroups From: Norway, Skien Time: 2000-03-02 08:24:57 Comments: Dear Antonio Banderas To start off, I want to make it clear that I have nothing against you personally. You are a great actor and I've loved you in both Evita and the Zorro-movies I've seen. But you are not the actor I would want in "The Phantom of the Operah". Please decline the offer for this role. If you don't you risk loosing me as a fan. Yours sincerely Rasmus Rimestad |
| Name: Katy Jessup Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Waterloo, IN Time: 2000-02-17 23:01:13 Comments: Mr. Banderas: I wanted to say that as far as I'm concerned Michael Crawford is the ONLY "Phantom". I'm not here to criticize you, for you are my favorite actor. The first time I saw "Evita" I was blown away. If anyone is to play the "Phantom" on film it should definitely be Mr. Crawford. On the other hand, if for some reason he was unable to do so, I would want it to be you. Respectfully yours, Katy Jessup |
| Name: florence
ritter Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: Time: 2000-02-15 18:16:41 Comments: My Daer Sir As you have heard,the role of the 'Phantom',is a very detailed part. I truly believe that,someone,who has had great experience,should do this role in the movie version. To be honest,I do have a tape that shows different songs of 'Phantom',sung by different people,including Mr. Crawford. THEY DO NOT HAVE WHAT IT TAKES! I saw 'Evita',and was impressed by your singing,but,you could never be my 'PHANTOM'! I thank you for your time and truly hope,for the sake of the people who love the 'Phantom',you will decline the role. You are a fine man,but,not the man for 'Phantom'. |
| Name: Chuck F Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: FLORIDA! Time: 2000-02-12 16:41:35 Comments: Dear Sir, I must admit something to you. As many POTO fans there are, there are VERY FAMILIAR with the lyrics. I shall now recite a few, "Should these demands be ignored, a disaster beyond your imagination will occur...Si, atleast he (michael crawford) make it sound like music". I hold your acting abilities in the upmost respect, but, your singing capabilities REQUIRED for the show, are however, not up to par. I believe your portrayal of Che in EVITA was impressive. But, I hold Michael Crawford in the highest bid 'cause he is the phantom. Have you read Susan Kay's "Phantom"? If not sir, i HIGHLY recommend you read what your voice calls for. I highly recommend you also, read my open letter to ALW for further insistence on my feelings. I believe those who read this will see that my writings are true and from the heart. I believe you would fit suitably in the portrayal of Raoul. handsome, charming, suave, but you sir, are no Phantom. :) thank you for your time, sir. |
| Name: Marilyn Adamo Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: New York Time: 2000-02-10 15:30:36 Comments: Antonio, you are cute, but you are no Phantom. Maybe Che wasn't such a stretch, but the Phantom is Michael Crawford. This role needs a real voice. Yours isn't bad, but again, you are no Phantom. Make a wise business decision and decline the offer. |
| Name: AnneMarie
Lowell Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: New York City Time: 2000-02-08 16:41:04 Comments: You are a great talent. I write this as a professional actress, singer and writer (screen and other endeavors) I say this. But please, PLEASE -- the Phantom belongs to Michael Crawford. For the sake of ego, whatever - don't let happen to you what happened to Barbra Streisand when "Hello, Dolly!" was cast. Forever, it's there for the world to see and tsk-tsk. Be as gracious a man as you are a great talent and politely withdraw yourself from the film casting of "Phantom of the Opera." |
| Name: Mollie Duck
McBride Website: Referred by: AOL From: Tulsa, Oklahoma Time: 2000-02-06 21:04:36 Comments: Antonio, as you can tell, as much as so many of us adore you, your voice, and your work, and would love to see you as Raoul ... Phantom is simply not an option for you as far as we Phantom Phanatics are concerned. Keep your career on the right track ... stick to Raoul! No one can or will ever fill the shoes of the great Michael Crawford, and it would be a grave mistake for anyone to ever even attempt to do so. Thank you, Mollie |
| Name: Joanne Daley Website: Referred by: AngelFire From: Illinois Time: 2000-01-29 21:09:36 Comments: I would only like to see you in the Phantom of the Opera movie if you would play the part of Raoul and I'm sure this is the role your fans would want too. Michael Crawford IS the phantom although I would love to see him in a movie without his mask. |
| Name: MFestin Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Time: 2000-01-29 09:28:55 Comments: I agree with the comments that you were indeed good in Evita. I also agree that you may not be right for the Phantom role, which Michael Crawford had exceled in. You might be forever be compared to him if you get into that role. I also agree that the Raoul part may be just right for you. |
| Name: craig Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: texas Time: 2000-01-28 22:22:20 Comments: Mr. Banderas, There is certainly no question of your talent in Film. As a true artist, you must realize the importance of having the right man in the part. Michael IS the phantom. I would love to see you in the role of Raoul!! You would be perfect! I can't imagine anyone buy Michael doing the part of the Phantom. He created that role and is (in my opinion)still the best for that role. |
| Name: James
Henley Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: San Diego Time: 2000-01-21 16:13:57 Comments: I have seen PTO 9 times. 3 times w/Davis Gaines, once w/Robert G., recently w/Brad Little and 4 times w/Michael Crawford. I saw Evita on stage 3 times with very diverse cats and own the DVD of Evita where you play Che. You where outstanding in that role. I also saw you perform on AWL's 50th B-day party. As loyal PTO phan and the fact I have seen the show so many times in my opinion casting you as the Phantom does not do the part justice it deserves. I believe you are more vocally suited for role Roul. Please reconsider you desire play the part of Phantom. A devoted Phantom phan JMH |
| Name: Melanie
Young Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Martin, TN USA Time: 2000-01-20 06:14:25 Comments: I agree, Mr. Banderas, with statements made by many that you are a fine actor and did a great job with the role of Che in EVITA. However, the thought of you in the role of Erik (as well as the fact that I saw your performance on the ALW 50th Birthday Celebration) frankly horrifies me. I would love to see you in the role of Raoul because I believe you have the ability to handle it well and with the dignity it also deserves. Michael is able to do something that you can't remotely understand...he is able to tap into the soul of Erik to the point that he is no longer Michael Crawford...he IS The Phantom. That is a rare gift he gives to us all. Please don't take away the chance for him to share that with so many POTO fans that never were able to see him perform in onstage. This movie can be a musical masterpiece or it can be another musical with movie star-big names. You are a very talented man, but you, dear sir, are not The Phantom. |
| Name: Laura Organa Solo Website: The Qui-Gon Jinn Discussion List Referred by: Lycos From: California Time: 2000-01-16 08:37:31 Comments: I have been an Antonio Banderas fan since Mambo Kings in 1991 but you, sir, are no Erik. :o) I can say nothing more because John Miller spoke my heart in msg 219. Michael Crawford is the one, true Phantom to me and it would be a sad thing to see someone so completely un-Erik get the role (No offense, of course. Antonio Banderas is a fine actor indeed). The role belongs to Michael Crawford: the first and only (in my opinion) Phantom of the Opera. |
| Name: Bob
Abdich Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Alabama Time: 2000-01-12 21:00:46 Comments: Mr. Banderas. You were an excellent choice for "Che" in Evita. Your vocal range and talent was perfect for that role. However, I don't think that you will make as effective a "Phantom" as Michael Crawford. Please consider stepping down and letting the fans see the best actor in the role. |
