Back to Home >  Beacon Journal > 

 
The Beacon Journal  

 

         
Posted on Sun, Dec. 19, 2004

 

Waiting in the wings




Beacon Journal movie critic


 

Any eyes in Hollywood will cast a watchful eye this week to see if Andrew Lloyd Webber's tale of an opera ghost will haunt movie theaters the way it has New York and London stages, or merely be a phantom at the box office.

Andrew Lloyd Webber's The Phantom of the Opera, his musical adaptation of Gaston Leroux's novel, opens on area screens this week, with expectations high for fans and for studios wanting to see how viable the movie musical can be in this post-Chicago reality.

You'd think that Phantom would be a prime candidate for blockbuster status. The play has grossed $3.2 billion worldwide from 65,000 performances in front of more than 80 million people, according to Webber's company, the Really Useful Group. It's also enjoyed a run of more than 16 years on Broadway.

``The play is so successful and has been playing in England, New York and around the world, that this is going to be a test,'' said Thomas Hischak, author of the book, Film It With Music: An Encyclopedic Guide to the American Movie Musical. ``Can a play that was an international hit be a movie blockbuster?''

All of the success Chicago enjoyed changed the landscape for movie musicals, Hischak said; that film grossed more than $300 million worldwide. Jim Farrelly, director of film studies at the University of Dayton, agreed.

``Investors are expecting the same kind of results with The Phantom of the Opera. People think it is the best musical written. It certainly has a strong story,'' he said. ``I would quibble with it being the best ever written, but I do think it has a following -- a cult kind of following -- so people are expecting great things.''

Those people aren't just investors, but fans. For all of its popularity, Phantom endured a bumpy ride to get to the silver screen. First touted as a major release for 1991 by Warner Bros., the studio never got the film made, eventually selling its rights back to Webber for approximately $2 million and signing a deal to distribute the movie, according to reports.

Casting had never been easy either. Actors including Antonio Banderas and John Travolta were linked to the role, much to the dismay of Phantomphiles across the planet. At one point fans established www.phantommovie.com, a site whose sole purpose was to ensure that Michael Crawford, the actor who originated the role, would be cast in the film. Imagine the ruckus when relative unknown Gerard Butler won it last year.

For 57-year-old Robert Sawyer, a retired City of Akron employee, no one will ever truly measure up to Crawford.

``You're going through all this trouble (to make a movie) and you have to wonder what Webber was thinking,'' he said. ``I know he's getting old, but just to hear him (Crawford) do it, I'd overlook any note he can't hit at age 62.''

Diana Wilson, 51, a truck driver from Akron, agreed.

``I was very disappointed that he didn't get the part just because he does it so well,'' she said. ``He was part of the reason I fell in love with the show.''

But Sawyer and Wilson have both seen the show multiple times, with Crawford only once each, and both plan to see the movie with an open mind. So there's something else at play there, be it the show's sweeping romance or Webber's sometimes haunting music. The play has evolved into a cultural phenomenon without Crawford and his co-star Sarah Brightman, who portrayed the object of the Phantom's obsession, Christine Daae, Hischak said.

``They're taking the approach that they're selling the play, not the names, which is what the producers learned after Crawford and Brightman left,'' he said.

And with Joel Schumacher directing the movie, and it being shot conventionally, Webber and company may be hoping the name is enough to continue the resuscitation of a genre that's lain comatose since the '60s.

``It was neglected,'' Neil Meron, executive producer of Chicago, said of the movie musical during a round of interviews for that movie. ``I think the whole genre was being maligned because there was a period of where the musicals that were being done were bad, and they blamed it on the genre and not an individual film.''

Chicago succeeded at the box office because it crossed demographic lines. Once the purview of older-skewing audiences, this musical featured the likes of Queen Latifah, lending it some credibility with younger audiences. But ultimately, Chicago worked because it allowed you -- through dream sequences -- to suspend your disbelief of people spontaneously bursting into song.

More importantly, it also struck a balance between old-fashioned musical and a film geared toward the MTV generation. For all of its popularity, Phantom is a very traditional Hollywood musical that was directed by Schumacher, best known for his efforts with Batman Returns, Batman Forever and Phone Booth. It points to a problem that is a bane for Hollywood right now.

Chicago's breakthrough sent studios scurrying to obtain or greenlight musicals. Sweeney Todd is in development with Sam Mendes (American Beauty) expected to helm; Rent will go before the cameras early in 2005; The Producers, the Broadway play adapted from Mel Brooks' 1968 comedy, will return to movie houses in 2005 with Nathan Lane and Matthew Broderick reprising their roles; and Hairspray has been announced.

But who will direct? Sweeney Todd has Mendes, who moved from the British stage to film. In the case of The Producers and Hairspray, respected Broadway vets are expected to helm those films too, according to reports. But in other cases, directors with no experience in the genre will be used.

``They (the studios) really don't know what to do with musicals because they've lost the tradition,'' the University of Dayton's Farrelly said. ``I think Chicago was lucky; they found someone who worked. There's no director who has what I consider to be a genuine ability to move from genre to genre.''

None of that will matter if Phantom disappears from theaters quickly, Hischak said.

``They're not going to care about reviews. They are going to care about box office and they're going to care about who sees it. They're going to look at the demographics,'' he said. ``If it totally bombs at the box office, I think a lot of projects are going to get stalled.''