| Name: John Miller Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Pennsylvania Time: 1999-12-31 19:23:28 Comments: Dear Mr. Banderas, I hold nothing personal against you or your work. However, it is very clear that the fans want THEIR Phantom, the one man who has the essence of Erik within him. That man is Michael Crawford. Mr. Crawford is my idol. And, unfortunately, outside of video clips from shows, I've never seen him perform. For those of us who couldn't see him perform live, this movie would be a Godsend. So please, reconsider your bid for the role as the Phantom. Grant it to the man who is the rightful heir to the Phantom's throne. |
| Name: Meg Fantine Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: New York Time: 1999-12-29 04:28:39 Comments: Yo Antonio! In case you haven't noticed most fans want Michael Crawford! We feel thatmost Phantom fans are the ones who will be going to see the Phantom of the Opera and if most fans want Michael Crawford then not very many peeps will be seeing the movie! We just wanted to enlighten you with this info! |
| Name: Jaime
Dawn Crawford. Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Australia. Time: 1999-12-28 14:06:16 Comments: Dear Mr. Banderas, I would just like to say that the role of THE PHANTOM---MUST go to Mr. Michael Crawford;---he was born for the role of THE PHANTOM OF THE OPERA---HIS ROLE! I certainly do not mean any disrespect to you, Mr. Banderas, but---the role of ERIK cannot be played by anybody else but Mr. Crawford. It would be like:---birds swimming in the ocean and fish flying in the sky---if anybody else was to play the part---it would just make no sense at all whatsoever. PLEASE, MR. BANDERAS, it's got to be MR. MICHAEL CRAWFORD. Thank you, Kindest Regards, Jaime Crawford. {No Relation---unfortunately}. |
| Name: Megan
Gilbert Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Pennsylvania Time: 1999-12-27 05:16:09 Comments: I can do nothing but repeat what over 200 people have said before me, but one more repetition might just do the trick, eh? I think, respectfully, that this is a role you should never have been offered. It was a mistake and betrayal on the part of those who made the offer, and you should insist they keep the promise they made to someone who is guaranteed not to make a mockery of himself by not being able to sing the beautiful and beloved ~original~ songs. I'd personally hate to see the Broadway or London shows have to close because someone was told "I've seen the movie, don't waste your money." |
| Name: Jeff Sherman Website: Referred by: Yahoo! From: Virginia Time: 1999-12-21 07:11:54 Comments: Mr Banderas, I have been a long time fan of yours and thought that you did a wonderful job as Che in Evita. However, I do not believe that you could properly do the same justice to the role of Phantom as Michael Crawford can. Please do the right thing and step down from consideration. |
| Name: CHRIS BURNS Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: St. Pete, FL. Time: 1999-12-17 07:06:55 Comments: This is by no way a demeaning letter, please, however, reconsider the part of the Phantom. There have been many envious fans of Michael(I being one of them) who have been robbed of the chance to see his performance as THE PHANTOM. His voice sends chills up people's spines as the true essence of the Phantom is revealed. Had he not made such an impact on the world with his debut, this issue would be null and void, however, as Richard Kiley will always be Don Quixote, Michael Crawford will always be the one, the only true PHANTOM. Thank you. CHris |
| Name: Hayley Marie
Christine Witthans Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Minneapolis, Minnesota Time: 1999-12-12 21:08:47 Comments: Dear Antonio, I know that it may be sickening to hear from me again, but I promise you that I won't bother you much more. I just wanted to say that after hearing your voice and viewing this guestbook, I got a new idea. I saw many people write that you would be a good Raoul when they told you to let Michael play the Phantom. I thought about it, especially when I came home from school every day to eat supper. I then thought it would be a wonderful idea for you to play Raoul. Here are my reasons: 1)You and Sarah Brightman are about the same age. So were Raoul and Christine in the story. You both are very young and very young looking. And of course Michael Crawford is better agewise as of playing the Phantom. 2)Your voice is perfect for the role. Steve Barton was originally wonderful, and Michael Ball is pretty good too, but as I imagine you singing in "All I Ask of You" with Sarah, it sounds wonderful! Keep singing! 3)You do get the girl in the end, so that's one advantage for you. I've also seen Michael portray the role of Raoul. He is very good at it, but he makes a much better Phantom. The same with you, only you make a much better Raoul. It would also be nice for you to become really good friends with Michael after this whole movie is made, one way or another. That way I can adore you both at the same time, along with Andrew and Sarah! I'm sorry if I'm being too bossy or telling you how to live your life. But it would be absolutely wonderful for me to see you play Raoul in this musical. Please think about it, at least. Again, thank you for your time! |
| Name: Ana Sol Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Palm Springs Time: 1999-12-11 22:50:45 Comments: I continually read in the Phantom's guestbooks that the Phantom is an old, mature creature. The Erik I read is ageless. His maturity is not. The creature was compelled to mature to survive his environment. He did grow to be vindictive, but also fair. The book doesn't have the horrific ending that the movies had. Even if the Phantom were young, I do not believe that Antonio can satisfy the role because in every movie I have seen him in, he gives the impression of being a rash, but god's-gift to the world. If he demands more narrative and less lyrics; more special effects; etc. would he not demand to let a little more of his "guapa" shine through the mask? To paraphrase Bennet, I knew the Phantom (I saw him many years in the form of Michael Crawford), and you sir are no Phantom. You can't crack your voice as Michael can when he commiserates with himself, when he attempts to conjures Christine. Please DON'T DO phantom. |
| Name: Meghan Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Ohio Time: 1999-12-10 21:16:23 Comments: You are a fine actor, but if you go through with this it will ruin many peopls reputation AWL,WB,Really Useful Group,and you own for preforming a part that wasn't made for you. I know you have heard this thounds of times play Raul or one of the Mangers.They are very significant to the musical. You could preforem it beautifuly. With people saying your too young for the role of Phantom I have to agree. He's in his 50's to maybe early 60's. Raul on the other hand is in his early 20's to early 30's which is you age bracket. Please, try a role other than Phantom. Who knows you might do wonderfuly in it with something you couldn't accomplish with the role of Phantom. I'm truly sorry about the lenghth and any errors in spelling. |
| Name: Anastasia
Lynn Taylor-Kane I Website: Oosh -n- Alley Referred by: From a Friend From: Santa Clarita, California in the US of A Time: 1999-12-08 18:05:52 Comments: Mr. Banderas, I would like to open by saying that I truely enjoy your movies. Ever since you were in 'Interview with a Vampire' I've been in love with you. I believe your performance in Evita was superb. However, after seeing your performance with Sarah Brightman at Andrew Lloyd Webbers Birthday Celebration I do not believe the role of the phantom, Erik, is right for you. You're just NOT Michael Crawford! Please don't get offended. I hope you make many more movies (I'll be in the front row on openning to see them). But, If you're cast as Erik, I don't know if I'll be able to sit through my beloved musical. Please take this into consideration. Thank you. |
| Name: Reggie
Naus Website: Realm Of The Opera Ghost Referred by: From a Friend From: the Netherlands Time: 1999-12-03 13:16:52 Comments: No offence, you were a fine Che but the Phantom requires a completely different singing voice. Michael Crawford's voice. Besides, you look too young. The Phantom is an older man. |
| Name: Jeanne Cooper Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Time: 1999-11-29 23:00:23 Comments: There is only one PHANTOM, and that Mr. Banderas is Michael Crawford.And if you do not have him in the film, that will be a disaster. |
| Name: Kim Casella Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Time: 1999-11-29 23:06:59 Comments: There is only one PHANTOM, and that Mr. Banderas is Michael Crawford. |
| Name: Hayley Marie
Christine Witthans Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Minneapolis, Minnesota Time: 1999-11-28 18:06:51 Comments: Dear Antonio(Mr. Bandares), Allow me to introduce myself. I am a 13-year-old, female opera singer(not to mention one who can do twice as well as Charlotte Church), I am a piano player, I am a great fan of Andrew Lloyd Webber's and Sarah Brightman's, and I am in love with Michael Crawford and his singing. I also must say that you are a wonderful actor/singer. You were magnifique in "The Mask of Zorro" and you took away the show in Lloyd Webber's "Evita". But I have a best friend my age by the name of Danielle(who is a wonderful violinist) who loves Lloyd Webber's "Phantom of the Opera" as much as I do, and we both think the film role of the Phantom should go to Michael Crawford. So please, do continue on with your great career, but at least let Michael be the Phantom in this film. That way, his accomplishment as singing the music of the night will be recorded on videotape for all to cherish forever and ever. Thank you for your time! |
| Name: starr Website: Angel of Night Referred by: From a Friend From: Eastern States Time: 1999-11-26 21:35:41 Comments: Mr. Benderas, I would like to say, I think you were brilliant in "Interview with a Vampire" and that if you were to perform as the Phantom, I would not hold it against you. You'd be brilliant -- IF it were a DRAMATIC role and not a musical role. The role is just toooooooo much for Micheal Crawford to be given away to anyone else in the film. And I pray that ALW doesn't make a single change to it! Please, reconsider this role, and give it to MC. I'll always be your fan though, no matter what you chose. |
| Name: Jane
A. Whitmoyer Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Time: 1999-11-26 12:38:44 Comments: Mr. Banderas, I would like to say that you are a very fine actor, but I believe the role of the "Phantom of the Opera" should go to Mr. Michael Crawford. He is and always will be the "Phantom". He was a brilliant success on Broadway and Los Angeles, and nobody else in the world can do the role as he can. I wish you continued success in your fine acting career. |
| Name: Cathy
Conover Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Tampa, Florida Time: 1999-11-20 14:36:22 Comments: I agree that Antonio Banderas is wonderfully talented but much more suited to the role of Raoul. There is only one person that can do justice to the role of the Phantom and that is Michael Crawford. The movie would be incredible with the combination of these two talented actors. Mr. Banderas please reconsider.. Thanks. |
| Name: Jane Hoerman Website: Referred by: NewsGroups From: Goddard, KS Time: 1999-11-16 00:19:20 Comments: Mr. Banderes, Please make everyone involved happy, accept the role of Raoul and leave the Phantom role for Michael Crawford. Fans want to SEE your handsome face AND want to HEAR the Angel of Music's voice. Don't you usually get the girl at the end of a movie? I see a can't go wrong situation if the movie were cast this way with the original songs and only minor script changes. Thank you, Jane Hoerman |
| Name: Mindy
Meissner Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: VA Time: 1999-11-15 22:19:40 Comments: Dear Mr. Banderas, I would like to say that I thoroughly enjoyed both Mask of Zorro and Evita. However, I believe that the portrayal of the Phantom is beyond your current abilities. I have heard that some think you would better suit the part of Raoul and I have to agree. To me you seem more of the romantic lover that Raoul is than the estranged psychopath that is the phantom we all know and love. Will you not accede the role to Michael Crawford? The original and only Phantom? I'm sure your role in the film will be ever so more successful if you play the part that matches you and your personality. I understand that you might take the part because of the challenge it represents to your acting/singing talents but how exhilirating is a challenge when it is not beaten? Why put yourself in a position that would make people think less of your abilities when you have another major role that would suit you perfectly? My letter is written with all due respect, sir, but I do hope you will consider your decision carefully. Many thanks. |
| Name: Victor
Faughnan Website: Referred by: Viewing another Guestbook From: San Diego, California Time: 1999-11-07 17:09:27 Comments: Mr. Antonio Banderas: Sir, My name is Victor Faughnan, I reside in Santee, California... I would like to address your obvious desire to be cast in the role of The Phantom in the proposed Warner Bros./Andrew Lloyd Webber production of the film version "The Phantom of the Opera". You should stop and think what taking that part may ultimately mean to your very impressive career. Certainly you would be able to handle the acting segments of such a role but Antonio, admit to yourself your voice is simply not up to the challenges the role demands. If ever two roles in a movie were meant for two different actors The Phantom is that movie. A magnificent opportunity is at hand for you, make the right decision and your fantastic career will take a giant leap, make the wrong choice and your present box-office appeal will likely plumment. Sir, you should take a moment to reflect on the actions taken by to other reknowned actors that found themselves in a similar position as you are now in, namely, Cary Grant and James Cagney. Many years ago Warner Bros. was planning a film version of a Broadway Play much as they are doing now. The Play, was, "My Fair Lady" a smash hit on Broadway at the time. The Broadway star that made the Play the hit that it had become was Rex Harrison. Warner Bros., even then was ignoring the inevitable, they wanted to cast the role of "Higgins" with Cary Grant, who was the box-office name at the time, much as you are today. They also were giving some thought to James Cagney as well. Both these actors showed some outsatnding personal inner strength, outstanding integrity by declining to take the role. Cary Grant went so far as to inform the Warner Bros. Studio Executives in no uncertain terms "either you cast Rex Harrison as Higgin's or I will never make another film for your Studio". It is said, that James Cagney also expressed similar feelings. The Studio cast Rex Harrison, the rest is film history. You, Sir, have the samee opportunity now, to show the World, your fans, Michael Crawford's fans, Phantom fans everywhere that you, also, like, Cary Grant and James Cagney have integrity, decline the role of The Phantom and advise the Studio and Lord Lloyd Webber of that decision. Request they cast the only legitmate actor for the role and that they allow you, Sir, to be cast as "Raoul", a role you were born for as was Crawford born to do the Phantom on film. Do this Mr. Banderas and your career will leap-frog, ten-fold. This movie, with you two gentlemen cast in those two roles will be an instant box-office block-buster Warner Bros., Lord Lloyd Webber, yourself and Michael Crawford will put on celluloid a musical masterpiece that will be treasured by all for as long as movies and musicals exist. As Cary Grant and James Cagney are remeembered for their contribution to the successful production of "My Far Lady", you sir, will as well, be remembered along side those two Filmdom Giants for the personal stance you took to preserve a part of musical history for posterity. Mr. Antonio Banderas, after you take such a career move, let me, now, be the first to thank you and congratulate you for showing such outstanding professional integrity. See you at the movies. Thank you Sir, for listening to me, this certainly is not just me talking, it is the combined thoughts of the movie going public and an anxious world. Sincerely Yours, Victor Faughnan vicsantee@aol.com |
| Name: Cynthia Bleich Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Davenport, Ia. Time: 1999-11-05 13:50:33 Comments: Mr. Banderas, I am sure you know that there are many movie projects for which you are perfect, but this is not one of them. Why risk aleinating thousands of people, not just Michael Crawford's fans, but others who will find that you are horribly miscast in this particular movie? Put your incredible talents to work on projects that suit you and you will gain fans, some of them from the ranks of the Michael Crawford Fan Association. Trusting in your good common sense, Cynthia Bleich |
| Name: Sally Scheef Website: Referred by: AOL From: Aurora, Illinois Time: 1999-11-05 07:03:19 Comments: Antonio, You seem to be a very busy man. Picture follows picture, some successful, some not. Please find some other project to focus on. SHOW some respect to a great musical, its original star, and his fans rather than just TALKING about "respect." Make a million friends, not a million enemies. |
| Name: JOSEPHINE
MARSCH Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: New Jersey Time: 1999-11-05 00:10:18 Comments: Dear Mr. Banderas: I loved you in Evita and Zorro, but I sincerely feel that Michael Crawford is the ONLY PHANTOM. Though I admire your work I really feel that Michael Crawford will make the movie more of a success. I sincerely hope you will reconsider this role and I am sure there are many more parts available that you are more suited for. Sincerely, |
| Name: Jessie Lewis Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: Utah, United States of America Time: 1999-11-04 20:39:57 Comments: Mr. Banderas, I have been following your career and commend you for your successes. You have come a long way. As a concerned supporter of you, I highly recommend you turn down the part of the Phantom in the movie "The Phantom of the Opera" that is now being discussed. If you do it as is, your voice will not carry the show. If it is re-written for you so you can sing it, you will be compared very unfavorably with the man who is considered throughout the world to be THE PHANTOM - Michael Crawford. I hope you can see this would not be a good career move for you. Good luck in your other projects. |
| Name: Hal W. Glenn Website: Referred by: From a Friend From: San Diego, Ca Time: 1999-11-02 03:54:07 Comments: Mr. Banderas, I can only repeat what so many have said before me, the role DOES belong to Mr. Crawford! I saw him on Broadway in New York, and he WAS the show. A perfomance I will never forget. |
| Name: Arielle
Perez Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: New York City, NY Time: 1999-11-01 23:40:08 Comments: Dear Mr.Banderas, I know you are really want to be the Phantom in the upcoming movie, but let's get back to reality; you can't do this! Not that I'm critisizing you or anything, but we all know that there is more to this part now then meets the eye. Everyone knows that 13th Warrior and Crazy in Alabama weren't the box office smashes that you hoped for. Now you have even more reasons to play the role. I mean, what better way to get back on top as a celeberty than playing the most famous and loved role in all of musical theater. Makes sense, right? WRONG! Yes, the role is a great one, but it's just out of your league. The musical range is beyond yours, which is why a lot of the music is being rewritten so you can sing them. This is just a kick in the head for all those people who love the musical in the first place, and a futher insult for people in the Michael Crawford Phantom Movie Campaign. Not only are they being denied the original Phantom and Cristine which they were PROMISED(I'm stressing this word for a reason), they are also being denied the inspirational music which drew them to the musical in the first place. So, not only are you provoking people who are angry about you being considered for the role instead of Michael Crawford, you are also pushing people who are not Crawford fans, but love Phantom and the music. This is just going to add to your list of failures on screen, and put you on VERY bad terms with the public, and you don't want that, do you? However, there is a way that you can can be in the movie and make all those people who are angered by this situation all happy. Why not play the role of Raoul? It would be perfect for you. He's young, hansome, and you won't get all those fans mad at you for making such a big mistake and ruining their favorite musical. Just think it over. Which would you rather want people to remember you as?; the man who ruined The Phantom of the Opera by trying to play a part that was beyond your range and which nobody wants you in, or as the man who triumphed with Michael Crawford and Sarah Brightman in what could very well be the greatest triumph in all of musical and movie history! Please, we all know that you are a great guy at heart, and we don't want to see you or our favorite musical lose popularity for something like this. Please, make that decision that all of us want to hear. Not only will you save yourself a lot of embarresment and bad reviews, you;ll be making a LOT of people VERY happy. Thank-you for your time. Sincerely, Arielle Perez |
| Name: Doug
McCallum Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Time: 1999-11-01 11:33:08 Comments: Dear Mr. Banderas: As a historian of theatre and film, I am writing to protest the idea of your playing the title role in the film version of Andrew Lloyd Webber’s 'The Phantom of the Opera.' This is a doubly unfortunate prospect—indeed a multiply unfortunate one—for it will have an adverse effect not only on you and Michael Crawford, but also on the composer, Andrew Lloyd Webber, on Warner Brothers, and on audiences everywhere, who will not be fobbed off with something second or third rate. Yet many of us are torn between our affection for two performance artists we admire. Like many others we will not accept anything substandard, but though we protest the project we do not write to criticize you or your talent, but only your artistic judgment in becoming involved in this controversy. I want to apologize for those intemperate souls who have written ad hominem letters. Please forgive them, for they know not what they do. They are carried away by their loyalty to Michael Crawford to the exclusion of other considerations. My wife and I, and I hope the majority of correspondents, are writing out of a concern for two artists we respect: you and Michael Crawford. We do not want to be placed in the unpleasant position of having to choose between you, nor can we understand why that should be necessary. We have have admired your acting ever since we saw some films you made in Spain before you fell into the clutches of the “Hollowood” movie industry, especially those of Warner Brothers, perpetrators of the cinematic travesty of 'My Fair Lady.' We also enjoyed your virtuosic performance in 'Desperado' and your fascinating study of a hired killer in 'Assassins' opposite Sylvester Stallone. Your performance in Evita was completely different from that of David Essex in the original production—all hot-blooded anger versus his cool Brechtian distanciation—but your distincitive interpretation worked just as well, and I agree with other commentators that you 'stole the show,' though you did so quite legitimately because of the superiority of your work. Recently your athletic Fairbanks-style performance in “The Mask of Zorro” showed yet another dimension of your acting ability. It pains us, therefore, to have to write to you regarding your intention to take the title role in the film version of 'The Phantom of the Opera' away from Michael Crawford, who set his indelible stamp on that role. We find ourselves torn between the two of you, for we are fans of both of you. However, in view of the intense international identification of the role with Mr. Crawford, we feel bound to tell you that you are about to participate in a grotesque act of injustice and a betrayal of your own integrity by allowing others to influence you to the extent of stealing a richly deserved opportunity for another great artist to preserve an interpretation that he created. Therefore, for your own sake as well as Michael Crawford’s we urge you not to take this assignment. It is not in your best interest. Is an actor of your caliber going to rely solely on cheap and obvious make-up effects to do what you are far too young to do? You’re about to make the biggest mistake of your young career. What will you do next? King Lear? Olivier, wisely, didn’t tackle that part until he was an old man himself. As a young man he restricted himself to relatively youthful roles. You should follow his example. This brings us to the crux of the matter. As a romantic star, why do you want to divert your energies and your future opportunities to character roles which you can play later in life and which are simply inappropriate and undesirable at this time? This decision makes no sense. It may very well jeopardize your present career because it will probably repel both your movie fans and the millions of people who have enjoyed “The Phantom” in its spell-binding theatrical productions. You may find yourself surrounded by invidious comparisons. We hope that your intentions are not motivated by egotism (and possibly by self- destructive impulses) as others have suggested, but rather by bad advice and the short-sighted machinations of Warner Brothers. We hope you will resist such influences. Though we feel compelled to join the growing protest movement against your proposed portrayal of the phantom, we also wish you well and wish to emphasize that we emphatically do not share the sentiments of some of the Crawford fans who have written what we consider to be unfair and inaccurate letters claiming that you do not have a good enough singing voice. We have had the pleasure of hearing you sing in “Evita” and in the recent concert honouring Andrew Lloyd Webber. As a longtime opera-lover who has heard enjoyed performances by many great singers from Dame Joan Sutherland and Lenontyne Price to Placido Domingo and Luciano Pavarotti, I know that you have a good enough voice to sing the role. What you do not have is an old enough voice. Nor, to be honest, can you claim the vast experience Michael Crawford has in the performance of musical theatre. These latter qualities are more important than a singing voice in this role. The truth is, you are simply far too young for the role of this would-be father figure, and the handsome presence that made you a movie star counts against you even more: no one who has ever seen you is going to believe that you are deformed. As a result, you are simply going to look miscast and ridiculous. Don’t do it to yourself, especially when there is a simple solution that would please everyone. I am scarcely the first person to suggest it, but I still want to add my support for it because I believe like many others that it is the only solution to the controversy that will benefit everyone concerned. Moreover, it will do the right thing and result in a film that everyone involved with can be proud of. That solution is for Michael Crawford to play the role that was virtually written for his unique attributes and for you to play the character of Raoul, for which you are equally suited. Your singing at the Lloyd Webber Tribute convinced me that your warm, lyrical voice is perfect for what is after all the romantic lead. At this point in your career that is what you should be playing, the sort of role audiences will be expecting, and the one that will do your career the most good. Otherwise you risk a future in Grade B horror movies. As things stand you may be involved in a flop that could bury your promising career. Other correspondents have suggested this. One of them has appropriately referred to the movie version of 'Mame,' with the provision that instead of an older person trying to appear as a younger charachter, we now have the prospect of the opposite and equally ludicrous error. Don’t let Warner Brothers’ notorious short- sightedness make a fool out of you. Your previous magnificent interpretations of appropriate roles have shown that you are a brilliant actor. Take the role of Raoul, and your star will continue in the ascendant. You were born to play this role. Why take one that is patently uncongenial? When the Canadian touring production of “The Phantom” was due to open in Vancouver, a local newspaper printed an interview in which Harold Prince, who directed all the productions of this musical, admitted that every subsequent performer has had to imitate Michael Crawford: his vocal quality, inflections, gestures, walk, etc. That is how definitive Crawford’s approach has become in the public consciousness. Audiences simply will not accept anything other than the next best thing to Michael Crawford. Is that what you want to be: another Crawford clone? That would be a terrible waste of your talent. Take the role of Raoul instead: it is made for you, and you will be magificent in it. In support of my arguments, I quote an excerpt from “Talkin’ Broadway” by V. J. His internet address is as follows: http://www.talkinbroadway.com/rialto/past/1999/10_27_99.htm Among other things he says: "The other day I'm listening to the radio and I hear Michael Crawford singing 'The Music of the Night.' It was just shortly after I had read 2 articles about Antonio Banderas in major newspapers. I'm not in the Michael Crawford fanclub or involved with the infamous "Phantom Movie Campaign" or whatever they're called. Anyhow, listening to Crawford took me back to 1988 when Phantom was the hottest ticket in town. . . . Michael Crawford simply blew me away. I mean, he was the Phantom and his singing was, and still is, sensational. . . . Crawford was rewarded with a Tony Award the following June for his portrayal and it remains one of the landmark performances of all time. . . . "And now there is the ever constant and ever annoying film project. Warner Brothers makes no statements and Andrew Lloyd Webber says nothing. Yet, Antonio Banderas is quoted in newspapers as saying he has the role, has met up with Webber and Shakur Kapur, the director of the upcoming film version of the Broadway musical, and that he will be playing the Phantom despite the boos from the fans of Crawford whom he respects. On top of this, USA Today stated that there is nothing in writing to guarantee that he has the role. ". . . I like Antonio Banderas. I think he did a superb job in Zorro and in the not so mega-musical Evita. But, for him to allow himself, and I'm sure he's thought about this, to be cast as the Phantom rather than Raoul, is a major mistake. He'll go down in history just as Lucille Ball did with Mame. He's a perfect Raoul and I don't understand why he does not see this. And now, dear readers, I'll tell you why he should not play the Phantom. "First off, Antonio is in a 'no win' situation. Comparisons will be made to Michael Crawford and most people have the perception that Michael is the Phantom. Even if he does an exceptional job he'll be criticized. On top of that if the film is not an artistic or box office success he'll be blamed for that as well. His age is another problem; the good-looking Banderas is too young for the role. The Phantom should be played by a more mature man (Crawford?). His youthful appearance makes him perfect casting for Raoul. No question. He's a movie star and will put butts in the seats, just as will Crawford. Now, you may question Crawford's ability to sell tickets. Well, he's been doing exactly that throughout the world with his concerts for the last year. . . . "What would be satisfying to us theater-fans would be if RUG and Webber videotaped Phantom with Crawford in the stage role he created. They did this with Cats with great success; then we wouldn't care how they cast the Hollywood film. Many say the movie musical is dead, and perhaps it is. With Crawford as the Phantom and Banderas as Raoul, at least they'd have a shot of bringing back life to this artform. Otherwise, it looks D.O.A. to me." We hope you will listen to reason. You have nothing to gain and everything to lose by taking the role of the phantom away from the man who created it and whom you cannot hope to surpass at your age. But you have everything to gain and nothing to lose in taking on the role of Raoul. This could provide for a film in which the most pragmatic becomes the most ideal. Think before you act. It is true that if you persist in efforts to play the role of Erik, the phantom, all members of the Michael Crawford campaign will boycott the film. This may not seem significant to you. But consider this: we are merely the tip of the iceberg toward which you are heading. We will also bring every influence to bear on friends and relatives to do likewise. Moreover, we are only the most active Crawford fans who are repelled by the mere prospect. Many more, inactive people will be equally repelled by the result and will communicate their feelings to still more people. In short there will be a snowball effect that will greatly reduce potential audiences, and revenues, for what will undoubtedly be a very expensive film. None of this will do you or Warner Brothers any good. You have the good will of film audiences now. Why risk it for something that will not enhance your stature but can only degrade it? Sincerely, Doug McCallum, Ph.D. |
| Name: Steven
Hurley Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Baltimore, MD Time: 1999-10-29 21:40:53 Comments: Take the part of Raul, and leave the Phantom to the man who perfected the role, Michael Crowford. |
| Name: Debra
Baird Website: Referred by: NewsGroups From: California Time: 1999-10-25 05:26:49 Comments: Mr. Banderas, The recent remark in your last interview shows your lack of appreciation for your audience. As I recall Evita did very poorly at the box office. What makes you think this will be any different? Let me enlighten you and maybe make some of that cocky attitude disapear. Phantom Of The Opera was seen by people on both coasts. People travelled just to see the musical. People that love the theater and have seem most of the musicals around for many years, came for many reasons. One was a wonderful storyline. Another reason was a beautiful performance. The two combined made the show a classic in theater. The audience you spite knows great theater. They are the same people who saw Evita on stage. You notice they didn't like the movie. There was a reason. We are not fooled by a pretty face. You are an adequate actor. You are not a singer. We also appreciate an original piece's quality, not a "Hollywood" rendition. You can't fool us and neither can Andrew. Your "pretty" face will not be a factor. It will have a mask over it. All that will be left is your acting and singing. With talk of re-writing the story and the music to accomodate your voice, I don't think you have a prayer. I heard you sing at Andrew's Birthday Celebration. I don't want to be rude, but it isn't close to what it should be. It is an opera! The character Erik is supposed to be a musical genius. Do you really think he would sing "inadequately". All the hype in the world isn't going to help you when you open your mouth. Michael Crawford conceived the character and has a beautiful voice. He has been touring the country. We have all heard him sing the songs. We will know the difference. By the way, it is ...The Phantom Of The Opera not The Phantom Of "De" Opera. Erik is Parisian. You either need to have a Parisian accent or none at all. I am an intelligent woman.I am not fooled by hype. Just remember that all the cocky bragging will catch up with you. We can use word of mouth too. If Michael made the movie I would see it again and again. I know a lady who went to see him 30 times. Theater tickets are expensive, but she felt it was worth it. I won't be seeing the movie even once. I bet she won't either. I suggest you not put your foot in your mouth any more. We will have the last laugh and it will echo through every theater. Sincerely, Debra Baird |
| Name: Madelyn Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Time: 1999-10-23 02:11:35 Comments: Antonio, NO, NO, NO. This role belongs to Michael Crawford. You are just the seemingly more commercial choice to try to entice the younger set to the film. Respect art, be a true gentleman, and gracefully bow out. Don't be remembered as a Crawford wannabe. |
| Name: Jana Lynn Ploss Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Time: 1999-10-21 22:48:58 Comments: I know it is quite soon to be writing again. I cannot help it! After I learnt of Antonio Bandit's audacious interview with Miami Herald, I felt compelled to relate to my friends that his insensitivity in an interview regarding Michael Crawford fans only reflects his incapabilities to perform Erik with sensitivity. We summarised the reason why Mr Crawford has not come forth as did Patti Lupone did in Sunset Boulevard. All Mr Crawford has spoken regarding POTO is the fact that he would like to re-re-create the role. He is too much of a gentleman to step on toes, and by the fans' responses, it looks like he does not need to do so. His fans speak for him. We will step on toes! Mr Bandit, you make a foxy bandit-gentleman in black cape and mask, but leave the white mask to a professional gentleman's gentleman. You will ruin the film if you have Lord Lloyd Webber downgrade the music for your range and allow your zest for needless action stunts. Can you not stick with Crazy in Alabama schtick? My friends were in total agreement that all you will accomplish if you proceed is to alienate Lord Lloyd Webber's phans and create a horde of boycotters. It seems Lord Lloyd Webber needs our help as he is suffering from temporary loss of sanity. He is reneging all his earliest statutes on professionalism. You and phantom phans must help him recover them and do the right thing. PLEASE MR BANDIT--DO NOT KILL ERIK! |
| Name: fluttrby Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Ohio Time: 1999-10-21 00:54:14 Comments: Antonio, you are a very fine actor and singer. In Evita, I think you stole the entire movie from Madonna. But, I beg you, please leave the role of Phantom to Michael Crawford. I hate to say it Antonio, but he has a much better voice. And this role needs someone with a wide voice range. Plus, let's face it, Michael is Phantom. It it his role now. So, let him play him one last time. Let it be recorded forever on film for all to see. As for you, I have one last, small, suggestion. Another very fine role in Phantom of the Opera. Raoul. Now, it is not the title role. But, it is still a major role in the play. And, I personally think you could do wonders with it. Think Che in Evita. And, this way, you'll still be in the movie. You're wonderful talent will still be used. Michael, will get to play Phantom (a role he was born to play, like you with the Mask of Zorro), and believe me. Everyone will be all the much more happier, in the end, with this arrangement. |
| Name: Jana Lynn Ploss Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Lompoc, CA Time: 1999-10-21 00:30:58 Comments: Mr Banderas, you ought to have shame! How dare you tell the Miami Herald so arrogantly that you will be the phantom and then disrespect the Phantom fans in the same breath. My disrespect is such that I shall remove my nose to spite my face (and become the phantomess?). I enjoyed Zorro and to an extent Evita. Now, if your name appears in any film, I will not view it or discuss (disgust?) it. Who's Fonda Jane was quite an actress. I did the same to her that I will do to you. I have yet forgiven that woman for Vietnam and the cause of a particular POW. You sir (and I am not sure I meant that) are an ego waiting to be deflated. You will not bring action-pack hordes to Phantom anymore than you did to Evita. Michael Crawford, a true gentleman, will bring in the crowds better than you because he has enchanted people worldwide in the theatre, television, yes--movies, and the record industries. People want the Michael Jordon of Theatre-- Michael Crawford. I humbly plead with you to listen. Direct it if you must, but do not destroy the one musical that can truly succeed since the MGM's musicals of the fifties. Beauty and the Beast stories (Christine and Erik) will succeed when properly performed. |
| Name: Dori Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: So. CA Time: 1999-10-20 03:29:44 Comments: Like so many other fans of the musical "Phantom of the Opera", I had expected that when the film was made it would be with Michael Crawford in his original role. I also had expected that the film would follow closely the stage version that has been one of the most successful in theatrical history. But now we hear you, Mr. Banderas, say that you are going to play the Phantom. And because of your limited singing ability, Andrew Lloyd Webber is going to change the music and the libretto to suit you. Everyone who has heard your name mentioned in connection with this film has wondered how you were going to be able to sing "The Music of the Night" and now it appears that you won't have to. Lloyd Webber is going to replace his beautiful music with tunes that you can warble. What a travesty!! What a terrible crime to a much-loved play. It makes me sick. |
| Name: Michelle
Osborne Website: Crysania's Worlds Referred by: From a Friend From: Syracuse, NY Time: 1999-10-18 07:31:31 Comments: Dear Mr. Banderas...You said in a recent interview that you do not want to disappoint Michael Crawford's fans with your portayal of the Phantom in the upcoming movie of the musical. Do you not understand that just by taking the role away from him, you are disappointing us? Truly, have you ever had the chance to see him perform? Have you ever listened to what you will be compared to? If you are still contemplating this role, then I highly doubt it. You are a fine actor, and I have enjoyed the movies I have seen you in...This is not the issue, however. The issue here is two-fold...Firstly, it is an issue of fairness, of what is the right thing to do. Michael Crawford was hand-picked for the role of the Phantom by the composer. He helped shape the role, helped define who the Phantom is. He *made* that role...without his influence, Phantom may never have been what it is to-day. He was also given the role in 1990 for the movie when it was first supposed to be filmed. It is only *fair* that he get to bring his creation, *his* Phantom, to the screen for the generations to come to enjoy it, and for those that had the pleasure of seeing him on stage in the role, to relive their memories. Secondly, this is an issue of artistic integrity. Pardon me if I may say this, but Phantom is perfect the way it was first written. To even contemplate taking parts out, and adding in speech in their place, is ludicrous. Also, please remember that Erik (the Phantom) had the voice of an angel. This means his singing has to be perfect, ethereal...it has to send shivers up your spine and make you want to listen to it forever. Michael Crawford fits this description. You, however well you may think you sing, do not. Pardon me for being blunt, but you sir are *no* Angel of Music. I am not saying you do not sing well, for there are many singers out there who I would enjoy in another role, but would never want to hear as the Phantom. Please, Mr. Banderas, turn down this role! It certainly won't harm your career. You wouldn't be the first famous actor to do such a thing. Both Cary Grant and James Cagney turned down roles in the motion picture of "My Fair Lady"...Why? Because they respected the musical and those actors who had originally brought it to life enough to refuse to be in it. Cary Grant even refused to do another picture for Warner Brothers if they didn't cast the originals in the roles. Please, sir, I beg you...Do what is right and refuse to be a part of what is sure to be a travesty without Michael Crawford! |
| Name: Sarah
Prigmore Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Isle of Wight, UK Time: 1999-10-17 16:39:48 Comments: Dear Mr Banderas, I used to be a fan of yours but now I no longer watch your films as they bring me no enjoyment, only remind me of my disappointment. Disappointment brought about by your assertion that you are a better candidate than Michael Crawford to play the Phantom in the film version of the musical. Have you ever read the reviews, or seen the list of awards Michael received for playing the Phantom? Do you really believe you can match his performance? I saw you perform for Andrew Lloyd Webber's 50th birthday celebration, and while I think you're a fine actor, you are no singer - certainly not of Michael's calibre. Michael Crawford's performance was an important one that will be talked about for many, many years to come. It SHOULD be preserved on film for future generations to enjoy. Please do not rob them - or us, the Michael Crawford/Phantom of the Opera fans - of that performance. |
| Name: Sheri Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Chicago Time: 1999-10-16 05:27:25 Comments: Mr. Banderas - I enjoy your work very much. You are a talented actor. However, the role of the Phantom must go to Michael Crawford. His passion, talent, and amazing voice have been critical and indispensible parts of the success of the Phantom of the Opera for more than a decade. I saw you perform with Sarah Brightman at Andrew Lloyd Weber's birthday and, while you can sing, it is not the Phantom's voice!!! I can understand your desire to play the Phantom...what actor wouldn't want this amazing role?! But, if you could stop for a moment and think about Michael's fans and what it would mean to us to see him do this role just one more time -- for future generations to enjoy -- then you would begin to understand our passion for him and this body of work. Please, Mr. Banderas, step down from the role...I guarantee that you will win over many more fans if you do! People who will go and see your other films. The Phantom film will fail if Michael is not in the lead role. The Phantom fans will see to it. |
| Name: Stef Website: Stef's Musicals Page Referred by: From a Friend From: PA-Penn State University Time: 1999-10-14 17:38:25 Comments: Antonio, why are you keeping a tenacious grip on this role? The movie doesn't even have a script yet but even then, there is NO WAY you can be the Phantom in this film and not disappoint Michael Crawford fans as well as millions of other Phantom fans. This Web site is living proof, and you're probably well aware of it and our opposition, yet you continue to ignore us. If you do not wish to "disappoint" us then why are you turning a deaf ear to our pleas? Why are you expressing concern for us in the papers when apparently you don't? You're not the only one expressing your opinions to the media. Haven't you seen the Variety ads, newspaper articles, etc.? The stakes are high...Do you REALLY think you can pull this off and NOT disappoint us? If so...I'm sorry but you're sorely mistaken. You're offending us now with your audacious claims to the role and will do more than "disappoint" us in the future if you continue in this vein and be the title role in this movie. So...I'll make my plea again in hopes that you will finally consider your options and rethink your decision...You do not have the vocal qualifications for the role and your lack of experience with it shows with the performance in the Andrew Lloyd Webber 50th birthday celebration. As far as I can tell, you can not pull off an adequate portrayal of the Phantom, nonetheless one of Michael Crawford's caliber. Please, Antonio, go down in history as having some class, modesty and artistic integrity and give the role to Michael Crawford. |
| Name: Maggie Birge Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Owensboro, KY Time: 1999-10-14 07:37:15 Comments: Antonio: You're doing it again! You and you alone are trying to spread the rumor that you are going to star in the movie version of The Phantom of the Opera. I don't hear any confirmation coming from either Andrew Lloyd Webber or Warner Bros. that this is a fact. Why don't you concentrate on drumming up interest for Crazy in Alabama and leave Phantom alone? You will not play the lead in that film if there is anything I or other members of The Michael Crawford Phantom Movie Campaign can do about it. Your statement that you don't want to offend Michael Crawford's fans was ridiculous. We are already offended that you don't have the class to realize your limitations and step aside so that the legitimate Phantom can recreate the performance millions of fans want to see. We are giving you a great gift, Antonio. We are providing you our reaction to your interpretation of the Phantom before you ever make the film. That reaction is totally negative. Whatever you think your musical abilities are, I assure you they are miniscule and inconsequential next to Michael Crawford's qualifications. How much voice training have you had? How many stage or movie musicals have you done? How much experience have you had with this character and this show? Except for your appearance in Evita, the answers to all the above questions is "none." Please do not confuse your pitiful performance on Lloyd Webber's birthday show with real musical experience. This was supposedly your first time to sing live before an audience, and it showed! You had absolutely no idea what you were doing. There was no understanding of the character, no passion, and not a hint of seduction. You revealed to the world what you really are...a complete musical amateur grasping for something you can never achieve. If your ego has convinced you that you really have what it takes to play this part, then why didn't you face the real challenge of the role and sing "Music of the Night?" Or where you afraid of humiliating yourself completely? You didn't have to worry. You couldn't have made yourself look any worse than what you did. What you can't seem to understand is that the essence of the Phantom is music. It is practically the only way he can communicate. He uses his voice to frighten his enemies and to control and seduce the woman he desires. The Phantom is supposed to be an "angel of music" and the actor playing him must have a remarkable voice, highly trained and versatile enough to range from falsetto to baritone. It's ALL in the voice, Antonio. You don't have it and you never will. Not all actors can play all roles. This is one you must not attempt. Take warning...if you actually do get this role, remember that everything you do will be measured against the impossibly high standard of Michael Crawford's performance. Surely even you cannot believe that you will attain those heights. You are risking public ridicule beyond anything you can imagine if you persist in this. As this campaign and the publicity it has generated prove, the world has already begun to judge you. You are already being compared to Michael Crawford and you are being found completely inadequate to be his successor. It will only get worse for you as time goes on. You say you don't want to offend or disappoint Michael Crawford's fans? How can you do anything but that unless you step aside, give up this insanity, and let Michael Crawford bring the Phantom to the movie screen as he has every legitimate right to do. Millions and millions of Phantom fans want him, and almost none of them want you. Those are the facts. You can't ignore them, so consider them carefully. Your professional reputation is at stake here. The movie business doesn't tolerate failure for very long. Hollywood is a slippery slope and careers can quickly disappear into oblivion. Beware! |
| Name: Linda Frey Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Apollo, PA Time: 1999-10-14 02:23:55 Comments: Mr. Banderas: You are not only "disappointing" the Michael Crawford fans but the millions of Phantom of the Opera fans and any person who is seriously interested in the theater-- the very people who will support a musical. Michael Crawford does not just "sing" songs, he becomes a part of every song and takes his audience with him. This is a special gift and one that sets him apart from the average singer. This will not be an easy role. I just don't think you have the voice for it. You are in great demand, why would you want to do a movie when the target audience is already telling you they won't support it? If you think we are vocal now, make this movie and see how vocal we can be! We will write to every newspaper, magazine and anyone else will listen to us. I have no intention of giving up on this movie. |
| Name: Diane
Flogerzi Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: California Time: 1999-10-13 19:00:35 Comments: Dear Mr. Banderas, Let's review just what your future in this film may be. The recent rumors that are once again coming only from you and your aggressive PR machine are saying that Kapur is working on the script and that much of the music has been deleted and new music added. Okay, other than I believe this is TOTALLY NUTS, after all, why are you guys supposedly planning on tampering with one of the most dearly loved and successful musical scores of this century? (But who am I to judge, right?) This is going to upset the millions of Phantom of the Opera fans who love the play just as it is and who expect this movie to be produced with integrity towards the original. You sir are personally in a no win position. If "Music of the Night" is cut due to your inability to sing it, you are going to be a laughingstock to every lover of the play. If you actually sing it, you are going to be compared to the voice of Michael Crawford and I don't care how much you prepare you are going to be found lacking. That is a fact and no amount of ego is going to change it, try it and see if I am not right. If they dub you, you are in big trouble once again. You have stated that you do not want to disappoint the people who saw Michael Crawford in the play. What about the people who didn't get the chance to see him, do you have any care or concern for them? Do you actually believe you can pull this off? I have news for you, the media will be back to this web site for quotes and opinions if this film is made with you in the role of the Phantom; without a doubt you will be in for criticism never experienced before in your career. There are going to be a lot of angry people out there and I am afraid a large portion of the anger will be directed at you. This will not bring me any personal satisfaction because it will then be too late for Michael Crawford's legendary performance to be captured and seen by all. This web site will be here and the history of this campaign will be available for all to see. The story will be told of who the fans wanted to star in this movie and the lengths that were taken to convince Hollywood and Andrew Lloyd Webber to go back to their original vision and their promise to use the man who created and breathed life into this role. HE is the one who made it famous. His name is MICHAEL CRAWFORD. Reports state that you have said that this role has been your dream ever since "Evita." What about Michael Crawford's dreams, and more importantly....the dreams of the thousands of fans who have waited for almost a decade? Do you really feel your "dream" takes precedence over ours? What accomplishments in your life make you a better candidate than Michael Crawford? Your looks? Your "box office" appeal at the present? How familiar are you with this role? Michael Crawford performed it over 1300 times, his voice is known by MILLIONS as the Phantom, the original cast recording has now sold over 14 million copies. He won an OLIVIER AND A TONY for THIS ROLE. He also won an OLIVIER for "Barnum," the play he starred in just prior to "The Phantom of the Opera." Where are your accolades from your peers? You have campaigned for this part since 1996 and it is difficult to forgive your publicity tactics in trying to convince the public that you are the man who should immortalize this role on screen. I used to be a fan of yours Mr. Banderas, but after the past year's events I do not feel I can enjoy you as an actor again, I am certainly no longer an admirer. We have stayed very polite when it comes to you throughout the course of this campaign....until now. The gloves are coming off, and this web site is going to remain. People do have a voice, there is freedom of speech in this country and we are going to continue to utilize all avenues available. Attached to the start page of this open letter is a real player video that was a polite hint to you to have the same class shown by Cary Grant and James Cagney who turned down roles in "My Fair Lady" in favor of the actors who are now immortalized in that motion picture. Step down and allow the person who will ALWAYS be the Phantom to record his creation. You will be a hero to thousands if you do. Sincerely, Diane Flogerzi |
| Name: Jessie Lewis Website: Referred by: Clicked on a 'Guestbooks by GuestWorld' Button From: USA, Utah Time: 1999-09-15 22:42:45 Comments: Hi Antonio, I'm sure by now you are aware that there is a huge ground swell of people who want Michael Crawford to star in The Phantom of the Opera if, and when, it is made into a movie. I understand your career is really blooming right now - I'm very happy for that. I thought you were kind of neat as Che in Evita. On ALW's Birthday Party you sang quite well, and I enjoyed it. But some roles just 'belong' to some people. The Phantom is Michael Crawford's role of a lifetime, and I hope you understand that. It would be very, very nice of you to decline this role in his favor. It certainly will not hurt your growing career. Please think about it. |
| Name: Carol A. Website: no Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Massachusettes Time: 1999-09-12 18:41:55 Comments: Dear Mr. Banderas, I know the role of the Phantom of the Opera is a great opportunity for you to play, but, please re-consider. The ONLY person who can do that role justice is Michael Crawford!! You have the FACE that I would rather see uncovered. Why not play Raoul?? I have never seem Mr. Crawford do the role in person...only clips & the CD that I fell in love with. Since he left the role in LA, hoping to do the movie, I, & others, have been waiting with 'baited breath' to see him do it on film. Now, however, the Powers that be has pulled the rug out from under him...us!!!! If Mr. Crawford doesn't do the role, I'm afraid millions of people, myself included, will boycott the film!! Don't get me wrong, Mr. Banderas, please. I am also a big fan of yours, but NOT IN THIS PARTICULAR FILM!!! Iloved you in Evita...you were GREAT!! ALAS, the role of the PHANTOM belongs to Michael Crawford. He originated it, brought him (Erik) to life, & gave the man a soul as NOBODY else can do. Please Please reconsider & don't disappoint me & many, many other fans. Thank you, Respectfully, Mrs. Carol Atkins Massachusetts |
| Name: Blake Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In From: Ohio Time: 1999-09-10 22:20:04 Comments: Dear Mr. Antonio Bandaras- YOU are a wounderful actor and singer for these OTHER parts you have been in. But PLEASE, do not do Phantom. Soem reasons are 1. You are about a BA-Zillion-are :) and are known around the world as ZORRO and CHE in |